Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Shakh on June 24, 2022, 07:19:22 AM

Title: ROE V Wade
Post by: Shakh on June 24, 2022, 07:19:22 AM
OVERTURNED!!! :)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 07:20:30 AM
I busted out laughing when it came across the screen. This could be the biggest Lib meltdown since Trump won.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 07:26:51 AM
I busted out laughing when it came across the screen. This could be the biggest Lib meltdown since Trump won.

COULD BE? COULD BE?

I just posted a thread about this on the Politics forum. Now, let's see how much the goofs in DC really care about political violence and "protecting our democracy" now!!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: robcguns on June 24, 2022, 07:30:17 AM
Very stupid for states to say you have to carry a rape/incest baby to term. Fucked up people. Why should they make a decision for anyone?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Super Natural on June 24, 2022, 07:30:33 AM
 :D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 24, 2022, 07:34:05 AM
I am quite surprised they overturned Roe vs Wade. The court has been very timid about challenging established precedent and appearing to be "legislating" from the bench. This is why they did not overturn ObamaCare in 2012, despite it being clearly unconstitutional (the court dodged by saying it was a tax) as well as overturning the Chevron deference. They did rule in such a way that the Chevron deference will largely die in most cases. But they did not outright overturn it.

The other reason I did not expect Roe to be overturned was that it was based on the previous case of Griswold vs State of Connecticut in 1966, which largely established privacy in medical affairs. \

It is worth noting that Roe vs. Wade was overturned in the very narrow fashion that abortion was seen as simply not being an issue of federal jurisdiction. This means that abortion, as a political issue, is thrown back to the states. One interpretation of this is that any legislative federal ban on abortion would also be considered unconstitutional. Thus, abortion stops being a political issue on the national level.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 24, 2022, 07:34:46 AM
I busted out laughing when it came across the screen. This could be the biggest Lib meltdown since Trump won.
Get out the popcorn early today.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 07:49:37 AM
Very stupid for states to say you have to carry a rape/incest baby to term. Fucked up people. Why should they make a decision for anyone?

The counter-argument is that you shouldn't compound one crime (rape/incest) with another (infanticide).

WWE wrestler, Titus O'Neil comes to mind. His mother was raped by one of her uncles, when she was 10. She had O'Neil at age 11.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2022, 07:55:10 AM
The counter-argument is that you shouldn't compound one crime (rape/incest) with another (infanticide).

WWE wrestler, Titus O'Neil comes to mind. His mother was raped by one of her uncles, when she was 10. She had O'Neil at age 11.

 :-X
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2022, 07:56:40 AM
anyways, the democrats had 50 years to codify this into law and failed to do so.  Proof that they don't give a shit about their constituents.  Hopefully this accelerates their destruction as an entity.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: webstar on June 24, 2022, 07:59:12 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWBoOP-XoAA169P?format=jpg&name=large)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 24, 2022, 08:02:16 AM
The meltdown isn't even warranted as the majority of states are not going to outlaw abortions. If anything it will just be an inconvenience for women to have to drive to another state.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: SweetDaddySiki on June 24, 2022, 08:04:36 AM
Wrap that rascal cause you don't want to get her pregnant!

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Coach is Back! on June 24, 2022, 08:09:50 AM
Devout fake Catholic Nancy Pelosi is having a meltdown because less babies will be murdered
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: beakdoctor on June 24, 2022, 08:12:03 AM
Very stupid for states to say you have to carry a rape/incest baby to term. Fucked up people. Why should they make a decision for anyone?

Well thats just it. RvW is about States rights as much as it is about abortion.  Individual states can still allow it or ban it based on their governance.

Overturning it is simply saying that having an abortion is not a guaranteed constitutional right. But states can still decide.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on June 24, 2022, 08:13:33 AM
(https://c.tenor.com/vQvuT8CJ_pcAAAAd/lib-tears.gif)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 24, 2022, 08:25:39 AM
Devout fake Catholic Nancy Pelosi is having a meltdown because less babies will be murdered
She isn't supposed to be talking about this anyway at a press conference. The Supreme Court is completely separate from the legislative branch. She said something about what Congress will do about it. They aren't doing shit.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: robcguns on June 24, 2022, 08:26:14 AM
The counter-argument is that you shouldn't compound one crime (rape/incest) with another (infanticide).

WWE wrestler, Titus O'Neil comes to mind. His mother was raped by one of her uncles, when she was 10. She had O'Neil at age 11.

To me it would be a crime to force someone to carry a rape/incest baby. That’s disgusting. Kill it immediately as it will have its disgusting raping/incest ways like it’s father.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 24, 2022, 08:27:30 AM
To me it would be a crime to force someone to carry a rape/incest baby. That’s disgusting. Kill it immediately as it will have its disgusting raping/incest ways like it’s father.
They give rape victims the morning after pill.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 24, 2022, 08:30:27 AM

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/ElectricDecisiveBudgie-size_restricted.gif)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Grape Ape on June 24, 2022, 08:48:58 AM
hope it doesn't fuck up the midterms
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 08:49:49 AM
anyways, the democrats had 50 years to codify this into law and failed to do so.  Proof that they don't give a shit about their constituents.  Hopefully this accelerates their destruction as an entity.

Agree on this one. That the Dem machine installed Kamala as VP after she was thoroughly rejected by the voters tells you all you need to know.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 08:53:49 AM
To me it would be a crime to force someone to carry a rape/incest baby. That’s disgusting. Kill it immediately as it will have its disgusting raping/incest ways like it’s father.

O'Neil is a rapist now?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 08:56:39 AM
anyways, the democrats had 50 years to codify this into law and failed to do so.  Proof that they don't give a shit about their constituents.  Hopefully this accelerates their destruction as an entity.

Not to mention, the Dems also change the judicial filibuster rule, allowing confirmation of judges with simple majorities instead of 60-vote supermajorities.

And, to top it all off, their hit job on Kavanaugh BACKFIRED!!! Not only did they fail to keep him off the court, they LOST TWO SENATE SEATS in 2018. This gave the GOP the votes to spare to get Barrett confirmed, knowing that Murkowski and Collins would side with the Dems and vote her down in 2020.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 24, 2022, 09:14:25 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWBoOP-XoAA169P?format=jpg&name=large)
typical of a man to chime in on something that doesnt affect them
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 24, 2022, 09:19:41 AM
She makes pregnancy sound like anticipating an alien chestburster after being raped by a facehugger..

(https://i.postimg.cc/q7jvmRBG/FWAl-WEQXo-AEPJ1-P.jpg)



This one looks like she inhaled R v Wade.

(https://i.postimg.cc/t7Gy5rJL/FWB644-FXo-AETZko.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on June 24, 2022, 09:24:58 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWBoOP-XoAA169P?format=jpg&name=large)

Why is she upset,  based on her stance the last 18 months of vilifying the anti-vaccination camp. Your personal rights aren’t more important than the collective rights of the nation.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 09:28:31 AM
hope it doesn't fuck up the midterms

I doubt it. Dems were still struggling after the leak last month. Plus, inflation and gas prices are TOP PRIORITY. If anything, I believe it energizes the right. The conservatives now know that, if they get Trump back (this time with MAGA reinforcements in Congress), the wall, gas prices, and our economy will get back on track.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Grape Ape on June 24, 2022, 09:51:12 AM
I doubt it. Dems were still struggling after the leak last month. Plus, inflation and gas prices are TOP PRIORITY. If anything, I believe it energizes the right. The conservatives now know that, if they get Trump back (this time with MAGA reinforcements in Congress), the wall, gas prices, and our economy will get back on track.

Don't want Trump back.  Would rather move on from him and go with Desantis.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 09:56:20 AM
Why is she upset,  based on her stance the last 18 months of vilifying the anti-vaccination camp. Your personal rights aren’t more important than the collective rights of the nation.

People always had a choice about about being vaccinated.

With abortion there is no choice.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 09:57:37 AM
So true.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: beakdoctor on June 24, 2022, 10:01:40 AM
She makes pregnancy sound like anticipating an alien chestburster after being raped by a facehugger..

(https://i.postimg.cc/q7jvmRBG/FWAl-WEQXo-AEPJ1-P.jpg)



This one looks like she inhaled R v Wade.

(https://i.postimg.cc/t7Gy5rJL/FWB644-FXo-AETZko.jpg)

What a disgusting piece of utter bile. As if she has no control over becoming pregnant. As if her decisions play no role.

With a mug like that I don't think she'll have to ever worry about it. She looks like a fucking abortion and her inner thoughts mirror her disgusting outward appearance.

Life, the earliest form of life-even within the womb- is the most delicate and precious form and should be protected. That's my opinion.  I don't force it on anyone.  At the end of tge day if someone can sleep soundly with the decisions they have made then good for them.

But her kind of speak as if the life growing inside of her is less deserving of life than her own is so morally bankrupt she betrays even her own liberal beliefs.

The arrogance of these people to be so dismissive of life itself.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Coach is Back! on June 24, 2022, 10:04:02 AM
So true.

🙁

You’re a walking leftist talking point. Like all liberal Marxists one has absolutely nothing to do with the other. But keep making an ass of yourself, you’ve been on a roll since you gimmicked yourself on here
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 10:04:51 AM
Don't want Trump back.  Would rather move on from him and go with Desantis.

I disagree. Why get DeSantis beat up unnecessarily? I live in Florida and we need him for another term. ;D

Besides, it's like Apple phones. Why break out the iPhone 12 early, if you can still make profits with the iPhone 11?

Biden sucks so badly that Trump is now beating him in head-to-head hypothetical polls.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 10:18:07 AM
You’re a walking leftist talking point. Like all liberal Marxists one has absolutely nothing to do with the other. But keep making an ass of yourself, you’ve been on a roll since you gimmicked yourself on here

As I've mentioned to you many times I'm right wing.

I am also pro choice.

How can you argue for the freedom to own a gun but not the freedom of pro choice.

I don't understand this.

 :(

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 24, 2022, 10:20:53 AM
As I've mentioned to you many times I'm right wing.

I am also pro choice.

How can you argue for the freedom to own a gun but not the freedom of pro choice.

I don't understand this.

 :(



Right wing my azz.

You're a Commie.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Coach is Back! on June 24, 2022, 10:21:27 AM
Right wing my azz.

You're a Commie.

This ^^^
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 24, 2022, 10:21:32 AM
NOT A LAWYER, so pardon my naïve questions. I don't think ANY government should have ANY say as to what people do with their own bodies. I want to make that clear, but I also was curious about a few things:

If this was ruled by the supreme court, yet the states can enact their own laws regarding abortion, why is this such a problem? Won't it be much like Marijuana, in that at the federal level it's illegal, but depending on the state you can purchase/use it anywhere? I know that if you live in the wrong state (Texas) that doesn't allow abortions, you will likely have to drive somewhere out of state, but aren't there obvious workarounds?

Will certain instruments for contraception, like Plan B, be affected by this ruling?

I know this is more of a political black eye for the government and a SERIOUS hit to women's rights, but what am I missing in the bigger picture here?

Thanks...

"1"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 24, 2022, 10:23:02 AM
You can still just go to a state that has legal abortion and get one.

Any blue state.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Coach is Back! on June 24, 2022, 10:26:28 AM
Does this mean the left can define what a woman is?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Coach is Back! on June 24, 2022, 10:29:58 AM
As I've mentioned to you many times I'm right wing.

I am also pro choice.

How can you argue for the freedom to own a gun but not the freedom of pro choice.

I don't understand this.

 :(

You’re anti-gun and against people defending themselves, family and home with one, you’re pro - Trudeau, a Marxist and you support abortion and are more than likely an atheist
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 10:30:18 AM
Watching the news, I suspect that the Democrats secretly like this as it gives them a rallying cry coming into election season.

Lord knows they have nothing else to stand on.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: GymnJuice on June 24, 2022, 10:31:53 AM
This decision will be re-overturned once the trannies decide they want a right to an abortion.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: robcguns on June 24, 2022, 10:34:44 AM
O'Neil is a rapist now?

Who the fuck is O’Neil?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Grape Ape on June 24, 2022, 10:36:20 AM
I disagree. Why get DeSantis beat up unnecessarily? I live in Florida and we need him for another term. ;D

Besides, it's like Apple phones. Why break out the iPhone 12 early, if you can still make profits with the iPhone 11?

Biden sucks so badly that Trump is now beating him in head-to-head hypothetical polls.

While I think a lot of people's angst and TDS is self inflicted, we just don't need that kind of BS for another four years.  Desantis/Gabbard cross party ticket.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 24, 2022, 10:36:45 AM
As I've mentioned to you many times I'm right wing.

 :(

Hi there "Liz Cheney with a smaller penis"..  ::)

Youe as far left as ghey barry and michella gorilla, goofy kvnt  ::)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BB on June 24, 2022, 10:40:41 AM

Will certain instruments for contraception, like Plan B, be affected by this ruling?

Thanks...

"1"

As of now, no.

This is probably the best quick breakdown I've seen on the subject -

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/abortion-pills-over-counter-experts-see-major-hurdles-widening-us-access-2022-06-23/ .
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 10:42:52 AM
While I think a lot of people's angst and TDS is self inflicted, we just don't need that kind of BS for another four years.  Desantis/Gabbard cross party ticket.

Trump is the reason Roe is no mo'. He's delivered what candidate after candidate and president after president from the GOP has promised but failed to do.

Let's also remember the lower courts that Trump loaded up with judges that upheld the MS law.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 24, 2022, 10:43:32 AM
Lol at these feminist white-knuckled while clenching their pussy hats ever so tight
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: TheShape. on June 24, 2022, 10:46:12 AM
Last week they wanted gun control to protect children’s lives, now they are upset they cannot kill them?? The hypocrisy is madness. My body my choice and then they are pro vax mandate.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 24, 2022, 10:52:34 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/6QWPXp0m/FVn-ELxn-Xw-AAI9g.png)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: beakdoctor on June 24, 2022, 10:52:51 AM
As I've mentioned to you many times I'm right wing.

I am also pro choice.

How can you argue for the freedom to own a gun but not the freedom of pro choice.

I don't understand this.

 :(

Because they still have a choice, numbnuts, overturning RvW is not a ban on abortion you dumbfuck.

You can't understand it because you don't evetrouble yourself to actually know what the fuck you're talking about.

Its merely saying its no longer a constitutional right. States can andwill still allow it.

Think before you respond. No need to thank me for explaining it to you.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Tennisballz on June 24, 2022, 10:55:16 AM
The same pieces of shit that are crying about this are the same ones who supported forcing people to get vaccinated in order to work.  Now all of a sudden they don’t like being told what to do with their bodies when it doesn’t support their political narrative. 

On a side note though, I wish all democrats would get abortions.  It would save the world a lot of heartache.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: B_B_C on June 24, 2022, 10:59:08 AM
Got to admit Mr Trump  has won bigtime

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on June 24, 2022, 11:09:05 AM
Got to admit Mr Trump  have won bigtime

That's wrong.


