« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy  (Read 6956 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83413
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« on: August 30, 2015, 06:08:45 AM »
Sorry Big Hamy fans Lee sets the record straight

Logged

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2015, 06:24:25 AM »
This midget starts sounding like the late "onlymen". Bitter and living in the past...
Logged

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33690
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2015, 06:25:07 AM »
I'm not impressed by him either.  Doubt he will break the Top 5 of the O this year.
Logged

Alucard

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1204
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2015, 06:26:47 AM »
Truth, completely agree... LOL at the guy who wrote that Ramy is better than Dillett and Nasser, bigger and more aesthetic... Ramy is an oilbag with a bunch of bodyparts put togheter, absolutely no flow, legs overpowering all the rest... Does he looks impressive? Yes, compared to the average bloated midgets in the line-up today, but when you have seen the monsters of the 90s, not at all... Dillett, Coleman and Nasser at their best were much more freaky and aesthetic...
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83413
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2015, 06:31:36 AM »
Quote from: affeman on August 30, 2015, 06:24:25 AM
This midget starts sounding like the late "onlymen". Bitter and living in the past...

There's no school like the old school. Guys of today just can't compete. Ramy is overrated.
Logged

French

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Solana @ 2000$
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2015, 06:52:35 AM »
Lee Priest is wrong, bitter and stupid.
Ramy : no oïl, no gut, flawless and mega mass.
Logged
$

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49682
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2015, 06:59:10 AM »
I agree, Dillet looks more freaky than Ramy


Logged
X

Sokolsky

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1483
  • Sensory receptors succumb
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2015, 07:07:19 AM »
Quote from: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 06:59:10 AM
I agree, Dillet looks more freaky than Ramy




It's mostly that rapist smile of his that gives away his freaky nature.
Logged
.

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2015, 07:22:42 AM »
In 10 years all you guys will be saying "Remember how aesthetic Ramy was? Guys today suck..."

Always so hard to appreciate the present talent....
Logged
?

Never1AShow

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8386
  • World Record Holder in French Toast Diving
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2015, 07:26:02 AM »
Maybe Dillett and Big Hamy can have places next to each other in the never could really get in shape and fulfill their potential hall of fame.

Logged

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49682
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2015, 07:27:10 AM »
Quote from: ritch on August 30, 2015, 07:22:42 AM
In 10 years all you guys will be saying "Remember how aesthetic Ramy was? Guys today suck..."

Always so hard to appreciate the present talent....

Because there is none.

And I don't think anyone will point to how aesthetic Ramy was. 30+ years later and people are still talking about 70's bodybuilding because it was good. In the same way that people still talk about bodybuilding from the 80's, 90's and early 2000s.

In 10 years, people will still continuously look toward the past when it was good. Not when Ramy was around.
Logged
X

Al Doggity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7286
  • Old School Gemini
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2015, 08:00:54 AM »
Quote from: SF1900 on August 30, 2015, 07:27:10 AM
Because there is none.

And I don't think anyone will point to how aesthetic Ramy was. 30+ years later and people are still talking about 70's bodybuilding because it was good. In the same way that people still talk about bodybuilding from the 80's, 90's and early 2000s.

In 10 years, people will still continuously look toward the past when it was good. Not when Ramy was around.

People were already talking about the decline of bodybuilding in the mid-90s ,when I first took an interest in it. The appreciation for Nasser seems to be largely a getbig thing, but back in the 90s, I remember the magazines constantly criticized him for not having arms, not  having a back and choosing mass over aesthetics. I agreed with that, quite frankly. I think nostalgia can give you a rose-colored perspective. Peak Nasser doesn't look any better than Roelly Winklaar.
Logged

DHEA-100

  • Guest
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2015, 08:18:29 AM »
Pro bb'ing is as dead as roadkill.  No one cares.  Its a cesspool of drugs, borderliine personalities, homosexual old impotent men, & bullshit supplement marketers.  Eventually the prize $$ will no longer worth dying over & it will hopefully die off to be reborn into what it was intended to be...healthy.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83413
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2015, 08:31:55 AM »
Quote from: French on August 30, 2015, 06:52:35 AM
Lee Priest is wrong, bitter and stupid.
Ramy : no oïl, no gut, flawless and mega mass.

No gut?  :-X Flawless?  ::)
Logged

local hero

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8714
  • mma finance warrior of peace
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2015, 08:36:03 AM »
Quote from: Al Doggity on August 30, 2015, 08:00:54 AM
People were already talking about the decline of bodybuilding in the mid-90s ,when I first took an interest in it. The appreciation for Nasser seems to be largely a getbig thing, but back in the 90s, I remember the magazines constantly criticized him for not having arms, not  having a back and choosing mass over aesthetics. I agreed with that, quite frankly. I think nostalgia can give you a rose-colored perspective. Peak Nasser doesn't look any better than Roelly Winklaar.


