Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Necrosis on September 06, 2025, 03:52:36 AM
-
Lost jobs in June (first time in 4 years), only 22k in august, losing manufacturing jobs for 4 straight months, unemployment up to 4.3% thats pretty impressive the guy is outdoing himself! Job openings to unemployment ratio flipped, there are less new job opening. Dollar weakening, trade partners pivoting away, countries boycotting the states LOLOL
It's almost like you guys have a moronic vindictive sociopathic narc running the country. It's honestly pretty impressive to see what he has been able to accomplish in a few short months. Hows that isolationism going?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0xe5dvp47o
-
Necrosis, what has happened to you? What's with the TDS? Did you lose your job as an Canadian MD? Are you a Trudeau fan and now you're mad that Trump got him fired?
-
Necrosis, what has happened to you? What's with the TDS? Did you lose your job as an Canadian MD? Are you a Trudeau fan and now you're mad that Trump got him fired?
lol
I think he is incredibly dumb and the US is becoming an idiocracy. It's a fun topic to talk about and gets people riled up.
Would you prefer I post in the nutrition or religious section? you let me know what you would like to see from me moving forward, thank you in advance.
-
No one?
LOL
he tariffs you, taxing you while lying that that the exporter is paying the tariff (how is that 38% whole food inflation feeling?) claiming to increase manufacturing jobs by doing so and since liberation day lololol 42k jobs have been lost in manufacturing. He then touts 17 trillion in investment in the US LMAO!!
Meanwhile he just launched and rugged pulled another shit coin and is sending emails asking for 15 dollars as using religious get into heaven bullshit. His personal wealth has exploded and he is destroying your economy.
It's almost like.... he is a grifter
Brilliant stuff!!
-
So the same as every single politician before him? Including your beloved demoncrats. What exactly is your point? You let you TDS take over and you post more moronic shit than Lurker.
-
No one?
LOL
he tariffs you, taxing you while lying that that the exporter is paying the tariff (how is that 38% whole food inflation feeling?) claiming to increase manufacturing jobs by doing so and since liberation day lololol 42k jobs have been lost in manufacturing. He then touts 17 trillion in investment in the US LMAO!!
Meanwhile he just launched and rugged pulled another shit coin and is sending emails asking for 15 dollars as using religious get into heaven bullshit. His personal wealth has exploded and he is destroying your economy.
It's almost like.... he is a grifter
Brilliant stuff!!
I believe its fairer to tax people based on their spending rather than their income. Tariffs offer a more equitable way for the government to generate revenue compared to income taxes. And they could have significant benefits. They could stimulate domestic industry by encouraging local production. Additionally, they might prompt other countries to lower their tariffs on our goods in response. Tariffs could also encourage consumers to be more mindful of their purchases. In my view, society isnt frugal enough. Too many people waste money on new cars every three years just to keep up with their neighbors.
I won't try to defend his alt-coin shenanigans. I don't think it is right for the president to do that.
-
So the same as every single politician before him? Including your beloved demoncrats. What exactly is your point? You let you TDS take over and you post more moronic shit than Lurker.
my guy, this is all self inflicted shit.
you see the world as all or nothing, everyone is shit, all politicians are the same, no one thing is any worse than any other thing. Actively grifting the public via shitcoins is next fucking level.
There are levels to this shit and he is top dawg moron.
Honestly you need to open your eyes and start thinking in grey scale cus your avoidance of thinking hard and in a nuanced way is simply apathy.
-
I believe its fairer to tax people based on their spending rather than their income.
they are also a way shielding inefficient companies from competition allowing them to produce inferior products at higher prices
They also favour business that has minimal physical import input eg property development, finance computer internet
The present regime has the advantage of reducing /eliminating pesky Congress interference.
VAT is a better way to tax spending
-
my guy, this is all self inflicted shit.
you see the world as all or nothing, everyone is shit, all politicians are the same, no one thing is any worse than any other thing. Actively grifting the public via shitcoins is next fucking level.
There are levels to this shit and he is top dawg moron.
Honestly you need to open your eyes and start thinking in grey scale cus your avoidance of thinking hard and in a nuanced way is simply apathy.
No, politicians are not all the same.
-
my guy, this is all self inflicted shit.
you see the world as all or nothing, everyone is shit, all politicians are the same, no one thing is any worse than any other thing. Actively grifting the public via shitcoins is next fucking level.