"has won" is grammatically correct.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on June 24, 2022, 11:12:29 AM
Trump is the reason Roe is no mo'. He's delivered what candidate after candidate and president after president from the GOP has promised but failed to do.

Let's also remember the lower courts that Trump loaded up with judges that upheld the MS law.

Still delivering on his promises, even after his Presidency.

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQpHorsvi6889mIIGSKn5iiptccKaN1qSaMhA&usqp=CAU)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Grape Ape on June 24, 2022, 11:14:09 AM
Trump is the reason Roe is no mo'. He's delivered what candidate after candidate and president after president from the GOP has promised but failed to do.

Let's also remember the lower courts that Trump loaded up with judges that upheld the MS law.

I don't disagree with any of this.

I just don't think another 4 of him is best for us.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2022, 11:16:00 AM
NOT A LAWYER, so pardon my naïve questions. I don't think ANY government should have ANY say as to what people do with their own bodies. I want to make that clear, but I also was curious about a few things:

If this was ruled by the supreme court, yet the states can enact their own laws regarding abortion, why is this such a problem? Won't it be much like Marijuana, in that at the federal level it's illegal, but depending on the state you can purchase/use it anywhere? I know that if you live in the wrong state (Texas) that doesn't allow abortions, you will likely have to drive somewhere out of state, but aren't there obvious workarounds?

Will certain instruments for contraception, like Plan B, be affected by this ruling?

I know this is more of a political black eye for the government and a SERIOUS hit to women's rights, but what am I missing in the bigger picture here?

Thanks...

"1"

not everyone has the ability to travel out of state to obtain an abortion.  it can be costly in terms of money and time.  further compounding the issue are the laws passed by texas et al that criminalize traveling to another state to obtain an abortion.

finally, if you see it as a human right (as I do), you want to see that right extended to all.  Imagine if civil rights in the 1960s was left as "states rights" issue, it would never make it past the Mason-Dixon line
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 24, 2022, 11:16:56 AM
I don't disagree with any of this.

I just don't think another 4 of him is best for us.

It would be great for economy. Just the constant melting by the left was too much.
But it wont matter who wins if a Pub, libs are going to melt, attack, accuse, make things up, cry, etc...

Very retarded cult-o-pussies these phaggot whiny child-raping libtardz...
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 24, 2022, 11:19:33 AM
I don't disagree with any of this.

I just don't think another 4 of him is best for us.
Do you think there is a better alternative?
Keep in mind, that this is the internet age.

There wasn't, and will never will be, a universally loved President.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2022, 11:21:59 AM
the irony is, the democrats of today would never pass the Civil Rights act or bother integrating the schools.  They'd hail "separate but equal" as a pragmatic & fair doctrine and scold those pushing for equal rights as unrealistic and naive.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: TheGrinch on June 24, 2022, 11:24:48 AM
really don't see what the big deal is..... abortion isn't made illegal.. just means its states rights now


who cares?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 11:38:00 AM
I don't disagree with any of this.

I just don't think another 4 of him is best for us.

But, let's not let good be the enemy of best. Why have just one "MAGA" president when you can have TWO?

Squeeze out four more years from Trump; then roll to DeSantis!!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 24, 2022, 11:38:20 AM
not everyone has the ability to travel out of state to obtain an abortion.  it can be costly in terms of money and time.  further compounding the issue are the laws passed by texas et al that criminalize traveling to another state to obtain an abortion.

finally, if you see it as a human right (as I do), you want to see that right extended to all.  Imagine if civil rights in the 1960s was left as "states rights" issue, it would never make it past the Mason-Dixon line

Uhm...don't get pregnant.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 12:22:35 PM
You’re anti-gun and against people defending themselves, family and home with one, you’re pro - Trudeau, a Marxist and you support abortion and are more than likely an atheist

Not an atheist.

I’m Christian.

Abortions were common in biblical times yet there is no clear mention of them in the Bible being wrong or immoral.

What does that tell you?

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 12:24:30 PM
Amen!

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 24, 2022, 12:31:05 PM
They "care" so much about but can't define.





----------------

on another note

Your dollars to disney fund abortions.

What is stronger, your desire to ogle cartoon rats or not fund abortions...

(https://i.postimg.cc/1t0W8gHS/bxvxnxbxbxvbxv.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Grape Ape on June 24, 2022, 12:33:36 PM
But, let's not let good be the enemy of best. Why have just one "MAGA" president when you can have TWO?

Squeeze out four more years from Trump; then roll to DeSantis!!

Trump should have rolled to Trump, but it didn't, mostly because of his BS.

So rolling to DeSantis isn't guaranteed.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 24, 2022, 12:35:02 PM
I’m gay!

You certainly are.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 12:38:56 PM
Trump should have rolled to Trump, but it didn't, mostly because of his BS.

So rolling to DeSantis isn't guaranteed.

That's due to coronavirus, which crippled Trump's strongest asset: The economy.

Now, that Biden is screwing that up even further, all the good will he had on that (and handling the 'rona crisis) IS GONE!!

This time, Sleepy Joe can't hide in his basement; and THIS TIME they can effectively cover for him.

The Dems are scrambling to find a replacement for the Sleepy one for 2024.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 24, 2022, 12:44:38 PM
Coronavirus didn’t cripple the economy. Leftist politicians’ response to coronavirus crippled the economy. And now it’s even further crippled by the worst energy policy ever to exist.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on June 24, 2022, 12:47:37 PM
really don't see what the big deal is..... abortion isn't made illegal.. just means its states rights now


who cares?
x2 vaginas might care but my cock and balls doesn’t give a shit!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 24, 2022, 12:48:34 PM
https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679601.0;attach=1377346;image

But they should be able to forcibly vaccinate people and detain them in their homes?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: funk51 on June 24, 2022, 12:51:17 PM
   
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 12:51:45 PM
Coronavirus didn’t cripple the economy. Leftist politicians’ response to coronavirus crippled the economy. And now it’s even further crippled by the worst energy policy ever to exist.

And those leftist politicians (including Biden) will pay for that and pay dearly. And what better way to punish them than make their worst nightmare come true.......A SECOND TIME??
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: SweetDaddySiki on June 24, 2022, 12:51:55 PM
Waiting for the mass freakout.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: funk51 on June 24, 2022, 12:54:44 PM
 
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: funk51 on June 24, 2022, 12:55:58 PM
 

   
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: hardgainerj on June 24, 2022, 12:56:26 PM
I guess it balances it out you get to exercise your 2n admendment in areas that are going to have more unruly negroes
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 24, 2022, 12:56:54 PM
I'm pro-choice. But it is very difficult for me to sympathize with the pro-choice "karens" right now when they were so eager to throw out their "my body, my choice" when it came to the covid-19 vaccinations. It was the "my body, my choice" feminists who were most eager to throw into the camps anyone who refused the covid-19 vaccinations, like myself. I no longer have any sympathy for these people and I strongly suspect there are a LOT of other people who feel as I do.

By going along with the forced vaccination express last year, the "my body, my choice" feminists burned up all of their political capital for people like me over the past 2 years. As with liberals in general, they completely lack the insight to realize this. You know, a complete lack of insight is also a trait common to mentally ill people as well.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: GigantorX on June 24, 2022, 12:58:19 PM
Roe was a terrible decision. Abortion isn't explicitly or even implicitly mentioned in the Constitution thus it goes to the 10th Amendment and is decided by each state, its voters and their elected representatives to make law.

Pretty simple here.

Biggest change is now it won't be a huge fundraising point to rile up voters for each party.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 12:59:26 PM
I'm pro-choice. But it is very difficult for me to sympathize with the pro-choice "karens" right now when they were so eager to throw out their "my body, my choice" when it came to the covid-19 vaccinations. It was the "my body, my choice" feminists who were most eager to throw into the camps anyone who refused the covid-19 vaccinations, like myself. I no longer have any sympathy for these people and I strongly suspect there are a LOT of other people who feel as I do.

That would be me. Too bad bitches. Boo boo boo.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Walter Sobchak on June 24, 2022, 01:03:09 PM
Thank you Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

You now have a lasting legacy.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 24, 2022, 01:08:07 PM
Thank you Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

You now have a lasting legacy.
Who the hell are the kids going to look up to? Babe Ruth, Darth Vader, or any Berg in the Jewish dictionary.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: funk51 on June 24, 2022, 01:10:19 PM
   
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: funk51 on June 24, 2022, 01:10:58 PM
   

   
&t=31s
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: epic is back on June 24, 2022, 01:12:19 PM
so was this all a big nothing burger as usual?

can the babykillers still kill?

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 01:15:29 PM
Thank you Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

You now have a lasting legacy.


LOL, the egomaniac couldn’t retire and give up having her ass kissed.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 24, 2022, 01:25:44 PM
   


This video was made by Christians who are saying that 97% of all genocides were perpetrated by atheists.

They even quote Vox Day, who is a far right Christian.

The title of the video is the opposite of what the video is about.

You are promoting religion and specifically Christianity. Was that your intent?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Walter Sobchak on June 24, 2022, 01:31:38 PM

LOL, the egomaniac couldn’t retire and give up having her ass kissed.

At least she got to die in office.

Thank you Harry Reid for eliminating the filibuster and giving America President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court justices.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: youandme on June 24, 2022, 01:43:03 PM
Last week they wanted gun control to protect children’s lives, now they are upset they cannot kill them?? The hypocrisy is madness. My body my choice and then they are pro vax mandate.

Exactly!

Bunch of weirdos.

Save the children….but not the babies. Lol.

My body my choice…but you must take the vaccine or you’re a killer.

Want an abortion, get in your car fill it with $5.00 gallon regular gas that Biden caused and drive to your nearest blue state. Get your abortion and don’t drive back to the red state.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 01:46:02 PM
Because they still have a choice, numbnuts, overturning RvW is not a ban on abortion you dumbfuck.

You can't understand it because you don't evetrouble yourself to actually know what the fuck you're talking about.

Its merely saying its no longer a constitutional right. States can andwill still allow it.

Think before you respond. No need to thank me for explaining it to you.

Congrats.

Now that MATT CANNING is gone you’re officially the DUMBEST person on GetBig.

Hope this helps.

🙂

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 24, 2022, 01:50:26 PM
Congrats.

Now that MATT CANNING is gone you’re officially the DUMBEST person on GetBig.

Hope this helps.

🙂


Don't sell yourself short  ;)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: robcguns on June 24, 2022, 01:53:19 PM
You certainly are.

Hahahahha
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 01:56:20 PM

Don't sell yourself short  ;)

Are you mad I didn’t pick you for the title?

😆
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 01:56:41 PM
Next up, Gay marriage and contraception!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 24, 2022, 01:59:59 PM
Next up, Gay marriage and contraception!
Careful, us whites haven't got over slavery yet. Baby steps.

Forceps.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 24, 2022, 02:04:01 PM
Are you mad I didn’t pick you for the title?

😆

Yes , yes I am. But you still take the cake , enjoy.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 02:05:37 PM
Careful, us whites haven't got over slavery yet. Baby steps.

Forceps.


Us whites? Your lowly commoner ass and those of the likes of you have no power. Lolol
You don't even get along with each other in so many different ways. You're done
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 02:08:33 PM
Yes , yes I am. But you still take the cake , enjoy.

Gee thanks.

😉
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 24, 2022, 02:15:16 PM
She's not burdened by any non-pathological concept of aesthetics or respectability.

(https://i.postimg.cc/gJZj9ThS/FWC3up4-WYAEuc-Du.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: beakdoctor on June 24, 2022, 02:22:07 PM
The same pieces of shit that are crying about this are the same ones who supported forcing people to get vaccinated in order to work.  Now all of a sudden they don’t like being told what to do with their bodies when it doesn’t support their political narrative. 

On a side note though, I wish all democrats would get abortions.  It would save the world a lot of heartache.

Well thats one benefit of the trans community.  They essentially mutilate their reproductive organs.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 24, 2022, 02:24:24 PM
She's not burdened by any non-pathological concept of aesthetics or respectability.

(https://i.postimg.cc/gJZj9ThS/FWC3up4-WYAEuc-Du.jpg)

how did she get hold of hankys underpants?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 24, 2022, 02:32:41 PM
how did she get hold of hankys underpants?

And why is she wearing them backwards?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on June 24, 2022, 02:33:02 PM
She's not burdened by any non-pathological concept of aesthetics or respectability.

(https://i.postimg.cc/gJZj9ThS/FWC3up4-WYAEuc-Du.jpg)
Filthy pig!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 24, 2022, 02:33:25 PM
Filthy pig!

Hey! That’s my sister!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 02:36:14 PM
I guess it’s safe to say that, as of today, Libs no longer give an F about Ukraine.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on June 24, 2022, 02:38:47 PM
Hey! That’s my sister!
Let her know she's filthy.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2022, 02:40:40 PM

Us whites? Your lowly commoner ass and those of the likes of you have no power. Lolol
You don't even get along with each other in so many different ways. You're done

Wiggs is correct, interracial strife is a distraction intended to keep working class people divided, instead of uniting against the wealthy elite that rule over us all.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 02:44:12 PM
Wiggs is correct, interracial strife is a distraction intended to keep working class people divided, instead of uniting against the wealthy elite that rule over us all.

100% correct.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on June 24, 2022, 02:47:18 PM
100% correct.
No one cares about your opinion on abortion. Getbig wants to know about your involvement with BLM!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 24, 2022, 02:48:01 PM
The June 24th committee needs to investigate this:

(https://i.postimg.cc/8PcT6YK7/FWCMg-AMWYAMt-Rv-D.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 24, 2022, 02:51:29 PM
Let her know she's filthy.

Oh, I will, mister! She’ll hear about this!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 02:57:17 PM
Wiggs is correct, interracial strife is a distraction intended to keep working class people divided, instead of uniting against the wealthy elite that rule over us all.

They’re not mutually exclusive: Special interests with too much power, entrenched bureaucracies and Dindu lack of civility are all problems.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 24, 2022, 02:59:50 PM
I guess it’s safe to say that, as of today, Libs no longer give an F about Ukraine.

Ding, ding, ding, ding...Winning quote of the day!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 24, 2022, 03:03:24 PM
All things considered, will this not lead to civil unrest in the form of possible protests and riots?

Does it not seem feasible that if the Supreme Court made this decision against a woman's right to do as she pleases for her body, that tomorrow they will find a way to take away from a man's direct rights?

Forgetting that abortion is the key issue here, I think this whole thing sets a bad precedent that if we allow the Supreme Court (Government) to dictate what we can do to our own bodies, sooner or later, they will simply keep chipping away at our "inalienable" rights. Don't stop them now and sooner or later the train will be too far-gone from the station to get a hold of.

I have no horse in this race, but it's about the principle behind this ruling.

"1"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 03:05:57 PM
No one cares about your opinion on abortion. Getbig wants to know about your involvement with BLM!