Woah there!!!! Once  roely getts dedicated nights on getbig u might get away with such a statement, until then there is only one beautiful man with glasses who is also the wizard of truth...
Logged

thegamechanger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4669
  • King of Cybex Glute Machine
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2015, 08:36:47 AM »
lee priest prefer his era. just as the ones before him prefered their era. and so on and so on.
same old.
Logged

Alucard

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1204
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2015, 08:40:57 AM »
Nasser looked great and very freaky at his best around 1996, in certain poses mostly, oil not too obvious and still fresh from the crazy insulin overload... Was he aesthetic and better than most then? No, funky build, short blocky legs, weak arms, oilbag calves, but compares very well with Ramy and the others today... Winklaar at his best looks better than most today, but lacks conditioning and he's very short... Regarding Dillett never in shape, that's a myth, in his first years the conditioning was great, striations and cuts everywhere, even the infamous glutes... He wasn't like Yates, but who was? Placed 6th and 4th first two Olympia with the high 90s standard, both questionable, Ramy placed worse in this laughable era, absolutely no comparison...
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on August 30, 2015, 08:31:55 AM
No gut?  :-X Flawless?  ::)
LOL, and the best "no oil"... Ramy is a petrol platform...
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83413
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2015, 08:45:08 AM »
Hamy Who?
Logged

Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2015, 08:50:37 AM »
Agree with Lee about Dillett. Had to see him up close to really appreciate it.
Logged

Al Doggity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7286
  • Old School Gemini
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2015, 08:51:39 AM »
Quote from: Alucard on August 30, 2015, 08:40:57 AM
Nasser looked great and very freaky at his best around 1996, in certain poses mostly, oil not too obvious and still fresh from the crazy insulin overload... Was he aesthetic and better than most then? No, funky build, short blocky legs, weak arms, oilbag calves, but compares very well with Ramy and the others today... Winklaar at his best looks better than most today, but lacks conditioning and he's very short... Regarding Dillett never in shape, that's a myth, in his first years the conditioning was great, striations and cuts everywhere, even the infamous glutes... He wasn't like Yates, but who was? Placed 6th and 4th first two Olympia with the high 90s standard, both questionable, Ramy placed worse in this laughable era, absolutely no comparison...LOL, and the best "no oil"... Ramy is a petrol platform...

YMMV, I don't really agree with everything you said here, but it's not really even about Nasser and Dillett specifically. It's the idea of what ritch said, people constantly remember the past as being so much better than the present when that is not the case. Not too long ago, there was a thread on here about how great Gunther Schlierkamp looked.  ::)
Logged

THEBOSS

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1093
  • Another day of being huge
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2015, 10:15:43 AM »
Spot on
Logged

Alucard

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1204
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #21 on: August 30, 2015, 10:21:13 AM »
Quote from: Al Doggity on August 30, 2015, 08:51:39 AM
YMMV, I don't really agree with everything you said here, but it's not really even about Nasser and Dillett specifically. It's the idea of what ritch said, people constantly remember the past as being so much better than the present when that is not the case. Not too long ago, there was a thread on here about how great Gunther Schlierkamp looked.  ::)
Schlierkamp, for one or two shows in his career, didn't look that bad, it's true... Great maybe not though... I don't always agree with the "past is always better" view, but bodybuilding it's one of those "sport" where it's absolutely true, in my honest opinion, heavyweight boxing is another, welter/middleweight also, tennis and MMA the opposite, for example... Not everything is the same... I just think that the genetic pool in the early 90s was much better, plus they were in better shape all year round, with less and better use of gear...
Logged

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #22 on: August 30, 2015, 10:50:38 AM »
Quote from: Alucard on August 30, 2015, 10:21:13 AM
Schlierkamp, for one or two shows in his career, didn't look that bad, it's true... Great maybe not though... I don't always agree with the "past is always better" view, but bodybuilding it's one of those "sport" where it's absolutely true, in my honest opinion, heavyweight boxing is another, welter/middleweight also, tennis and MMA the opposite, for example... Not everything is the same... I just think that the genetic pool in the early 90s was much better, plus they were in better shape all year round, with less and better use of gear...

What the hell are you talking about??? That is the era of mega dosing man and all the biggest guys got fat as fuck off season, lol!

But true about Gunter. Got in shape twice. Had a body/structure that had to be 100% perfect to be presentable. Seemed like such a cool fella though....
Logged
?

Azure

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2275
  • Getbig!
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2015, 11:21:03 AM »
Quote from: DHEA-100 on August 30, 2015, 08:18:29 AM
Pro bb'ing is as dead as roadkill.  No one cares.  Its a cesspool of drugs, borderliine personalities, homosexual old impotent men, & bullshit supplement marketers.  Eventually the prize $$ will no longer worth dying over & it will hopefully die off to be reborn into what it was intended to be...healthy.

Hope so! These guys look terrible.

During jays reign I pretty much stopped following altogether. I only started paying attention a year or two ago and it is ALL bad.

Doesn't look to be getting any better
Logged

oldschoolfan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6110
Re: Lee Priest NOT impressed with Big Ramy
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2015, 11:35:59 AM »
lee is right though

never see why so many o fyou think ramy is such a good bodybuilder, hes big full of oil and water wont crack top 5

and every single year the same people on here will be like ramy is going to dial it in this year bla bla bla
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »