Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on March 31, 2017, 10:02:23 AM
-
Keep making it legal for recreational use and you're going to see this more. Shitbags
'Stoned' dog bleary-eyed and barely able to stand after 'eating a joint while out walking'
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/stoned-dog-bleary-eyed-barely-10132164
-
Republicans: '"WE WANT SMALL GOVERNMENT."
Republicans: 'GOVERNMENT, PLEASE TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT STICK INTO OUR OWN BODIES!!!"
-
Keep making it legal for recreational use and you're going to see this more. Shitbags
stfu u piece of shit imbecile
-
Hahahhaha,weed don't hurt nobody.Alcohol should be illegal not weed.I don't think it should be sold in stores for recreation but legal to possessing over 21 sure,why not?
-
MJ. Now very legal and accessable in LV.
-
MJ. Now very legal and accessable in LV.
Are all of the poor little puppies ok? what measures r u taking to protect them? ::)
-
Pot Of Peace :D
-
MJ. Now very legal and accessable in LV.
Like it wasn't before? haha. Yeah anywhere but the strip. The Strip must abide to Federal law the same way it does with prostitution plus the NGC pushes that rule to all casinos in the state. Not sure how many miles from the strip a store needs to be to make it legal.
-
Hahahhaha,weed don't hurt nobody.Alcohol should be illegal not weed.I don't think it should be sold in stores for recreation but legal to possessing over 21 sure,why not?
Are you sure about weed not hurting anybody?
-
Are you sure about weed not hurting anybody?
Weed will fuck up your perception,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I wouldn`t discount it as harmless, especially while driving or working with power tools.
-
Weed will fuck up your perception,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I wouldn`t discount it as harmless, especially while driving or working with power tools.
Yes, any substance that alters perception has the potential to hurt anyone or another. But alcohol kills way more people than weed and I don't see Republicans calling for a ban of alcohol. ??? ??? ???
Again, its people just randomly picking and choosing what they like and don't like.
-
Republicans: '"WE WANT SMALL GOVERNMENT."
Republicans: 'GOVERNMENT, PLEASE TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT STICK INTO OUR OWN BODIES!!!"
You're missing the point.
-
Keep making it legal for recreational use and you're going to see this more. Shitbags
'Stoned' dog bleary-eyed and barely able to stand after 'eating a joint while out walking'
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/stoned-dog-bleary-eyed-barely-10132164
yes i fear there will be an epidemic of stoned dogs if they keep making cannabis legal :-\
-
Republicans: '"WE WANT SMALL GOVERNMENT."
Republicans: 'GOVERNMENT, PLEASE TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT STICK INTO OUR OWN BODIES!!!"
I don't give a shit what people do behind closed doors. It's when they bring it out in public that harms others......like this dog.
-
yes i fear there will be an epidemic of stoned dogs if they keep making cannabis legal :-\
You didn't read the article did you?
-
Poor pooch of Peace
It needs peace, not pot
-
Keep making it legal for recreational use and you're going to see this more. Shitbags
'Stoned' dog bleary-eyed and barely able to stand after 'eating a joint while out walking'
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/stoned-dog-bleary-eyed-barely-10132164
next thing you know that dog will do something really crazy like vote for Trump or become a fundie christian
-
I don't give a shit what people do behind closed doors. It's when they bring it out in public that harms others......like this dog.
So, then you're fine with banning alcohol in public places (bars, lounges, sport bars, clubs)? I mean, alcohol is legal for recreational use. Are you okay with that?
In 2014, 9,967 people were killed in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (31%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States. Of the 1,070 traffic deaths among children ages 0 to 14 years in 2014, 209 (19%) involved an alcohol-impaired driver.
-
You didn't read the article did you?
no but i watched the video which was very informative :D
-
next thing you know that dog will do something really crazy like vote for Trump or become a fundie christian
Or even worse a modernized Muslim. The owner will have a hard time getting it to pray 5 times a day and also the dog will not recognize gay rights or treat women equally.
-
So, then you're fine with banning alcohol in public places (bars, lounges, sport bars, clubs)? I mean, alcohol is legal for recreational use. Are you okay with that?
In 2014, 9,967 people were killed in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (31%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States. Of the 1,070 traffic deaths among children ages 0 to 14 years in 2014, 209 (19%) involved an alcohol-impaired driver.
And just remember those numbers are only for deaths. Alcohol hurts millions and destroys families. I don't think marijuana is anything good either but alcohol is horrible. What doesn't get talked about is how widely alcohol is abused. You can go to any bar and watch people get served till they are absolutely smashed then watch them dive away. It's actually pretty fucked up and it's one of the double standards of our society.
-
That's in the fault of the dogs owners, not a plants fault.
-
I don't think marijuana is anything good
thinking isnt your strong suit
-
Republicans: '"WE WANT SMALL GOVERNMENT."
Republicans: 'GOVERNMENT, PLEASE TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT STICK INTO OUR OWN BODIES!!!"
Pretty sure neither political party is okay with you sticking other men's penises up your fat ass.
-
Republicans: '"WE WANT SMALL GOVERNMENT."
Republicans: 'GOVERNMENT, PLEASE TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT STICK INTO OUR OWN BODIES!!!"
Anyone suggesting there should be no one "watching what people are doing" should pay a visit to Somalia.
In Somalia there is practically no government or related institutions.
I doubt any of the hipsters campaigning for "mini-state" would last a day there.
It's easy to mouth stupid ideas from safety of organized society based on common rules set by authorities.
-
And just remember those numbers are only for deaths. Alcohol hurts millions and destroys families. I don't think marijuana is anything good either but alcohol is horrible. What doesn't get talked about is how widely alcohol is abused. You can go to any bar and watch people get served till they are absolutely smashed then watch them dive away. It's actually pretty fucked up and it's one of the double standards of our society.
Exactly. For some strange reason, alcohol gets a pass, yet destroys millions.
-
Anyone suggesting there should be no one "watching what people are doing" should pay a visit to Somalia.
In Somalia there is practically no government or related institutions.
I doubt any of the hipsters campaigning for "mini-state" would last a day there.
It's easy to mouth stupid ideas from safety of organized society based on common rules set by authorities.
Its stupid to compare America to Somalia. Apples and oranges. Even if weed was legal, it would never turn into a place like Somalia. Use a better analogy.
Plus, making something illegal is clearly not stopping people form using. In fact, drug use is on the rise.
-
What if we put micro doses of cannabis into dog food? I'm Gonna patent that.
#SuccessStories
-
Its stupid to compare America to Somalia. Apples and oranges. Even if weed was legal, it would never turn into a place like Somalia. Use a better analogy.
Plus, making something illegal is clearly not stopping people form using. In fact, drug use is on the rise.