There are levels to this shit and he is top dawg moron.
Honestly you need to open your eyes and start thinking in grey scale cus your avoidance of thinking hard and in a nuanced way is simply apathy.
Bullshit. You're only saying this because it's Trump. You were oddly silent the last several years when mentally declining Biden and whoever was controlling him was fucking things up.
-
I believe its fairer to tax people based on their spending rather than their income. Tariffs offer a more equitable way for the government to generate revenue compared to income taxes. And they could have significant benefits. They could stimulate domestic industry by encouraging local production. Additionally, they might prompt other countries to lower their tariffs on our goods in response. Tariffs could also encourage consumers to be more mindful of their purchases. In my view, society isnt frugal enough. Too many people waste money on new cars every three years just to keep up with their neighbors.
I won't try to defend his alt-coin shenanigans. I don't think it is right for the president to do that.
Tariffs work for protectionism in specific areas like the dairy situation with canada for example, not broad blanket tariffs, that is inherently inflationary.
Tariffs will never work to replace income tax, its too variable and when it did work there was little to no infrastructure.
-
So the same as every single politician before him? Including your beloved demoncrats. What exactly is your point? You let you TDS take over and you post more moronic shit than Lurker.
Should be easy for you to refute him then. But you haven't yet.
-
No one?
LOL
he tariffs you, taxing you while lying that that the exporter is paying the tariff (how is that 38% whole food inflation feeling?) claiming to increase manufacturing jobs by doing so and since liberation day lololol 42k jobs have been lost in manufacturing. He then touts 17 trillion in investment in the US LMAO!!
Meanwhile he just launched and rugged pulled another shit coin and is sending emails asking for 15 dollars as using religious get into heaven bullshit. His personal wealth has exploded and he is destroying your economy.
It's almost like.... he is a grifter
Brilliant stuff!!
Come on now.... I heard that we were making BILLIONS of dollars through taxes tariffs that Americans other countries are paying for.
-
So the same as every single politician before him? Including your beloved demoncrats. What exactly is your point? You let you TDS take over and you post more moronic shit than Lurker.
Is TDS and BDS just plain BS?
It is common for folks to complain about whichever politicians, regardless of their party affiliation, are in office at any given time. On average, only something like 4% of adults in the U.S. think the political system is satisfactory. Something like 72% of folks have a negative view of Congress.
Unfortunately, the majority of folks have a negativity bias. When Biden was President, one could correctly note that most Getbig posters had BDS (Biden derangement syndrome). Now that Trump is back in office, anyone who disagrees with his policies supposedly suffers from TDS.
On the other hand, more than half of the American people have a more positive view of local politicians. I find this somewhat curious because often local politicians eventually become candidates for federal office; School Board members run for office as city and county commissioners who then become State legislators and some of these folks become Congress people.
-
Is TDS and BDS just plain BS?
It is common for folks to complain about whichever politicians, regardless of their party affiliation, are in office at any given time. On average, only something like 4% of adults in the U.S. think the political system is satisfactory. Something like 72% of folks have a negative view of Congress.
Unfortunately, the majority of folks have a negativity bias. When Biden was President, one could correctly note that most Getbig posters had BDS (Biden derangement syndrome). Now that Trump is back in office, anyone who disagrees with his policies supposedly suffers from TDS.
On the other hand, more than half of the American people have a more positive view of local politicians. I find this somewhat curious because often local politicians eventually become candidates for federal office; School Board members run for office as city and county commissioners who then become State legislators and some of these folks become Congress people.
TDS is real, and there's never been anything like it.
It's not simply just disliking a person in office. It's shunning your friends, your morals, your objectivity, your, values your common sense, your dignity, etc....all in the name of hating a person.
-
TDS is real, and there's never been anything like it.
It's not simply just disliking a person in office. It's shunning your friends, your morals, your objectivity, your, values your common sense, your dignity, etc....all in the name of hating a person.
Did you see his post about Chicago? lol thats the president.
-
Did you see his post about Chicago? lol thats the president.
No I didn't.
I don't hang on his every tweet like you guys do.
-
No I didn't.
I don't hang on his every tweet like you guys do.
Oh ok, makes sense.
-
No I didn't.
I don't hang on his every tweet like you guys do.
I've never seen a group of people more obsessed with the every movement of someone they supposedly hate. They act more like fans than haters sometimes.
