Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Dos Equis on March 18, 2024, 05:43:45 PM
-
I should have created this thread a long time ago. Leftists repeatedly lie to the public. The "very fine people on both sides" lie. The Trump mocked a disabled reporter lie. The Trump is a Russian Manchurian candidate lie. The deceased service members are losers lie. The Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation lie. The Covid lab leak lie. The Trump paid no income taxes for 18 years lie.
There is an endless list.
This one is the latest, from the media to Nancy Pelosi, just outright lying about Trump's bloodbath comment. Even FactCheck.org acknowledges that these leftists are lying. Again.
Trump’s ‘Bloodbath’ Comment
By Robert Farley
Posted on March 18, 2024
While speaking about the potential loss of U.S. auto manufacturing jobs to foreign countries, former President Donald Trump said if he isn’t elected, “it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.”
President Joe Biden’s campaign quickly accused Trump of fomenting “political violence.” The Trump campaign said Trump was clearly using the term in the context of an economic bloodbath.
“If you actually watch and listen to the section, he was talking about the auto industry and tariffs,” Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Trump’s campaign, told the Washington Post, adding that “Biden’s policies will create an economic bloodbath for the auto industry and autoworkers.”
That explanation seems the most plausible, given the context of Trump’s comments.
Speaking at a rally on the grounds of the Dayton International Airport in Ohio, Trump said that over the last three decades, Mexico has siphoned off U.S. auto manufacturing jobs, and he accused China of building car manufacturing plants in Mexico that will cost U.S. autoworkers their jobs.
Trump, March 16: China now is building a couple of massive plants where they’re going to build the cars in Mexico and think, they think, that they’re going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border. Let me tell you something to China, if you’re listening President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal. Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you’re building in Mexico right now, and you think you’re going to get that, you’re going to not hire Americans, and you’re going to sell the cars to us? No. We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars. If I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars.
The Chinese electric vehicle company BYD says it is planning to build an EV plant in Mexico. But the company says it intends to sell the cars locally to consumers in Mexico and has no plans to sell any across the border in the U.S.
On Truth Social on March 18, Trump wrote that his words were being purposely misconstrued.
“The Fake News Media, and their Democrat Partners in the destruction of our Nation, pretended to be shocked at my use of the word BLOODBATH, even though they fully understood that I was simply referring to imports allowed by Crooked Joe Biden, which are killing the automobile industry,” Trump wrote, promising that if elected U.S. auto manufacturing “WILL THRIVE LIKE NEVER BEFORE.”
(An aside: When Trump was president, auto manufacturing jobs rose about 5.8% to 1,012,500 in his first two years, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but dipped in his third year, and then again sharply during the pandemic. There were 949,300 auto manufacturing jobs in the U.S. when Trump left office. Under Biden, the number of auto manufacturing jobs has increased about 12.2% to 1,065,100 in February, the most recent data available.)
The Trump campaign also noted — rightly — that one of the definitions of “bloodbath,” according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is “a major economic disaster.” We did a Nexis search of TV news transcripts and found numerous instances of bloodbath being used in that way.
Another definition provided by Merriam-Webster is “a notably fierce, violent, or destructive contest or struggle,” which is how Biden, his campaign and others viewed the former president’s “bloodbath” comment.
In a post on X, Biden posted a clip of Trump saying, “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it.” Biden commented, “It’s clear this guy wants another January 6.”
At the start of his speech in Ohio, Trump saluted as the sound system played a recording of the so-called J6 Prison Choir singing its song “Justice for All.” The song is a mashup of the choir — featuring people incarcerated for their role in the attack on the Capitol — singing the “Star Spangled Banner” as Trump recites the Pledge of Allegiance.
After the song finished, Trump praised the “spirit” of the “hostages,” a word he has repeatedly used to describe those convicted of various crimes for their roles in the Jan. 6 riot.
“They’ve been treated terribly and very unfairly, and you know that and everybody knows that,” Trump said, vowing that once elected, he would work on their behalf to free them.
“And we’re going to be working on that, soon as — the first day we get into office,” Trump said. “We’re going to save our country, and we’re going to work with the people to treat those unbelievable patriots, and they were unbelievable patriots, and are. You see the spirit, this cheering. They’re cheering while they’re doing that, and they did that in prison. And it’s a disgrace, in my opinion.”
Asked on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on March 17 about Trump’s “bloodbath” comments, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy said Trump’s rhetoric often “walks up to the edge,” allowing people on both sides of the political aisle to interpret his meaning.
“That kind of rhetoric, it’s always on the edge, maybe doesn’t cross, maybe does, depending upon your perspective,” Cassidy said. “I also think, though, that the mainstream media contributes to it. If you take the one about the bloodbath, which arguably could be about an economic bloodbath not about kind of street violence related to the election, then it gives his defenders something to focus on, something – which was distorted. So, yes, he always walks up to the edge on that rhetoric. And again, that’s why people are concerned. But sometimes the mainstream media, whether they want to or not, can’t resist, and they go just a little bit too far, which distracts from what could be the impact.”
