Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Kwon on September 27, 2024, 01:13:53 PM
-
-
apart from the possibility of birth defects what is morally wrong with siblings sleeping together?
Try and answer that withouts the usual " Its just wrong" comments
Lets say its two sisters so the birth defects is irrelevant..
-
She used to be a really beautiful girl - in every interview she says she wants to get her facial tattoos removed, and a few months later she got another one. She already has several children from different guys raised by her grandma, now she's got one with her own brother.
Crazy crackwh*re is on the road to nowhere, it's mind-boggling.
-
sibling means her direct related brother with same parents right?
there will be birth defects.
degenerate as f*ck...
some people defend cousins having kids but even that leads to alot of birth defects. Also degenerate behaviour.
-
sibling means her direct related brother with same parents right?
there will be birth defects.
degenerate as f*ck...
some people defend cousins having kids but even that leads to alot of birth defects. Also degenerate behaviour.
see my question above
Whats degenerate about it?
-
see my question above
Whats degenerate about it?
there is a built in disgust in all humans to doing that. Even animals don't do it.
for good reason. It leads to defective offspring.
these are reason enough for it to be morally wrong.
-
a family result of close related inbreeding:
-
there is a built in disgust in all humans to doing that. Even animals don't do it.
for good reason. It leads to defective offspring.
these are reason enough for it to be morally wrong.
Built in?
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/may-8-sounds-of-a-predator-horses-are-well-diggers-grass-defuses-a-toxic-explosive-and-more-1.6016777/animals-rarely-avoid-mating-with-relatives-new-study-says-1.6016789
You are aware many brothers and sisters have crushes on each other growing up, its society trhat tells them its wrong
I told you to leave that out of it....
-
what is morally wrong with siblings sleeping together?
Lets say its two sisters so the birth defects is irrelevant..
how hot r these sisters… pic would help
-
how hot r these sisters… pic would help
(https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2024/01/21/10/44/ai-generated-8522872_1280.png)
-
how hot r these sisters… pic would help
18 of the 23 members of Getbig standing by with tissues and lotion ready.
-
18 gimmicks of the 23 members of Getbig standing by with tissues and lotion ready.
fixed
-
Built in?
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/may-8-sounds-of-a-predator-horses-are-well-diggers-grass-defuses-a-toxic-explosive-and-more-1.6016777/animals-rarely-avoid-mating-with-relatives-new-study-says-1.6016789
You are aware many brothers and sisters have crushes on each other growing up, its society trhat tells them its wrong
I told you to leave that out of it....
Highly doubt that. You're just making sh*t up now
I know you like to be a contrarian with edgy takes but common...
Seems you defend it for a reason. You have incest in your family? Cousins having kids or smth?
-
fixed
The hand would still be cradling the same dick.
Shizzo should post pics of his sister’s humongous milky-white funbags so the rest of Getbig can see what he’s been spraying off to for the last decade.
-
So you do a bit of jugglin’ with your sis’s balogna tits after a few episodes of TJ Hooker.
What’s the harm?
-
Highly doubt that. You're just making sh*t up now
I know you like to be a contrarian with edgy takes but common...
Seems you defend it for a reason. You have incest in your family? Cousins having kids or smth?
Im not defending it, I saw the question asked to some great thinkers and minds of our time, they struggled with it.
a bit like you are...
-
There's open minded and there's weird
this goes for the latter
there's also right vs wrong. some things are just wrong, no need to go philosophical about stupid sh*t
-
There's open minded and there's weird
this goes for the latter
there's also right vs wrong. some things are just wrong, no need to go philosophical about stupid sh*t
see, its not an easy question is it?
"its just wrong" isnt really a valid answer, try and answer why its wrong...
Do we all know right from wrong or do we learn it?
Thats another philosophical question for you
-
There's open minded and there's weird
this goes for the latter
there's also right vs wrong. some things are just wrong, no need to go philosophical about stupid sh*t
I have many thoughts about this moral dilemma but getbig is not the place to discuss it.
With that said, if you want to read a great author who talks about moral decision making, read Jonathan Haidt. His book, “The Righteous Mind” is a great read.
PS: Haidt conducted a study where he asked people why two siblings having sex was wrong, particularly if it did not lead to negative consequences? Most just said “it’s gross.” Just saying something is gross is not a good way to make a moral decision. Haidt contends that moral decision making is based on moral intuitions, gut like reactions, not rational/logical processes, which is why when asked if two siblings can sleep together, there is an automatic “it’s gross,” even before the moral decision is contemplated.
-
there is a built in disgust in all humans to doing that. Even animals don't do it.
for good reason. It leads to defective offspring.
these are reason enough for it to be morally wrong.
Don’t use animals as a metric for trying to explain human behavior.
Animal parents also kill their offspring and this is very common. That’s not very common with humans.
-
I have many thoughts about this moral dilemma but getbig is not the place to discuss it.
With that said, if you want to read a great author who talks about moral decision making, read Jonathan Haidt. His book, “The Righteous Mind” is a great read.