Translation: Deadz wants to see if my opinion is in or out of line with Getbig status quo. Seeing how you stalk me (and now I stalk you  :-*) you should know my opinion on BLM. I've written about many times before but I'll play your game...

BLM was established by lesbians with the intent to destroy the nuclear family. Next, it's funded by scumbag billionaire and culture jammer George Soros, finally, if the group truly cared about "black" lives, they'd be trying to shut down abortion clinics, and stop black on black crime among other problems but that's not what happens.

So does this line up with my moral code? No.
I'm anti LGBTQ, anti BLM, anti left, and anti Democrat.




Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2022, 03:06:36 PM
They’re not mutually exclusive: Special interests with too much power, entrenched bureaucracies and Dindu lack of civility are all problems.

“Dindu lack of civility” isn’t making the policy that worsens our lives, the first two things you mentioned are.  Blaming other races for the problems in your life is exactly what they want you to do—you’ve already fallen into their trap.

You have far more in common w Wiggs, Vince, or any other Black man in America than with any of the bloodless fucks in our Congress.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 24, 2022, 03:07:26 PM
All things considered, will this not lead to civil unrest in the form of possible protests and riots?

Does it not seem feasible that if the Supreme Court made this decision against a woman's right to do as she pleases for her body, that tomorrow they will find a way to take away from a man's direct rights?

Forgetting that abortion is the key issue here, I think this whole thing sets a bad precedent that if we allow the Supreme Court (Government) to dictate what we can do to our own bodies, sooner or later, they will simply keep chipping away at our "inalienable" rights. Don't stop them now and sooner or later the train will be too far-gone from the station to get a hold of.

I have no horse in this race, but it's about the principle behind this ruling.

"1"

No such thing, all rights are a man made construct
the way the world works is very simple

You can do whatever you like, but if other people dont like what you are doing they will stop you.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 24, 2022, 03:10:05 PM
No such thing, all rights are a man made construct

Indeed.

the way the world works is very simple

You can do whatever you like, but if other people dont like what you are doing they will stop you.

Or you will stop them from stopping you by any means necessary.

Are we assuming that a revolution cannot occur? I can not fathom a better stage than the USA. With as many armed Americans as this country has, it has the perfect stage for it.

"1"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 03:11:18 PM
“Dindu lack of civility” isn’t making the policy that worsens our lives, the first two things you mentioned are.  Blaming other races for the problems in your life is exactly what they want you to do—you’ve already fallen into their trap.

You have far more in common w Wiggs, Vince, or any other Black man in America than with any of the bloodless fucks in our Congress.

You're on fire!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 24, 2022, 03:11:49 PM
Indeed.

Or you will stop them from stopping you by any means necessary.

Are we assuming that a revolution cannot occur? I can not fathom a better stage than the USA. With as many armed Americans as this country has, it has the perfect stage for it.

"1"

No man is an Island

To enforce your rights you need other people to help you

After any revolution you need people to make rules
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on June 24, 2022, 03:12:44 PM
Translation: Deadz wants to see if my opinion is in or out of line with Getbig status quo. Seeing how you stalk me (and now I stalk you  :-*) you should know my opinion on BLM. I've written about many times before but I'll play your game...

BLM was established by lesbians with the intent to destroy thenuclear family. Next, it's funded by scumbag billionaire and culture jammer George Soros, finally, if the group truly cared about "black" lives, they'd be trying to shut down abortion clinics, and stop black on black crime among other problems but that's not what happens.

So does this line up with my moral code? No.
I'm anti LGBTQ, anti BLM, anti left, and anti Democrat.
Don't believe your stance on BLM. Porn was good now it's bad. Cannabis was good now it's bad. Walking contradiction, liar , phony, never was never will be.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2022, 03:13:17 PM
You're on fire!

Thank you sir  .. Great minds think alike  8)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 24, 2022, 03:13:53 PM
No man is an Island

To enforce your rights you need other people to help you

After any revolution you need people to make rules

I know a man that can help...

(https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/587ad80e2a677fe11973b503/master/pass/giancarlo-espositoo.jpg)

"1"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: epic is back on June 24, 2022, 03:14:37 PM
All things considered, will this not lead to civil unrest in the form of possible protests and riots?

Does it not seem feasible that if the Supreme Court made this decision against a woman's right to do as she pleases for her body, that tomorrow they will find a way to take away from a man's direct rights?

Forgetting that abortion is the key issue here, I think this whole thing sets a bad precedent that if we allow the Supreme Court (Government) to dictate what we can do to our own bodies, sooner or later, they will simply keep chipping away at our "inalienable" rights. Don't stop them now and sooner or later the train will be too far-gone from the station to get a hold of.

I have no horse in this race, but it's about the principle behind this ruling.

"1"

do you abort unborn babies out of your ass when men are done with
you?

or are you currently pregnant and pissed you werent smart enough to use birth control
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: B_B_C on June 24, 2022, 03:18:02 PM
That's wrong.


"has won" is grammatically correct.

corrected
thanks

meanwhile
Mr Trump is unusually quiet about this winning achievement
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 24, 2022, 03:22:28 PM
do you abort unborn babies out of your ass when men are done with
you?

or are you currently pregnant and pissed you werent smart enough to use birth control

You know what, I banned you before for posting private messages and that's an offense you don't come back from.

Now, because you keep acting like a pasty fucking faggot, I'm going to ban you once more. The good thing is, psychology doesn't lie. Your rate of posting indicates that you have an addiction to this site and particularly in your attempts to combat Vince Goodrum. Now, I'll take away the needle and you'll be cold turkey'ing this bitch without any suboxone.

For as long as the internet exists, that little picture of you frolicking around like a pasty little faggot with the pink shirt, khakis and homo sandals will float around with your name plastered to it. The more and more people comment that there is the man that Vince Goodrum fucked raw for weeks on in, the more it will become an internet meme that any time coworkers or associates Google your name will show up for their pleasure and your complete annihilation. You will walk around the streets of Florida wondering who recognizes you as the fool who got penetrated by Vince Goodrum.

Goodbye faggot.

"1"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: epic is back on June 24, 2022, 03:23:04 PM
this is just to get the dems off their asses to vote

dems crushed themselves  with biden and socialism and they aretrying to find a way to keep dems voting dem, so they get them angry   such a con  but works sadly

people can still kill unborn kids all they want

the tv watchers believe anything they are told
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 24, 2022, 03:26:35 PM
this is just to get the dems off their asses to vote

dems crushed themselves  with biden and socialism and they aretrying to find a way to keep dems voting dem, so they get them angry   such a con  but works sadly

people can still kill unborn kids all they want

the tv watchers believe anything they are told

This

It’s so predictable. Every idiot women on Twitter making some moronic analogy and acting as though it’s the most brilliant thing anybody has ever said, “Rapists making the rules about rape.” Yeah, okay.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 03:26:43 PM
Don't believe your stance on BLM. Porn was good now it's bad. Cannabis was good now it's bad. Walking contradiction, liar , phony, never was never will be.

If you don't believe me, why'd you ask dumb ass. Here's the thing with you "Deadz". You want me and need me to be 2012 loser Wiggs because it was low hanging fruit. A guy down on his luck, going through trials and tribulations (which in hindsight I shouldn't have been so forthcoming on this board but live and learn) of life some self inflicted, some not, has opposing opinions to yours etc...

But when that same guy 2022 Wiggs cleans up his act, does better, your loser miserable ass spews BS like he's still that same guy because you got off on him being that guy and now that you don't have your weapons to use anymore and realize, this guy isn't the piece of shit, I thought he was. You can't handle it and don't want to hear it because to you a n##ga is a n##ga no matter what. Which really shows how literally stupid, shallow and what a loser you are.

Now you're the porn watching, dick beating,  pot smoking , no job having loser you always hated and you're old and miserable to boot.

See a therapist. You should be a lot happier. Learn to accept changes in people that are positive vs putting out negative energy.

Now go enjoy the beach and that lovely wife and son of yours and be thankful for what you do have.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: wes on June 24, 2022, 03:27:23 PM
You know what, I banned you before for posting private messages and that's an offense you don't come back from.

Now, because you keep acting like a pasty fucking faggot, I'm going to ban you once more. The good thing is, psychology doesn't lie. Your rate of posting indicates that you have an addiction to this site and particularly in your attempts to combat Vince Goodrum. Now, I'll take away the needle and you'll be cold turkey'ing this bitch without any suboxone.

For as long as the internet exists, that little picture of you frolicking around like a pasty little faggot with the pink shirt, khakis and homo sandals will float around with your name plastered to it. The more and more people comment that there is the man that Vince Goodrum fucked raw for weeks on in, the more it will become an internet meme that any time coworkers or associates Google your name will show up for their pleasure and your complete annihilation. You will walk around the streets of Florida wondering who recognizes you as the fool who got penetrated by Vince Goodrum.

Goodbye faggot.

"1"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Royalty on June 24, 2022, 03:32:42 PM
You know what, I banned you before for posting private messages and that's an offense you don't come back from.

Now, because you keep acting like a pasty fucking faggot, I'm going to ban you once more. The good thing is, psychology doesn't lie. Your rate of posting indicates that you have an addiction to this site and particularly in your attempts to combat Vince Goodrum. Now, I'll take away the needle and you'll be cold turkey'ing this bitch without any suboxone.

For as long as the internet exists, that little picture of you frolicking around like a pasty little faggot with the pink shirt, khakis and homo sandals will float around with your name plastered to it. The more and more people comment that there is the man that Vince Goodrum fucked raw for weeks on in, the more it will become an internet meme that any time coworkers or associates Google your name will show up for their pleasure and your complete annihilation. You will walk around the streets of Florida wondering who recognizes you as the fool who got penetrated by Vince Goodrum.

Goodbye faggot.

"1"

GOLD 😂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 24, 2022, 03:36:30 PM
You know what, I banned you before for posting private messages and that's an offense you don't come back from.

Now, because you keep acting like a pasty fucking faggot, I'm going to ban you once more. The good thing is, psychology doesn't lie. Your rate of posting indicates that you have an addiction to this site and particularly in your attempts to combat Vince Goodrum. Now, I'll take away the needle and you'll be cold turkey'ing this bitch without any suboxone.

For as long as the internet exists, that little picture of you frolicking around like a pasty little faggot with the pink shirt, khakis and homo sandals will float around with your name plastered to it. The more and more people comment that there is the man that Vince Goodrum fucked raw for weeks on in, the more it will become an internet meme that any time coworkers or associates Google your name will show up for their pleasure and your complete annihilation. You will walk around the streets of Florida wondering who recognizes you as the fool who got penetrated by Vince Goodrum.

Goodbye faggot.

"1"

 :D ;D :D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Royalty on June 24, 2022, 04:54:08 PM
▫️
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 24, 2022, 05:45:05 PM
Don't want Trump back.  Would rather move on from him and go with Desantis.
True.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 24, 2022, 05:48:06 PM
Amen!
Fuck Trudeau and you too.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 24, 2022, 05:54:27 PM

Us whites? Your lowly commoner ass and those of the likes of you have no power. Lolol
You don't even get along with each other in so many different ways. You're done
Are you claiming your kind get along with each other? :D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 24, 2022, 05:59:22 PM

Are we assuming that a revolution cannot occur?

"1"
Some are, some aren't.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 24, 2022, 06:01:37 PM
You know what, I banned you before for posting private messages and that's an offense you don't come back from.

Now, because you keep acting like a pasty fucking faggot, I'm going to ban you once more. The good thing is, psychology doesn't lie. Your rate of posting indicates that you have an addiction to this site and particularly in your attempts to combat Vince Goodrum. Now, I'll take away the needle and you'll be cold turkey'ing this bitch without any suboxone.

For as long as the internet exists, that little picture of you frolicking around like a pasty little faggot with the pink shirt, khakis and homo sandals will float around with your name plastered to it. The more and more people comment that there is the man that Vince Goodrum fucked raw for weeks on in, the more it will become an internet meme that any time coworkers or associates Google your name will show up for their pleasure and your complete annihilation. You will walk around the streets of Florida wondering who recognizes you as the fool who got penetrated by Vince Goodrum.

Goodbye faggot.

"1"
:D

Multiple post meltdown. This thread delivered some wing dingers! :D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 06:08:33 PM
Are you claiming your kind get along with each other? :D

Do I even need to dignify this with an answer?
I think you see my point. Your kind has a much longer way down and I've never seen your average American white this weak in my lifetime. Shizzo is living in the 80s.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Princess L on June 24, 2022, 07:52:59 PM
All things considered, will this not lead to civil unrest in the form of possible protests and riots?

Does it not seem feasible that if the Supreme Court made this decision against a woman's right to do as she pleases for her body, that tomorrow they will find a way to take away from a man's direct rights?

Forgetting that abortion is the key issue here, I think this whole thing sets a bad precedent that if we allow the Supreme Court (Government) to dictate what we can do to our own bodies, sooner or later, they will simply keep chipping away at our "inalienable" rights. Don't stop them now and sooner or later the train will be too far-gone from the station to get a hold of.

I have no horse in this race, but it's about the principle behind this ruling.

"1"

I am shocked and saddened by the above statements.  When does human life BEGIN?  It is not the woman's body.  It is another HUMAN LIFE she is hosting. 

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 07:59:52 PM
I am shocked and saddened by the above statements.  When does human life BEGIN?  It is not the woman's body.  It is another HUMAN LIFE she is hosting. 


So you’re ok with men controlling what a women does with her own body.

That’s surprising.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Princess L on June 24, 2022, 08:09:34 PM
So you’re ok with men controlling what a women does with her own body.

That’s surprising.

🙁

You fail in reading comprehension.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 24, 2022, 08:11:49 PM
You fail in reading comprehension.

So you’re pro choice?

😮
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Voice of Doom on June 24, 2022, 08:44:27 PM
hope it doesn't fuck up the midterms
Dominion machines have got that covered, amigo!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 24, 2022, 08:48:29 PM
Do I even need to dignify this with an answer?
I think you see my point. Your kind has a much longer way down and I've never seen your average American white this weak in my lifetime. Shizzo is living in the 80s.
Ahh, now I see your point my tranny loving friend. 8)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 24, 2022, 08:49:41 PM
So you’re ok with men controlling what a women does with her own body.

That’s surprising.

🙁
You were ok with men forcing women to get the governments covid poison injected in them.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: tommywishbone on June 24, 2022, 09:07:19 PM
Coronavirus didn’t cripple the economy. Leftist politicians’ response to coronavirus crippled the economy. And now it’s even further crippled by the worst energy policy ever to exist.

Bingo
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 24, 2022, 09:17:41 PM
corrected
thanks

meanwhile
Mr Trump is unusually quiet about this winning achievement

Not quite!

"Today’s decision, which is the biggest WIN for LIFE in a generation, along with other decisions that have been announced recently, were only made possible because I delivered everything as promised, including nominating and getting three highly respected and strong Constitutionalists confirmed to the United States Supreme Court. It was my great honor to do so! I did not cave to the Radical Left Democrats, their partners in the Fake News Media, or the RINOs who are likewise the true, but silent, enemy of the people. These major Victories prove that even though the Radical Left is doing everything in their power to destroy our Country, your Rights are being protected, the Country is being defended, and there is still hope and time to Save America! I will never stop fighting for the Great People of our Nation!"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 24, 2022, 10:40:53 PM
Ahh, now I see your point my tranny loving friend. 8)

I shouldn't be the guy you're passive aggressively upset with. You're getting sensitive in your old age or you've been in So Cal too long. I've wined and dined on only the finest vagine. 
 :-*
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 25, 2022, 06:41:42 AM
I am shocked and saddened by the above statements.  When does human life BEGIN?  It is not the woman's body.  It is another HUMAN LIFE she is hosting. 


Princess,

I understand your point of view. But realize that I wasn't taking away from the importance of a human life being carried within the vessel that is the woman. I even stated in my post that "Forgetting that abortion is the key issue here" this situation sets a bad precedent from a legal standpoint. I have no horse in this race.

I think it comes down to perspective. Do I value the unborn life that is in the woman? Yes, but in very few/rare instances no.

I have a cousin who was raped in NYC back in the early 1990s. She was walking home from work pretty late at night and a man attacked her with a resultant rape. She was practically unconscious from the sheer blows to the head while he was raping her. The next day she was found barely breathing on the ground by random strangers, who called the cops and she was then taken to the local hospital. They ran a rape kit at the hospital and they knew early on she had been raped. Detectives got involved and tried to help out. Following 10 days after her hospitalization, she was then faced with the harsh reality that she could likely be pregnant. She knew at the end of the month that she was in fact pregnant and she DID have an abortion. Do you think in this instance I felt bad for the "unborn" life? No. I felt bad for my cousin and rage against the rapist. That event was traumatizing enough that she tried to commit suicide twice afterwards. Imagine had she had the child and had to live with a reminder of that night for the rest of her natural life?

So, I guess context is everything when it comes to this and depending on where you sit it can go either way. Personally, I just don't like the government having a say with what any human being can do with their body. Forgetting the moral issue of whether a life sits in that woman's womb (that's a BIG enough issue on its own), I'm just leaning towards limiting what a government can enforce against basic human rights. My problem is that it can be about any issue regarding our freedom to do to our bodies what we want to do (insert things like: using cigarettes, getting breast implants, tattooing our eyes black, using steroids etc). Yes, the aforementioned pale in comparison to the major issue at hand, but realize that my plight isn't with the question of abortion (we can have an entirely different conversation about that moral issue), it's looking at what this government action can lead to next.

I'm sorry if you felt offended by my post. I love you.

"1"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 25, 2022, 07:09:36 AM
When the left can't control Blacks, they feel very at home breaking out the "N word" with the hard "R".

(https://i.postimg.cc/XJ4g8Ty6/FWC1-Sm5-Xo-AMA666634fp-X.jpg)


Oh, she was just making a point. Got it.

(https://i.postimg.cc/wBNdYsvQ/wrtwrtwtrwrtww.jpg)


(https://i.postimg.cc/256kZ52s/FWC1-Sn-IWIAAGQe-M.jpg)


Another one with the "point making":

(https://i.postimg.cc/Kv2ggnLC/ytyetyeyteyetyte.jpg)


This woman warns Blacks that racial slurs will commence because Clarence Thomas got uppity.

(https://i.postimg.cc/zDny5VM7/FWFQ7c-WQAMe-ERv.jpg)


This character is skipping the "high-tech" and going straight for the lynching.

(https://i.postimg.cc/15sfzy1Q/FWEHxi-IX0-AErp-Ge.jpg)

Q: The media will continue painting US Whites of European descent as "terrorists" but how will they treat Blacks if Blacks aren't useful tools anymore?

A: They'll turn on you on a dime if you're not useful to them.

If you're on the left, how would you feel about Blacks if they all thought like Clarence Thomas?   EXACTLY.

(https://i.postimg.cc/zXzKcCBK/FWGc3d-HUc-AAg0-Bx.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Princess L on June 25, 2022, 07:41:01 AM
Princess,

I understand your point of view. But realize that I wasn't taking away from the importance of a human life being carried within the vessel that is the woman. I even stated in my post that "Forgetting that abortion is the key issue here" this situation sets a bad precedent from a legal standpoint. I have no horse in this race.

I think it comes down to perspective. Do I value the unborn life that is in the woman? Yes, but in very few/rare instances no.

I have a cousin who was raped in NYC back in the early 1990s. She was walking home from work pretty late at night and a man attacked her with a resultant rape. She was practically unconscious from the sheer blows to the head while he was raping her. The next day she was found barely breathing on the ground by random strangers, who called the cops and she was then taken to the local hospital. They ran a rape kit at the hospital and they knew early on she had been raped. Detectives got involved and tried to help out. Following 10 days after her hospitalization, she was then faced with the harsh reality that she could likely be pregnant. She knew at the end of the month that she was in fact pregnant and she DID have an abortion. Do you think in this instance I felt bad for the "unborn" life? No. I felt bad for my cousin and rage against the rapist. That event was traumatizing enough that she tried to commit suicide twice afterwards. Imagine had she had the child and had to live with a reminder of that night for the rest of her natural life?

So, I guess context is everything when it comes to this and depending on where you sit it can go either way. Personally, I just don't like the government having a say with what any human being can do with their body. Forgetting the moral issue of whether a life sits in that woman's womb (that's a BIG enough issue on its own), I'm just leaning towards limiting what a government can enforce against basic human rights. My problem is that it can be about any issue regarding our freedom to do to our bodies what we want to do (insert things like: using cigarettes, getting breast implants, tattooing our eyes black, using steroids etc). Yes, the aforementioned pale in comparison to the major issue at hand, but realize that my plight isn't with the question of abortion (we can have an entirely different conversation about that moral issue), it's looking at what this government action can lead to next.

I'm sorry if you felt offended by my post. I love you.

"1"

Fair enough. 

The SCOTUS rules on the CONSTITUTION.  Nowhere in the Constitution does it say a woman has a right to an abortion. The issue is back in the hands of the States to legislate into/out of state law. 
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 25, 2022, 07:46:56 AM
The reality of the decision
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 25, 2022, 07:59:17 AM
The reality of the decision

Indeed. It was the wrong ruling to begin with. Liberals love federal gov’t overreach.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Never1AShow on June 25, 2022, 08:03:56 AM
Fair enough. 

The SCOTUS rules on the CONSTITUTION.  Nowhere in the Constitution does it say a woman has a right to an abortion. The issue is back in the hands of the States to legislate into/out of state law. 

In a properly functioning model of self-government, the Supreme Court would be irrelevant because the laws change with those properly elected by the only legitimate soveriegn:  The People.  The left is mad that they now have to justify their very extreme abortion positions or even bother to discuss it with the serfs.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 25, 2022, 08:07:12 AM
Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) has the most insightful comments about Dobbs:

A FEW MORE THOUGHTS ON DOBBS: First, it’s a big win for the rule of law — by which I mean not so much the opinion as that the justices stood firm in the face of unprecedented threats ranging from Chuck Schumer’s “pay the price” language to mobs and an actual armed assassin showing up at their homes. A Supreme Court that can be bullied is a Supreme Court that will be bullied. Unlike Roberts’ flip in the ObamaCare case, the majority here held firm, which will discourage bullying in the future.

Second, the likely result is that a few states will ban abortion entirely, a few will permit it for the entire term, and for most it’ll look something like Europe, with abortion easy to get for the first 12 weeks or so, and much harder after that. (The Mississippi law in question here, which allows abortion for any reason through the 15th week, was actually more liberal than many, perhaps most, European laws).

States won’t be able to ban interstate travel for the purpose of getting an abortion because interstate travel is a separate constitutional right. Congress will not be able to guarantee a right to abortion because its 14th Amendment power to enforce the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment doesn’t apply to abortion, which the Court has found isn’t protected under the 14th Amendment. It will not be able to either protect abortion or ban it under its commerce power because abortion isn’t interstate commerce, and is a traditional subject of state regulation.

It’ll take a few years to shake out, but we’re likely to wind up with what we would have had by 1976 or so if Roe had never been decided — a spectrum of laws around the country that will be adjusted over time based on experience and the views of the electorate. Though, of course, the norm may be stricter than it would have been without Roe, which called into being a huge pro-life movement that probably wouldn’t have existed otherwise.

UPDATE: It’ll be interesting to see if this reduces the flow of immigrants from blue states to red. That’ll be a measure of how much people actually care. To be honest, I kinda hope it does slow the flow.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 25, 2022, 08:18:45 AM
The reality of the decision
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679601.0;attach=1377418;image)

Because they saw the "right to privacy" stretch gasping for air, they recently started promoting abortion as a religious right in order to go the 1st amendment route.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 25, 2022, 08:19:33 AM
Fair enough. 

The SCOTUS rules on the CONSTITUTION.  Nowhere in the Constitution does it say a woman has a right to an abortion. The issue is back in the hands of the States to legislate into/out of state law. 
So, what we are heading towards , is another time in history when we are so-called "United" yet, each state has their own laws?

How does that usually end up working out? Are we going to devolve, into a loose group of city-states, that may or may not choose to unite during war? (Greeks)

Make no mistake, our country is as divided as its ever been. The mistake is thinking we have evolved passed another civil war.

We are just stupid with technology.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 25, 2022, 08:46:15 AM
As I've mentioned to you many times I'm right wing.

I am also pro choice.

How can you argue for the freedom to own a gun but not the freedom of pro choice.

I don't understand this.

 :(

Would you be pro abortion if a gun was used to terminate the baby?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 25, 2022, 08:54:22 AM
Not an atheist.

I’m Christian.

Abortions were common in biblical times yet there is no clear mention of them in the Bible being wrong or immoral.

What does that tell you?

I’m gonna ask you a question

Who is Jesus to you?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 25, 2022, 08:55:33 AM
I’m gonna ask you a question

Who is Jesus to you?
He mows my lawn.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Griffith on June 25, 2022, 08:57:44 AM
Outlawing abortions would probably lead to women going to backyard clinics instead.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 25, 2022, 09:24:01 AM
Are you claiming your kind get along with each other? :D

I was gonna say a black male has a 200% chance of being shot and killed by another black vs a white male
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 25, 2022, 09:51:37 AM
He mows my lawn.

Your thinking Oak
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 25, 2022, 09:54:19 AM
I was gonna say a black male has a 200% chance of being shot and killed by another black vs a white male
I love how when I bring up an obvious fact, you two try to flip it and speak about the obvious dysfunction of the relationships between Israelites in America. No shit. This goes without saying so lets talk about what's not talked about. You all fighting with each other over politics so much, it has fractured the country.

I'm independent party wise but I'm definitely Conservative. So I'll always side that way but my point is Ol Shitzo pretended it was 1985 and whites are gonna rally and do anything to "blacks". Those days are loooooong gone. You don't have the fortitude, will, money, leadership or teamwork to do any of this. I'm  not saying it to be a dick, I'm saying it because it's true.

Racial identity politics are old and outdated in this country. Ideas will rally people much more effectively in this country. We're gonna have to learn to get along based on ideas. Guys like Chaos and many others here used to dominating via race and American Way and Superiority are relics of the old order and as long as you hold on to these outdated, failed ideas will die with them. Keep in mind this is within America. Countries like say Russia where racial demographics are different and nationalism via culturally and racially have a better chance of "sticking" are your best chances for these kind of mindsets to be fruitful.

In America it's a dead end. I'll cooperate with other conservatives of all ethnicities to stomp out the leftist wicked scum to bring order to this country.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 10:31:56 AM
Spot on!!

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 25, 2022, 10:51:34 AM
Spot on!!

Are you gonna answer my questions?

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 10:54:41 AM
Are you gonna answer my questions?

Ask away!

I’m too lazy to scroll back 🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 25, 2022, 11:03:49 AM
If the establishment Conservatives were smart, they'd go after more conservative Black and Hispanics (especially charismatic ones) and put them more up front to be faces of new American Conservatism and change these old narratives about Conservatives and to a degree the Republican Party. This in turn would usher in a new era and many more votes and with those votes, change.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BB on June 25, 2022, 11:05:45 AM
(https://media.communities.win/post/qAQFPcMk1PMW.jpeg).



Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 25, 2022, 11:06:56 AM
(https://media.communities.win/post/qAQFPcMk1PMW.jpeg).

Mission accomplished. Now get a real job whore.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 25, 2022, 11:08:53 AM
I wish people would just stop falling for the same trick over and over again.
Its about dividing society and turning people against one another.

Its that simple

Nothing has really changed

The world outside is still the same
Go take your shoes off and stand on some early morning dew soaked grass and ground yourselves

"Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ziballz on June 25, 2022, 11:09:42 AM
The memes coming out of this latest liberal triggering have been amazing  :D


(https://i.postimg.cc/CxWp4c2k/tearsc.gif)

(https://i.postimg.cc/YCcw6XZg/6krl2y.gif)

(https://i.ibb.co/YTQhkCD/MjKuqtb.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/DgMFn49/both.jpg)

(https://i.imgflip.com/6ks85x.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/rFcxdJ1/abortion.jpg)


Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 25, 2022, 11:23:18 AM
AZ Capitol

Wasn't Ashli Babbitt shot to death for less than this?

Will the self-described Muslim that celebrated a non Muslim's execution have no outrage over this...


(https://i.postimg.cc/bJ1P4t5X/FWHPJW5-Us-AAL9qz-1.jpg)


She's referring to her self.


(https://i.postimg.cc/xd47g1jw/FWDb-QTEXw-AM-pgg.jpg)


She and her baby are 2 separate beings. Nothing to do with religion.

(https://i.postimg.cc/mkRSyvMx/FWDJir1-Us-AEctfa.jpg)


Abortion is a component of Gloria Steinem's religion. She's saying taking away abortion is taking away her sacrament.

(https://i.postimg.cc/3Jqv8MRK/FWEO1-R2-UAAAo570.png)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 25, 2022, 12:30:12 PM
The Left is completely unhinged. When they lose they destroy property and assault people. Right wingers strolling through the Capitol was an "Insurrection." ::)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 12:31:17 PM
😮
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 12:32:13 PM
🙄🙄🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 25, 2022, 12:34:47 PM
nice nonsense libturd memes, like they mean something   ::)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 12:38:34 PM
🙄🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 12:40:47 PM
nice nonsense libturd memes, like they mean something   ::)

Great comeback.

🙄🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 25, 2022, 12:44:22 PM
🙄🙄

Black Lives Matters.....unless the victims:

- Have assailants are also black
- Are located in the womb
- Have Rs by their name politically
- Wear police badges.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 25, 2022, 12:47:35 PM
🙄🙄
You still believe in the clot shot?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Wiggs on June 25, 2022, 12:50:52 PM
You know a long time ago our very own Coach, aka Joe posted something that has stuck with me for over a decade. "Liberalism is a sickness." When I began to look at it and them that way, I was able to understand that warped way of thinking and be able to predict their behavior.  Anyway liberalism is indeed a mental illness. It's in contrast to God's Law which makes it wicked and of the devil. This is obvious to those with a working moral compass.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 12:53:46 PM
You still believe in the clot shot?

