| (https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2016/05/31/election-polls/87489f5278d9eb0469905e154406cefeb09a5792/images/trump-silo-colorized.png) Donald J. Trump 40% |
(http://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2016/06/1455035904-h176we.gif)
Reince Priebus just gave Trump permission to sit out the 3 debates with hilary.
He may know the election is over - and just wants to focus on local/state/senate/house races. Putting trump on the national stage could lead to him having a major meltdown which hurts their fundraising and get-out-the-vote efforts even worse.
As it is now, trump loses by 10 points nationally and hilary gets 35 states. Give Trump a national stage to look manic and unprepared, and it's 45 states she takes, and they lose the senate for sure... and flirt with a house loss.
Trump may end up giving President hilary a massive win, huge mandate, and both houses. Some republican.
2016 Election Polls
Updated August 5, 2016
National Polling Average
(https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2016/05/31/election-polls/1971a8995a6fde56335f0dea423b2e3a6b252ea6/images/clinton-silo-colorized.png)
Hillary Clinton
45%
(https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/2016/05/31/election-polls/87489f5278d9eb0469905e154406cefeb09a5792/images/trump-silo-colorized.png)
Donald J. Trump
40%
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/polls.html
oh yeah cause they don't manipulate the polls at all.....lmfao
Doesn't FOX news poll have trump down by 9 or 10 now?
Tough to claim poll manipulation when even FOX News is saying it.
Fox News has Clinton up by +10
(http://i64.tinypic.com/m96gcy.png)
yeah, a lot of trump supporters believed in polls when he was up 4 points. Now that he's down 10, suddenly they want to say it's rigged.
Fact is, Trump lost about 10% of his support in the past week by simply acting erratic. We want erratic/unpredictable/a little crazy, in our rock stars and linebackers... we don't want erratic in QBs or presidents.
Politics and all their followers are dumb-ass pussies... Keep drinking the Koo-laid guys...
There's always be you people with "it's all rigged", "iluminati bs", etc, etc..
Why don't you do something about it then? Do you open your legs for anybody?
At least Trump is promoting against religious fanatism, building USA a strong economy.. will he do it? who knows?
While Hillary is a feminist cuckold promoting backed up by the Saudis..
Meanwhile you seem to do nothing but put on your tinfoil hat and scream "it's all rigged!", and whoever wins you'll just take it up the butthole
In modern society politics is everything! You can't escape politics..
oh yeah cause they don't manipulate the polls at all.....lmfao
some polls are showing clinton up by 17% which is really astonishing.
have you been following the news?
are you aware many in the GOP want rid of trump?
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/insiders-to-trump-drop-out-226689
it's looking very bad.
if they cut ties NOW, they can still win many house, senate, governor, and local races.
If they stay with him - and he gets more erratic and crazy - they go right down with him.
Many repubs are starting to make anti=Trump speeches and commercials now. Tough to turn this around with another good conservative teleprompter speech, but repubs fell for it twice this year, so yeah...
There is nothing we can do. That's the problem. If the FBI and CIA, etc, won't even hold Hillary accountable for her actions, what makes you think the average person can? We live in an oligarchy. The people have little to no power. The only way for things to truly change is to start at the top, i.e., honest politicians. However, that will never happen, so we are left with a corrupted, rigged system. The people just have to take accept this reality.
So, if Hillary wins, what will you do? Will you just sit down and take it? Or, will you fight back?
There is nothing we can do. That's the problem. If the FBI and CIA, etc, won't even hold Hillary accountable for her actions, what makes you think the average person can? We live in an oligarchy. The people have little to no power. The only way for things to truly change is to start at the top, i.e., honest politicians. However, that will never happen, so we are left with a corrupted, rigged system. The people just have to take accept this reality.
So, if Hillary wins, what will you do? Will you just sit down and take it? Or, will you fight back?
the system is not going to magically reform itself. It's not that nothing can be done it's more like it takes a huge amount of work and effort.
I was purposely using hyperbolic language. Of course change can always occur, however, its an extremely slim chance.
The system won't magically transform itself, but the people have very little power in changing the system.
You would need to get in a few honest politicians who can try to reform the system within. Outsiders (citizens) have very little power in changing a corrupted government.
Poll numbers are bogus.
Not one person I know is voting for Clinton... NOT ONE.
Hilary didn't gain a bunch of supporters this week.
Trump lost a bunch this week.
That explains the polls. They think he's crazy, in bed with Russia, or just planning to tank it to start trump TV in November.
She's still at 43 percent.
400 million reasons for thinking he isn't a plant, or maybe this kind:
(http://f5paper.com/sites/default/files/main/articles/view-little_shop_of_horrors.jpg)
By the way some mod please send 240 and turbo circle jerks back to the politics board.
paul ryan would be smashing hilary in the polls right now.
Poll numbers are bogus.
Not one person I know is voting for Clinton... NOT ONE.
comes across as a decent principled open borders TPP Globalist fellow
Fixed
(http://allnewspipeline.com/images/CLINTON_BODY_COUNT_GETS_BIGGER.jpeg)Uh...
(http://allnewspipeline.com/images/hillary-clinton-death-list-unexplained-suicides-2016-vince-foster-ron-brown.jpg)
(http://allnewspipeline.com/images/body_count_grows.jpeg)
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/48/53/e6/4853e675ab3e1faa5071e4019292c768.jpg)
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/08/05/heres-the-iranian-video-of-hostages-for-pallets-of-money-cnn-and-washington-post-claim-doesnt-exist/#more-119785
uh...Didn't make up that $400 million ransom though. Somebody got caught and is lying lying lying. The public hates that both the ransom and the obvious lie.
Donald Trump Admits He Gets Confused and Makes Things Up After Watching Fox News
Tony Schwartz, who wrote “The Art of the Deal” in Trump’s voice, recently told The New Yorker that Trump’s short attention span has given him “a stunning level of superficial knowledge and plain ignorance.”
“That’s why he so prefers TV as his first news source — information comes in easily digestible sound bites,” he added.
https://theintercept.com/2016/08/05/donald-trump-admits-doesnt-understand-sees-television/
Didn't make up that $400 million ransom though. Somebody got caught and is lying lying lying. The public hates that both the ransom and the obvious lie.
Globalism is caring more about lining your pockets than the interests of America. Nafta has proven to be awful. China is a huge bunch of crooks. And the TPP is a disaster. You are an open borders dude right?
Border enforcement increases illegal immigration. Oh brother. You have no idea at all what you are talking about. Not even worth another keystroke.
Meanwhile the story has been in the news 3-4 days.
And still no one can tell us why they would vote for Killary.
This douchey fuck is the exact dude some/many of us once KO'd at a college kegger. The epitome of TOOL, no question.
Also, anyone on either side using "liar" is a fucking hypocrite.
shouldn't you be in RIO with your two olympic athletes?
So you can answer either? I know you're Canadian and already have a female in office but no answer for Killary.
here comes coaches little defender
did you receive some training advice from coach?
you can spell I don't get it!
???
hillary sucks, she's terrible. everybody hates her. It's amazing she's leading. what's up with that?
starting to think trump is tanking on purpose.
what do you think?
???
I was talking about Trump. How did you miss that?
If you're married and your partner each makes $50k/ yr, you would pay $16,518 in income tax under Hillary's plan whereas it would only be $5k under Trump's plan. That would save you $11k a year ☺️ clearly Hillary is trying to destroy the middle class
Trump has said some stupid stuff, some I agree with some I don't. But again, as I've said in two other posts, Killary has said statements and done things 10 fold compared to Trump and nothing happens. It's a media hit on trump.
Trump has said some stupid stuff, some I agree with some I don't. But again, as I've said in two other posts, Killary has said statements and done things 10 fold compared to Trump and nothing happens. It's a media hit on trump.
Oh... I see what this is saying. Yes. Trump is going to cut taxes across the board (or so he says) There's only one problem. Where is his spending cuts? He's not cutting Social Security, Defense, or Medicare.
Tax cuts are great, but you can't just cut taxes and keep the same shit going. He's cutting them... great.
How is he going to pay for the shit that the government does then?
she ain't lying here(video):
https://www.instagram.com/p/BIvAeYXDxVj/
(https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/13734347_306802696336629_68323554_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTMxMDU3NzkyOTQ5NDg1NDMwMg%3D%3D.2)
Trump also supported the war in Iraq. He said so on the howard stern show. Google it.
And Trump admitted he paid horrible hilary - with all her flaws and shady history - to sit front row at his wedding.
it's weird to criticize someone you were in bed with for decades, bribing to get your way politically, and pretend you're not muddy too.
Oh brother.
::)
Clearly she said aren't. But even if she does. Her plan clearly shows an increase of .1%
Would I like tax cuts? Sure. But tax cuts don't do anything if you are still paying for the same stuff.
Where's Trump's spending cuts?
Brother how deaf are you?? she Clearly said "He are going to raise taxes on the middle class!"
Damn even with evidence you aren't budging on Killary.. Trumps spending cuts, you should ask a trump forum.. they'll give you the best answer
hillary sucks, she's terrible. everybody hates her. It's amazing she's leading. what's up with that?
starting to think trump is tanking on purpose.
what do you think?
???
i saw a video last night... trump on all the top issues, supporting both sides of it.
last summer he even said - in july - we have to accept the syrian illegals, and the illegal aliens from mexico can stay if they're not criminals. the next week, he reversed both of these.
he's just all over the place. I suspect he's pretty liberal on most things, but knows what to say to rile up the base to get votes.
I'm simply telling you what I heard.
To me is sounded like she said aren't and the mic cut out. It also doesn't jive with her actual tax plan that she has presented. Her plan is freely available should you decide to bother researching it.
I'm not voting for either one. They are both shit. I'm telling you the issues I have with both plans. That's what normal common sense people do.
I'm not saying Trumps' an angel.. but compared to Hillary, there's much more and I mean MUCH more with Killary going on behind the curtains.
Hillary is a Merkel, who will accept without much hassle immigrants, accept sharia law based advancement. Backed/Sponsored by the Saudis who are Wahhabis - ISIS, it will get much worse.
Vote at least for something, it's much worse if your're passive. This is not paradise, but you haven't much choices and at least vote what's best for the US as of right now. Make lemonade if you have lemons.
Everybody hates her? Apparently not everybody. Haters don't generally part with their money. Hilary's raised 600 mil - Trump raised less than half that amount.
Tanking on purpose? That is what some people believe. I think he's just plain nuts and he doesn't know when to shut-up.
Trump lacks basic knowledge of critical issues.
No matter how many things one might agree with him on... I don't think any Trump supporters can disagree with this. A massive number of non-partisan, military, and intelligence people agree with it.
He doesn't know a lot of things about major issues - and he proudly refuses to learn anything new. He repeats things daily which have been disproved. Pride before all.
Trump lacks basic knowledge of critical issues.
No matter how many things one might agree with him on... I don't think any Trump supporters can disagree with this. A massive number of non-partisan, military, and intelligence people agree with it.
He doesn't know a lot of things about major issues - and he proudly refuses to learn anything new. He repeats things daily which have been disproved. Pride before all.
bottom line
Trump supporters need to denounce him and end the madness immediately
We will if Obama pays us a $400,000,000 ransom with taxpayer's money.....
even that got fumbled when trump decided to confuse the story with a lie about a video ...hahahahahah
sad
The video of the ransom payment was shown in Europe, came from a U.K. news agency
Obama paid $400M of taxpayer money to the biggest supporters of terrorism in the world
I'm sure obama paid the money but no video exists. It's been reported widely. The problem is Trump poisoned the story by talking about an imaginary video....hahaha...repeat edly! sometimes it's ok just to keep to the facts :D
you can't make this stuff up
I was talking about Trump. How did you miss that?
The video of the pallets of cash was shown on Iranian TV.
It was rebroadcast on European TV. Photos of the cash are all over the Internet. One of the hostages who is a priest confirms that they couldn't be released until the plane with the cash arrived.
Just because the liberal MSM in the US is sucking Obama pussy and won't show the video, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
bottom line
Trump supporters need to denounce him and end the madness immediately
I'm sure obama paid the money but no video exists. It's been reported widely. The problem is Trump poisoned the story by talking about an imaginary video....hahaha...repeat edly! sometimes it's ok just to keep to the facts :D
you can't make this stuff up
Actually the only reason many non Trump supporters knew about the ransom was because of the coverage of the video comment, which it turns out did exist. But it backfired on the media. People care way more about the ransom than some mistake (if it even was one). Just like with the DNC emails, you guys are tone deaf to what people care about.
ok well why don't you provide us a link to the video...take your time with it! 8)
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/trump-iran-video-cash-payment/
When even liberal protectionists like CNN have to begrudgingly admit to it.
ok so there is a video but it's a different video with no plane. I understand now!
Sure.....HRC - "there were no classified emails"
FBI - "Well actually there were 113."
HRC - "See, the FBI themselves said I told the truth"
Liberals.....It is Bush's fault Hillary had to send those emails.
Face it....$400,000,000 of taxpayer money to the Aayatollahs on the same day the prisoners were released. Nahhhhh.....just a coincidence to the most transparent administration in history.
The video of the ransom payment was shown in Europe, came from a U.K. news agency
Obama paid $400M of taxpayer money to the biggest supporters of terrorism in the world
This was AFTER I said this was a media hit...
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/08/05/drive_bys_go_full_palin_on_trump
Why did reagan promise to give them the 12 billion back, KNOWING they were sponsors of terrorism?
Obama is keeping reagan's promise here, right?
I thought nobody watches the liberal media anymore? Roughly 1% of the population watches MENBC, coach.
explain how a network reaching 1% of the population (most of whom are already diehard dems) is painting trump in a bad light...
What does this have to do with Reagan assclown?
it's poor form when you call names, coach. That's how anonymous trolls talk to one another. We are known, grown men having a political debate. Don't act like the screaming trash protesters, calling names of those with whom they disagree.
Once again, derailing the facts, Son.
Translation; No relevance, got it.
why did trump tweet and ADMIT he was wrong about the video, then?
Fuck that theory then. SO much for "trump was smarter than everyone..."
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
The plane I saw on television was the hostage plane in Geneva, Switzerland, not the plane carrying $400 million in cash going to Iran!
6:39 AM - 5 Aug 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-iran-video-geneva_us_57a476a8e4b021fd98783ba4
The video of the pallets of cash was shown on Iranian TV.
It was rebroadcast on European TV. Photos of the cash are all over the Internet. One of the hostages who is a priest confirms that they couldn't be released until the plane with the cash arrived.
Just because the liberal MSM in the US is sucking Obama pussy and won't show the video, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Trump has injected a huge amount of confusion in this scandal.
Just a wonderful gift to obama
Congrats. You're the first flaming lib that's admitted this is a scandal.
have you been drinking?
it seems you're unfit to participate in this discussion.
he's calling names and making some weird statements tonight.
I'm trying to explain the difference to him between a college transcript and a degree, it's been a troubling time.
Trump is 6'2 and was a very good athlete. Could have possibly played pro baseball. He'd be the guy knocking people out or having people do that for him in College. He's a straight up sociopath. Nobody fucked with him.
Trump in the middle
(https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSwNdfL9qIJcl-jZ28SZLb1Mtlb0XEbvwMA3vb4fBD0LiiKLSS8)
coach has a lot on his plate, he's been training two olympic athletes
for the record, these two athletes will be completing their training in colorado prior to travelling to Rio
I don't place you that high on the commonsense chart plus you're Canadian with a twink prime minister that you probably voted for.
The people most against Trump all fall into one of the liberal victim groups profiting off of the lies he is trying to end. I try to look at those like 240 and the rest and try to identify which victim group they belong to. It eventually comes out.
The people most against Trump all fall into one of the liberal victim groups profiting off of the lies he is trying to end. I try to look at those like 240 and the rest and try to identify which victim group they belong to. It eventually comes out.
The video of the pallets of cash was shown on Iranian TV.
It was rebroadcast on European TV. Photos of the cash are all over the Internet. One of the hostages who is a priest confirms that they couldn't be released until the plane with the cash arrived.
Just because the liberal MSM in the US is sucking Obama pussy and won't show the video, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Donald Trump says he didn't see video of cash being transferred for ransom after all
For two days, Donald Trump told rally audiences a detailed account of seeing video footage of stacks of cash being taken off an airplane, destined to pay Iran for the release of American hostages.
Now, even Trump acknowledges that such video footage doesn’t exist.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/aug/05/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-he-didnt-see-video-cash-being-tr/
there is a video but trump flubbed it and had to retract his made up story about it.
sad
I watched the video. It proved nothing with regards to the supposed 400 mil ransom. In the video there is a pallet of stacked money which could be any currency in any airport.
Repubs like to say "Polls are all fixed!" until they see one where Trump is only down by 1 or 2, then they tattoo that shit everywhere they go.
Repubs like to parse which Trump statements make him look good, and pretend the others are just media creations.
Trump says really stupid shit, several times each week. He has a weird 70 year old man opinion on things. Like, he's mentally composted about 99% of the time, but that 1% is really crazy or weird or scary. You don't want a president who just goes a little batty a few times a month.
Some Short Circuiting going on. Release the medical records
Ahhahahahahahhahahahaahha, release the medical records is trending huge now.
I bet she responds with, "I will if he releases his taxes."
After she releases her Goldman Sachs speeches and also the 33,000 emails she "deleted". Cmon does anyone think she really doesn't have a copy?
In brighter news, it looks like she got some Iranian scientist who was feeding us info on Iran's nuclear program hanged due to her emails being open and vulnerable.