PS: Haidt conducted a study where he asked people why two siblings having sex was wrong, particularly if it did not lead to negative consequences? Most just said “it’s gross.” Just saying something is gross is not a good way to make a moral decision. Haidt contends that moral decision making is based on moral intuitions, gut like reactions, not rational/logical processes, which is why when asked if two siblings can sleep together, there is an automatic “it’s gross,” even before the moral decision is contemplated.
this
-
Preface: I am philosophically opposed to being promiscuous(explanation for another time).
You sluts out there:
Which would you rather do
1) Eat your non-fat sister's pussy
or
2) Suck some dude's dick
Hetero incest is superior to faggotry.
-
Preface: I am philosophically opposed to being promiscuous(explanation for another time).
You sluts out there:
Which would you rather do
1) Eat your non-fat sister's pussy
or
2) Suck some dude's dick
Hetero incest is superior to faggotry.
hahaha outed, would sooner suck a dick than eat out his fat sister... ;D
-
see, its not an easy question is it?
"its just wrong" isnt really a valid answer, try and answer why its wrong...
Do we all know right from wrong or do we learn it?
Thats another philosophical question for you
What's wrong with eating poop?
-
apart from the possibility of birth defects what is morally wrong with siblings sleeping together?
Try and answer that withouts the usual " Its just wrong" comments
Lets say its two sisters so the birth defects is irrelevant..
The Bible condemns it? :-\
-
The Bible condemns it? :-\
It also suggests stoning people to death..
-
It also suggests stoning people to death..
They still do that in the Middle East.
-
They still do that in the Middle East.
I wish they did it in Selma...
-
Joswift has jumped the shark. Hahahaha.
-
Joswift has jumped the shark. Hahahaha.
I asked an age old question that is difficult to answer.
I didnt agree or disagree with any premise
Did you answer it Rob?
-
I asked an age old question that is difficult to answer.
I didnt agree or disagree with any premise
Did you answer it Rob?
Some things just don’t pass the “does it feel right?” test and this is for sure one of them.
-
Some things just don’t pass the “does it feel right?” test and this is for sure one of them.
and thats the point of the question, where does that "it doesnt feel right" come from?
Its very difficult to answer the question without resorting to "it doesnt feel right" or "its not normal"
-
Look up "The Whittakers" on YouTube. :'( :-X
-
Look up "The Whittakers" on YouTube. :'( :-X
the birth defects is omitted from the argument....
two sisters in a relationship for example...
-
the birth defects is omitted from the argument....
two sisters in a relationship for example...
Yes, I understood that but could not resist showing what really mixing similar DNA can do over a few generations. I think two sisters is gross. I knew a couple of brothers that were homosexual and said they did the "bhanky roll" with one another. Again, G R O S S.
It just seems morally wrong but that may be a factor that is also excluded from possible reasons?
-
Yes, I understood that but could not resist showing what really mixing similar DNA can do over a few generations. I think two sisters is gross. I knew a couple of brothers that were homosexual and said they did the "bhanky roll" with one another. Again, G R O S S.
It just seems morally wrong but that may be a factor that is also excluded from possible reasons?
Just saying its "gross" isnt a really a valid reason, its an opinion.
If people believe in the bible we all came from Adam and Eve and then again Noahs family after the flood.
-
Why is it ok to kill and eat a boar, but canibalism is not, even if it leads you to die from hunger? One could argue it's only meat, but it isnt.
-
Just saying its "gross" isnt a really a valid reason, its an opinion.
If people believe in the bible we all came from Adam and Eve and then again Noahs family after the flood.
It's valid for me and mine. That is all I need and if you think otherwise, that's fine for you but I still think it is disgusting. ;D
-
Why is it ok to kill and eat a boar, but canibalism is not, even if it leads you to die from hunger? One could argue it's only meat, but it isnt.
Well stated.
-
Why is it ok to kill and eat a boar, but canibalism is not, even if it leads you to die from hunger? One could argue it's only meat, but it isnt.
"civilised" people have resorted to canibalism to survive, the only reason its not acceptable normally is because we hold human life to a higher standard than animals.
There are no health reasons why we cant eat other humans.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/311277
-
the birth defects is omitted from the argument....
two sisters in a relationship for example...
How can you omit the birth defects?
Explain why standing in front of a train is dumb, but exclude the death aspect.
-
How can you omit the birth defects?
Explain why standing in front of a train is dumb, but exclude the death aspect.
two sisters
as for the train, you may get hurt and not killed, you also may leave relatives and family behind who depend on you, you may traumatise the train driver who runs over you, all the staff dealing with the clean up afterwards...
Getting hit by a train creates shockwaves through many peoples lives.
-
two sisters
as for the train, you may get hurt and not killed, you also may leave relatives and family behind who depend on you, you may traumatise the train driver who runs over you, all the staff dealing with the clean up afterwards...
Getting hit by a train creates shockwaves through many peoples lives.
So does fucking your sister, if family and friends find out about it. That's why in Haidt's example he specifies that they agree to never tell another soul, and that's where I'd begin trying to build an argument as to why it's immoral. Is cheating on your wife moral if you never get caught? (Answer: of course :D).