Yes.

I never got COVID.

How about you?

🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 25, 2022, 12:55:52 PM
Yes.

I never got COVID.

How about you?

🙂
Yeah, I've had it, so what? Family members who have gotten the jab along with 3 boosters also have gotten Covid.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 25, 2022, 01:03:14 PM
Just because the left are effeminate liars, doesn't mean they're not violent airheads:

What's wrong with these hateful stooges.... ???

(https://i.postimg.cc/bwXJJk75/FWEHx-Wp-X0-AECHxs-1.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/sxkVMCNW/FWEJr7k-Xw-AAt-Bs-K.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/zfzqbj0x/FWEO-OXWIAIg7ij.jpg)


(https://i.postimg.cc/Vkyq8SDf/FWEIz-Cw-X0-AEb-Xxd.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/Dzw8knkf/FWEJgpb-WQAEGq8-V.jpg)

(https://postimg.cc/vcBMj81p)

(https://i.postimg.cc/2Sz5hr5d/FWEN4dy-Xo-AEgp-Kq.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/ncfrVvbP/FWENBTYXg-AUu3u.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/3xnxZVys/FWEOt41-Xg-AAQy-Er.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 01:05:13 PM
Yeah, I've had it, so what? Family members who have gotten the jab along with 3 boosters also have gotten Covid.

That's not good.

The virus will be in your body for the rest of your life now.


 :(
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 25, 2022, 01:48:38 PM
Spot on!!
You seemed to enjoy the governments opinion when it swayed in your favor.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 25, 2022, 01:51:22 PM
I shouldn't be the guy you're passive aggressively upset with. You're getting sensitive in your old age or you've been in So Cal too long. I've wined and dined on only the finest vagine. 
 :-*
I am an anomaly in SoCal! You've been around long enough to know I lack the passive in passive aggressive. ;D
The way your post read came across like an insinuation,  so I asked for a clarification.  You clarified, end of. Hope you're well my chocolaty hebrew. 8)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 02:50:33 PM

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 25, 2022, 03:08:14 PM
Contraceptives, and common sense are still in place.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 03:12:05 PM
Contraceptives, and common sense are still in place.

Not for long.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 25, 2022, 03:19:00 PM
Not for long.

🙁

Are you wearing your pussy hat while reading “The Hill”?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 25, 2022, 03:20:47 PM
We already have an abundance of children, around the world, that don't have families and lack basic care.

Now, we are going to make this worse?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 03:37:05 PM
We already have an abundance of children, around the world, that don't have families and lack basic care.

Now, we are going to make this worse?

Abortions don’t stop women from having children. It just delays childbirth to a better time in their life (ie. when they are no longer young broke teenagers).

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 25, 2022, 03:39:36 PM
Abortions don’t stop women from having children. It just delays childbirth to a better time in their life (ie. when they are no longer young broke teenagers).
"Abortions don't stop women from having children" ....

Yes, they do.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: mphgrove on June 25, 2022, 04:05:09 PM
Not quite!

"Today’s decision, which is the biggest WIN for LIFE in a generation, along with other decisions that have been announced recently, were only made possible because I delivered everything as promised, including nominating and getting three highly respected and strong Constitutionalists confirmed to the United States Supreme Court. It was my great honor to do so! I did not cave to the Radical Left Democrats, their partners in the Fake News Media, or the RINOs who are likewise the true, but silent, enemy of the people. These major Victories prove that even though the Radical Left is doing everything in their power to destroy our Country, your Rights are being protected, the Country is being defended, and there is still hope and time to Save America! I will never stop fighting for the Great People of our Nation!"

True, for better or worse, Trump is fully consistent on this. The one who is squirming is Ron DeSantis. He is between a rock and a hard place on this one, given the way the nation leans.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: B_B_C on June 25, 2022, 04:13:30 PM
Contraceptives, and common sense are still in place.

but not always in the same place at the same time
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 25, 2022, 04:31:59 PM
Spot on!!

You cannot be for the various covid-19 lockdowns and vaccine mandates and for personal liberty as well.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 25, 2022, 04:38:13 PM
Spot on!!
That's an across the pond term.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 04:41:53 PM
That's an across the pond term.

Is it?

I thought it was a GetBig term.

😆
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 04:42:55 PM
"Abortions don't stop women from having children" ....

Yes, they do.

I stand corrected!

I think we’re on the same side here though.

🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 25, 2022, 04:44:25 PM
I stand corrected!

I think we’re on the same side here though.

🙂
Same side of What? I'm transparent.

Not trans....
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 04:52:15 PM
Same side of What? I'm transparent.

Not trans....

LOL

On the Row v Wade debate.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 04:54:12 PM
You cannot be for the various covid-19 lockdowns and vaccine mandates and for personal liberty as well.

Of course I can.

EVERYONE was given a choice if they wanted to be vaccinated or not.

Abortion…..not so much.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 25, 2022, 04:57:11 PM
True, for better or worse, Trump is fully consistent on this. The one who is squirming is Ron DeSantis. He is between a rock and a hard place on this one, given the way the nation leans.

I don't think DeSantis is squirming at all. Again, why let the left beat on him unnecessarily, if you can squeeze another 4 years out of Trump?

Save DeSantis for 2028. Plus, I still want him as FL's governor, especially after he slapped Orange County mayor, Jerry Demings, and kept him from turning Orlando into NYC or Chicago during the 2020 lockdowns.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 25, 2022, 05:05:36 PM
If you were trying to force a needle in my arm last year, then I don't want to hear you say "my body, my choice" now.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 05:48:31 PM
That’s for sure!

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 06:02:52 PM
If you were trying to force a needle in my arm last year, then I don't want to hear you say "my body, my choice" now.

I see what you’re saying.

🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 25, 2022, 06:30:47 PM
I'm both pro-choice and anti mandatory vaccination.

So, I am consistently pro-liberty.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 06:45:26 PM
I'm both pro-choice and anti mandatory vaccination.

So, I am consistently pro-liberty.

Vaccines were never “mandatory” so your post makes ABSOLUTELY no sense.

Hope this helps.

🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Hypertrophy on June 25, 2022, 06:59:28 PM
Vaccines were never “mandatory” so your post makes ABSOLUTELY no sense.

Hope this helps.

🙂


Say what? If you were a federal employee in the US they certainly were, and still are. I was approached by the Department of Energy last year for a research project at the Savannah River Site (South Carolina). But only on the condition that I got the mandatory vaccination. I passed.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/09/09/executive-order-on-requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees/




Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 07:08:59 PM

Say what? If you were a federal employee in the US they certainly were, and still are. I was approached by the Department of Energy last year for a research project at the Savannah River Site (South Carolina). But only on the condition that I got the mandatory vaccination. I passed.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/09/09/executive-order-on-requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees/

You had a choice. You chose not to get vaccinated.

Mandatory vaccination means it is required by law.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: mphgrove on June 25, 2022, 07:30:20 PM
I don't think DeSantis is squirming at all. Again, why let the left beat on him unnecessarily, if you can squeeze another 4 years out of Trump?

Save DeSantis for 2028. Plus, I still want him as FL's governor, especially after he slapped Orange County mayor, Jerry Demings, and kept him from turning Orlando into NYC or Chicago during the 2020 lockdowns.


Four more years of Trump is highly unlikely, especially now. DeSantis, however has a good chance in either 2024 or 2028, whichever. But the abortion issue, just like the economy (and unlike all the investigations, etc), will not go away because it is an everyday matter which will stay in the news and actually be more and more visible as it gets more and more restricted. This presents a real dilemma for DeSantis. But he’s a clever guy, maybe he will figure out how to walk that tightrope. But life just got a lot more complicated for him yesterday.

DeSantis needs to keep the focus on the economy and many unpopular positions of the Left. But abortion will be an Achilles Heel.  A strong pro-life position most likely presents little risk in Florida where he is popular, but it will be a big problem in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Virginia, etc (even Georgia) in 2024 or 2028, states where he is not well known yet. Just watch him try to skirt around this and change the subject (my prediction)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 25, 2022, 09:04:19 PM
Of course I can.

EVERYONE was given a choice if they wanted to be vaccinated or not.

Abortion…..not so much.

🙁

Aborted babies have a choice?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Notomorrow on June 25, 2022, 09:16:49 PM
Marijuana is Federally illegal as well yet is does nothing to prevent states from making Marijuana legal. The Federal government is no longer representative of the people and has become a pure figurehead.  Time to move to pure states rights. Now states can have control through the votes of the people. California will always have legal abortion, but if some Conservative states majority doesn't want it, ban it and women that want it can go to California on an abortion vacation. The country is fractured beyond repair and the states need to de facto secede and let state by state vote in their own laws. We can still call it the USA but we are not a united country. It's over.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 09:19:11 PM
Aborted babies have a choice?

I don’t believe they are capable of making a choice.

If you believe differently can you explain?



Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 25, 2022, 09:31:19 PM

Four more years of Trump is highly unlikely, especially now. DeSantis, however has a good chance in either 2024 or 2028, whichever. But the abortion issue, just like the economy (and unlike all the investigations, etc), will not go away because it is an everyday matter which will stay in the news and actually be more and more visible as it gets more and more restricted. This presents a real dilemma for DeSantis. But he’s a clever guy, maybe he will figure out how to walk that tightrope. But life just got a lot more complicated for him yesterday.

DeSantis needs to keep the focus on the economy and many unpopular positions of the Left. But abortion will be an Achilles Heel.  A strong pro-life position most likely presents little risk in Florida where he is popular, but it will be a big problem in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Virginia, etc (even Georgia) in 2024 or 2028, states where he is not well known yet. Just watch him try to skirt around this and change the subject (my prediction)

But, Trump won most of the states you mentioned in 2016, when he flat-out stated, he'd appoint judges who are pro-life and would reverse Roe.

With Biden's utter buffoonery, which will have the Dems getting skinned alive, coupled with Trump handing the right the BIGGEST political win ever, The Donald is quite viable.

We all know that, no matter who the GOP selects, the media will paint him to be Satan-incarnate. A rematch in 2024 would be president vs president. Biden has squandered virtually all the good will he had (deservedly so or not), when it came to handling coronavirus, the economy, or bringing the country back to "normal".

And Trump crushes everybody else the Dems can put up, if they decide to abandon Sleepy Joe.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Flexacon on June 25, 2022, 10:01:03 PM
I haven't followed this particular news thread and who is doing what exactly, but it's mid-term elections this year right.

I would bet whatever is going on with this right now, it is just being used as a tool to divide people across party lines and infuriate them into voting later this year.

Maybe someone can piece it all together. When it comes to voters who exactly will this mobilize? Who stands to gain from all this come the mid terms.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 25, 2022, 10:14:23 PM
Nailed it!

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Tapeworm on June 25, 2022, 11:07:16 PM
Not reading 9 pages.


At least now both sides are fed up with government interference in their lives. Leftists were getting awfully Statist and this is a welcome antidote. So instead of arguing about what the government should make people do let's agree it's time for the government to just butt out.

You get your guns, they get their abortions. Maybe other people would be doing things you don't like but at least no one would be telling you what you can't/must do. That's liberty.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: mphgrove on June 25, 2022, 11:24:52 PM
But, Trump won most of the states you mentioned in 2016, when he flat-out stated, he'd appoint judges who are pro-life and would reverse Roe.

With Biden's utter buffoonery, which will have the Dems getting skinned alive, coupled with Trump handing the right the BIGGEST political win ever, The Donald is quite viable.

We all know that, no matter who the GOP selects, the media will paint him to be Satan-incarnate. A rematch in 2024 would be president vs president. Biden has squandered virtually all the good will he had (deservedly so or not), when it came to handling coronavirus, the economy, or bringing the country back to "normal".

And Trump crushes everybody else the Dems can put up, if they decide to abandon Sleepy Joe.

Looking at Trump, he won most of those states in 2016 then lost all of them in 2020 and has higher disapproval now than when he lost them. You are correct about Biden’s unpopularity so a Trump victory in a Biden/Trump matchup is a possibility. Your hypothesis is that Biden voters will switch back to Trump but I think he has lost those people for good. Maybe he can get a higher percentage of Latinos but the suburban women who are on the fence between Democrats and Republicans are gone for good for Trump, especially with the abortion reversal and possible fears regarding contraception infringement. But I admit none of us have a perfect crystal ball.

I just do not see Trump. But another Republican without his baggage is a strong possibility. But it cannot be someone like Pence who wants to make any and all abortions in all circumstances illegal. Abortion will absolutely remain in the news no matter what anyone says. And by the way, saying you will appoint conservative judges (back in 2016) and now having the abortion reversal actually take place are 100 percent different things.

https://www.usnews.com/news/elections/articles/2022-06-07/persuadable-voters-favor-gop-over-democrats-until-trump-is-mentioned-poll
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 26, 2022, 06:32:24 AM
Nailed it!

But the right arent murderers, this comes from the BLM/Black left.

Nice libturd meme you fucking jackass retard.  ::)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 26, 2022, 06:33:43 AM
Since Oak thinks memes are indeed facts  ::)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 07:42:09 AM
But the right arent murderers


🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 26, 2022, 07:48:29 AM
Abortions don’t stop women from having children.

This is probably the dumbest thing I EVER read on this site and that's saying a LOT
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 08:24:51 AM
This is probably the dumbest thing I EVER read on this site and that's saying a LOT

Abortions don't stop women from having children.

Think about it.

Get back to me.

And apologize.

 :)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 26, 2022, 08:32:39 AM
Ian Miller says it best:

https://www.outkick.com/my-body-my-choice-only-applies-to-roe-v-wade-and-not-vaccine-mandates-experts-say/

Key quote:

It’s nothing new for politicians and public health authorities to be hypocritical. But their ability to blatantly disregard the principles of bodily autonomy and personal control over health decisions just a few months ago means it’s impossible to take them seriously now.

It’s almost assuredly too much to ask “experts” and politicians to be intellectually consistent, but it’s yet another example of why trust in institutions and those that run them continues to deteriorate.


Please do not misunderstand me. I am not trying to undermine a woman's right to abortion. I am and always have been pro-choice. Instead, I am using this as rhetorical tool to attack the government's massive invasion of bodily autonomy for any reason whatsoever, including covid-19.

Unlike either the liberal left or religious right, I consider bodily autonomy to be an absolute, infinite value, not to be compromised for any reason whatsoever. Unlike either the left or the religious right. my world-view is 100% logically consistent by being 100% pro-liberty.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 08:45:24 AM
Ian Miller says it best:

https://www.outkick.com/my-body-my-choice-only-applies-to-roe-v-wade-and-not-vaccine-mandates-experts-say/

Key quote:

It’s nothing new for politicians and public health authorities to be hypocritical. But their ability to blatantly disregard the principles of bodily autonomy and personal control over health decisions just a few months ago means it’s impossible to take them seriously now.