Cassidy noted that the definition of bloodbath includes an economic disaster.
“And so if he’s speaking about the auto industry in particular in Ohio, then you can take it with a little bit more context,” Cassidy said. “That’s why I say you walk up to the line. Depending upon the perspective, somebody is going to interpret it. He’s running against Biden, so Biden’s going to say it’s about political violence. His defenders want to defend him, and so they’re going to say it’s about economic disaster. There’s always just that little bit of tension there, which allows the dispute about the interpretation as opposed to the kind of general sort of, ‘Is this a person we want to have in office?'”
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/03/trumps-bloodbath-comment/
-
I looked up "Liar" on thesaurus.com... Its just another name for "Libtard"...
-
This is going to be a long thread. Remember the Jussie tweets by Harris and Biden, the Rittenhouse matter, the hands up don't shoot lies, the million other race hoaxs? That is just the beginning.
I should have created this thread a long time ago. Leftists repeatedly lie to the public. The "very fine people on both sides" lie. The Trump mocked a disabled reporter lie. The Trump is a Russian Manchurian candidate lie. The deceased service members are losers lie. The Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation lie. The Covid lab leak lie. The Trump paid no income taxes for 18 years lie.
There is an endless list.
This one is the latest, from the media to Nancy Pelosi, just outright lying about Trump's bloodbath comment. Even FactCheck.org acknowledges that these leftists are lying. Again.
Trump’s ‘Bloodbath’ Comment
By Robert Farley
Posted on March 18, 2024
While speaking about the potential loss of U.S. auto manufacturing jobs to foreign countries, former President Donald Trump said if he isn’t elected, “it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.”
President Joe Biden’s campaign quickly accused Trump of fomenting “political violence.” The Trump campaign said Trump was clearly using the term in the context of an economic bloodbath.
“If you actually watch and listen to the section, he was talking about the auto industry and tariffs,” Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Trump’s campaign, told the Washington Post, adding that “Biden’s policies will create an economic bloodbath for the auto industry and autoworkers.”
That explanation seems the most plausible, given the context of Trump’s comments.
Speaking at a rally on the grounds of the Dayton International Airport in Ohio, Trump said that over the last three decades, Mexico has siphoned off U.S. auto manufacturing jobs, and he accused China of building car manufacturing plants in Mexico that will cost U.S. autoworkers their jobs.
Trump, March 16: China now is building a couple of massive plants where they’re going to build the cars in Mexico and think, they think, that they’re going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border. Let me tell you something to China, if you’re listening President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal. Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you’re building in Mexico right now, and you think you’re going to get that, you’re going to not hire Americans, and you’re going to sell the cars to us? No. We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars. If I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars.
The Chinese electric vehicle company BYD says it is planning to build an EV plant in Mexico. But the company says it intends to sell the cars locally to consumers in Mexico and has no plans to sell any across the border in the U.S.
On Truth Social on March 18, Trump wrote that his words were being purposely misconstrued.
“The Fake News Media, and their Democrat Partners in the destruction of our Nation, pretended to be shocked at my use of the word BLOODBATH, even though they fully understood that I was simply referring to imports allowed by Crooked Joe Biden, which are killing the automobile industry,” Trump wrote, promising that if elected U.S. auto manufacturing “WILL THRIVE LIKE NEVER BEFORE.”
(An aside: When Trump was president, auto manufacturing jobs rose about 5.8% to 1,012,500 in his first two years, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but dipped in his third year, and then again sharply during the pandemic. There were 949,300 auto manufacturing jobs in the U.S. when Trump left office. Under Biden, the number of auto manufacturing jobs has increased about 12.2% to 1,065,100 in February, the most recent data available.)
The Trump campaign also noted — rightly — that one of the definitions of “bloodbath,” according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is “a major economic disaster.” We did a Nexis search of TV news transcripts and found numerous instances of bloodbath being used in that way.
Another definition provided by Merriam-Webster is “a notably fierce, violent, or destructive contest or struggle,” which is how Biden, his campaign and others viewed the former president’s “bloodbath” comment.
In a post on X, Biden posted a clip of Trump saying, “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it.” Biden commented, “It’s clear this guy wants another January 6.”
At the start of his speech in Ohio, Trump saluted as the sound system played a recording of the so-called J6 Prison Choir singing its song “Justice for All.” The song is a mashup of the choir — featuring people incarcerated for their role in the attack on the Capitol — singing the “Star Spangled Banner” as Trump recites the Pledge of Allegiance.
After the song finished, Trump praised the “spirit” of the “hostages,” a word he has repeatedly used to describe those convicted of various crimes for their roles in the Jan. 6 riot.
“They’ve been treated terribly and very unfairly, and you know that and everybody knows that,” Trump said, vowing that once elected, he would work on their behalf to free them.
“And we’re going to be working on that, soon as — the first day we get into office,” Trump said. “We’re going to save our country, and we’re going to work with the people to treat those unbelievable patriots, and they were unbelievable patriots, and are. You see the spirit, this cheering. They’re cheering while they’re doing that, and they did that in prison. And it’s a disgrace, in my opinion.”