-
So does fucking your sister, if family and friends find out about it. That's why in Haidt's example he specifies that they agree to never tell another soul, and that's where I'd begin trying to build an argument as to why it's immoral. Is cheating on your wife moral if you never get caught? (Answer: of course :D).
I suppose thats like a father finding out his sons gay, added bonus if hes a receiver... ;D
-
I suppose thats like a father finding out his sons gay, added bonus if hes a receiver... ;D
Lololol. Every parent's nightmare.
-
Lololol. Every parent's nightmare.
"As long as my sons happy its all that matters".. they say through gritted teeth...
-
So does fucking your sister, if family and friends find out about it. That's why in Haidt's example he specifies that they agree to never tell another soul, and that's where I'd begin trying to build an argument as to why it's immoral. Is cheating on your wife moral if you never get caught? (Answer: of course :D).
So, in and of itself, two siblings sleeping with each other is not immoral if no one gets hurt (themselves or other people).
That’s the whole point of Haidts argument. Something is not inherently immoral “Just because it’s gross.” The reasons have to be distilled why it’s immoral, which may be because it hurts other people. A potential valid reason, which is based on logic, not “ewwww it’s gross.”
Haidt is simply trying to get people to logic their way through moral decisions, and not simply rely on gut reactions.
To further expand on “not telling a soul” so other people are not hurt, well, why do my family and friends get to determine if my actions are moral because their feelings are hurt? What if only 1 family member is hurt out of 15? Is it still immoral? Why does their inability to regulate their own feelings about X behavior make it immoral?
-
Why is it ok to kill and eat a boar, but canibalism is not, even if it leads you to die from hunger? One could argue it's only meat, but it isnt.
Most of our moral inclinations are very gut based reactions, based on which particular culture you are raised in. That’s obvious—different cultures will have different moral inclinations.
I’m not saying I agree or disagree with two siblings having sex, as much as I’m stressing the importance to look beyond our own cultural worldviews and have a more nuanced understanding of moral decision making.
-
Some things just don’t pass the “does it feel right?” test and this is for sure one of them.
Yes the whole “it just doesn’t feel right,” is an intuitive, gut based reaction, which may or may not lead you down the right moral pathway.
-
two sisters
as for the train, you may get hurt and not killed, you also may leave relatives and family behind who depend on you, you may traumatise the train driver who runs over you, all the staff dealing with the clean up afterwards...
Getting hit by a train creates shockwaves through many peoples lives.
You tryin to make me cum dude?
-
So, in and of itself, two siblings sleeping with each other is not immoral if no one gets hurt (themselves or other people).
That’s the whole point of Haidts argument. Something is not inherently immoral “Just because it’s gross.” The reasons have to be distilled why it’s immoral, which may be because it hurts other people. A potential valid reason, which is based on logic, not “ewwww it’s gross.”
Haidt is simply trying to get people to logic their way through moral decisions, and not simply rely on gut reactions.
To further expand on “not telling a soul” so other people are not hurt, well, why do my family and friends get to determine if my actions are moral because their feelings are hurt? What if only 1 family member is hurt out of 15? Is it still immoral? Why does their inability to regulate their own feelings about X behavior make it immoral?
Yeah, it was an interesting thought experiment, and I suppose one could go quite deep with it and appeal to Kantian principles and so on, but as an exercise in getting people to examine their own intuitions and question if disgust alone can be a reliable barometer of morality, it does that very well.
Personally, I need to see a video of these two filthy, depraved sisters going at it hammer and tongs to really make my mind up.
-
You tryin to make me cum dude?
over the sisters or the train fatality?
-
over the sisters or the train fatality?
why not both?
-
why not both?
Google is your friend
-
Yeah, it was an interesting thought experiment, and I suppose one could go quite deep with it and appeal to Kantian principles and so on, but as an exercise in getting people to examine their own intuitions and question if disgust alone can be a reliable barometer of morality, it does that very well.
Personally, I need to see a video of these two filthy, depraved sisters going at it hammer and tongs to really make my mind up.
Would two bodybuilding brothers suffice, perhaps the Tren Twins?
-
Google is your friend
(https://media1.tenor.com/m/odyVsZbC-OYAAAAC/why-not-both-why-not.gif)
-
hahaha outed, would sooner suck a dick than eat out his fat sister... ;D
hahaha The spirit of squadfather lives....6.45 inches up your ass. ;D
-
Look up "The Whittakers" on YouTube. :'( :-X
Very interesting people.
-
Yes the whole “it just doesn’t feel right,” is an intuitive, gut based reaction, which may or may not lead you down the right moral pathway.
In this case it most certainly does.
-
In this case it most certainly does.
I’d say it depends.
-
Would two bodybuilding brothers suffice, perhaps the Tren Twins?
Oof, Lord. SF, even just imagining this has left me with the conviction that incest is but a beautiful expression of love. ❤️
-
That’s like a father finding out his son’s gay.
No greater shame or disgust known to man.
If I had a son, and he was gay, it would be a challenge not to waste both him and myself.
-
No greater shame or disgust known to man.
If I had a son, and he was gay, it would be a challenge not to waste both him and myself.
:D Brutal!