Even your protests turn quite anarchistic pretty fast, and that's under watch of massive security apparatus. One night mob gets together and you have shops looted and windows smashed, cars set ablaze and what not. How long would it take to turn America into Somalia if there was no one stopping that? Quite some time for sure but it would be on the route. Same of course happens everywhere, implying that human beings in general are not developed enough to live without authority and enforcement of common rules.
Not talking only about weed being legal but about philosophy of "mini-state" in general.
-
Even your protests turn quite anarchistic pretty fast, and that's under watch of massive security apparatus. One night mob gets together and you have shops looted and windows smashed, cars set ablaze and what not. This happens everywhere, implying that human beings in general are not developed enough to live without authority and enforcement of common rules.
Not talking only about weed being legal but about philosophy of "mini-state" in general.
Who said living without authority or enforcement? You're putting words into my mouth and engaging in fallacious arguments to try to prove your point.
I am talking about weed being legal, not murder.
-
next thing you know that dog will do something really crazy like vote for Trump or become a fundie christian
Yeah because that's who is smoking up all the weed in the this country. ::)
Stupid twat.
-
Who said living without authority or enforcement? You're putting words into my mouth and engaging in fallacious arguments to try to prove your point.
I am talking about weed being legal, not murder.
Yea, yea I get your point.
I just expanded the idea a little. Because why stop at weed being legal? Next someone wants to make heroine legal.
Look at development in other subjects: homosexuality was punishable or at least viewed as psychological disorder even in most liberal countries just some decades ago. Nowadays there are first public voices to legalize incest. Pedo is next.
The erosion advances quickly once it gets under the protective layer.
-
Yes, any substance that alters perception has the potential to hurt anyone or another. But alcohol kills way more people than weed and I don't see Republicans calling for a ban of alcohol. ??? ??? ???
Again, its people just randomly picking and choosing what they like and don't like.
Not hardly. I am Republican and I don't drink nor do I smoke dope nor take anything else that is illegal or I deem bad for me. I don't like pussies being high all 'round me. I don't like 'em being drunk either.
What's next for these shitasses? Make meth legal because they can "make money" off the sale? Why not heroin? Why not whores? Male, female, whatever the fucking perverts, oh excuse me, the "customers" desire. Why not because who are we to judge? That's what you'll hear from people that want what you find wrong and they want it now and forever.
I'll tell you who these sub-humans are. Someone that wants what they want but doesn't want to be ostracized. That wants right made illegal and all that is wrong made a right. Fuck that noise.
There's a reason it's called "dope". But of course, you already know that. And still you ignore it. I wonder why? Nah. I don't wonder at all. Fuck that noise.
So make excuses and make the world an even bigger mess.
-
How long would it take to turn America into Somalia
Did u know that blacks live in the u s? Any of their 'hoods' could turn into somalia lite in short order.
-
Yea, yea I get your point.
I just expanded the idea a little. Because why stop at weed being legal? Next someone wants to make heroine legal.
Look at development in other subjects: homosexuality was punishable or at least viewed as psychological disorder even in most liberal countries just some decades ago. Nowadays there are first public voices to legalize incest. Pedo is next.
The erosion advances quickly once it gets under the protective layer.
Escape to the Future Fallacious Argument--You can't say that your point of view may prevail because SOMETHING may become legal in the future. Is pedophilia currently legal? No. Move on.
We can determine what is right and wrong by its influence on well-being. How many people have overdosed on weed? How many people have overdosed on heroine? How many people have lost their home to smoking weed? How many people have lost their home to doing heroine?
Of course, certain things should be illegal or legal. You have to have a discussion about X variable and its relation to well-being.
For what it's worth, I have never smoked weed once in my life.
-
well i just hope this experience doesn't tempt the dog into experimenting with harder drugs.
-
Not hardly. I am Republican and I don't drink nor do I smoke dope nor take anything else that is illegal or I deem bad for me. I don't like pussies being high all 'round me. I don't like 'em being drunk either.
What's next for these shitasses? Make meth legal because they can "make money" off the sale? Why not heroin? Why not whores? Male, female, whatever the fucking perverts, oh excuse me, the "customers" desire. Why not because who are we to judge? That's what you'll hear from people that want what you find wrong and they want it now and forever.
I'll tell you who these sub-humans are. Someone that wants what they want but doesn't want to be ostracized. That wants right made illegal and all that is wrong made a right. Fuck that noise.
There's a reason it's called "dope". But of course, you already know that. And still you ignore it. I wonder why? Nah. I don't wonder at all. Fuck that noise.
So make excuses and make the world an even bigger mess.
We already know your position. You hate weed because of a family members experience. Your assertion a few months back was that everyone who smokes weed is lazy.
I then pointed out that I know many professors who smoke weed, who have written books and published and are notable in their field. I would hardly consider these professors "dopey." Again, your worldview is out of touch with reality.
I get it, you have a personal vendetta against drugs. That is your subjective vendetta. So, be it.
-
Cannabis is an extremely safe miracle medicine for many, many people. Anyone against it is evil, stupid, and can fuck off.
-
I then pointed out that I know many professors who smoke weed, who have written books and published and are notable in their field. I would hardly consider these professors "dopey." Again, your worldview is out of touch with reality.
Some of the most brilliant minds on this planet r blazed all day.
-
Some of the most brilliant minds on this planet r blazed all day.
According to The Scott, these people are lazy losers.
I mean, I know tons of lazy people who write books! Don't you?!?!
-
According to The Scott, these people are lazy losers.
I mean, I know tons of lazy people who write books! Don't you?!?!
of course... producing anything of merit, let alone brilliance, requires a lotta laziness first and foremost... common knowledge.
-
of course... producing anything of merit, let alone brilliance, requires a lotta laziness first and foremost... common knowledge.
Sigmund Freud did coke for 10+ years and look how lazy he was! He didn't produce anything of brilliance.
Same with the English writer, novelist, and philosopher, Aldous Huxley. Another lazy buffoon!
Lazy bastards.
-
Cannabis is an extremely safe miracle medicine for many, many people. Anyone against it is evil, stupid, and can fuck off.
Then keep it for medicinal use ONLY. I don't need my neighborhood, the neighborhood around schools, restaurants, etc with that smelly shit and having kids getting contact highs. Dumbasses who pass this don't think of who it may effect.
-
What an absolute train wreck of a thread. It's a good job the cannabis didn't kill the dog because even he'd be rolling in his grave right now at the utter stupidity on display here.
-
What an absolute train wreck of a thread. It's a good job the cannabis didn't kill the dog because even he'd be rolling in his grave right now at the utter stupidity on display here.
Feel free to click on another thread....hope this helps.
-
I don't need my neighborhood, the neighborhood around schools, restaurants, etc with that smelly shit and having kids getting contact highs. Dumbasses who pass this don't think of who it may effect.
u've got a point there, about the restaurants, I admit. If I were the proprietor of a restaurant, the very last thing on earth I'd want around are a bunch of relaxed, hungry people... in a good mood even - god forbid.