Asked on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on March 17 about Trump’s “bloodbath” comments, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy said Trump’s rhetoric often “walks up to the edge,” allowing people on both sides of the political aisle to interpret his meaning.
“That kind of rhetoric, it’s always on the edge, maybe doesn’t cross, maybe does, depending upon your perspective,” Cassidy said. “I also think, though, that the mainstream media contributes to it. If you take the one about the bloodbath, which arguably could be about an economic bloodbath not about kind of street violence related to the election, then it gives his defenders something to focus on, something – which was distorted. So, yes, he always walks up to the edge on that rhetoric. And again, that’s why people are concerned. But sometimes the mainstream media, whether they want to or not, can’t resist, and they go just a little bit too far, which distracts from what could be the impact.”
Cassidy noted that the definition of bloodbath includes an economic disaster.
“And so if he’s speaking about the auto industry in particular in Ohio, then you can take it with a little bit more context,” Cassidy said. “That’s why I say you walk up to the line. Depending upon the perspective, somebody is going to interpret it. He’s running against Biden, so Biden’s going to say it’s about political violence. His defenders want to defend him, and so they’re going to say it’s about economic disaster. There’s always just that little bit of tension there, which allows the dispute about the interpretation as opposed to the kind of general sort of, ‘Is this a person we want to have in office?'”
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/03/trumps-bloodbath-comment/
-
And they say Trump is a liar.
-
This is going to be a long thread. Remember the Jussie tweets by Harris and Biden, the Rittenhouse matter, the hands up don't shoot lies, the million other race hoaxs? That is just the beginning.
Truth.
-
Tom Elliott
@tomselliott
SUPERCUT!
Trump critics would never use a term like “bloodbath”
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1769455728941547695
-
I should have created this thread a long time ago. Leftists repeatedly lie to the public. The "very fine people on both sides" lie. The Trump mocked a disabled reporter lie. The Trump is a Russian Manchurian candidate lie. The deceased service members are losers lie. The Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation lie. The Covid lab leak lie. The Trump paid no income taxes for 18 years lie.
There is an endless list.
This one is the latest, from the media to Nancy Pelosi, just outright lying about Trump's bloodbath comment. Even FactCheck.org acknowledges that these leftists are lying. Again.
Trump’s ‘Bloodbath’ Comment
By Robert Farley
Posted on March 18, 2024
While speaking about the potential loss of U.S. auto manufacturing jobs to foreign countries, former President Donald Trump said if he isn’t elected, “it’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.”
President Joe Biden’s campaign quickly accused Trump of fomenting “political violence.” The Trump campaign said Trump was clearly using the term in the context of an economic bloodbath.
“If you actually watch and listen to the section, he was talking about the auto industry and tariffs,” Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Trump’s campaign, told the Washington Post, adding that “Biden’s policies will create an economic bloodbath for the auto industry and autoworkers.”
That explanation seems the most plausible, given the context of Trump’s comments.
Speaking at a rally on the grounds of the Dayton International Airport in Ohio, Trump said that over the last three decades, Mexico has siphoned off U.S. auto manufacturing jobs, and he accused China of building car manufacturing plants in Mexico that will cost U.S. autoworkers their jobs.
Trump, March 16: China now is building a couple of massive plants where they’re going to build the cars in Mexico and think, they think, that they’re going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border. Let me tell you something to China, if you’re listening President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal. Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you’re building in Mexico right now, and you think you’re going to get that, you’re going to not hire Americans, and you’re going to sell the cars to us? No. We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars. If I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars.
The Chinese electric vehicle company BYD says it is planning to build an EV plant in Mexico. But the company says it intends to sell the cars locally to consumers in Mexico and has no plans to sell any across the border in the U.S.
On Truth Social on March 18, Trump wrote that his words were being purposely misconstrued.
“The Fake News Media, and their Democrat Partners in the destruction of our Nation, pretended to be shocked at my use of the word BLOODBATH, even though they fully understood that I was simply referring to imports allowed by Crooked Joe Biden, which are killing the automobile industry,” Trump wrote, promising that if elected U.S. auto manufacturing “WILL THRIVE LIKE NEVER BEFORE.”
(An aside: When Trump was president, auto manufacturing jobs rose about 5.8% to 1,012,500 in his first two years, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but dipped in his third year, and then again sharply during the pandemic. There were 949,300 auto manufacturing jobs in the U.S. when Trump left office. Under Biden, the number of auto manufacturing jobs has increased about 12.2% to 1,065,100 in February, the most recent data available.)
The Trump campaign also noted — rightly — that one of the definitions of “bloodbath,” according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is “a major economic disaster.” We did a Nexis search of TV news transcripts and found numerous instances of bloodbath being used in that way.
Another definition provided by Merriam-Webster is “a notably fierce, violent, or destructive contest or struggle,” which is how Biden, his campaign and others viewed the former president’s “bloodbath” comment.
In a post on X, Biden posted a clip of Trump saying, “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it.” Biden commented, “It’s clear this guy wants another January 6.”
At the start of his speech in Ohio, Trump saluted as the sound system played a recording of the so-called J6 Prison Choir singing its song “Justice for All.” The song is a mashup of the choir — featuring people incarcerated for their role in the attack on the Capitol — singing the “Star Spangled Banner” as Trump recites the Pledge of Allegiance.
After the song finished, Trump praised the “spirit” of the “hostages,” a word he has repeatedly used to describe those convicted of various crimes for their roles in the Jan. 6 riot.
“They’ve been treated terribly and very unfairly, and you know that and everybody knows that,” Trump said, vowing that once elected, he would work on their behalf to free them.
“And we’re going to be working on that, soon as — the first day we get into office,” Trump said. “We’re going to save our country, and we’re going to work with the people to treat those unbelievable patriots, and they were unbelievable patriots, and are. You see the spirit, this cheering. They’re cheering while they’re doing that, and they did that in prison. And it’s a disgrace, in my opinion.”
Asked on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on March 17 about Trump’s “bloodbath” comments, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy said Trump’s rhetoric often “walks up to the edge,” allowing people on both sides of the political aisle to interpret his meaning.
“That kind of rhetoric, it’s always on the edge, maybe doesn’t cross, maybe does, depending upon your perspective,” Cassidy said. “I also think, though, that the mainstream media contributes to it. If you take the one about the bloodbath, which arguably could be about an economic bloodbath not about kind of street violence related to the election, then it gives his defenders something to focus on, something – which was distorted. So, yes, he always walks up to the edge on that rhetoric. And again, that’s why people are concerned. But sometimes the mainstream media, whether they want to or not, can’t resist, and they go just a little bit too far, which distracts from what could be the impact.”
Cassidy noted that the definition of bloodbath includes an economic disaster.
“And so if he’s speaking about the auto industry in particular in Ohio, then you can take it with a little bit more context,” Cassidy said. “That’s why I say you walk up to the line. Depending upon the perspective, somebody is going to interpret it. He’s running against Biden, so Biden’s going to say it’s about political violence. His defenders want to defend him, and so they’re going to say it’s about economic disaster. There’s always just that little bit of tension there, which allows the dispute about the interpretation as opposed to the kind of general sort of, ‘Is this a person we want to have in office?'”
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/03/trumps-bloodbath-comment/
LIES! TDSnopes says it is correctly attributed! Orangemanbad!
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-bloodbath-for-country/
-
LIES! TDSnopes says it is correctly attributed! Orangemanbad!
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-bloodbath-for-country/
They are such liars. lol
-
(https://s3.amazonaws.com/i.snag.gy/csrtnF.jpg)
-
Biden's Latest Campaign Ad Goes All-In on Scaremongering Around Trump's 'Bloodbath' Comment
By Brandon Morse | March 18, 2024
https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2024/03/18/bidens-latest-campaign-ad-goes-all-in-on-scaremongering-around-trumps-bloodbath-comment-n2171555
-
Elon Musk has done so much here.
Can't believe the vajayjay woman is going to get away with all her content manipulation and censorship.
-
President Biden announced his 2020 campaign by citing the "very fine people" comment. Now even leftwing snopes says it was not true. Will the debate moderators mention this?
No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People'
Trump's remarks about the deadly Charlottesville "Unite the Right" rally in 2017 remain controversial.
Taija PerryCook
Published June 20, 2024
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
-
President Biden announced his 2020 campaign by citing the "very fine people" comment. Now even leftwing snopes says it was not true. Will the debate moderators mention this?
No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 'Very Fine People'
Trump's remarks about the deadly Charlottesville "Unite the Right" rally in 2017 remain controversial.
Taija PerryCook
Published June 20, 2024
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
Trump did comment to the press "You had very fine people on both sides". . It is possible his comment was misunderstood but he did say this and unless someone can prove this video was altered, it confirms that this is what he said. i=T00A_SHz7EQZ6mrB At 1:05.
What was this about if it was not mocking the reporter for his disability? i=LhdgrKmwMGVfsg76 approximately at :18
-
Trump did comment to the press "You had very fine people on both sides". . It is possible his comment was misunderstood but he did say this and unless someone can prove this video was altered, it confirms that this is what he said. i=T00A_SHz7EQZ6mrB At 1:05.
What was this about if it was not mocking the reporter for his disability? i=LhdgrKmwMGVfsg76 approximately at :18
There's a video somewhere of Trump using the same lame gesture to mock himself, perhaps on Larry King.
-
There's a video somewhere of Trump using the same lame gesture to mock himself, perhaps on Larry King.
So, how does this change anything? Are you suggesting if someone mocks themselves it makes doing this towards other folks okay? Trump seemed to be mocking the reporter's disability which includes that particular hand gesture. I am not aware that Trump has such a disability. If Trump was mocking himself on Larry King, what exactly did it mean? I don't see where there could be any connection. Also, I have never seen a video or heard anything wherein Trump made fun of himself.