It’s almost assuredly too much to ask “experts” and politicians to be intellectually consistent, but it’s yet another example of why trust in institutions and those that run them continues to deteriorate.


Please do not misunderstand me. I am not trying to undermine a woman's right to abortion. I am and always have been pro-choice. Instead, I am using this as rhetorical tool to attack the government's massive invasion of bodily autonomy in the covid-19 business.

Unlike either the liberal left or religious right, I consider bodily autonomy to be an absolute, infinite value, not to be compromised for any reason whatsoever. Unlike either the left or the religious right. my world-view is 100% logically consistent by being 100% pro-liberty.

I agree with what you are saying about "bodily autonomy".

However, "bodily autonomy" means that I have the right to protect myself from getting a deadly virus.

Restricting the unvaccinated ensures that right.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 26, 2022, 08:46:42 AM
I agree with what you are saying about "bodily autonomy".

However, "bodily autonomy" means that I have the right to protect myself from getting a deadly virus.

Restricting the unvaccinated ensures that right.

No, youre a scared retard, if youre scared, stay home and hide like a kvnt, dont restrict others w/ a brain...
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 08:51:41 AM
No, youre a scared retard, if youre scared, stay home and hide like a kvnt, dont restrict others w/ a brain...

This means a lot coming from the person who thinks the COVID vaccine will kill EVERYONE on the planet.

Hope this helps.

😎
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 08:54:30 AM
Ain’t that the truth.

🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 26, 2022, 10:05:21 AM
What am I missing here? It should be a cause for celebration. The states get to decide. No more overlords from D.C. getting into the mix.

I get it, it's a very fine line now. But we needed this jolt, if not for all of us to wake the Fuck up!

We live in a land of air conditioning and the internet, but we fail to realize, that we haven't evolved enough to compensate.

Do you want big government, or do you want a bunch of states to act independently?
We've seen how this can play out.



Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 26, 2022, 10:39:45 AM
I saw a beta male wearing an “Abort the Court” t-shirt today. I saw another beta wearing two masks in a Fairway Market.

We’re doomed.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 26, 2022, 10:45:10 AM
It's literally history repeating itself.

We will be in-fighting (literally) before long.

"Romica" will implode, because we are all decadent, and self-centered.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 10:57:01 AM
🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 26, 2022, 11:07:59 AM
🙁

And who said he was a rapist again? Oh, a cracked-in-the-skull white woman who claimed she was drunk at age 15......conveniently right before Kavanaugh was about to be confirmed.  ::)

I guess we should thank Blasé Ford, in a way. If she hadn't pulled that hit job, Kavanaugh would have greased to the Supreme Court. But, the Dems wouldn't have acted a fool.....AND LOST TWO MORE SENATE SEATS in 2018, which gave the cushion needed for the Republicans to confirm Barrett after Ginsburg died.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: mac33 on June 26, 2022, 11:08:37 AM
.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 26, 2022, 11:20:36 AM
And who said he was a rapist again? Oh, a cracked-in-the-skull white woman who claimed she was drunk at age 15......conveniently right before Kavanaugh was about to be confirmed.  ::)

I guess we should thank Blasé Ford, in a way. If she hadn't pulled that hit job, Kavanaugh would have greased to the Supreme Court. But, the Dems wouldn't have acted a fool.....AND LOST TWO MORE SENATE SEATS in 2018, which gave the cushion needed for the Republicans to confirm Barrett after Ginsburg died.

Libs are very dumb, insane people, who fail with everything they do and touch.
Is hilarious...  ;D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 11:21:36 AM
And who said he was a rapist again? Oh, a cracked-in-the-skull white woman who claimed she was drunk at age 15......conveniently right before Kavanaugh was about to be confirmed.  ::)

I guess we should thank Blasé Ford, in a way. If she hadn't pulled that hit job, Kavanaugh would have greased to the Supreme Court. But, the Dems wouldn't have acted a fool.....AND LOST TWO MORE SENATE SEATS in 2018, which gave the cushion needed for the Republicans to confirm Barrett after Ginsburg died.

Fair enough.

Innocent until proven guilty.

🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: mac33 on June 26, 2022, 11:31:25 AM
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 26, 2022, 11:52:16 AM
Just a reminder, OAK is Canadian, he's whining like a bitch about something that has no impact on him, nor could he change it if he wanted to. Fuck OAK and his useless opinion. :)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 26, 2022, 11:55:03 AM
Just a reminder, OAK is Canadian, he's whining like a bitch about something that has no impact on him, nor could he change it if he wanted to. Fuck OAK and his useless opinion. :)
I ask you the same question as I asked Coach....
Why do you continue to complain about liberals, yet live in Commifornia?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 12:20:57 PM
Sooo true.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 26, 2022, 01:26:44 PM
Sooo true.

🙁
Nobody cares about your opinion. You are entertainment fodder for the bored.

So true..
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 26, 2022, 01:42:52 PM
Nobody cares about your opinion. You are entertainment fodder for the bored.

So true..

FYI

I’ll be reporting you to Ron.

🤨
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 26, 2022, 01:51:22 PM
FYI

I’ll be reporting you to Ron.

🤨
FYI
Uncle Ron and I mock you on the phone, in text and at the getbig Committee meetings.

 ;)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 26, 2022, 02:13:24 PM
FYI

I’ll be reporting you to Ron.

🤨

You should do a weekly report, detailing the behavior of individuals on Getbig.💡
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Never1AShow on June 26, 2022, 03:03:11 PM
Just a reminder, OAK is Canadian, he's whining like a bitch about something that has no impact on him, nor could he change it if he wanted to. Fuck OAK and his useless opinion. :)

What is the situation on abortions in Casnada?  I heard today that while there are few law restricting them, as a practical matter anyhting past 1st 12 weeks is restricted because no one is willing to do them as the government only reimburses $200.  Any know? 

Is Matt C banned?  If so, plea unban as I think he'd be able find out and expound (at length).
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Super Natural on June 27, 2022, 05:14:21 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 27, 2022, 05:54:53 AM
;D
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679601.0;attach=1377912;image)

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/1a23ec339a054f4266b92020690b22e8/tenor.gif?itemid=4948835)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: wes on June 27, 2022, 06:06:36 AM
:D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 27, 2022, 06:09:35 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/sftPP1Wd/FWOc-Yw-XUEAA9-F3.jpg)

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 27, 2022, 08:26:01 AM
https://www.outkick.com/my-body-my-choice-only-applies-to-roe-v-wade-and-not-vaccine-mandates-experts-say/

As Glenn Reynolds likes to say. The past is no guarantee of future results:

Shot:

Vaccines are the best way to finish the fight against COVID-19. That’s why we will make vaccines mandatory for anyone boarding a plane or train, or any federally-regulated worker. This is how we will keep everyone, including our kids, safe and healthy.

    Justin Trudeau, 27 August 2021

Chaser:

No government, politician, or many should tell a woman what she can or cannot do with her body. I want women in Canada to know that we will always stand up for your right to choose.

    Justin Trudeau, 24 June 2022

Vox Day concludes wit this:

Quote
But the obvious contrast with the vaccine mandates is simply too recent and too stark for the pro-choice advocates to get any traction at all with a resort to their historical rhetoric. I suspect that’s why we’re mostly hearing it from female entertainers and a few low-wattage politicians like Trudeau rather than the narrative-reinforcing propaganda corps, because the massive government invasion of bodily autonomy inherent in the vaccine mandates has had the unintended effect of auto-neutralizing the abortion rhetoric.

You know, it is just too easy to poke fun at the liberal-left types. Even The Onion 10 years ago could not parody the liberal-left types as well as they seem to be doing to themselves now.



Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 27, 2022, 08:28:23 AM
;D
That's a nice shade of orange, for Princess L.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 27, 2022, 08:44:45 AM
The real life Handmaid's Tale

(https://i.postimg.cc/k5CB1Cb7/fyuyrqrqr.jpg)


vs the fantasy hollywood-conjured smear against western culture and men(and women) of European descent. Waging war by deception.

We get it. You hate western culture and humans of European descent.
We get it. You hate western culture and humans of European descent.
We get it. You hate western culture and humans of European descent................. ..................

(https://i.postimg.cc/J0MfvTQD/The-Handmaid-s-Tale-season-3-1146003.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 27, 2022, 08:58:21 AM
;D

Deal!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Super Natural on June 27, 2022, 09:39:31 AM
.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on June 27, 2022, 09:42:47 AM
Nothing has changed. Except that whores may have to travel now.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 27, 2022, 09:59:32 AM
I saw a beta male wearing an “Abort the Court” t-shirt today. I saw another beta wearing two masks in a Fairway Market.

We’re doomed.

No, they are doomed.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 27, 2022, 10:12:33 AM
Exactly!

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 27, 2022, 11:34:20 AM
Exactly!

🙁
(https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679601.0;attach=1377950;image.)

Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, was a proponent of eugenics who wanted to sterilize blacks and abort their children, because she considered them sub-human.

Your illustration is on target.  Bet you didn't know that, Oak.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 27, 2022, 11:35:43 AM
That's a nice shade of orange, for Princess L.
Men everywhere are crushed.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: MCWAY on June 27, 2022, 12:53:59 PM
Exactly!

🙁

So, why is it someone else's responsibility to take care of that baby, other than her and the dude that knocked her up?

Taxpayers have to now give her money to care for/chop up her kid?



Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on June 27, 2022, 12:56:57 PM
Posters still feeding the Joak troll.  ::)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ThisisOverload on June 27, 2022, 01:20:46 PM
Posters still feeding the Joak troll.  ::)

He's the best troll we've had in years. ;D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: oldschoolfan on June 27, 2022, 01:44:47 PM
Exactly!

🙁

I am not a liberal but I also feel it’s a woman’s choice and to much government overreach bad decision
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Ronnie Rep on June 27, 2022, 02:21:14 PM
Exactly!

🙁
This !!!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: 20inch calves on June 27, 2022, 02:34:06 PM
I am not a liberal but I also feel it’s a woman’s choice and to much government overreach bad decision

I'm not sure what the big deal is? It puts it back on the states to decide.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 27, 2022, 03:34:02 PM
I'm not sure what the big deal is? It puts it back on the states to decide.

Its not a big deal, just fun watching the whiny libz melt and riot because they didnt get their way.
All ugly kvnts, unsure who is fukking them anyways. Man-bun half-gender retardz?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on June 27, 2022, 03:54:29 PM
Women on Why They're Stocking Up on the Morning-After Pill

https://www.yahoo.com/news/women-why-theyre-stocking-morning-182353819.html
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 27, 2022, 05:01:43 PM
Seems like it.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ThisisOverload on June 27, 2022, 05:13:24 PM
Seems like it.

🙁

 ;D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 27, 2022, 05:35:49 PM
If you want to see the black nurse Rachet, Annie Wilkes in Misery, Leona Helmsley, watch this: https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1541549352136675336
 (https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1541549352136675336)

If you don't, watch this rocket scientist:






On a side note, I heard someone say Rosie O'Donnell is going on a sex strike.

(https://i.postimg.cc/dDPYLvMh/FWRNar-UUYAEp-S05.jpg)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Below)She explains why many lost tolerance for the "pro-choice" movement.

It's, historically, not knowing when to stop.  They said it's about gay marriage and it became drag strippers for kids, trans kids, and eventually the P will be added to LGTB+. Not to mention rainbow flags replacing national flags.

Same with how "safe and rare" changed to late, late term abortions, and worse....





How to say a country has been conquered without saying a country's been conquered:

(https://i.postimg.cc/0N2FcrPY/FWNWSZAWQAARog2.jpg)


Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 27, 2022, 06:43:38 PM


How to say a country has been conquered without saying a country's been conquered:

(https://i.postimg.cc/0N2FcrPY/FWNWSZAWQAARog2.jpg)
Looks like a Nazi Germany parade.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 28, 2022, 12:55:51 PM
Good point!

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ThisisOverload on June 28, 2022, 01:26:57 PM
Good point!

🙁

 ;D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 28, 2022, 01:53:55 PM
Sad….but 100% true.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ThisisOverload on June 28, 2022, 01:54:27 PM
Sad….but 100% true.

🙁

 :D :D :D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: GymnJuice on June 28, 2022, 02:48:42 PM
It is politically idiotic to force rape victims to have their rapist's child. Democrats will use this in the next election. They only way they'll lose is if they rerun Biden in the middle of a horrible recession (which they might be dumb enough to do) and as a consequence we'll all end up with higher taxes.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 28, 2022, 03:14:27 PM
It's up to each state.

Drive to a state that allows abortion or take a bus or fly.

No biggie.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 28, 2022, 03:17:14 PM
It is politically idiotic to force rape victims to have their rapist's child. Democrats will use this in the next election. They only way they'll lose is if they rerun Biden in the middle of a horrible recession (which they might be dumb enough to do) and as a consequence we'll all end up with higher taxes.

hes never going to make the next election
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rascal full on June 28, 2022, 03:18:10 PM
If you want to see the black nurse Rachet, Annie Wilkes in Misery, Leona Helmsley, watch this: https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1541549352136675336
 (https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1541549352136675336)

If you don't, watch this rocket scientist:






On a side note, I heard someone say Rosie O'Donnell is going on a sex strike.

(https://i.postimg.cc/dDPYLvMh/FWRNar-UUYAEp-S05.jpg)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Below)She explains why many lost tolerance for the "pro-choice" movement.

It's, historically, not knowing when to stop.  They said it's about gay marriage and it became drag strippers for kids, trans kids, and eventually the P will be added to LGTB+. Not to mention rainbow flags replacing national flags.

Same with how "safe and rare" changed to late, late term abortions, and worse....





How to say a country has been conquered without saying a country's been conquered:

(https://i.postimg.cc/0N2FcrPY/FWNWSZAWQAARog2.jpg)

That fat kunt on the video said men can have abortions and it was being serious! Did you find Oak?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on June 28, 2022, 03:20:48 PM
That fat kunt on the video said men can have abortions and it was being serious! Did you find Oak?

Its if a woman identifies as a man then in her world then yes, men can have abortions
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 28, 2022, 03:38:44 PM
...
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rascal full on June 28, 2022, 03:53:07 PM
Its if a woman identifies as a man then in her world then yes, men can have abortions

Everyone has their world and their truth in today's society. What happened to sticking to reality and the actual truth? I sound 90 years old but what happened to the world? How did we get to such a low in societal history? Opposite of a renaissance, we are experiencing something really crap with Western culture.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: GigantorX on June 28, 2022, 04:50:56 PM
Sad….but 100% true.

🙁

Another retard level take.

It goes back to the states and the people now.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on June 28, 2022, 04:53:22 PM
I heard Planned Parenthood is rapidly closing their offices in states where abortion is now illegal.

