Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 06:08:45 AM

Title: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 06:08:45 AM
Sorry Big Hamy fans Lee sets the record straight

Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: affeman on August 30, 2015, 06:24:25 AM
This midget starts sounding like the late "onlymen". Bitter and living in the past...
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: LurkerNoMore on August 30, 2015, 06:25:07 AM
I'm not impressed by him either.  Doubt he will break the Top 5 of the O this year.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Alucard on August 30, 2015, 06:26:47 AM
Truth, completely agree... LOL at the guy who wrote that Ramy is better than Dillett and Nasser, bigger and more aesthetic... Ramy is an oilbag with a bunch of bodyparts put togheter, absolutely no flow, legs overpowering all the rest... Does he looks impressive? Yes, compared to the average bloated midgets in the line-up today, but when you have seen the monsters of the 90s, not at all... Dillett, Coleman and Nasser at their best were much more freaky and aesthetic...
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 06:31:36 AM
This midget starts sounding like the late "onlymen". Bitter and living in the past...

There's no school like the old school. Guys of today just can't compete. Ramy is overrated.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: French on August 30, 2015, 06:52:35 AM
Lee Priest is wrong, bitter and stupid.
Ramy : no oïl, no gut, flawless and mega mass.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 06:59:10 AM
I agree, Dillet looks more freaky than Ramy

(https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5296/5509611484_8cc58d7ae5.jpg)
(http://web.quick.cz/fit/olympia/paul%20dillett.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Sokolsky on August 30, 2015, 07:07:19 AM
I agree, Dillet looks more freaky than Ramy

(https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5296/5509611484_8cc58d7ae5.jpg)
(http://web.quick.cz/fit/olympia/paul%20dillett.jpg)

It's mostly that rapist smile of his that gives away his freaky nature.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: ritch on August 30, 2015, 07:22:42 AM
In 10 years all you guys will be saying "Remember how aesthetic Ramy was? Guys today suck..."

Always so hard to appreciate the present talent....
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Never1AShow on August 30, 2015, 07:26:02 AM
Maybe Dillett and Big Hamy can have places next to each other in the never could really get in shape and fulfill their potential hall of fame.

Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 07:27:10 AM
In 10 years all you guys will be saying "Remember how aesthetic Ramy was? Guys today suck..."

Always so hard to appreciate the present talent....

Because there is none.

And I don't think anyone will point to how aesthetic Ramy was. 30+ years later and people are still talking about 70's bodybuilding because it was good. In the same way that people still talk about bodybuilding from the 80's, 90's and early 2000s.

In 10 years, people will still continuously look toward the past when it was good. Not when Ramy was around.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Al Doggity on August 30, 2015, 08:00:54 AM
Because there is none.

And I don't think anyone will point to how aesthetic Ramy was. 30+ years later and people are still talking about 70's bodybuilding because it was good. In the same way that people still talk about bodybuilding from the 80's, 90's and early 2000s.

In 10 years, people will still continuously look toward the past when it was good. Not when Ramy was around.

People were already talking about the decline of bodybuilding in the mid-90s ,when I first took an interest in it. The appreciation for Nasser seems to be largely a getbig thing, but back in the 90s, I remember the magazines constantly criticized him for not having arms, not  having a back and choosing mass over aesthetics. I agreed with that, quite frankly. I think nostalgia can give you a rose-colored perspective. Peak Nasser doesn't look any better than Roelly Winklaar.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: DHEA-100 on August 30, 2015, 08:18:29 AM
Pro bb'ing is as dead as roadkill.  No one cares.  Its a cesspool of drugs, borderliine personalities, homosexual old impotent men, & bullshit supplement marketers.  Eventually the prize $$ will no longer worth dying over & it will hopefully die off to be reborn into what it was intended to be...healthy.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 08:31:55 AM
Lee Priest is wrong, bitter and stupid.
Ramy : no oïl, no gut, flawless and mega mass.

No gut?  :-X Flawless?  ::)
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: local hero on August 30, 2015, 08:36:03 AM
People were already talking about the decline of bodybuilding in the mid-90s ,when I first took an interest in it. The appreciation for Nasser seems to be largely a getbig thing, but back in the 90s, I remember the magazines constantly criticized him for not having arms, not  having a back and choosing mass over aesthetics. I agreed with that, quite frankly. I think nostalgia can give you a rose-colored perspective. Peak Nasser doesn't look any better than Roelly Winklaar.


Woah there!!!! Once  roely getts dedicated nights on getbig u might get away with such a statement, until then there is only one beautiful man with glasses who is also the wizard of truth...
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: thegamechanger on August 30, 2015, 08:36:47 AM
lee priest prefer his era. just as the ones before him prefered their era. and so on and so on.
same old.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Alucard on August 30, 2015, 08:40:57 AM
Nasser looked great and very freaky at his best around 1996, in certain poses mostly, oil not too obvious and still fresh from the crazy insulin overload... Was he aesthetic and better than most then? No, funky build, short blocky legs, weak arms, oilbag calves, but compares very well with Ramy and the others today... Winklaar at his best looks better than most today, but lacks conditioning and he's very short... Regarding Dillett never in shape, that's a myth, in his first years the conditioning was great, striations and cuts everywhere, even the infamous glutes... He wasn't like Yates, but who was? Placed 6th and 4th first two Olympia with the high 90s standard, both questionable, Ramy placed worse in this laughable era, absolutely no comparison...
No gut?  :-X Flawless?  ::)
LOL, and the best "no oil"... Ramy is a petrol platform...
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 08:45:08 AM
Hamy Who?
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Ronnie Rep on August 30, 2015, 08:50:37 AM
Agree with Lee about Dillett. Had to see him up close to really appreciate it.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Al Doggity on August 30, 2015, 08:51:39 AM
Nasser looked great and very freaky at his best around 1996, in certain poses mostly, oil not too obvious and still fresh from the crazy insulin overload... Was he aesthetic and better than most then? No, funky build, short blocky legs, weak arms, oilbag calves, but compares very well with Ramy and the others today... Winklaar at his best looks better than most today, but lacks conditioning and he's very short... Regarding Dillett never in shape, that's a myth, in his first years the conditioning was great, striations and cuts everywhere, even the infamous glutes... He wasn't like Yates, but who was? Placed 6th and 4th first two Olympia with the high 90s standard, both questionable, Ramy placed worse in this laughable era, absolutely no comparison...LOL, and the best "no oil"... Ramy is a petrol platform...

YMMV, I don't really agree with everything you said here, but it's not really even about Nasser and Dillett specifically. It's the idea of what ritch said, people constantly remember the past as being so much better than the present when that is not the case. Not too long ago, there was a thread on here about how great Gunther Schlierkamp looked.  ::)
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: THEBOSS on August 30, 2015, 10:15:43 AM
Spot on
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Alucard on August 30, 2015, 10:21:13 AM
YMMV, I don't really agree with everything you said here, but it's not really even about Nasser and Dillett specifically. It's the idea of what ritch said, people constantly remember the past as being so much better than the present when that is not the case. Not too long ago, there was a thread on here about how great Gunther Schlierkamp looked.  ::)
Schlierkamp, for one or two shows in his career, didn't look that bad, it's true... Great maybe not though... I don't always agree with the "past is always better" view, but bodybuilding it's one of those "sport" where it's absolutely true, in my honest opinion, heavyweight boxing is another, welter/middleweight also, tennis and MMA the opposite, for example... Not everything is the same... I just think that the genetic pool in the early 90s was much better, plus they were in better shape all year round, with less and better use of gear...
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: ritch on August 30, 2015, 10:50:38 AM
Schlierkamp, for one or two shows in his career, didn't look that bad, it's true... Great maybe not though... I don't always agree with the "past is always better" view, but bodybuilding it's one of those "sport" where it's absolutely true, in my honest opinion, heavyweight boxing is another, welter/middleweight also, tennis and MMA the opposite, for example... Not everything is the same... I just think that the genetic pool in the early 90s was much better, plus they were in better shape all year round, with less and better use of gear...