-
I've never seen a group of people more obsessed with the every movement of someone they supposedly hate. They act more like fans than haters sometimes.
It gives miserable or bored folks something to focus on.
And you know this - none of us 100% agree with everything this guy is doing. But there's a point of being informed, and letting nonsensical stuff slide. Like I started reading something funk posted the other day, got about 2 sentences in and was like "cubic zirconia cufflinks?"....yeah, fuck off, not wasting my time.
As far as the Chicago thing, I do know Trump's going back and forth with their mayor, but I can't take anything seriously until it happens. At the end of the day, the Chicago dipshit morons replaced the putrid Lightfoot with an actual worse version, and so this is what happens. The goal is to stop so many people shooting each other every weekend. But that's not cool because Trump wants it.
And, you'd think the left has such a track record of being outright wrong about stuff, they'd learn.
But they don't.
-
It gives miserable or bored folks something to focus on.
And you know this - none of us 100% agree with everything this guy is doing. But there's a point of being informed, and letting nonsensical stuff slide. Like I started reading something funk posted the other day, got about 2 sentences in and was like "cubic zirconia cufflinks?"....yeah, fuck off, not wasting my time.
As far as the Chicago thing, I do know Trump's going back and forth with their mayor, but I can't take anything seriously until it happens. At the end of the day, the Chicago dipshit morons replaced the putrid Lightfoot with an actual worse version, and so this is what happens. The goal is to stop so many people shooting each other every weekend. But that's not cool because Trump wants it.
And, you'd think the left has such a track record of being outright wrong about stuff, they'd learn.
But they don't.
ya man using the military against citizens and it will only be leftist run states, cities at that under the guise of law and order is totally fine
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/unhinged-and-anti-american-critics-erupt-over-trumps-ai-generated-threat/
This is an actual post he made, fucking embarassing. It's embarassing that people excuse this behaviour.
Meanwhile, GOP run cites and states have more crime, but not a peep of course. I see you guys are fine with a vindictive petty manchild running your country.
If you are on the internet you know, there is literally no where this shit isn't posted.
-
ya man using the military against citizens and it will only be leftist run states, cities at that under the guise of law and order is totally fine
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/unhinged-and-anti-american-critics-erupt-over-trumps-ai-generated-threat/
This is an actual post he made, fucking embarassing. It's embarassing that people excuse this behaviour.
Meanwhile, GOP run cites and states have more crime, but not a peep of course. I see you guys are fine with a vindictive petty manchild running your country.
If you are on the internet you know, there is literally no where this shit isn't posted.
He tweets stuff this to make folks like you react like you did. Congrats, he owns you too.
But, once again, as far as being "fine with it"...what the fuck are we supposed to do? I voted. That's it. And I don't regret it at all, especially considering the alternative.
I'll let all you X Warriors tweet your days away, thinking you're making a difference.
But, if sending in the guard gets Chicago on the right path, have at it. It might become a deterrent and get all these states, red or blue, to clean up their shit.
-
ya man using the military against citizens and it will only be leftist run states, cities at that under the guise of law and order is totally fine
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/unhinged-and-anti-american-critics-erupt-over-trumps-ai-generated-threat/
This is an actual post he made, fucking embarassing. It's embarassing that people excuse this behaviour.
Meanwhile, GOP run cites and states have more crime, but not a peep of course. I see you guys are fine with a vindictive petty manchild running your country.
If you are on the internet you know, there is literally no where this shit isn't posted.
You say stupid shit just to get people to respond right? Trump isn't sending NG in to control/take over LE from leftist run states, only from cities. If those dem run cities actually enforced the law and kept their citizens safe, maybe the feds wouldn't feel the need to step in. Unbelievable that you faggot leftists are against lowering crime and making cities safer because Trump is behind it. I'm well aware that as soon as NG pulls out the shitty leftist liberal twats running these cities will just allow the crime to skyrocket as usual then try to blame Trump for the increase when in reality it's their own failures as leadership to enforce the law and keep the people safe. ::)
-
No I didn't.
I don't hang on his every tweet like you guys do.
I don't think he tweets any longer. Especially since tweets no longer exist. X calls them posts. He did post this on Truth Social last night.
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54772236675_1dcc7fff7c_w.jpg)
-
I don't think he tweets any longer. Especially since tweets no longer exist. X calls them posts. He did post this on Truth Social last night.