I'll take the drunk cigarette smoking crowd.... cuz who doesn't appreciate a little drunken vomit and violence? I know I sure do.
What can we do to save all of these children and puppies from a 'contact high'? What will we do?
-
Yeah because that's who is smoking up all the weed in the this country. ::)
Stupid twat.
yeah, Trump voters are more likely unemployed opioid addicts (Trump himself said the people at his rallies were unemployed)
just pointing out that once the dog gets baked he could do something really crazy like vote for Trump or think it has a personal relationship with a 2000 year old jewish zombie
-
We already know your position. You hate weed because of a family members experience. Your assertion a few months back was that everyone who smokes weed is lazy.
I then pointed out that I know many professors who smoke weed, who have written books and published and are notable in their field. I would hardly consider these professors "dopey." Again, your worldview is out of touch with reality.
I get it, you have a personal vendetta against drugs. That is your subjective vendetta. So, be it.
I'm not here to stop anyone from "doing what they want to their body", but neither do I have to agree with it. Neither should I have to suffer the result(s) of their ignorance, bet it to themselves or others. Or in public. You ignore reality and think that just because someone thinks it fine to do something with their body, it is just fine to do so. There are consequences to be paid for. Don't believe me, just look at the ignorant bodybuilders of today. Coleman is a prime example of paying up for being stupid.
Oh yeah...It is, after all, "his body". When he runs out of "his" money, it will have to come from someone. Same with dopers. Perhaps the same government that you think should stay out of your private business should also let addicts rot by the side of the road as an example. In some areas of the country, men can claim to be women to use the women's restroom. If you had a daughter in there and she was raped would you be able to complain with a clear conscience? After all, who are you to question someone's self-identity and how they fulfill their sexual needs.
Pedophiles want to be pedophiles and claim it is not a choice but by nature. This is the same rote spewed by homosexuals for ages until it was finally accepted by the few who have power over the many. What will you say if some professor determines that a murderer is a murderer by their nature? Free them to be themselves? How dare you keep them from doing what their body demands, even if it comes at the expense of the civilized world.
Sounds like islam.
Some here that want to do disgusting things to themselves hate the police but will furiously dial 911. Sounds like you desire to be an uninvited grasper of cone.
-
Then keep it for medicinal use ONLY. I don't need my neighborhood, the neighborhood around schools, restaurants, etc with that smelly shit and having kids getting contact highs. Dumbasses who pass this don't think of who it may effect.
Trust me I hate that smell more than anything else however, people are going to smoke it regardless if it's legal or illegal. We might as well make some $ on it because it's not going away anytime soon.
-
Even though I don't use mj anymore, I'm still for having it legal. I'll never smoke again though because it stole my motivation to do anything in life. I don't like that. Plus I started abusing it and it made me lazy and fat. It was fun for a while but not as a lifestyle.
-
Adults will ingest what they like and all of u insane, dickhead control freaks can simply fuk off and deal with it.
Go after coffee or cigarettes or alcohol... shit that actually harms people, as opposed to a plant that has profound health benefits. at least that would make some kind of sense.
-
Not hardly. I am Republican and I don't drink nor do I smoke dope nor take anything else that is illegal or I deem bad for me. I don't like pussies being high all 'round me. I don't like 'em being drunk either.
What's next for these shitasses? Make meth legal because they can "make money" off the sale? Why not heroin? Why not whores? Male, female, whatever the fucking perverts, oh excuse me, the "customers" desire. Why not because who are we to judge? That's what you'll hear from people that want what you find wrong and they want it now and forever.
I'll tell you who these sub-humans are. Someone that wants what they want but doesn't want to be ostracized. That wants right made illegal and all that is wrong made a right. Fuck that noise.
There's a reason it's called "dope". But of course, you already know that. And still you ignore it. I wonder why? Nah. I don't wonder at all. Fuck that noise.
So make excuses and make the world an even bigger mess.
Smoking is legal, yet theyre ostracized. Look an how much smoking has decreased in the past 10-20yrs.
Legal or not, most drug users are ostracized.
Im not a big pot smoker, & i usually camt stand being around pot heads. It being illegal wouldnt stop me if i did want to smoke (or eat or whatever).
-
Adults will ingest what they like and all of u insane, dickhead control freaks can simply fuk off and deal with it.
Go after coffee or cigarettes or alcohol... shit that actually harms people, as opposed to a plant that has profound health benefits. at least that would make some kind of sense.
So then, being concerned about the effects of a bunch of stoners makes those that care "insane, dickhead control freaks"? Dope has no profound health benefits, unless you count being stoned a "benefit". This is the same argument that AIDS has. It was the first preventable disease with "rights" attached to it. You may well have a right to get high, but do it and harm someone due to your being an inattentive, stoned driver and I hope you enjoy PBJ and lose everything that matters to you.
Driving stoned can be as bad as driving drunk. When a stoner hits someone in your family, get back to us. Until then, you can simply live in your Leslie Gore stoner version of "its my body and I'll get high if I want to".
-
A good friend who knows I don't do drugs but can tolerate those who do gave me a huge marijuana chocolate bar wrapped in gold foil as a Christmas gift
I took one bite and laughed for 45 minutes because it had no affect on me at all and I knew beforehand that it would not work
Then he began to laugh and all four of us were finally asked to leave the restaurant
We all left that well respected steakhouse wth heavy doggy bags and grudging compliments from the mater-de.
-
So then, being concerned about the effects of a bunch of stoners
u'll have to clarify what that is supposed to mean.
Dope has no profound health benefits, unless you count being stoned a "benefit"
I do, very much so... you can learn all about even more exciting health benefits here - www.google.com
This is the same argument that AIDS has.
Idiot.
Driving stoned can be as bad as driving drunk.
no one should drive while impaired - that includes sleep deprivation and being a female.
-
u'll have to clarify what that is supposed to mean.
I do, very much so... you can learn all about even more exciting health benefits here - www.google.com
Idiot.
no one should drive while impaired - that includes sleep deprivation and being a female.
And alcoholics think drinking is just great too. Addicts tend to justify their addiction. "Idiot"? Okay, little man.
-
"Idiot"?
u bet.
-
u bet.
I never bet, pudenda. Keep in touch with yourself and I'll look for your stoned ass on the roads.
-
Republicans: '"WE WANT SMALL GOVERNMENT."
Republicans: 'GOVERNMENT, PLEASE TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT STICK INTO OUR OWN BODIES!!!"