-
So, how does this change anything? Are you suggesting if someone mocks themselves it makes doing this towards other folks okay? Trump seemed to be mocking the reporter's disability which includes that particular hand gesture. I am not aware that Trump has such a disability. If Trump was mocking himself on Larry King, what exactly did it mean? I don't see where there could be any connection. Also, I have never seen a video or heard anything wherein Trump made fun of himself.
This is going to be a long thread. Remember the Jussie tweets by Harris and Biden, the Rittenhouse matter, the hands up don't shoot lies, the million other race hoaxs? That is just the beginning.
Let's just wait 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
-
Trump did comment to the press "You had very fine people on both sides". . It is possible his comment was misunderstood but he did say this and unless someone can prove this video was altered, it confirms that this is what he said. i=T00A_SHz7EQZ6mrB At 1:05.
What was this about if it was not mocking the reporter for his disability? i=LhdgrKmwMGVfsg76 approximately at :18
In context, and by his own words, Trump was not talking about Nazis when he said "very fine people on both side." So you can keep lying about it, but even a liberal rag like Snopes is finally admitting the obvious truth.
And no, Trump did not mock a disabled reporter. I thought he did and that was one of the reasons I didn't vote for him in 2016. I was wrong and I've posted the video evidence before.
Twelve minute clip and the background music is irritating, but I think a lot of people (me included) got manipulated by the media. :-\
What do you think?
-
In context, and by his own words, Trump was not talking about Nazis when he said "very fine people on both side." So you can keep lying about it, but even a liberal rag like Snopes is finally admitting the obvious truth.
And no, Trump did not mock a disabled reporter. I thought he did and that was one of the reasons I didn't vote for him in 2016. I was wrong and I've posted the video evidence before.
They knew it was BS but they played along for years ("repetition is the key to a successful message" per Soros Jr). They are very selective and particular in their "fact checking".
-
They knew it was BS but they played along for years ("repetition is the key to a successful message" per Soros Jr). They are very selective and particular in their "fact checking".
They're Lying Cheating low life Scumbags
Just like the Pedocrat supporters on here, Not 1 decent bone in them.
They don't care / not interested in Facts or Truth.
-
(https://scontent.fhnl3-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/449453306_1032323321595596_1027759101193147523_n.jpg?stp=cp6_dst-jpg&_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=833d8c&_nc_ohc=kXkUkage7eIQ7kNvgFDTttf&_nc_ht=scontent.fhnl3-2.fna&oh=00_AYAOHePW6Vfgl2r-R0vbzbsIyJxpH79qA1Rw3mcnuVy5jQ&oe=66860962)
-
(https://scontent.fhnl3-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/449453306_1032323321595596_1027759101193147523_n.jpg?stp=cp6_dst-jpg&_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=833d8c&_nc_ohc=kXkUkage7eIQ7kNvgFDTttf&_nc_ht=scontent.fhnl3-2.fna&oh=00_AYAOHePW6Vfgl2r-R0vbzbsIyJxpH79qA1Rw3mcnuVy5jQ&oe=66860962)
These people need to be mocked and laughed at 24/7
-
(https://scontent.fhnl3-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/449453306_1032323321595596_1027759101193147523_n.jpg?stp=cp6_dst-jpg&_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=833d8c&_nc_ohc=kXkUkage7eIQ7kNvgFDTttf&_nc_ht=scontent.fhnl3-2.fna&oh=00_AYAOHePW6Vfgl2r-R0vbzbsIyJxpH79qA1Rw3mcnuVy5jQ&oe=66860962)
[/quote
Prime or LurkingForBoys Said exact same thing & very likely still do ;D :D ;D
-
Might as well add this here.
Yep. Up until recently the media kept parroting how Biden has no issues and is still sharp. Meanwhile when Hur mentioned Biden's weak recollection, Biden responded angrily with "how the hell dare he raise that".
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
Biden allies say president is ‘sharp,’ special counsel criticism is ‘B.S.’
Feb. 11, 2024
President Joe Biden’s allies on Sunday defended the commander in chief and blasted a special counsel report that questioned the president’s age and mental fitness as containing “gratuitous, unnecessary and inaccurate personal remarks.”
Mitch Landrieu, a former senior adviser to Biden who is now a national co-chair of his re-election campaign, told NBC News' “Meet the Press” that “this kind of sense that he’s not ready for this job is just a bucket of B.S. It’s so deep [that] your boots will get stuck under.”
Landrieu added that as a longtime adviser to Biden, he can testify to his mental acuity.
“I’ve been knowing him for 30 years. I have met with him personally. I’ve met with him with two people, five people, 10 people. I have been on trips with him, crisscrossing the country, rebuilding America based on this incredible infrastructure bill that was passed. And I’m telling you, this guy is tough. He’s smart. He’s on his game,” Landrieu said.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas offered a similar defense, calling Biden “sharp.”