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54772236675_1dcc7fff7c_w.jpg)
Thank you, Dr. semantics.
-
Thank you, Dr. semantics.
You are quite welcome. -Happy to help you out anytime. :)
-
No one?
LOL
he tariffs you, taxing you while lying that that the exporter is paying the tariff (how is that 38% whole food inflation feeling?) claiming to increase manufacturing jobs by doing so and since liberation day lololol 42k jobs have been lost in manufacturing. He then touts 17 trillion in investment in the US LMAO!!
Meanwhile he just launched and rugged pulled another shit coin and is sending emails asking for 15 dollars as using religious get into heaven bullshit. His personal wealth has exploded and he is destroying your economy.
It's almost like.... he is a grifter
Brilliant stuff!!
The US economy is just fine. You should focus on your own Canadian economy, which isn't doing so well:
Canada's economy lost 66K jobs in August, adding to BoC pressure to 'stem the bleeding in the economy'
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/canadas-economy-lost-66k-jobs-in-august-adding-to-boc-pressure-to-stem-the-bleeding-in-the-economy-140014453.html
-
Prime belongs to Truth Social?
-
Prime belongs to Truth Social?
With his TDS do you expect anything less?
-
Prime belongs to Truth Social?
Do not tell anyone. I would not want this to get around. Paranoid Trump might find this out and decide I am a spy then accuse me of having two or more primary residences and use the DOJ and FBI to investigate me. Worse, he could have ICE arrest me and deport me even though my ancestors have lived in this country since before the Revolutionary War
much, much longer than his family has.
-
Do not tell anyone. I would not want this to get around. Paranoid Trump might find this out and decide I am a spy then accuse me of having two or more primary residences and use the DOJ and FBI to investigate me. Worse, he could have ICE arrest me and deport me even though my ancestors have lived in this country since before the Revolutionary War
much, much longer than his family has.
;D
-
Its what happens when you cut government jobs and deport illegals
.as promised. Then you have a Fed Chair working against him. It's as simple as that.
-
You say stupid shit just to get people to respond right? Trump isn't sending NG in to control/take over LE from leftist run states, only from cities. If those dem run cities actually enforced the law and kept their citizens safe, maybe the feds wouldn't feel the need to step in. Unbelievable that you faggot leftists are against lowering crime and making cities safer because Trump is behind it. I'm well aware that as soon as NG pulls out the shitty leftist liberal twats running these cities will just allow the crime to skyrocket as usual then try to blame Trump for the increase when in reality it's their own failures as leadership to enforce the law and keep the people safe. ::)
This is moronic, your rationale is the crime is out of control thus you need to sed the military in lolol OK how about the fact that the most crime ridden cites are red and in particular the increase in rate is higer? if this was because of crime wouldn;t you logically start with the most dangerous cities and states or at least ones with increasing crime rates at the highest percentile?
Also, how the fuck will this lower crime? in the short term, maybe, who knows. In the long term what benefit would this temporary retarded action have?
I love how you conflate arguing against sending the military in to a city that doesn't want it when the logic of why its being done doesnt check out and the person doing it is a vindictive little manchild.
Just go along with daddy lil boy. You will do what trump says and defend him till the end. You are happy to unleash the government on fellow citizens if they think differently than you, typical narc behaviour.
Enjoy the mcarthyism/isolationism
-
Baghdad Bessent
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/68/Official_portrait_of_Treasury_Secretary_Scott_Bessent_%28borderless%29.jpg/500px-Official_portrait_of_Treasury_Secretary_Scott_Bessent_%28borderless%29.jpg)
-
The US economy is just fine. You should focus on your own Canadian economy, which isn't doing so well:
Canada's economy lost 66K jobs in August, adding to BoC pressure to 'stem the bleeding in the economy'
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/canadas-economy-lost-66k-jobs-in-august-adding-to-boc-pressure-to-stem-the-bleeding-in-the-economy-140014453.html
Ya its pretty shit. No one cares about Canada. So there is no point talking about it. I am interested in the melts and retards.
-
Ya its pretty shit. No one cares about Canada. So there is no point talking about it.
;D
-
This is moronic, your rationale is the crime is out of control thus you need to sed the military in lolol OK how about the fact that the most crime ridden cites are red and in particular the increase in rate is higer? if this was because of crime wouldn;t you logically start with the most dangerous cities and states or at least ones with increasing crime rates at the highest percentile?