;D
-
Stoners making excuses for being stoned. First sign of denial
-
I'm not here to stop anyone from "doing what they want to their body", but neither do I have to agree with it. Neither should I have to suffer the result(s) of their ignorance, bet it to themselves or others. Or in public. You ignore reality and think that just because someone thinks it fine to do something with their body, it is just fine to do so. There are consequences to be paid for. Don't believe me, just look at the ignorant bodybuilders of today. Coleman is a prime example of paying up for being stupid.
Oh yeah...It is, after all, "his body". When he runs out of "his" money, it will have to come from someone. Same with dopers. Perhaps the same government that you think should stay out of your private business should also let addicts rot by the side of the road as an example. In some areas of the country, men can claim to be women to use the women's restroom. If you had a daughter in there and she was raped would you be able to complain with a clear conscience? After all, who are you to question someone's self-identity and how they fulfill their sexual needs.
Pedophiles want to be pedophiles and claim it is not a choice but by nature. This is the same rote spewed by homosexuals for ages until it was finally accepted by the few who have power over the many. What will you say if some professor determines that a murderer is a murderer by their nature? Free them to be themselves? How dare you keep them from doing what their body demands, even if it comes at the expense of the civilized world.
Sounds like islam.
Some here that want to do disgusting things to themselves hate the police but will furiously dial 911. Sounds like you desire to be an uninvited grasper of cone.
What are you driveling on about? We get it, you had a family experience with drugs, now you think everyone who smokes weed sits home all day and is lazy and doesn't contribute anything to society. Okay, we get it. Welcome yourself to reality, as that would allow you to think more objectively about the situation. Youre like the 5 year old who had one bad experience with something, then paint all experiences similar to that one. I really don't want to continue debating with someone who can't think objectively and who is just going to rely on personal experience to argue their point.
-
Making something illegal rarely stops somebody from using a drug if they want to.
The people who argue against that are painfully and embarrassingly ignorant.
Alcohol and tobacco are legal, yet there is absolutely a stigma surrounding using (cigs and dip) & abusing (booze) those drugs.
People find out a guy is drinking at 10am and think "wtf dude... Whats wrong with you?", or see somebody smoking or chewing and think "fuck that stinks" "or fuck thats gross"... Same thing will happen with somebody using meth (at least in most countries... Thailand or japan, etc i dunno about), or heroin. A coworker learns Bob has developed a painkiller addiction after his shoulder surgery and it's understandable and gets sympathy, while 6months later Bob moved on to Heroin because his percs/oxys were cut off or too expensive and he's looked at like "he chose to be an addict" (not really. He chose to not be dope-sick & continue to function)... Same can be said of benzos.
No speed limit on the autobahn, yet do you see everybody doing 160mph? Nope. Narcotics are legal in Portugal and drug use/abuse has decreased and treatment has increased.
Bunch of fucking finger pointers here. Probably wake up teir wives at night talking in their sleep saying "hey you cant do that!".
-
Some of the most brilliant minds on this planet r blazed all day.
Yeah, It's like some of these people have never heard of Joe Rogan.
-
Yeah, It's like some of these people have never heard of Joe Rogan.
I usually like JRE, but he's not the best example to use when discussing pot. He tends to be a pseudo-philosophical dick sometimes and you cant tell him shit about pot. Eddie bravo is juat aa bad in a different way... Like they get stuck on something and the record just keeps skipping no mattet how many times you hit the needle. Thats the main thing i hate about pot heads. Like in high school, you get 2 or 3 stoners pointing something out they think is funny when it really isnt, but they're stuck on it while everybody else is like "are you done?".
I had an employee, a trainer, who'd show up weekend mornings stoned. There'd be a contest the day before and id be checking the pics/results online and he'd see and ask something and look at the pics and say "whaaa???!!" in amazement with everything he saw, like i was showing him how to time-travel or something. Everytime he was stoned he was like that... Fuck it was annoying. I have no patience for people like that or immature people in general.
-
Could you imagine a government ran by Coach, mass243, and The Scott?
Coach: Guys, I've called this emergency meeting because I've just clicked onto Facebook and read about an isolated incident in Glasgow, Scotland where a dog has ingested a small amount of the class-B illegal drug cannabis. This is fucking serious...do you know what’s going to happen in the US if this shit becomes available for anything other than medicinal purposes? WALLS!! THEY WILL BUILD GARDEN WALLS OUT OF IT! Dogs everywhere will be stoned; children will be getting it handed to them on Halloween! Junkie dogs and zombie kids will destroy muh free market!
Mass243: Ho-lee-fuk! He's right. That's what happened in Somalia - I seent it in a movie: walls of cannabis, gays bumming each other and looters everywhere. It was 'anarchistic' as fuck. I know hipsters (and most people generally to the right) like to argue about the philosophy of the 'mini-state', but what these classical liberals and dumbasses who embrace certain principles of anarchy don’t realise is that people like me will come along, redefine everything, throw in a few non sequiturs and then before you know it - boom! You're a banana republic!
The Scott: One such as I am inclined to agree. I don't drink, nor do I partake in smoking, and I certainly do not wish to have these 'dopes' near me when they are intoxicated and overcome with sin! What’s next? Allowing consenting adults to do what they like with their own bodies? Legalising prostitution? Blasphemy! Don’t they realise that it’s a slippery slope? Next on the agenda will be paedophilia!
Mass243: You're right. If they allow weed then what next? HEROIN!? INCEST!? Being gay used to be illegal - now look at the place!
Coach: Lol, libtard Marxists on Facebook are asking me if I've bothered to read up about any sort of 'harm principle' or know the difference between positive and negative freedoms! Do you think we should entertain the idea of looking at economic arguments for legalisation? Maybe examine Portugal, or debate whether or not it might lower crime and reduce the likelihood of addiction?
The Scott: THAT SOUNDS LIKE ISLAM!! NEXT THEY’LL BE SAYING A MURDERER CAN MURDER BECAUSE IT’S IN HIS NATURE! MY BROTHER ATTACKED MY MOTHER WHEN HE HAD THE MUNCHIES!! I DON’T NEED ANY DATA! YOU WANT EVIDENCE? LISTEN TO THE PHONE CALL RECORDING OF THE INCIDENT:
(audio plays)
Operator: Hello, 911, what service do you require?
The Scott: I suppose one such as I might be requiring the police force, and no shilly-shallying!
Operator: Excuse me, sir, could you please talk in plain English?
The Scott: Ha! Typist. Is one bamboozled by my loquacity? Well, what one such as I am asking for is a police officer to arrive and prevent my brother from murdering my mother in a drug-induced frenzy!
(background noise)
'Where's the fucking biscuits, bitch? I know you've hidden them! WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE CRISPS?! I'M STARVING!'
'AAAAAAARRHHH, He's attempting to restrict my airway! Hurry, The Scott, one such as your mother is about to expire!'
Operator: Don't worry, sir...the police are on their way. (hangs up)
Coach: Sweet baby Jesus! I’ve heard enough. Ban it. Ban everything!