STATEMENT BY FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIALS
The undersigned individuals have all served in senior national security
and/or foreign policy positions in Republican Administrations, from
Richard Nixon to George W. Bush. We have worked directly on
national security issues with these Republican Presidents and/or their
principal advisers during wartime and other periods of crisis, through
successes and failures. We know the personal qualities required of a
President of the United States.
None of us will vote for Donald Trump.
From a foreign policy perspective, Donald Trump is not qualified to be
President and Commander-in-Chief. Indeed, we are convinced that he
would be a dangerous President and would put at risk our country’s
national security and well-being.
Most fundamentally, Mr. Trump lacks the character, values, and
experience to be President. He weakens U.S. moral authority as the
leader of the free world. He appears to lack basic knowledge about and
belief in the U.S. Constitution, U.S. laws, and U.S. institutions,
including religious tolerance, freedom of the press, and an independent
judiciary.
In addition, Mr. Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he has little
understanding of America’s vital national interests, its complex
diplomatic challenges, its indispensable alliances, and the democratic
values on which U.S. foreign policy must be based. At the same time,
he persistently compliments our adversaries and threatens our allies and
friends. Unlike previous Presidents who had limited experience in
foreign affairs, Mr. Trump has shown no interest in educating
himself. He continues to display an alarming ignorance of basic facts of
contemporary international politics. Despite his lack of knowledge, Mr.
Trump claims that he understands foreign affairs and “knows more
about ISIS than the generals do.”
Mr. Trump lacks the temperament to be President. In our experience, a
President must be willing to listen to his advisers and department heads;
must encourage consideration of conflicting views; and must
acknowledge errors and learn from them. A President must be
disciplined, control emotions, and act only after reflection and careful
deliberation. A President must maintain cordial relationships with
leaders of countries of different backgrounds and must have their respect
and trust.
In our judgment, Mr. Trump has none of these critical qualities. He is
unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood. He does not
encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts
impetuously. He cannot tolerate personal criticism. He has alarmed our
closest allies with his erratic behavior. All of these are dangerous
qualities in an individual who aspires to be President and Commanderin-Chief,
with command of the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
We understand that many Americans are profoundly frustrated with the
federal government and its inability to solve pressing domestic and
international problems. We also know that many have doubts about
Hillary Clinton, as do many of us. But Donald Trump is not the answer
to America’s daunting challenges and to this crucial election.We are convinced that in the Oval Office, he would be the most reckless President in American history.
Donald B. Ayer
Former Deputy Attorney General
John B. Bellinger III
Former Legal Adviser to the Department of State; former Legal Adviser
to the National Security Council, The White House
StatementofFormerNationa lSecurityOfficials.docx
Robert Blackwill
Former Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Planning, The
White House
Michael Chertoff
Former Secretary of Homeland Security; former Assistant Attorney
General for the Criminal Division, Department of Justice
Eliot A. Cohen
Former Counselor of the Department of State
Eric Edelman
Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy; former National Security
Advisor to the Vice President, The White House
Gary Edson
Former Deputy National Security Advisor, The White House
Richard Falkenrath
Former Deputy Homeland Security Advisor, The White House
Peter Feaver
Former Senior Director for Strategic Planning, National Security
Council, The White House
Richard Fontaine
Former Associate Director for Near East Affairs, National Security
Council, The White House
Jendayi Frazer
Former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for
African Affairs; former Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs
StatementofFormerNationa lSecurityOfficials.docx
Aaron Friedberg
Former Deputy National Security Advisor to the Vice President, The
White House
David Gordon
Former Director of Policy Planning, Department of State
Michael Green
Former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Asia,
National Security Council, The White House
Brian Gunderson
Former Chief of Staff, Department of State
Paul Haenle
Former Director for China and Taiwan, National Security Council, The
White House
Michael Hayden
Former Director, Central Intelligence Agency; former Director, National
Security Agency
Carla A. Hills
Former U.S. Trade Representative
John Hillen
Former Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs
William Inboden
Former Senior Director for Strategic Planning, National Security
Council, The White House
StatementofFormerNationa lSecurityOfficials.docx
Reuben Jeffery III
Former Under Secretary of State for Economic Energy and Agricultural
Affairs; former Special Assistant to the President for International
Economic Affairs, National Security Council, The White House
James Jeffrey
Former Deputy National Security Advisor, The White House
Ted Kassinger
Former Deputy Secretary of Commerce
David Kramer
Former Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and
Labor
James Langdon