Also, how the fuck will this lower crime? in the short term, maybe, who knows. In the long term what benefit would this temporary retarded action have?
I love how you conflate arguing against sending the military in to a city that doesn't want it when the logic of why its being done doesnt check out and the person doing it is a vindictive little manchild.
Just go along with daddy lil boy. You will do what trump says and defend him till the end. You are happy to unleash the government on fellow citizens if they think differently than you, typical narc behaviour.
Enjoy the mcarthyism/isolationism
If you're going to go through drastic actions like utilizing the military (which has not happened yet), you want to focus on the spots with the highest number of violent crimes. Per capita rate is not as important as the absolute number in this case. If you do that, Chicago is near the top of the list. So why it might not be the very highest, it's a good place to start.
And I took these numbers based on violent crimes. I did not break it down to shootings, so I'm not sure where it lands. Chicago, Houston, and Memphis all seem to be awful.
-
This is moronic, your rationale is the crime is out of control thus you need to sed the military in lolol OK how about the fact that the most crime ridden cites are red and in particular the increase in rate is higer? if this was because of crime wouldn;t you logically start with the most dangerous cities and states or at least ones with increasing crime rates at the highest percentile?
Also, how the fuck will this lower crime? in the short term, maybe, who knows. In the long term what benefit would this temporary retarded action have?
I love how you conflate arguing against sending the military in to a city that doesn't want it when the logic of why its being done doesnt check out and the person doing it is a vindictive little manchild.
Just go along with daddy lil boy. You will do what trump says and defend him till the end. You are happy to unleash the government on fellow citizens if they think differently than you, typical narc behaviour.
Enjoy the mcarthyism/isolationism
I missed this. Are you trying to rationalize the NG coming in to crime ridden blue cities with incompetent "leadership" to help stop crime and murders?
-
I missed this. Are you trying to rationalize the NG coming in to crime ridden blue cities with incompetent "leadership" to help stop crime and murders?
It won't stop anything though.
Why would it? The crime is a function of inequality and poverty, I would imagine the crime rate is highest in the "inner city".
If you think sending the NG to cities in the states is fine when civilians do not want that then we simply disagree. It would be quite easy to weaponize this tactic.
It will hurt the economy of the city just like DC as well. It also costs an arm and a leg and has not been shown to do anything.
-
I don't think he tweets any longer. Especially since tweets no longer exist. X calls them posts. He did post this on Truth Social last night.
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54772236675_1dcc7fff7c_w.jpg)
Love it...trolls better than anyone I've ever seen on any platform. Knows how to drive the weak minded left absolutely crazy and how to trigger them. It's exactly why the democrat party is failing. The TDS is just too much. They're mental weakness will their demise
-
This is moronic, your rationale is the crime is out of control thus you need to sed the military in lolol OK how about the fact that the most crime ridden cites are red and in particular the increase in rate is higer? if this was because of crime wouldn;t you logically start with the most dangerous cities and states or at least ones with increasing crime rates at the highest pe rates at the highest percentile?
Really? Which specific cities are you talking about?
-
Really? Which specific cities are you talking about?
The per capita rates are higher in plenty of other cities besides Chicago.
But for absolute numbers, Chicago is one of the top in violent crime, which was the point I made a few posts up.
-
It won't stop anything though.
Why would it? The crime is a function of inequality and poverty, I would imagine the crime rate is highest in the "inner city".
If you think sending the NG to cities in the states is fine when civilians do not want that then we simply disagree. It would be quite easy to weaponize this tactic.
It will hurt the economy of the city just like DC as well. It also costs an arm and a leg and has not been shown to do anything.
Murial Bowser praised Trump for making DC safer and raising the moral of the Metro Police to do their job. Brandon Johnson is literally polling at 13% and the number one issue in Chicago is crime and people want the NG come in and clean it up. You have high crime in all of these blue ran cities because of defunding PD's and DA's not doing their job in prosecuting criminals only to be released to have them commit the same crimes. Case in point and this isn't isolated. The person who murdered the Ukrainian girl on the bus had 14 previous arrests with a bunch of them being felonies then released on cashless bail.
In short, you don't what you're talking about and as usual, repeat leftist talking points.
1. Start arresting and convicting. Try violent minors in adult courts and convict them as adults
2. Start issuing CCW to law abiding citizens and speed up the process per Bruen
3. Fund the PD's, don't give stand down orders when attacked. Hire and full and capable police force and saturate higher crime areas.