-
tbh i think coach makes a valid point here. take alcohol for instance, look at how many hours vets waste each week dealing with raucous inebriated dogs. you legalise cannabis as well and a lot of these vets will fold under the pressure.
-
Yo fuck your self, would much rather smoke up to alleviate pain or relax instead of resort to prescription painkillers like most bodybuilders
-
Could you imagine a government ran by Coach, mass243, and The Scott?
Coach: Guys, I've called this emergency meeting because I've just clicked onto Facebook and read about an Isolated incident in Glasgow, Scotland where a dog has ingested a small amount of the class-B illegal drug cannabis. This is fucking serious...do you know what’s going to happen in the US if this shit becomes available for anything other than medicinal purposes? WALLS!! THEY WILL BUILD GARDEN WALLS OUT OF IT! Dogs everywhere will be stoned; children will be getting it handed to them on Halloween! Junkie dogs and zombie kids will destroy muh free market!
Mass243: Ho-lee-fuk! He's right. That's what happened in Somalia - I seent it in a movie: walls of cannabis, gays bumming each other and looters everywhere. It was 'anarchistic' as fuck. I know hipsters (and most people generally to the right) like to argue about the philosophy of the 'mini-state', but what these classical liberals and dumbasses who embrace certain principles of anarchy don’t realise is that people like me will come along, redefine everything, throw in a few non sequiturs and then before you know it - boom! You're a banana republic!
The Scott: One such as I am inclined to agree. I don't drink, nor do I partake in smoking, and I certainly do not wish to have these 'dopes' near me when they are intoxicated and overcome with sin! What’s next? Allowing consenting adults to do what they like with their own bodies? Legalising prostitution? Blasphemy! Don’t they realise that it’s a slippery slope? Next on the agenda will be paedophilia!
Mass243: You're right. If they allow weed then what next? HEROIN!? INCEST!? Being gay used to be illegal - now look at the place!
Coach: Lol, libtard Marxists on Facebook are asking me if I've bothered to read up about any sort of 'harm principle' or know the difference between positive and negative freedoms! Do you think we should entertain the idea of looking at economic arguments for legalisation? Maybe examine Portugal, or debate whether or not it might lower crime and reduce the likelihood of addiction?
The Scott: THAT SOUNDS LIKE ISLAM!! NEXT THEY’LL BE SAYING A MURDERER CAN MURDER BECAUSE IT’S IN HIS NATURE! MY BROTHER ATTACKED MY MOTHER WHEN HE HAD THE MUNCHIES!! I DON’T NEED ANY DATA! YOU WANT EVIDENCE? LISTEN TO THE PHONE CALL RECORDING OF THE INCIDENT:
(audio plays)
Operator: Hello, 911, what service do you require?
The Scott: I suppose one such as I might be requiring the police force, and no shilly-shallying!
Operator: Excuse me, sir, could you please talk in plain English?
The Scott: Ha! Typist. Is one bamboozled by my loquacity? Well, what one such as I am asking for is a police officer to arrive and prevent my brother from murdering my mother in a drug-induced frenzy!
(background noise)
'Where's the fucking biscuits, bitch? I know you've hidden them! WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE CRISPS?! I'M STARVING!'
'AAAAAAARRHHH, He's attempting to restrict my airway! Hurry, The Scott, one such as your mother is about to expire!'
Operator: Don't worry sir...the police are on their way. (hangs up)
Coach: Sweet baby Jesus! I’ve heard enough. Ban it. Ban everything!
That was pretty funny!
-
Could you imagine a government ran by Coach, mass243, and The Scott?
Coach: Guys, I've called this emergency meeting because I've just clicked onto Facebook and read about an Isolated incident in Glasgow, Scotland where a dog has ingested a small amount of the class-B illegal drug cannabis. This is fucking serious...do you know what’s going to happen in the US if this shit becomes available for anything other than medicinal purposes? WALLS!! THEY WILL BUILD GARDEN WALLS OUT OF IT! Dogs everywhere will be stoned; children will be getting it handed to them on Halloween! Junkie dogs and zombie kids will destroy muh free market!
Mass243: Ho-lee-fuk! He's right. That's what happened in Somalia - I seent it in a movie: walls of cannabis, gays bumming each other and looters everywhere. It was 'anarchistic' as fuck. I know hipsters (and most people generally to the right) like to argue about the philosophy of the 'mini-state', but what these classical liberals and dumbasses who embrace certain principles of anarchy don’t realise is that people like me will come along, redefine everything, throw in a few non sequiturs and then before you know it - boom! You're a banana republic!
The Scott: One such as I am inclined to agree. I don't drink, nor do I partake in smoking, and I certainly do not wish to have these 'dopes' near me when they are intoxicated and overcome with sin! What’s next? Allowing consenting adults to do what they like with their own bodies? Legalising prostitution? Blasphemy! Don’t they realise that it’s a slippery slope? Next on the agenda will be paedophilia!
Mass243: You're right. If they allow weed then what next? HEROIN!? INCEST!? Being gay used to be illegal - now look at the place!
Coach: Lol, libtard Marxists on Facebook are asking me if I've bothered to read up about any sort of 'harm principle' or know the difference between positive and negative freedoms! Do you think we should entertain the idea of looking at economic arguments for legalisation? Maybe examine Portugal, or debate whether or not it might lower crime and reduce the likelihood of addiction?
The Scott: THAT SOUNDS LIKE ISLAM!! NEXT THEY’LL BE SAYING A MURDERER CAN MURDER BECAUSE IT’S IN HIS NATURE! MY BROTHER ATTACKED MY MOTHER WHEN HE HAD THE MUNCHIES!! I DON’T NEED ANY DATA! YOU WANT EVIDENCE? LISTEN TO THE PHONE CALL RECORDING OF THE INCIDENT:
(audio plays)
Operator: Hello, 911, what service do you require?
The Scott: I suppose one such as I might be requiring the police force, and no shilly-shallying!
Operator: Excuse me, sir, could you please talk in plain English?
The Scott: Ha! Typist. Is one bamboozled by my loquacity? Well, what one such as I am asking for is a police officer to arrive and prevent my brother from murdering my mother in a drug-induced frenzy!
(background noise)
'Where's the fucking biscuits, bitch? I know you've hidden them! WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE CRISPS?! I'M STARVING!'
'AAAAAAARRHHH, He's attempting to restrict my airway! Hurry, The Scott, one such as your mother is about to expire!'
Operator: Don't worry sir...the police are on their way. (hangs up)
Coach: Sweet baby Jesus! I’ve heard enough. Ban it. Ban everything!
You realize not one person read this.
-
Could you imagine a government ran by Coach, mass243, and The Scott?