What the hell are you talking about??? That is the era of mega dosing man and all the biggest guys got fat as fuck off season, lol!

But true about Gunter. Got in shape twice. Had a body/structure that had to be 100% perfect to be presentable. Seemed like such a cool fella though....
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Azure on August 30, 2015, 11:21:03 AM
Pro bb'ing is as dead as roadkill.  No one cares.  Its a cesspool of drugs, borderliine personalities, homosexual old impotent men, & bullshit supplement marketers.  Eventually the prize $$ will no longer worth dying over & it will hopefully die off to be reborn into what it was intended to be...healthy.

Hope so! These guys look terrible.

During jays reign I pretty much stopped following altogether. I only started paying attention a year or two ago and it is ALL bad.

Doesn't look to be getting any better
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: oldschoolfan on August 30, 2015, 11:35:59 AM
lee is right though

never see why so many o fyou think ramy is such a good bodybuilder, hes big full of oil and water wont crack top 5

and every single year the same people on here will be like ramy is going to dial it in this year bla bla bla
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Alucard on August 30, 2015, 11:44:40 AM
What the hell are you talking about??? That is the era of mega dosing man and all the biggest guys got fat as fuck off season, lol!

But true about Gunter. Got in shape twice. Had a body/structure that had to be 100% perfect to be presentable. Seemed like such a cool fella though....
I was talking about dosages during late 80s and early 90s, not comparable to today, especially regarding peptides... Agreed about Schlierkamp...
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: affeman on August 30, 2015, 11:51:42 AM
Big Ramy would wipe the stage floor with anyone from the 90s, how can anyone take that midget even seriously. ::)

Lee himself could be Ramy's fluffer at best at the Olympia, but not his competition...

(http://musculardevelopment.com/contests/1813-new-york-pro/2014/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay-181_final.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 11:54:55 AM
Big Ramy would wipe the stage floor with anyone from the 90s, how can anyone take that midget even seriously. ::)

Lee himself could be Ramy's fluffer at best at the Olympia, but not his competition...

(http://musculardevelopment.com/contests/1813-new-york-pro/2014/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay-181_final.jpg)

He can't even " wipe the stage floor " with anyone now lol never mind the best of the best from the 90s.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 11:59:45 AM
Big Ramy would wipe the stage floor with anyone from the 90s, how can anyone take that midget even seriously. ::)

Lee himself could be Ramy's fluffer at best at the Olympia, but not his competition...

(http://musculardevelopment.com/contests/1813-new-york-pro/2014/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay-181_final.jpg)

lol, looks bloofy and unconditioned.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 12:01:02 PM
He can't even " wipe the stage floor " with anyone now lol never mind the best of the best from the 90s.

haha lol. Affeman is either an annoying troll or an idiot lol. In the 2014 Mr. Olympia, Ramy came in 7th, behind Branch. Ramy couldn't even beat Branch, and affeman thinks hes going to wipe the floor with most any guy from the 90's.  :D :D
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: affeman on August 30, 2015, 12:04:22 PM
haha lol. Affeman is either an annoying troll or an idiot lol. In the 2014 Mr. Olympia, Ramy came in 7th, behind Branch. Ramy couldn't even beat Branch, and affeman thinks hes going to wipe the floor with most any guy from the 90's.  :D :D

Yeah, and behind Cutler. Do the maths... ::)

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TuW616XC68Q/hqdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 12:08:34 PM
Yeah, and behind Cutler. Do the maths... ::)

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TuW616XC68Q/hqdefault.jpg)

Wow Hamy won a pose , 1 down dozens more to go. He can't ' mop the stage floor ' with this ho-hum competition but he's supposed to beat the best of the 90s? lol Come on get serious.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 12:10:55 PM
Yeah, and behind Cutler. Do the maths... ::)

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TuW616XC68Q/hqdefault.jpg)

lol, uh oh, here comes the bodybuilding conspiracy theories lol. You fail.