-
Murial Bowser praised Trump for making DC safer and raising the moral of the Metro Police to do their job. Brandon Johnson is literally polling at 13% and the number one issue in Chicago is crime and people want the NG come in and clean it up. You have high crime in all of these blue ran cities because of defunding PD's and DA's not doing their job in prosecuting criminals only to be released to have them commit the same crimes. Case in point and this isn't isolated. The person who murdered the Ukrainian girl on the bus had 14 previous arrests with a bunch of them being felonies then released on cashless bail.
In short, you don't what you're talking about and as usual, repeat leftist talking points.
1. Start arresting and convicting. Try violent minors in adult courts and convict them as adults
2. Start issuing CCW to law abiding citizens and speed up the process per Bruen
3. Fund the PD's, don't give stand down orders when attacked. Hire and full and capable police force and saturate higher crime areas.
The highest crime rate cities or states better yet are RED.
What polls are you using?
You are cherry picking one case as well, without context for the overall picture it's meaningless.
-
Love it...trolls better than anyone I've ever seen on any platform. Knows how to drive the weak minded left absolutely crazy and how to trigger them. It's exactly why the democrat party is failing. The TDS is just too much. They're mental weakness will their demise
It's childish, immature and unbecoming of a man his age and in his position. Ya let's troll as the president.
Dude he is a narc, no one is mentally weaker lolol. he is a petty petulant man child.
-
The per capita rates are higher in plenty of other cities besides Chicago.
But for absolute numbers, Chicago is one of the top in violent crime, which was the point I made a few posts up.
My understanding is the cities with the biggest crime problems have Democrat mayors. But maybe I'm missing something, which is why I asked him which specific cities he is talking about.
-
If you're going to go through drastic actions like utilizing the military (which has not happened yet), you want to focus on the spots with the highest number of violent crimes. Per capita rate is not as important as the absolute number in this case. If you do that, Chicago is near the top of the list. So why it might not be the very highest, it's a good place to start.
And I took these numbers based on violent crimes. I did not break it down to shootings, so I'm not sure where it lands. Chicago, Houston, and Memphis all seem to be awful.
Sure, but I suspect that's not trumps logic, its incredibly drastic (has it been done before for this reason?).
i realize Chicago is near the top of the list, I suspect it was chosen based on its politics though. I guess we will see if he does this and what cities he targets. If I am right then there is a slippery slope.
-
Murial Bowser praised Trump for making DC safer and raising the moral of the Metro Police to do their job. Brandon Johnson is literally polling at 13% and the number one issue in Chicago is crime and people want the NG come in and clean it up. You have high crime in all of these blue ran cities because of defunding PD's and DA's not doing their job in prosecuting criminals only to be released to have them commit the same crimes. Case in point and this isn't isolated. The person who murdered the Ukrainian girl on the bus had 14 previous arrests with a bunch of them being felonies then released on cashless bail.
In short, you don't what you're talking about and as usual, repeat leftist talking points.
1. Start arresting and convicting. Try violent minors in adult courts and convict them as adults
2. Start issuing CCW to law abiding citizens and speed up the process per Bruen
3. Fund the PD's, don't give stand down orders when attacked. Hire and full and capable police force and saturate higher crime areas.
I will say I am impressed with this post lol I didn't think you had this in you, I won't lie.
Kudos.
-
Love it...trolls better than anyone I've ever seen on any platform. Knows how to drive the weak minded left absolutely crazy and how to trigger them. It's exactly why the democrat party is failing. The TDS is just too much. They're mental weakness will their demise
It is no surprise that you love Trump's trolling and ignore how inappropriate it is for someone in his position. Trolling is attention-seeking behavior. Trump is a person who intentionally causes trouble, spreads negativity, and takes pleasure from causing other folks distress. His trolling is childish behavior. Good leadership is serious adult business. You admire a clown who is not a leader and never will be ::)
-
My understanding is the cities with the biggest crime problems have Democrat mayors. But maybe I'm missing something, which is why I asked him which specific cities he is talking about.
per capita there are a lot of cities higher then Chicago.
Regardless this method isn't scalable, hasn't been shown to lead to meaningful reduction long term, causes huge impacts across multiple markers and is quite costly. It also opens up weaponizing the military and I am shocked that small government right wingers want the federal government stepping in, in any capacity.