But what about all the valuable women services they provide?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Tapeworm on June 28, 2022, 06:36:02 PM
Another retard level take.

It goes back to the states and the people now.

Just 6 months ago "The People" would have voted in the majority to put me in a camp. The problem with democracy is that humans are goddamn idiots.

Its impossible to legislate or vote away a natural right like bodily autonomy. Natural rights don't come from a government so they can't be removed by a government.

If you don't like abortions then don't get one.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Zillotch on June 28, 2022, 06:36:35 PM
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: AbrahamG on June 28, 2022, 07:02:06 PM
It's up to each state.

Drive to a state that allows abortion or take a bus or fly.

No biggie.

What happens if a lady travels from Louisiana to New York to receive this procedure and is arrested and prosecuted from murder when she returns home?  I'd say "no biggie" might not apply here. 
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 28, 2022, 07:33:58 PM
That won't happen. States have jurisdiction over act that only occur within the geographical boundaries of that state. Jurisdiction is territorial, not over individuals where ever they may be. Abortion is neither regulated by the 14th amendment or considered interstate commerce. No particular state's law can be applied to individuals that leave that state and do the deed somewhere else.

If I live in Arkansas and travel to California and kill someone there, I would be prosecuted under California law, since thats where I would have done the crime.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: oldschoolfan on June 28, 2022, 07:34:32 PM
What happens if a lady travels from Louisiana to New York to receive this procedure and is arrested and prosecuted from murder when she returns home?  I'd say "no biggie" might not apply here.

Good point and quite insane if that happens both the left and right are filled with sick insane leaders
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: AbrahamG on June 28, 2022, 07:35:15 PM
That won't happen. States have jurisdiction over act that only occur within the geographical boundaries of that state. Jurisdiction is territorial, not over individuals where ever they may be. Abortion is neither regulated by the 14th amendment or considered interstate commerce. No particular state's law can be applied to individuals that leave that state and do the deed somewhere else.

I'm far from convinced.  No offense meant.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 28, 2022, 07:38:53 PM
I stand by my point. All state level criminal law covers crime committed only in that state. Louisiana cannot prosecute someone for committing a crime, say, in New York state.  U.S. states do not have extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: AbrahamG on June 28, 2022, 07:41:12 PM
I stand by my point. All state level criminal law covers crime committed only in that state. Louisiana cannot prosecute someone for committing a crime, say, in New York state.

We'll see.  The thought is that they will call it murder and be able to go after them. 
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Abelard Lindsey on June 28, 2022, 07:43:16 PM
They could. But any lawyer worth their weight in salt would challenge it in federal jurisdiction and would easily win. Any lawyer worth their weight in salt knows this as well.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on June 29, 2022, 01:09:52 AM
What does "Capt'N Insano" think about this??

--------------

President Biden

@POTUS


United States government official
My Administration will do everything in its lawful power to fight back against the devastating decision overturning Roe v. Wade and to protect the fundamental rights of women. Now, Congress must take action.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 29, 2022, 02:46:37 AM
[/youtube]
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: GymnJuice on June 29, 2022, 07:24:41 AM
only our weakness prevents us from changing our mind over the course of a lifetime

Are you saying the Yates vs Coleman debate may never end?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 29, 2022, 07:32:11 AM
only our weakness prevents us from changing our mind over the course of a lifetime

LOL. He didn’t change his mind. He has no core values and could give a rats ass one way or the other. He just goes with whatever position is politically expedient at the time.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on June 29, 2022, 07:34:08 AM
Roe vs. Wade?

This is Getbig. We are schmoes. All we care about is Coe vs. Zane!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Grape Ape on June 29, 2022, 07:36:47 AM
Are you saying the Yates vs Coleman debate may never end?

It did.  Yates won.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 29, 2022, 09:26:29 AM
Nothing creepy about these two.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 29, 2022, 09:29:40 AM
The religious left is angry!

"Clarence Thomas is a clown in black face" says Screwloose from Star Trek.



Clarence Thomas is driving the bus. Sulu sits in the back to reflect on his hatred against Thomas.

(https://i.postimg.cc/GmYvjHk9/FWWAFar-Xk-AEPAOt.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on June 29, 2022, 09:34:37 AM
Amazon is limiting sales of Plan B and other emergency contraceptives to three units per customer in the wake of increased demand, the company confirmed to several media outlets. Last week’s US Supreme Court overturning of Roe v. Wade prompted a spike in sales of Plan B and other generic brands of levonorgestrel morning-after pills.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/amazon-limits-plan-b-roe-wade-demand-surge-234711157.html

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on June 29, 2022, 02:54:56 PM
Amazon is limiting sales of Plan B and other emergency contraceptives to three units per customer in the wake of increased demand, the company confirmed to several media outlets. Last week’s US Supreme Court overturning of Roe v. Wade prompted a spike in sales of Plan B and other generic brands of levonorgestrel morning-after pills.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/amazon-limits-plan-b-roe-wade-demand-surge-234711157.html


I still watch Seinfeld on Netflix. Great show.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on June 30, 2022, 03:20:39 AM
Top Democrats' response to abortion ruling sparks frustration within party

“You’re saying now the president said that this fall, Roe is on the ballot,” asked reporter Dana Bash. “But what do you say to Democratic voters who argue, ‘Wait a minute, we worked really hard to elect a Democratic president and vice president, a Democrat-led House, a Democrat-led Senate — do it now’?”

“But do what now? What now?” asked Harris, who said they did not have the votes.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/top-democrats-response-to-abortion-ruling-sparks-frustration-within-party-190119831.html
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on June 30, 2022, 03:31:07 AM
I still watch Seinfeld on Netflix. Great show.

Yup, great show.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Marvin Martian on June 30, 2022, 05:54:23 AM
Nothing creepy about these two.

🙁

I bet that they are WAY more creepy to a baby that’s half born seeing the scissors that are about to be jabbed through its neck during a partial birth abortion!

Your justification “kill the fckn kid - don’t let these creepy looking people have a chance to love and care for it”
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Tapeworm on June 30, 2022, 06:14:55 AM
Dems insist on gun control. Republicans demand laws to protect the unborn.

Both sides are now screaming for greater government involvement. Even Dave "Anarcho-Capitalist At Heart" Smith suddenly feels it's the role of government to tyrannise on the basis of what he feels are sufficiently compelling moral imperatives.

Even you guys, supposedly hardcore Right Wing adherents and adamant individualists, who bitched and moaned endlessly about medical mandates and Washington dictating your health care choices, are now clamoring for government policy to override individual choice.

Boo people who have abortions. Shame them socially. That's fine. It's just not a law/police/government issue. You want your tax money spent on enforcing this and financing the associted  porkbarrel shit? Now all of a sudden you're accepting of "If these laws save lives then we're justified in curtailing individual liberty." Think about what you're inviting to dinner here.

Of course you feel strongly about it. Of course you really really want it. So does the fish when he sees the worm.

Well played, gubment.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 30, 2022, 08:27:13 AM
I bet that they are WAY more creepy to a baby that’s half born seeing the scissors that are about to be jabbed through its neck during a partial birth abortion!

Your justification “kill the fckn kid - don’t let these creepy looking people have a chance to love and care for it”

Yep.

NOTHING creepy about these Pro Lifers.

😬
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on June 30, 2022, 09:09:01 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/ZYXrBbFq/FWWFZGd-XEAAair-L.jpg)


The left makes it like her whole life was about child sacrifice.

(https://i.postimg.cc/28P2DdX2/dfadfafdfaf.jpg)


The left's racism flares when Blacks disobey them.

(https://i.postimg.cc/DZHBwqwv/ererer.jpg)


As if.

(https://i.postimg.cc/QMD9gVHX/FWD9-EKIVEAALVFl.jpg)


The simp allies feel aborted.

(https://i.postimg.cc/yNFVPT25/gprim322.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 30, 2022, 09:30:39 AM
Yep.

NOTHING creepy about these Pro Lifers.

😬

Who did he rape?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on June 30, 2022, 09:41:12 AM
Who did he rape?

Nobody.

He’s totally innocent.

Wink Wink
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 30, 2022, 01:00:26 PM
Women act like there is no other form of birth control. ::) After watching these meltdowns it is apparent women should not be leaders in our country. No rational thinking skills at all, just screeching and screaming "my rights!"
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on June 30, 2022, 01:17:02 PM
Nobody.

He’s totally innocent.

Wink Wink

You should get your E2 checked

I guarantee your test levels are below 200
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on June 30, 2022, 07:25:36 PM
Nobody.

He’s totally innocent.

Wink Wink
Does it help to know your tears are solely used for Americans entertainment?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 01, 2022, 05:14:57 AM
.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Super Natural on July 01, 2022, 06:48:18 AM
You still believe in the clot shot?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on July 01, 2022, 04:55:15 PM
.
Faggotry!!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Skeletor on July 01, 2022, 05:28:37 PM
.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679601.0;attach=1378751;image)

Biden's regime.

Degenerate filth.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: King Shizzo on July 01, 2022, 05:34:45 PM
She/He/It is perfect for the job.

Spent fuel and Waste disposition. It's a fancy term to say, let's throw the thing overboard.

Looking like a Dragon Ball(less)z character.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Rambone on July 02, 2022, 04:36:48 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679601.0;attach=1378750;image)

Is it ma’am? Is it they? Is it them? Love the heels (nh)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on July 02, 2022, 05:00:20 AM
Nobody.

He’s totally innocent.

Wink Wink

What do you think about Joe Biden and Tara Reades allegations against him?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on July 02, 2022, 09:54:05 AM
10 year old girl raped & denied abortion in Ohio  :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2022/07/01/ohio-girl-10-among-patients-going-indiana-abortion/7788415001/

Quote
On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.

Could Bernard help?

Indiana lawmakers are poised to further restrict or ban abortion in mere weeks. The Indiana General Assembly will convene in a special session July 25 when it will discuss restrictio ns to abortion policy along with inflation relief.

But for now, the procedure still is legal in Indiana. And so the girl soon was on her way to Indiana to Bernard's care./quote]

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 02, 2022, 10:00:05 AM
What do you think about Joe Biden and Tara Reades allegations against him?

I’m sure he did something inappropriate.

I’m not a huge Biden fan though.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: deadz on July 02, 2022, 10:04:41 AM
10 year old girl raped & denied abortion in Ohio  :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2022/07/01/ohio-girl-10-among-patients-going-indiana-abortion/7788415001/

Quote
On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.

Could Bernard help?

Indiana lawmakers are poised to further restrict or ban abortion in mere weeks. The Indiana General Assembly will convene in a special session July 25 when it will discuss restrictio ns to abortion policy along with inflation relief.

But for now, the procedure still is legal in Indiana. And so the girl soon was on her way to Indiana to Bernard's care./quote]
10 that’s crazy
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on July 02, 2022, 10:27:43 AM
I’m sure he did something inappropriate.

I’m not a huge Biden fan though.

🙁

All right, just checking. I’m sure you’ve encountered others who were happy to condemn Kavanaugh on Ford’s testimony but had all sorts of reasons why Reade was not credible.  Kudos for your consistency

 
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 02, 2022, 12:59:16 PM
All right, just checking. I’m sure you’ve encountered others who were happy to condemn Kavanaugh on Ford’s testimony but had all sorts of reasons why Reade was not credible.  Kudos for your consistency

👍
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 02, 2022, 01:08:55 PM
🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on July 02, 2022, 06:02:53 PM
🙂
You're Canadian.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 02, 2022, 07:35:48 PM
You're Canadian.

Thank goodness!

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: loco on July 03, 2022, 09:16:12 AM
Since last week's Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, men across the country are rushing to get vasectomies. But common myths about vasectomies continue to circulate on social media, including that they are easily reversible and are a preventive measure until a patient is ready to have a child.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/debunking-myths-vasectomies-popularity-increases-202735872.html
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on July 03, 2022, 09:52:46 AM
Thank goodness!

🙁
Yes, that means your opinion is worthless, like your life. :)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: joswift on July 03, 2022, 10:52:06 AM
Since last week's Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, men across the country are rushing to get vasectomies. But common myths about vasectomies continue to circulate on social media, including that they are easily reversible and are a preventive measure until a patient is ready to have a child.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/debunking-myths-vasectomies-popularity-increases-202735872.html

Are the waiting lists weighted by Affirmative Action?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Skeletor on July 03, 2022, 11:09:02 AM
Since last week's Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, men across the country are rushing to get vasectomies. But common myths about vasectomies continue to circulate on social media, including that they are easily reversible and are a preventive measure until a patient is ready to have a child.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/debunking-myths-vasectomies-popularity-increases-202735872.html

So just 1 week after the SCOTUS decision "men across the country are rushing to get vasectomies". Must be some millennial intern coming up with this crap.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Skeletor on July 06, 2022, 10:53:39 AM
.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=679601.0;attach=1378751;image)

Biden's regime.

Degenerate filth.



Top New Biden Staffer Defended Underage, Gay Prostitution Website Raided By Feds in Jaw-Dropping 2015 Article

A recent, high-level hire at the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy defended a controversial gay prostitution website with a track record of allowing children to be promoted for sexual services on the platform, The National Pulse can reveal.

The revelations, from unearthed op-ed, follow The National Pulse exposé of appointee Samuel Brinton’s past as a drag queen, LGBTQ+ activist who has “lectured” on kink at college campuses and participated in interviews about fetish roleplay.

In an article published on September 15th on the pro-LGBT+ website Advocate, Biden’s latest top nuclear hire dives into a defense of the “Rentboy.com” website, which shuttered following an August 2015 illegal prostitution raid. “Rentboy” is a colloquial term for young men who have sex with older men in exchange for money, often under dubious circumstances.

Brinton, who now serves as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition in the Office of Nuclear Energy, defended “Rentboy.com” in a September 2nd, 2015 op-ed in Advocate magazine: “The Real Ramifications of the Rentboy Raid.”

The article followed Department of Homeland Security officials raiding Rentboy’s Manhattan offices and arresting chief executive Jeffrey Hurant and six employees on charges of promoting prostitution. The following year, the CEO of the site, which connected male prostitutes and escorts with potential clients, was indicted on a charge of promoting prostitution which he ultimately pleaded guilty.

The U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of New York’s indictment also revealed the site’s negligence regarding underage sex work, particularly across Asia.

It detailed how Rentboy employees described the age verification process as a “gray area,” as they “did not always remove advertisements when the advertisers failed to provide identification.” “In one case, after an escort agency failed to provide photo identification for an escort, a RENTBOY.COM employee advised the escort agency that he had deleted photographs with the face of the subject escort, but left the advertisement online and left photographs that showed only the escort’s body,” explained the indictment.

(https://thenationalpulse.com/wp-content/uploads/Screen-Shot-2022-07-02-at-4.45.31-PM-1160x250.png)


Despite the deeply concerning developments, Brinton wrote in defense of the website:

“…sex work disproportionately affects the LGBT community. Transgender people engage in sex work at a rate 10 times that of cisgender (nontrans) women. And many LGBT youth engage in sex work just to survive. A 2013 Center for American Progress report suggests that LGBT youth are more than three times as likely to have engaged in survival sex.”