“The most difficult part about a meeting with President Biden is preparing for it because he is sharp, intensely probing and detail-oriented and focused,” Mayorkas told “Meet the Press.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/mayorkas-defends-biden-sharp-intensely-probing-detail-oriented-rcna138192
Republicans who interact with Biden don’t question his sharpness
Many Republicans would have people believe that Joe Biden is old and feeble. Republicans who actually interact with the president know better.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-interact-biden-dont-question-sharpness-rcna119195
Joint Chiefs Chairman says Biden is ‘pretty sharp’
Amid questions raised about President Biden’s mental acuity from Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. CQ Brown tells Lester Holt that the commander-in-chief often asks “pertinent” and pointed questions in the Oval Office.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/joint-chiefs-chairman-says-biden-is-pretty-sharp-204069445504
This is by the loon Oliver Darcy but let's include it as well:
Top news outlets acknowledge Hur’s characterization of Biden’s mental state didn’t match reality
After spending weeks breathlessly questioning President Joe Biden’s mental faculties in the wake of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s explosive report, some of America’s top news organizations on Tuesday effectively stated that Hur’s characterization of the commander-in-chief was off base.
The Wall Street Journal declared that the transcripts of Biden’s deposition with Hur released on Tuesday painted “a more nuanced picture” than the report indicated. The New York Times found that Biden appeared “clearheaded,” despite having fumbled some dates. And The Washington Post concluded Biden “doesn’t come across as being as absent-minded as Hur has made him out to be.”
In other words, the Hur report offered a misleading view of the president’s mental state. That’s a significant problem for news organizations, given that much of their recent coverage about Biden’s age was derived from that very report where Hur offered a wince-inducing depiction of the president as a “sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/13/media/news-outlets-robert-hur-biden-mental-state/index.html
-
Progressives enraged as Democrats reportedly privately admit Trump isn't an 'existential threat to democracy'
'Absolutely f---ing enraging,' former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau reacted
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn Fox News
Published July 11, 2024
https://www.foxnews.com/media/progressives-enraged-democrats-reportedly-privately-admit-trump-isnt-existential-threat-democracy
-
So, how does this change anything? Are you suggesting if someone mocks themselves it makes doing this towards other folks okay? Trump seemed to be mocking the reporter's disability which includes that particular hand gesture. I am not aware that Trump has such a disability. If Trump was mocking himself on Larry King, what exactly did it mean? I don't see where there could be any connection. Also, I have never seen a video or heard anything wherein Trump made fun of himself.
The reporter's disability isn't characterized by Trump's puerile gestures.
Do some research to answer your own questions.
-
The reporter's disability isn't characterized by Trump's puerile gestures.
Do some research to answer your own questions.
Perception is everything. Most people perceived that Trump was mocking Serge Kovaleski who has a congenital joint disorder.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtSDh1SWgAA7J_B.jpg?format=jpg&name=small)
-
Very smart & coherent Man - is his Mocking Senile/ Dementia Folk ?
Not very nice of him - Many will think so - perception is everything.
-
Perception is everything. Most people perceived that Trump was mocking Serge Kovaleski who has a congenital joint disorder.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtSDh1SWgAA7J_B.jpg?format=jpg&name=small)
So the truth is meaningless to you. ::)
Trump's flailing is nothing like the reporter's handicap, and he's used the flailing to mock himself and others.
-
So the truth is meaningless to you. ::)
Trump's flailing is nothing like the reporter's handicap, and he's used the flailing to mock himself and others.
Your comment does not answer the questions of why Trump did this when, and where he did. Are you suggesting it was just a random coincidence?
Can you give me some examples of Trump flailing to mock himself?
-
Perception is everything. Most people perceived that Trump was mocking Serge Kovaleski who has a congenital joint disorder.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtSDh1SWgAA7J_B.jpg?format=jpg&name=small)
You are still clinging to this nonsense? I posted the video for you that shows this was a farce. That reporter doesn't hold his arm like that. They freeze framed that shot to sell a deceptive story. But you are the same person who still clinging to the "fine people on both sides" lie.
-
Very smart & coherent Man - is his Mocking Senile/ Dementia Folk ?
Not very nice of him - Many will think so - perception is everything.
Pedocrats think PedoJoe is the greatest leader ever, smart folks. ::)
-
Pedocrats think PedoJoe is the greatest leader ever, smart folks. ::)
They really are a special breed - mentally Fucked up.
We only have to look at the shit state of any Pedocrat run
Town or city. ::)
-
Anyone still holding on to the "very fine people" thing is a fucking idiot. It's amazing people are so ill informed that 8 years later the president still feels he can utilize it.
Here, for any idiot still believing it:
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
That's the whole quote. Anyone could find it in no time if they did the research. So my question would be - Is Biden so f'n shielded or in decline that he actually believes it, or is he just comfortable lying to the public? Which one is it?
-
You are still clinging to this nonsense? I posted the video for you that shows this was a farce. That reporter doesn't hold his arm like that. They freeze framed that shot to sell a deceptive story. But you are the same person who still clinging to the "fine people on both sides" lie.