Coach: Guys, I've called this emergency meeting because I've just clicked onto Facebook and read about an Isolated incident in Glasgow, Scotland where a dog has ingested a small amount of the class-B illegal drug cannabis. This is fucking serious...do you know what’s going to happen in the US if this shit becomes available for anything other than medicinal purposes? WALLS!! THEY WILL BUILD GARDEN WALLS OUT OF IT! Dogs everywhere will be stoned; children will be getting it handed to them on Halloween! Junkie dogs and zombie kids will destroy muh free market!
Mass243: Ho-lee-fuk! He's right. That's what happened in Somalia - I seent it in a movie: walls of cannabis, gays bumming each other and looters everywhere. It was 'anarchistic' as fuck. I know hipsters (and most people generally to the right) like to argue about the philosophy of the 'mini-state', but what these classical liberals and dumbasses who embrace certain principles of anarchy don’t realise is that people like me will come along, redefine everything, throw in a few non sequiturs and then before you know it - boom! You're a banana republic!
The Scott: One such as I am inclined to agree. I don't drink, nor do I partake in smoking, and I certainly do not wish to have these 'dopes' near me when they are intoxicated and overcome with sin! What’s next? Allowing consenting adults to do what they like with their own bodies? Legalising prostitution? Blasphemy! Don’t they realise that it’s a slippery slope? Next on the agenda will be paedophilia!
Mass243: You're right. If they allow weed then what next? HEROIN!? INCEST!? Being gay used to be illegal - now look at the place!
Coach: Lol, libtard Marxists on Facebook are asking me if I've bothered to read up about any sort of 'harm principle' or know the difference between positive and negative freedoms! Do you think we should entertain the idea of looking at economic arguments for legalisation? Maybe examine Portugal, or debate whether or not it might lower crime and reduce the likelihood of addiction?
The Scott: THAT SOUNDS LIKE ISLAM!! NEXT THEY’LL BE SAYING A MURDERER CAN MURDER BECAUSE IT’S IN HIS NATURE! MY BROTHER ATTACKED MY MOTHER WHEN HE HAD THE MUNCHIES!! I DON’T NEED ANY DATA! YOU WANT EVIDENCE? LISTEN TO THE PHONE CALL RECORDING OF THE INCIDENT:
(audio plays)
Operator: Hello, 911, what service do you require?
The Scott: I suppose one such as I might be requiring the police force, and no shilly-shallying!
Operator: Excuse me, sir, could you please talk in plain English?
The Scott: Ha! Typist. Is one bamboozled by my loquacity? Well, what one such as I am asking for is a police officer to arrive and prevent my brother from murdering my mother in a drug-induced frenzy!
(background noise)
'Where's the fucking biscuits, bitch? I know you've hidden them! WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE CRISPS?! I'M STARVING!'
'AAAAAAARRHHH, He's attempting to restrict my airway! Hurry, The Scott, one such as your mother is about to expire!'
Operator: Don't worry sir...the police are on their way. (hangs up)
Coach: Sweet baby Jesus! I’ve heard enough. Ban it. Ban everything!
Bingo. The amount of logical fallacies in their thinking is astounding. They are jumping from weed to America turning into Somali, to people who smoke weed are lazy all day, to incest and pedophilia will be legalized. Geez, talk about fallacious reasoning. Anyone can make a point by saying, "WELL, X MIGHT COME TRUE.....THEREFORE, I AM RIGHT." ??? ???
-
You realize not one person read this.
Ummmm...I read the parts about me and laughed. I have a sense of humor and can appreciate that a great deal of monkey thought went into his humorous little diatribe. It was kinda funny.
-
Bingo. The amount of logical fallacies in their thinking is astounding. They are jumping from weed to America turning into Somali, to people who smoke weed are lazy all day, to incest and pedophilia will be legalized. Geez, talk about fallacious reasoning. Anyone can make a point by saying, "WELL, X MIGHT COME TRUE.....THEREFORE, I AM RIGHT." ??? ???
And you tend to feel you're right. So then, what is the problem? We just disagree on a great many subjects. Big deal.
-
And you tend to feel you're right. So then, what is the problem? We just disagree on a great many subjects. Big deal.
The closes way, or the best way to be right, is to examine good evidence and come to a sound, critical decision based on the best available evidence. That is the difference--you think you're right based on your own opinion. There is only one way to go about examining truth claims. And, guess what, your opinion means little if you cannot critically examine the evidence. I am sorry that you think it is okay to engage in fallacious thinking and believe this is the pathway to the "truth." IF you care about the "truth" then you will care about using sound reasoning to examine the evidence. You don't care about any of this. You just want to have your opinion and ignore all evidence that challenges your worldview. So be it.
There is no evidence that legalizing weed will create a population of lazy people. I've already told you 100 times, that I know many professors who smoke weed and are highly successful. Yet, you still want to hold onto the myth that people who smoke weed are all lazy who have no jobs. Talk about shitty logic.
-
The closes way, or the best way to be right, is to examine good evidence and come to a sound, critical decision based on the best available evidence. That is the difference--you think you're right based on your own opinion. There is only one way to go about examining truth claims. And, guess what, your opinion means little if you cannot critically examine the evidence. I am sorry that you think it is okay to engage in fallacious thinking and believe this is the pathway to the "truth." IF you care about the "truth" then you will care about using sound reasoning to examine the evidence. You don't care about any of this. You just want to have your opinion and ignore all evidence that challenges your worldview. So be it.
There is no evidence that legalizing weed will create a population of lazy people. I've already told you 100 times, that I know many professors who smoke weed and are highly successful. Yet, you still want to hold onto the myth that people who smoke weed are all lazy who have no jobs. Talk about shitty logic.
You have your examples and I have mine, chief among them are the example of my late brother but I can assure you I have witnessed many more like that. And so we will just disagree. I will never think as you and I seriously doubt your mind will change. God forbid you experience what I did with my brother.
As for your closing comment on my "shitty logic", fuck off with that. What a total cuntlette you can be.
My pain is my own and as I said I would not wish it upon you, so quite being a whole ass.
-
You have your examples and I have mine, chief among them are the example of my late brother but I can assure you I have witnessed many more like that. And so we will just disagree. I will never think as you and I seriously doubt your mind will change. God forbid you experience what I did with my brother.
As for your closing comment on my "shitty logic", fuck off with that. What a total cuntlette you can be.
My pain is my own and as I said I would not wish it upon you, so quite being a whole ass.
I don't care about your examples. I care about evidence. Sure, I used some examples, however, there is no available evidence to suggest that legalizing marijuana will lead to the downfall of society. And since you and others are making the claim against marijuana, it makes sense that you would provide evidence--I don't care about anecdotal evidence.
It is shitty logic to use a few experience and think it is objectively the truth without sound reasoning. You continue to use anecdotal evidence. Who gives a shit about your experience when it comes to measuring the objective truth. You just want to be right, so will keep relying on shitty logic (your own personal experiences).