“In another email, another RENTBOY.COM employee speaking about the Asia-market ads said “Christ … talk about copyrighted and underage pies! TONS in that area … ALWAYS,” detailed the indictment, which also revealed that company executives never acted on these concerns.
https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/07/05/biden-doe-official-defended-underage-sex-site/
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 09, 2022, 07:03:43 PM
Kavanaugh Owned!!!

😎
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on July 10, 2022, 12:37:30 AM
Thank goodness!

🙁

This hasn’t been substantiated
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: hardgainerj on July 10, 2022, 07:39:25 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CmaG0ML8TnA
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Primemuscle on July 10, 2022, 08:00:25 PM
not everyone has the ability to travel out of state to obtain an abortion.  it can be costly in terms of money and time.  further compounding the issue are the laws passed by texas et al that criminalize traveling to another state to obtain an abortion.

finally, if you see it as a human right (as I do), you want to see that right extended to all.  Imagine if civil rights in the 1960s was left as "states rights" issue, it would never make it past the Mason-Dixon line

Passing and upholding that law are very different matters.
 
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a concurring opinion that states could not ban out-of-state travel to access abortion. “May a state bar a resident of that state from traveling to another state to obtain an abortion?” he wrote. “In my view, the answer is no, based on the constitutional right to interstate travel,”
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 10, 2022, 08:08:33 PM
This hasn’t been substantiated

No it has to be true. The 10 year that was raped found out she was pregnant right after this ruling came down….. in 3 days. And then Ohio had banned abortions for children just in time. But because she is a minor she couldn’t make the decision on her own anyhow regardless of her body her choice.

Story seems 100% legit.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Primemuscle on July 10, 2022, 08:14:16 PM
Uhm...don't get pregnant.

And there's that. If but the solution was so easy. There are multiple reasons for unwanted pregnancies which are not within a woman's control, such as when she is raped. No manner of contraception a woman can employ is foolproof except having a hysterectomy. 
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: beakdoctor on July 10, 2022, 08:39:09 PM
No it has to be true. The 10 year that was raped found out she was pregnant right after this ruling came down….. in 3 days. And then Ohio had banned abortions for children just in time. But because she is a minor she couldn’t make the decision on her own anyhow regardless of her body her choice.

Story seems 100% legit.

Exactly.

Incidentally don't be surprised if the number of claims of pregnancy via rape goes up.

Forcible rape almost never ever result in pregnancy. Most predatorial rapist cant 'perform' in the moment if at all.

Date rape is another story.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 10, 2022, 09:03:22 PM
Exactly.

Incidentally don't be surprised if the number of claims of pregnancy via rape goes up.

Forcible rape almost never ever result in pregnancy. Most predatorial rapist cant 'perform' in the moment if at all.

Date rape is another story.


No one with an ounce of decency would deny that a raped woman, or child, should have the right to an abortion.

It would be interesting to see the historical numbers for cause of pregnancy and reason for abortion. I wonder what percentage of abortions are due to rape; 75%, 50%, 25%?

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on July 10, 2022, 09:17:44 PM
And there's that. If but the solution was so easy. There are multiple reasons for unwanted pregnancies which are not within a woman's control, such as when she is raped. No manner of contraception a woman can employ is foolproof except having a hysterectomy.

Rape is less than 1%

Try again
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 10, 2022, 09:42:50 PM
Rape is less than 1%

Try again

Rape was less than 1% and incest was less than 0.5%.

I agree that in these cases abortion should be considered.

It has turned into a method of birth control.

However, when you have an abortion, they don't ask you why, so it's possible the statistics are a bit off.

To me, just using common sense, i believe the stats are probably accurate.

If every woman that was raped had an abortion, it would still be less than 1%.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Primemuscle on July 10, 2022, 11:02:38 PM
Rape is less than 1%

Try again

Whether it is 1% or 10% is not relevant to what I posted about rape.

Try again.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: mac33 on July 11, 2022, 12:30:16 AM
Its fascinating how many vile people on here and elsewhere justify killing a human because of a way he/she was conceived.

It may surprise you, but not every woman wants to kill her child because she was raped...







Herods of today rejoice when lives of innocent are being taken away, servants of moloch...
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Tapeworm on July 11, 2022, 03:54:07 AM
And there's that. If but the solution was so easy. There are multiple reasons for unwanted pregnancies which are not within a woman's control, such as when she is raped. No manner of contraception a woman can employ is foolproof except having a hysterectomy.

It also makes them way less hysterical.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on July 11, 2022, 04:53:23 AM
15 pages of bullshit. You know that none of your opinions matter. 
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on July 11, 2022, 05:15:31 AM
Whether it is 1% or 10% is not relevant to what I posted about rape.

Try again.

You’re not getting it

Your using a less than 1% stat to justify the 99%
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 12, 2022, 02:22:02 AM
Mis-carries are at unheard of numbers following the clot-shot...
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 12, 2022, 10:35:08 AM
Mis-carries are at unheard of numbers following the clot-shot...
:D I love it.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on July 12, 2022, 01:44:41 PM
Roe Roe Roe your Wade gentle down the stream
merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily, life starts once he cums!!!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 12, 2022, 03:31:18 PM
Can you say LOW INTELLIGENCE?

😎
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: ThisisOverload on July 12, 2022, 03:37:32 PM
Can you say LOW INTELLIGENCE?

😎

 ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: IroNat on July 12, 2022, 03:46:12 PM
Oak = Commie
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on July 12, 2022, 03:58:46 PM
Can you say LOW INTELLIGENCE?

😎

The funny part was catching countless maskers contracting themselves

Oak do you ever call out all the self righteous maskers like yourself when they are caught without a mask on?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 12, 2022, 04:06:50 PM
Thank goodness!

🙁

The whole story is bullshit. And in your tradition and low IQ you fell for it.


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/07/11/ohio-a-g-yost-there-isnt-request-for-dna-analysis-or-whisper-anywhere-to-back-up-10-year-old-rape-victim-story/


Ohio AG Yost: There Isn’t Request for DNA Analysis or ‘Whisper Anywhere’ to Back up 10-Year-Old Rape Victim Story


Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 13, 2022, 07:49:48 AM
The funny part was catching countless maskers contracting themselves

Oak do you ever call out all the self righteous maskers like yourself when they are caught without a mask on?

LOL

I do not.

Antivaxxers are crazy.

Don’t want to get stabbed.

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Megalodon on July 13, 2022, 08:01:44 AM
This was one of those big vaxx pushers, now he's pushing abortion.

(https://i.postimg.cc/CKr1t6wX/FXbv-JN3-UUAEhew-Y.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/9M4MjtMM/FXbv-JBKUYAAghf-P.jpg)
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 13, 2022, 08:03:41 AM
This was one of those big vaxx pushers, now he's pushing abortion.

(https://i.postimg.cc/CKr1t6wX/FXbv-JN3-UUAEhew-Y.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/9M4MjtMM/FXbv-JBKUYAAghf-P.jpg)

Ummmm…..he’s not “pushing abortions” he’s promoting “Pro Choice”.

🙄🙄🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gym-Rat on July 13, 2022, 08:20:34 AM
Ummmm…..he’s not “pushing abortions” he’s promoting “Pro Choice” disgusting perverted gay ass-sex.

🙄🙄🙄
.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Humble Narcissist on July 13, 2022, 10:32:58 AM
This was one of those big vaxx pushers, now he's pushing abortion.

(https://i.postimg.cc/CKr1t6wX/FXbv-JN3-UUAEhew-Y.jpg)

(https://i.postimg.cc/9M4MjtMM/FXbv-JBKUYAAghf-P.jpg)
I love how the freak has a "religion is toxic" bumper sticker.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on July 13, 2022, 10:51:11 AM
Its fascinating how many vile people on here and elsewhere justify killing a human because of a way he/she was conceived.

It may surprise you, but not every woman wants to kill her child because she was raped...







Herods of today rejoice when lives of innocent are being taken away, servants of moloch...

Yep Baal has got nothin over us
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 13, 2022, 11:03:16 AM
I love how the freak has a "religion is toxic" bumper sticker.

😆
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on July 13, 2022, 04:56:45 PM
Ummmm…..he’s not “pushing abortions” he’s promoting “Pro Choice”.

🙄🙄🙄
Of course he's pro choice, his ass (literally) can't get pregnant.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: AbrahamG on July 13, 2022, 05:05:50 PM
Of course he's pro choice, his ass (literally) can't get pregnant.

Science probably already has something in the works for that problem.   ;D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 13, 2022, 06:06:43 PM
The whole story is bullshit. And in your tradition and low IQ you fell for it.


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/07/11/ohio-a-g-yost-there-isnt-request-for-dna-analysis-or-whisper-anywhere-to-back-up-10-year-old-rape-victim-story/


Ohio AG Yost: There Isn’t Request for DNA Analysis or ‘Whisper Anywhere’ to Back up 10-Year-Old Rape Victim Story

WHAT?

The poor 10 year old was raped and is pregnant and the state of ohio is refusing to investigate it, all so they can protect their image?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 13, 2022, 06:11:07 PM
The whole story is bullshit. And in your tradition and low IQ you fell for it.


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/07/11/ohio-a-g-yost-there-isnt-request-for-dna-analysis-or-whisper-anywhere-to-back-up-10-year-old-rape-victim-story/


Ohio AG Yost: There Isn’t Request for DNA Analysis or ‘Whisper Anywhere’ to Back up 10-Year-Old Rape Victim Story

So much for this story being “bullshit”.


🙄🙄🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 13, 2022, 06:13:09 PM
So much for this story being “bullshit”.


🙄🙄🙄

Why did the Ohio attorney general lie?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on July 13, 2022, 06:15:15 PM
So much for this story being “bullshit”.


🙄🙄🙄

He’s illegal

You know when Trump said how Mexico isn’t sending their best?
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 13, 2022, 06:18:52 PM
Why did the Ohio attorney general lie?

He’s since changed his position.

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 13, 2022, 06:20:39 PM
The whole story is bullshit. And in your tradition and low IQ you fell for it.


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/07/11/ohio-a-g-yost-there-isnt-request-for-dna-analysis-or-whisper-anywhere-to-back-up-10-year-old-rape-victim-story/


Ohio AG Yost: There Isn’t Request for DNA Analysis or ‘Whisper Anywhere’ to Back up 10-Year-Old Rape Victim Story

You can DM me with your apology.

😎
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 13, 2022, 06:27:57 PM
He’s illegal

You know when Trump said how Mexico isn’t sending their best?

Yeah. Interesting that the rapist is an undocumented immigrant.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 14, 2022, 12:34:56 PM
Disgusting!

🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Hypertrophy on July 14, 2022, 12:57:55 PM
Hey OAK- how's it going? I hope you are doing well!
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 14, 2022, 01:03:10 PM
Disgusting!

🙁

Agreed!

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 14, 2022, 01:16:13 PM
Hey OAK- how's it going? I hope you are doing well!

Hey Hypertrophy!

I'm doing great! Thank you for asking.

How are you?

Great to hear from you.

 :D
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 14, 2022, 01:47:25 PM
You can DM me with your apology.

😎

I stand corrected. The story is worse , an illegal raped her  :-X
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 14, 2022, 01:50:13 PM
I stand corrected. The story is worse , an illegal raped her  :-X

ND what are you saying?

This rape would not have occurred if we had stronger borders? That’s racist, those people have rights too.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 14, 2022, 04:12:46 PM
I stand corrected. The story is worse , an illegal raped her  :-X

Apology accepted!

🙂
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 15, 2022, 03:39:50 PM
USA! USA!

🙄
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: chaos on July 15, 2022, 04:06:10 PM
USA! USA!

🙄
Thank GOD you're not American. :-*
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: BlackMetallic on July 15, 2022, 05:18:02 PM
Thank GOD you're not American. :-*

Would love to drop him off in Compton
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Dave D on July 15, 2022, 05:41:13 PM
Would love to drop him off in Compton

LOL it would be a great YouTube series. Telling the citizens of Compton to get vaccinated, have abortion and get rid of their guns.
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 15, 2022, 10:02:56 PM
Not a 3rd World country… it’s the USA.


🙁🙁
Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: OAK on July 15, 2022, 10:08:25 PM
That’s for sure!!!

Title: Re: ROE V Wade
Post by: Gregzs on July 06, 2023, 12:08:08 AM
That’s for sure!!!

Ohio man sentenced to life in prison for rape of 10-year-old girl who traveled to Indiana for abortion

An Ohio man was sentenced to life in prison on Wednesday for raping a 10-year-old girl who then had to travel to Indiana for an abortion in a case that drew national attention when the obstetrician-gynecologist who provided the procedure spoke about it with a journalist.

Gerson Fuentes, 28, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to life in prison. However, his plea deal states he can file for parole after 25 years, according to court documents. If parole is granted, Fuentes, who is from Guatemala and was living in Columbus, Ohio, would have to register as a sex offender.

Common Pleas Court Judge Julie Lynch called the plea deal a "very hard pill for this court to swallow," The Associated Press reported. Lynch said the victim's family asked the judge to back the deal.

(https://assets1.cbsnewsstatic.com/hub/i/r/2023/07/05/f432a338-0905-49c1-ae0c-3da24c7099d5/thumbnail/1240x908/eadc35dcbe157bad222ba7e494708af0/ap22209522530769.jpg?v=46148a329842187f630d57e5930d74c4)

The girl was 9 years old when she was assaulted by Fuentes. Columbus police learned about the girl's pregnancy through a referral to the Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother. Shortly after her 10th birthday, the girl traveled to Indiana to get an abortion. Prosecutors said DNA testing of the aborted fetus confirmed Fuentes was the father.

The girl couldn't get the procedure in Ohio under a newly imposed state ban on abortions at the first detectable "fetal heartbeat," which went into full effect after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.     

The girl's doctor, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, told a journalist at the Indianapolis Star she was contacted by a child abuse doctor in Ohio to arrange for the procedure in Indiana. Attorney General Todd Rokita filed a complaint against the doctor for speaking about the procedure and violating medical privacy laws.

Bernard said she raised the issue to alert Indiana residents to the realities of pregnancy termination care if the state passed strict abortion bans. During a hearing, Bernard said she used a real-life example because a hypothetical case wouldn't have the same impact on readers. She said she notified Indiana hospital social workers about the abuse, and the girl's case was already being investigated by Ohio authorities. The doctor's attorneys said she didn't release any identifying information about the patient.

Indiana's medical licensing board issued Bernard $3,000 in fines and a letter of reprimand but didn't suspend her license.

On June 30, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled the state's near-total abortion ban can take effect. The legislation — among the strictest in the nation — bans abortion except in cases of rape, incest, and to protect the life and physical health of the mother.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gerson-fuentes-guilty-sentenced-life-rape-10-year-old-girl-abortion/