Former Chairman, President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, The
White House
Peter Lichtenbaum
Former Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration
Mary Beth Long
Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs
Clay Lowery
Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs;
former Director for International Finance, National Security Council,
The White House
Robert McCallum
Former Associate Attorney General; former Ambassador to Australia
StatementofFormerNationa lSecurityOfficials.docx
Richard Miles
Former Director for North America, National Security Council, The
White House
Andrew Natsios
Former Administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development
John Negroponte
Former Director of National Intelligence; former Deputy Secretary of
State; former Deputy National Security Advisor
Meghan O’Sullivan
Former Deputy National Security Advisor for Iraq and Afghanistan
Dan Price
Former Deputy National Security Advisor
Tom Ridge
Former Secretary of Homeland Security; former Assistant to the
President for Homeland Security, The White House; former Governor of
Pennsylvania
Nicholas Rostow
Former Legal Adviser to the National Security Council, The White
House
Kori Schake
Former Director for Defense Strategy, National Security Council, The
White House
Kristen Silverberg
Former Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations
StatementofFormerNationa lSecurityOfficials.docx
Stephen Slick
Former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for
Intelligence Programs, National Security Council, The White House
Shirin R. Tahir-Kheli
Former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for
Democracy, Human Rights and International Operations, National
Security Council, The White House; former Ambassador and Senior
Advisor for Women’s Empowerment, Department of State
William H. Taft IV
Former Deputy Secretary of Defense; former Ambassador to NATO
Larry D. Thompson
Former Deputy Attorney General
William Tobey
Former Deputy Administrator, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy; former Director for CounterProliferation
Strategy, National Security Council, The White House
John Veroneau
Former Deputy U.S. Trade Representative
Kenneth Wainstein
Former Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and
Counterterrorism, The White House; former Assistant Attorney General
for National Security, Department of Justice
Matthew Waxman
Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense; former Director for
Contingency Planning and International Justice, National Security
Council, The White House
StatementofFormerNationa lSecurityOfficials.docx
Dov Zakheim
Former Under Secretary of Defense
Roger Zakheim
Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
Philip Zelikow
Former Counselor of the Department of State
Robert Zoellick
Former U.S. Trade Representative; former Deputy Secretary of State
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3007589/Nationalsecurityletter.pdf
trump will be completely obliterated in the general election
it's all over but the crying.
(oh wait, trump and his backers already cry every day.)
Globalists every damn one.
how did you arrive at this conclusion?
Globalists every damn one.
Drudge has really been playing up this angle. Suddenly anyone who says Trump is not prepared, emotional, erratic, suddenly supports globalism.
i guess... anything to remain the underdog. everyone loves an underdog.
What is your liberal interest group?
Open borders, foreign wars, neocons. That's them, they don't want to lose control and all the dollars they've been making off the backs of that.
You guys are not antiTrump for the same reasons. You hate him because he's going to end your liberal leftist group identity politics and whatever group it is that you are aligned with, racial, ethnic, religion of peace, or gender/sex. Just identify it for me, please.
What is it exactly that leads you to believe that trump will do any of the things you claim above?
again, how do you arrive at these conclusions?
??
Well, all of your liberal interests groups such as LaRaza and CAIR and the rest are dead set against him. Plus liberal mouthpieces like CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post, etc are also crazy filled with hate and bias against him. They obviously think he'll do them. That's good enough for me.
Globalists every damn one.
you said trump will "do" the globalists and "do" all of these above mentioned special interest groups.
I'm asking you to explain what it is specifically that caused to to arrive at this conclusion. For example you can say, "trump said so" or "this is consistent with his action in the past" or "he's always supported these causes" etc. Just want to confirm that this is a reasonable expectation.
Again, for example the out voter was under the impression that leaving the EU would reduce immigration to the UK. This was a widespread misconception, once the vote was done the politicians reversed any claim to this effect. UK is now in an historic economic downturn and is teeming with chinese immigrants eager for cheap real estate.
???
Wiki leaks already knocked out those emails so she's gold there.
The speeches as in the content? I suppose that's a thing now.
Poor Iranian guy. She really is a mess of a politician.
Wiki leaks released DNC emails that they got via the dead DNC staffer (not the Russians). The 33,000 emails deleted are entirely different incriminating emails.
No, no, no. Okay now I see. You are a moron. When I said he would "do" them, I was responding to the prior comment asking what evidence there was that he would do any of the things he said he would do.
Again, CNN and the rest clearly think Trump will do what he said he would do policywise or they would not oppose him.