-
Sure, but I suspect that's not trumps logic, its incredibly drastic (has it been done before for this reason?).
i realize Chicago is near the top of the list, I suspect it was chosen based on its politics though. I guess we will see if he does this and what cities he targets. If I am right then there is a slippery slope.
I have no doubt Chicago's politics affected this.
However, I do think SOMETHING has to be done. So, if you have a city with big numbers (not per capita) near the top of the list, coupled with a shitty loud mouthed mayor whose approval ratings are in the tank who you can embarrass, why not start there? Politics exists, for better or worse.
The only other way I might do it is to send in the guard in partnership with a red state governor, have crime rates drop, and then say "see you blue dipshits, it works".
But that's not my choice to make, so Chicago it is.
-
It is no surprise that you love Trump's trolling and ignore how inappropriate it is for someone in his position. Trolling is attention-seeking behavior. Trump is a person who intentionally causes trouble, spreads negativity, and takes pleasure from causing other folks distress. His trolling is childish behavior. Good leadership is serious adult business. You admire a clown who is not a leader and never will be ::)
He does it to wind up Loony Leftist Libturds & it works every time 😂🤣😂
Just look at yourself/ Necrosis of the Brain / LurkingForBoys etc
Always frothing at the mouth about DONALD he said this / he did this etc
If I were Donald I'd be laughing all day every day at how easy it is to upset
You morons- If you lot had an iota of sense between you you'd all ignore Him &
He'd very likely stop it.
The fact that you're all 24/7 obsessed with anything he says / posts or does
Goes to show how much TDS you all have.
-
per capita there are a lot of cities higher then Chicago.
Regardless this method isn't scalable, hasn't been shown to lead to meaningful reduction long term, causes huge impacts across multiple markers and is quite costly. It also opens up weaponizing the military and I am shocked that small government right wingers want the federal government stepping in, in any capacity.
Which specific cities have the highest crime rates?
-
Which specific cities have the highest crime rates?
Per capita its several Alabama cities, Alaska and Arizona.
For violent crime totals it appears to be houston, stockton, nashville, rockford, tacoma
Anchorage is rape
-
Which specific cities have the highest crime rates?
According to 2024 FBI data these were the cities with the highest crime rates.
Memphis, Tennessee red state red city
Detroit, Michigan purple state blue city
Baltimore, Maryland blue state blue city
St. Louis, Missouri red state blue city
Jackson, Mississippi red state battle ground
New Orleans, Louisiana red state blue city
Cleveland, Ohio red state blue city
-
Per capita its several Alabama cities, Alaska and Arizona.
For violent crime totals it appears to be houston, stockton, nashville, rockford, tacoma
Anchorage is rape
Houston, Stockton, Nashville, Rockford, and Tacoma all have Democrat mayors.
-
According to 2024 FBI data these were the cities with the highest crime rates:
Memphis, Tennessee red state
Detroit, Michigan purple state
Baltimore, Maryland blue state
St. Louis, Missouri red state
Jackson, Mississippi red state
New Orleans, Louisiana red state
Cleveland, Ohio red state
Which of those cities have Democrat mayors?
-
Houston, Stockton, Nashville, Rockford, and Tacoma all have Democrat mayors.
Ya thats the highest violent crime cities per capita. For overall crime its heavily red leaning. Property theft, B and E etc..
My point is that I suspect this is politically motivated and there are equally (perhaps better) reasonable targets with higher crime rates.
I would also suspect one should base it on the direction of crime rates, are they decreasing, increasing etc.
I will say grape ape has swayed me a little on this tbf
-
Ya thats the highest violent crime cities per capita. For overall crime its heavily red leaning. Property theft, B and E etc..
My point is that I suspect this is politically motivated and there are equally (perhaps better) reasonable targets with higher crime rates.
I would also suspect one should base it on the direction of crime rates, are they decreasing, increasing etc.
I will say grape ape has swayed me a little on this tbf
The cities run by Democrat mayors are the problem. But politicians are being intellectually dishonest by citing red "states," rather than the the cities, where mayors have a much greater impact on crime than governors. What the facts show is a disproportionate number of cities run by Democrats are infested with crime.
-
The cities run by Democrat mayors are the problem. But politicians are being intellectually dishonest by citing red "states," rather than the the cities, where mayors have a much greater impact on crime than governors. What the facts show is a disproportionate number of cities run by Democrats are infested with crime.