-
I don't care about your examples. I care about evidence. Sure, I used some examples, however, there is no available evidence to suggest that legalizing marijuana will lead to the downfall of society. And since you and others are making the claim against marijuana, it makes sense that you would provide evidence--I don't care about anecdotal evidence.
It is shitty logic to use a few experience and think it is objectively the truth without sound reasoning. You continue to use anecdotal evidence. Who gives a shit about your experience when it comes to measuring the objective truth. You just want to be right, so will keep relying on shitty logic (your own personal experiences).
My experiences are both subjective in origin and objective in nature. That you don't care for them is noted. Fine. Be a cuntlette. We have zero effect on one another in the real world and here we merely exchange not so pleasant pleasantries. Your desire to be acknowledge as correct is no different from anyone else's except you're a pudenda about it. We will never meet so the reality is I don't give an intercourse about your Wiggsian frailties.
-
My experiences are both subjective in origin and objective in nature. That you don't care for them is noted. Fine. Be a cuntlette. We have zero effect on one another in the real world and here we merely exchange not so pleasant pleasantries. Your desire to be acknowledge as correct is no different from anyone else's except you're a pudenda about it. We will never meet so the reality is I don't give an intercourse about your Wiggsian frailties.
Yes, and your experience is a total of 1. That is poor reasoning.To make assumptions based on a few personal experiences is SHITTY logic. Anecdotal evidence is the least reliable form of evidence, but if you want to continue using shitty logic, so be it. I guess as long as you feel that you're right. When you listen to academic debates, do you see them relying on their own personal experiences? No. Why not? Because anyone with good reasoning knows personal experiences are the worst form of evidence.
Again, you just want to be right because it makes you feel good. You have no desire for the truth about your claim. By default, that is shitty logic.
-
Could you imagine a government ran by Coach, mass243, and The Scott?
Coach: Guys, I've called this emergency meeting because I've just clicked onto Facebook and read about an isolated incident in Glasgow, Scotland where a dog has ingested a small amount of the class-B illegal drug cannabis. This is fucking serious...do you know what’s going to happen in the US if this shit becomes available for anything other than medicinal purposes? WALLS!! THEY WILL BUILD GARDEN WALLS OUT OF IT! Dogs everywhere will be stoned; children will be getting it handed to them on Halloween! Junkie dogs and zombie kids will destroy muh free market!
Mass243: Ho-lee-fuk! He's right. That's what happened in Somalia - I seent it in a movie: walls of cannabis, gays bumming each other and looters everywhere. It was 'anarchistic' as fuck. I know hipsters (and most people generally to the right) like to argue about the philosophy of the 'mini-state', but what these classical liberals and dumbasses who embrace certain principles of anarchy don’t realise is that people like me will come along, redefine everything, throw in a few non sequiturs and then before you know it - boom! You're a banana republic!
The Scott: One such as I am inclined to agree. I don't drink, nor do I partake in smoking, and I certainly do not wish to have these 'dopes' near me when they are intoxicated and overcome with sin! What’s next? Allowing consenting adults to do what they like with their own bodies? Legalising prostitution? Blasphemy! Don’t they realise that it’s a slippery slope? Next on the agenda will be paedophilia!
Mass243: You're right. If they allow weed then what next? HEROIN!? INCEST!? Being gay used to be illegal - now look at the place!
Coach: Lol, libtard Marxists on Facebook are asking me if I've bothered to read up about any sort of 'harm principle' or know the difference between positive and negative freedoms! Do you think we should entertain the idea of looking at economic arguments for legalisation? Maybe examine Portugal, or debate whether or not it might lower crime and reduce the likelihood of addiction?
The Scott: THAT SOUNDS LIKE ISLAM!! NEXT THEY’LL BE SAYING A MURDERER CAN MURDER BECAUSE IT’S IN HIS NATURE! MY BROTHER ATTACKED MY MOTHER WHEN HE HAD THE MUNCHIES!! I DON’T NEED ANY DATA! YOU WANT EVIDENCE? LISTEN TO THE PHONE CALL RECORDING OF THE INCIDENT:
(audio plays)
Operator: Hello, 911, what service do you require?
The Scott: I suppose one such as I might be requiring the police force, and no shilly-shallying!
Operator: Excuse me, sir, could you please talk in plain English?
The Scott: Ha! Typist. Is one bamboozled by my loquacity? Well, what one such as I am asking for is a police officer to arrive and prevent my brother from murdering my mother in a drug-induced frenzy!
(background noise)
'Where's the fucking biscuits, bitch? I know you've hidden them! WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE CRISPS?! I'M STARVING!'
'AAAAAAARRHHH, He's attempting to restrict my airway! Hurry, The Scott, one such as your mother is about to expire!'
Operator: Don't worry, sir...the police are on their way. (hangs up)
Coach: Sweet baby Jesus! I’ve heard enough. Ban it. Ban everything!
Hahaa,
ok this was quite funny ;D
-
my late brother
Whats the story with this dillnuts dead brother?
-
Whats the story with this dillnuts dead brother?
Scotty is a cop caller who called the cops and had his brother who was an addict put in jail for "threatening his mommy". Now he's dead.
Real stand up guy.
-
Scotty is a cop caller who called the cops and had his brother who was an addict put in jail for "threatening his mommy". Now he's dead.
Real stand up guy.
so.... how does that relate to cannabis?
-
Yes, and your experience is a total of 1. That is poor reasoning.To make assumptions based on a few personal experiences is SHITTY logic. Anecdotal evidence is the least reliable form of evidence, but if you want to continue using shitty logic, so be it. I guess as long as you feel that you're right. When you listen to academic debates, do you see them relying on their own personal experiences? No. Why not? Because anyone with good reasoning knows personal experiences are the worst form of evidence.
Again, you just want to be right because it makes you feel good. You have no desire for the truth about your claim. By default, that is shitty logic.
Aren't you doing the same? Personal experiences? You posted about professors, etc.
Course with today's "education" that could be a point for the other side :D
-
so.... how does that relate to cannabis?
Same way watching porn makes somebody a rapist
-
Weed is fucking great for responsible adults.I use edibles and they help me sleep and put me in a great mood.Simple as that.Do I drive when on them?no.I don't even go in public.
-
Same way watching porn makes somebody a rapist
i see.
-
Aren't you doing the same? Personal experiences? You posted about professors, etc.
Course with today's "education" that could be a point for the other side :D
You should read my other statements to him:
Sure, I used some examples, however, there is no available evidence to suggest that legalizing marijuana will lead to the downfall of society. And since you and others are making the claim against marijuana, it makes sense that you would provide evidence--I don't care about anecdotal evidence.
I acknowledged that I used some personal experience, but also stated that he is making the claim that legalizing marijuana will lead to X therefore the burden of proof lies with him.