Spin it however you want, Trump was mocking the reporter. Your nonsense is evidenced by the fact you did not answer the question regarding why Trump did what he did when he did.
-
Spin it however you want, Trump was mocking the reporter. Your nonsense is evidenced by the fact you did not answer the question regarding why Trump did what he did when he did.
::)
Say's the biggest avoider of questions.
-
Spin it however you want, Trump was mocking the reporter. Your nonsense is evidenced by the fact you did not answer the question regarding why Trump did what he did when he did.
There is no spin. There are facts. You choose to ignore them.
-
Clay Travis
@ClayTravis
It’s amazing how left wing media gets talking points from Democrats and just goes out and executes on those talking points even if it means they have to refute their prior reporting. Watch this:
https://x.com/ClayTravis/status/1816323018630557905
-
It is incredible how many dishonest people get elected to positions of power and public trust.
Trump War Room
@TrumpWarRoom
Rep. Dan Goldman, who many people are saying has an impossibly good stock portfolio, claims Donald Trump is "afraid to debate" Kamala Harris.
Bret Baier then points out that he accepted three debates causing Goldman to have a meltdown.
https://x.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1823127610097869067
-
We cannot trust these people.
Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
The DNC's media mouthpieces lied to the American people about Beyoncé to pump up Kamala hype.
This will go down in history as #Beyoncegate
https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1827173323098226721
-
A complete FRAUD!!! Like the rest of them. Another white liberal woman fraud and disaster!
-
Megyn Kelly
@megynkelly
So Judy Woodruff LIED. Lied about Trump attempting to kill a cease fire deal (allegedly to help himself) & lied when she then blamed Axios & Reuters for the bad info. Taxpayers are paying for these lies. What will PBS do about it? (Well done
@yashar
, who has owned this story)
https://x.com/megynkelly/status/1828823375269310901
Yashar Ali 🐘
@yashar
I wanted to follow up on this Judy Woodruff clip after I confirmed something.
In this clip, Woodruff said that reporting—without citing which reporting—had revealed that former President Trump had been pushing Prime Minister Netanyahu not to accept a hostage deal because that would help Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign.
Obviously, this was a major allegation. It would mean that Netanyahu was sacrificing the lives of hostages and the security of Israel for Donald Trump’s candidacy and that Donald Trump was trying to keep the hostages, and civilians in Gaza, in harm’s way for political purposes.
When people pushed back against her, Woodruff tweeted that she had relied on Axios and Reuters reporting on the matter but had missed that Trump and Netanyahu had denied this reporting. She apologized for the oversight.
But her tweet was inaccurate.
As I noted last week, Axios and Reuters never reported that Netanyahu was being urged by Trump not to take a hostage deal. They had just reported that Trump and Netanyahu spoke about Gaza.
But to be sure, I went back to check a few things and also asked Axios for comment.
First, the Reuters report that Woodruff cited was just a pickup of an Axios story.
The Axios story Woodruff cited had been updated to reflect Netanyahu’s denial that he and Trump ever discussed Gaza and a hostage deal.
(I have linked to both reports in this thread)
A spokesperson for Axios confirmed that they NEVER reported that Trump was said to have been discouraging Netanyahu from taking the deal.
Not only were Woodruff’s on-air comments inaccurate, but her apology tweet also said that Axios (and Reuters) reported something that they never did.
Neither publication even stepped into the area that she suggested.
I have followed up with PBS for comment.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GWFHAiraIAAEJ3t?format=jpg&name=small)
https://x.com/yashar/status/1828821053420007535
-
-
-
Why isn't the media all over this?
Megyn Kelly Brings Receipts on Kamala Harris' Lies About Her Fracking Position During CNN Interview
[/youtube]
-
Sen. Bernie Sanders says he considers Harris ‘progressive’ and her policy changes are ‘pragmatic’
In an interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press," Sen. Bernie Sanders said Vice President Kamala Harris' changing views are part of "doing what she thinks is right in order to win the election."
Sept. 8, 2024
By Alexandra Marquez
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/bernie-sanders-considers-harris-progressive-policy-changes-pragmatic-rcna170102
-
If this is legit it speaks volumes about how weak, unintelligent, and dishonest Kamala Harris and the mainstream media are. If she needs these kinds of advantages to answer questions in a debate with Trump, there is no way she will have what it takes to deal with world leaders. God help us if that woman gets elected.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXiAOg7XUAAkpkR?format=jpg&name=large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXiATwPWIAAt2t0?format=jpg&name=large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXiAZ-DWYAEe7os?format=jpg&name=large)
-
Here is the senior Democrat in the House openly lying to the public. And the media's response: crickets.
Pelosi: We Had An Open Primary And Kamala Harris Won It, "It's Just Nobody Got In Because She Had A Running Start"
Posted By Ian Schwartz
On Date September 18, 2024
Speaker Emerita Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) talks about the nomination of Kamala Harris during an interview with Semafor's Kadia Goba.
"People could have jumped in," Pelosi told Goba. "There were some people who were sort of preparing but she just took off with it and actually it was a blessing because there wasn't that much time between then and the election and it sort of saved time."