Can Ramy beat some guys from the 90s? Of course. Mop the floor with every guy from the 90's? Keep dreaming.

What's even sadder is the amount of drugs guys today take compared to guys from the 90's.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: affeman on August 30, 2015, 12:13:04 PM
Wow Hamy won a pose , 1 down dozens more to go. He can't ' mop the stage floor ' with this ho-hum competition but he's supposed to beat the best of the 90s? lol Come on get serious.

You wanna compare a 190 pds Shawn Ray to a 300 pd Ramy?? lmao...now YOU get serious. Imagine those guys next to each other hahahahah....
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 12:14:47 PM
You wanna compare a 190 pds Shawn Ray to a 300 pd Ramy?? lmao...now YOU get serious. Imagine those guys next to each other hahahahah....

205lbs Shawn would make Hamy look like the bloated overstuffed underdeveloped pregnant bitch he is
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: affeman on August 30, 2015, 12:16:25 PM
205lbs Shawn would make Hamy look like the bloated overstuffed underdeveloped pregnant bitch he is

Yeah, whatever. Discuss shit like that with Hulkster, not with me... :D
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 12:17:52 PM
Yeah, whatever. Discuss shit like that with Hulkster, not with me... :D

There is no discussion , there's you trying to claim Ramy would " mop the floor " with guys from the 90s and he can't even beat the mediocre competition he currently faces. It's more denial on your behalf.



Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 12:20:22 PM
Yeah, whatever. Discuss shit like that with Hulkster, not with me... :D

Youre too concerned with size and not looking at the overall physique.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Wiggs on August 30, 2015, 12:21:43 PM
Ramy wouldn't mop the floor with anyone.  He can barely place top 6 at the Mr. O in a shitty era.  Nice try though.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: ritch on August 30, 2015, 12:22:35 PM
I was talking about dosages during late 80s and early 90s, not comparable to today, especially regarding peptides... Agreed about Schlierkamp...

The peptide situation is nothing but a bunch of hazardous shit waiting to happen...
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: denarii on August 30, 2015, 01:03:28 PM
MD deleted a thread of this video given lee disses chic in it.
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Simple Simon on August 30, 2015, 01:08:25 PM
Big Ramy would wipe the stage floor with anyone from the 90s, how can anyone take that midget even seriously. ::)

Lee himself could be Ramy's fluffer at best at the Olympia, but not his competition...

(http://musculardevelopment.com/contests/1813-new-york-pro/2014/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay/41262-mamdouh-elsbbiay-181_final.jpg)

lol, hes 300lb and doesnt look any bigger than the rest of the line up.

Where do you have him in this line up?
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Royalty on August 30, 2015, 04:28:14 PM
lee is right though

never see why so many o fyou think ramy is such a good bodybuilder, hes big full of oil and water wont crack top 5

and every single year the same people on here will be like ramy is going to dial it in this year bla bla bla

Ramy has only been competing as a pro for the past 2.5 years
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Royalty on August 30, 2015, 04:30:47 PM
This pic from the 2015 Arnold Classic Brazil really made me think that Ramy was making some dramatic improvements
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 04:31:46 PM
This pic from the 2015 Arnold Classic Brazil really made me think that Ramy was making some dramatic improvements


Where?  ???
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Royalty on August 30, 2015, 04:33:06 PM
Here is 2015 Arnold Classic Brazil version of Ramy compared to Phil
Title: Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
Post by: Royalty on August 30, 2015, 04:35:03 PM
Where?  ???

Lats

And his skin looked tighter than it did in 2013 & 2014