Read more than one of my posts.
-
Could you imagine a government ran by Coach, mass243, and The Scott?
Coach: Guys, I've called this emergency meeting because I've just clicked onto Facebook and read about an isolated incident in Glasgow, Scotland where a dog has ingested a small amount of the class-B illegal drug cannabis. This is fucking serious...do you know what’s going to happen in the US if this shit becomes available for anything other than medicinal purposes? WALLS!! THEY WILL BUILD GARDEN WALLS OUT OF IT! Dogs everywhere will be stoned; children will be getting it handed to them on Halloween! Junkie dogs and zombie kids will destroy muh free market!
Mass243: Ho-lee-fuk! He's right. That's what happened in Somalia - I seent it in a movie: walls of cannabis, gays bumming each other and looters everywhere. It was 'anarchistic' as fuck. I know hipsters (and most people generally to the right) like to argue about the philosophy of the 'mini-state', but what these classical liberals and dumbasses who embrace certain principles of anarchy don’t realise is that people like me will come along, redefine everything, throw in a few non sequiturs and then before you know it - boom! You're a banana republic!
The Scott: One such as I am inclined to agree. I don't drink, nor do I partake in smoking, and I certainly do not wish to have these 'dopes' near me when they are intoxicated and overcome with sin! What’s next? Allowing consenting adults to do what they like with their own bodies? Legalising prostitution? Blasphemy! Don’t they realise that it’s a slippery slope? Next on the agenda will be paedophilia!
Mass243: You're right. If they allow weed then what next? HEROIN!? INCEST!? Being gay used to be illegal - now look at the place!
Coach: Lol, libtard Marxists on Facebook are asking me if I've bothered to read up about any sort of 'harm principle' or know the difference between positive and negative freedoms! Do you think we should entertain the idea of looking at economic arguments for legalisation? Maybe examine Portugal, or debate whether or not it might lower crime and reduce the likelihood of addiction?
The Scott: THAT SOUNDS LIKE ISLAM!! NEXT THEY’LL BE SAYING A MURDERER CAN MURDER BECAUSE IT’S IN HIS NATURE! MY BROTHER ATTACKED MY MOTHER WHEN HE HAD THE MUNCHIES!! I DON’T NEED ANY DATA! YOU WANT EVIDENCE? LISTEN TO THE PHONE CALL RECORDING OF THE INCIDENT:
(audio plays)
Operator: Hello, 911, what service do you require?
The Scott: I suppose one such as I might be requiring the police force, and no shilly-shallying!
Operator: Excuse me, sir, could you please talk in plain English?
The Scott: Ha! Typist. Is one bamboozled by my loquacity? Well, what one such as I am asking for is a police officer to arrive and prevent my brother from murdering my mother in a drug-induced frenzy!
(background noise)
'Where's the fucking biscuits, bitch? I know you've hidden them! WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE CRISPS?! I'M STARVING!'
'AAAAAAARRHHH, He's attempting to restrict my airway! Hurry, The Scott, one such as your mother is about to expire!'
Operator: Don't worry, sir...the police are on their way. (hangs up)
Coach: Sweet baby Jesus! I’ve heard enough. Ban it. Ban everything!
LOL - best post I've read in a long time
-
You should read my other statements to him:
Sure, I used some examples, however, there is no available evidence to suggest that legalizing marijuana will lead to the downfall of society. And since you and others are making the claim against marijuana, it makes sense that you would provide evidence--I don't care about anecdotal evidence.
I acknowledged that I used some personal experience, but also stated that he is making the claim that legalizing marijuana will lead to X therefore the burden of proof lies with him.
Read more than one of my posts.
You are claiming it won't when there are lots of studies that support it being detrimental to mental function, etc.
These are a few with just a quick search:
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2484901
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221171/
Neither of you can really provide proof for either side of the equation as it still hasn't been widely legalized/studied long enough to see the effects over time in the general population, but is it worth the "risk" to society by fully legalizing it considering what is shown by various studies? He seems to have more to back up his position based on what I've seen/read.
I'm not really on one side or the other, btw, but would tend towards not fully legalizing it or there has to be a strong regulation system which maybe that is what is being pushed for (legalization to general population but with regulations). It is odd how alcohol is permitted but marijuana not but that doesn't necessarily mean that it should be fully legalized.
I guess the main issue would be whether it is detrimental to the individual mainly or does it have a large effect on those outside that individual as well.
Plus it stinks really bad!! :)
-
You are claiming it won't when there are lots of studies that support it being detrimental to mental function, etc.
These are a few with just a quick search:
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2484901
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221171/
Neither of you can really provide proof for either side of the equation as it still hasn't been widely legalized/studied long enough to see the effects over time in the general population, but is it worth the "risk" to society by fully legalizing it considering what is shown by various studies? He seems to have more to back up his position based on what I've seen/read.
I'm not really on one side or the other, btw, but would tend towards not fully legalizing it or there has to be a strong regulation system which maybe that is what is being pushed for (legalization to general population but with regulations). It is odd how alcohol is permitted but marijuana not but that doesn't necessarily mean that it should be fully legalized.
I guess the main issue would be whether it is detrimental to the individual mainly or does it have a large effect on those outside that individual as well.
Plus it stinks really bad!! :)
I already know it will lead to personal consequences. That wasn't what I was saying. The claim that appeared to be made by Coach and The Scott is that legalization of marijuana will have negative repercussions on a grander scale i.e., communities and society at large. In other words, legalizing marijuana will create a society of deadbeats who are just going to sit home and smoke all day. That is what I challenged. Is there evidence to suggest that the legalization of marijuana will negatively impact society at large? (beyond the direct individual and perhaps some idiots who get in the car while high)?
But as you said, there is not enough research to suggest it will negatively impact society at large. Until such evidence presents itself that demonstrates a correlation, you can't say either way. Yet, politicians are making these claims, which is why its illegal. They shouldn't make a statement until the evidence is demonstrable. They are making the claim that legalizing marijuana will lead to a society of deadbeats, therefore the burden of proof lies with them. It doesn't lie with me (you dont have to prove a negative in science).
-
Dog ate a joint and folks STILL want to legalize?!
Absolute madness.
-
Keep making it legal for recreational use and you're going to see this more. Shitbags
'Stoned' dog bleary-eyed and barely able to stand after 'eating a joint while out walking'
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/stoned-dog-bleary-eyed-barely-10132164
Didn't bother to read thread and oh yea alcohol is wayyy better for society.
-
Replace the word "marijuana" with "guns" and then watch how your opinion completely changes about the subject.
-
Replace the word "marijuana" with "guns" and then watch how your opinion completely changes about the subject.
Truth.
-
Replace the word "marijuana" with "guns" and then watch how your opinion completely changes about the subject.
You're asking too much.