"It wasn't that we didn't have an open president[ial primary]. It's just that nobody got in because she had a running start," Pelosi said.
KADIA GOBA, SEMAFOR: You had reportedly said you wanted a sort of an open primary when Joe Biden stepped down. Did you change your mind because you saw all the excitement around Kamala Harris?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: No, I didn't change my mind. We had an open primary and she won it. Nobody else got in the race because she was politically astute and that was the thought.
[APPLAUSE]
Let's show our talent. We have a great bench, all these great people in the country and the president endorsed her and that's a big deal because Joe Biden is the most consequential president of modern times.
He accomplished so much more. I mean even Barack Obama in his eight years in service would admit that in the short period of time that Joe Biden had the majority, which was two years of his four-year term. But it's not just about legislating, which we share that success, that legacy of what we did.
It's also about executing, that executive branch, how you get things done and how he translated the legislation into delivery of infrastructure, CHIPS Act, you name it, IRA in terms of saving the planet and reducing the cost of prescription drugs from $600 or $500 depending for insulin a month for seniors to $35 a month. I mean I could name many things. I've said about the 15 million jobs earlier.
So he's very consequential, highly respected and was to be our nominee and then he, because he knows the job of vice president, appointed her vice president three and a half years ago and because he knows the job of president, endorsed her for president. And so yes, people could have jumped in. There were some people who were sort of preparing but she just took off with it and actually it was a blessing because there wasn't that much time between then and the election and it sort of saved time.
It wasn't that we didn't have an open president. It's just that nobody got in because she had a running start.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/18/pelosi_we_had_an_open_primary_and_kamala_harris_won_it_its_just_nobody_got_in_because_she_had_a_running_start.html
-
Here is the senior Democrat in the House openly lying to the public. And the media's response: crickets.
Pelosi: We Had An Open Primary And Kamala Harris Won It, "It's Just Nobody Got In Because She Had A Running Start"
Posted By Ian Schwartz
On Date September 18, 2024
Speaker Emerita Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) talks about the nomination of Kamala Harris during an interview with Semafor's Kadia Goba.
"People could have jumped in," Pelosi told Goba. "There were some people who were sort of preparing but she just took off with it and actually it was a blessing because there wasn't that much time between then and the election and it sort of saved time."
"It wasn't that we didn't have an open president[ial primary]. It's just that nobody got in because she had a running start," Pelosi said.
KADIA GOBA, SEMAFOR: You had reportedly said you wanted a sort of an open primary when Joe Biden stepped down. Did you change your mind because you saw all the excitement around Kamala Harris?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: No, I didn't change my mind. We had an open primary and she won it. Nobody else got in the race because she was politically astute and that was the thought.
[APPLAUSE]
Let's show our talent. We have a great bench, all these great people in the country and the president endorsed her and that's a big deal because Joe Biden is the most consequential president of modern times.
He accomplished so much more. I mean even Barack Obama in his eight years in service would admit that in the short period of time that Joe Biden had the majority, which was two years of his four-year term. But it's not just about legislating, which we share that success, that legacy of what we did.
It's also about executing, that executive branch, how you get things done and how he translated the legislation into delivery of infrastructure, CHIPS Act, you name it, IRA in terms of saving the planet and reducing the cost of prescription drugs from $600 or $500 depending for insulin a month for seniors to $35 a month. I mean I could name many things. I've said about the 15 million jobs earlier.
So he's very consequential, highly respected and was to be our nominee and then he, because he knows the job of vice president, appointed her vice president three and a half years ago and because he knows the job of president, endorsed her for president. And so yes, people could have jumped in. There were some people who were sort of preparing but she just took off with it and actually it was a blessing because there wasn't that much time between then and the election and it sort of saved time.
It wasn't that we didn't have an open president. It's just that nobody got in because she had a running start.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/18/pelosi_we_had_an_open_primary_and_kamala_harris_won_it_its_just_nobody_got_in_because_she_had_a_running_start.html
(https://images.deccanherald.com/deccanherald%2Fimport%2Fsites%2Fdh%2Ffiles%2Farticleimages%2F2020%2F06%2F22%2FAP08-06-2020_000023A-1592797807.jpg?w=1200&ar=40%3A21&auto=format%2Ccompress&ogImage=true&mode=crop&enlarge=true&overlay=false&overlay_position=bottom&overlay_width=100)
-
“Former Trump Voters” in Harris Campaign Ad Are Professional Actors
By Stephen Phelps / September 25, 2024
https://wokespy.com/former-trump-voters-in-harris-campaign-ad-are-professional-actors/
-
Maher calls out SNL for 'zombie lie' that Republicans are racist, warns they are 'not helping'
Bill Maher called out 'Saturday Night Live' for its portrayal of Trump supporters, saying it 'doesn't ring true'
By Alexander Hall Fox News
Published May 19, 2025
https://www.foxnews.com/media/maher-calls-out-snl-zombie-lie-republicans-racist-warns-not-helping