I don't believe that is true if you are talking about overall crime though.
I would have to look through it in more detail.
-
Which of those cities have Democrat mayors?
Quick look at Memphis, NO, and Cleveland all Democrats
-
I don't believe that is true if you are talking about overall crime though.
I would have to look through it in more detail.
I think most people are referring to violent crime when they cite these statistics.
-
Quick look at Memphis, NO, and Cleveland all Democrats
Yeah not surprising. Thanks.
I have a former employee who moved from Hawaii to San Francisco a couple years ago. She and her husband are both Democrats. After they got settled she and her husband were shocked at how bad the crime and homelessness is. She actually said her husband and she agreed that this would not be a problem if they were in a red city. Now that is when reality really hits you in the face.
-
I think most people are referring to violent crime when they cite these statistics.
I wouldn't and didn't think that is what people were referring to. However, I would venture its more impactful, violent crime that is.
Regardless I think its a silly idea.
-
Yeah not surprising. Thanks.
I have a former employee who moved from Hawaii to San Francisco a couple years ago. She and her husband are both Democrats. After they got settled she and her husband were shocked at how bad the crime and homelessness is. She actually said her husband and she agreed that this would not be a problem if they were in a red city. Now that is when reality really hits you in the face.
Getting rid of crime is something that should be a bipartisan endeavor.
But the correction pendulum swung too far when the bail reform hit, crimes stopped getting prosecuted, defund the police, etc..........and thus we are now divided.
No democrat will dare partner with Trump, so we may be stuck for awhile.
-
Getting rid of crime is something that should be a bipartisan endeavor.
But the correction pendulum swung too far when the bail reform hit, crimes stopped getting prosecuted, defund the police, etc..........and thus we are now divided.
No democrat will dare partner with Trump, so we may be stuck for awhile.
I agree.
-
According to 2024 FBI data these were the cities with the highest crime rates.
Memphis, Tennessee red state red city mayor is Democratic
Detroit, Michigan purple state blue city mayor is Unaffiliated
Baltimore, Maryland blue state blue city mayor is Democratic
St. Louis, Missouri red state blue city -- mayor is Democratic
Jackson, Mississippi red state battle ground mayor is Democratic
New Orleans, Louisiana red state blue city mayor is Democratic
Cleveland, Ohio red state blue city mayor is Democratic
In January 2025, sixty-five of the 100 largest cities had Democratic mayors and twenty-five of the 100 largest cities had Republican mayors.
You moved the goal posts, (criterion). What you originally asked was, Which specific cities have the highest crime rates?
You did not ask about either the state or city political leanings, or which party the mayor of the city is affiliated with. Also, mayoral races may be either partisan or non-partisan. Will this be your next question, (deflection)?
-
According to 2024 FBI data these were the cities with the highest crime rates.
Memphis, Tennessee red state red city mayor is Democratic
Detroit, Michigan purple state blue city mayor is Unaffiliated
Baltimore, Maryland blue state blue city mayor is Democratic
St. Louis, Missouri red state blue city -- mayor is Democratic
Jackson, Mississippi red state battle ground mayor is Democratic
New Orleans, Louisiana red state blue city mayor is Democratic
Cleveland, Ohio red state blue city mayor is Democratic
In January 2025, sixty-five of the 100 largest cities had Democratic mayors and twenty-five of the 100 largest cities had Republican mayors.
You moved the goal posts, (criterion). What you originally asked was,
You did not ask about either the state or city political leanings, or which party the mayor of the city is affiliated with. Also, mayoral races may be either partisan or non-partisan. Will this be your next question, (deflection)?
He wasn't deflecting. He was continuing the conversation.
The cities that are in the shit are mostly run by democrats.
And it's not surprising to any thinking person.
-
According to 2024 FBI data these were the cities with the highest crime rates.
Memphis, Tennessee red state red city mayor is Democratic
Detroit, Michigan purple state blue city mayor is Unaffiliated
Baltimore, Maryland blue state blue city mayor is Democratic
St. Louis, Missouri red state blue city -- mayor is Democratic
Jackson, Mississippi red state battle ground mayor is Democratic
New Orleans, Louisiana red state blue city mayor is Democratic
Cleveland, Ohio red state blue city mayor is Democratic
In January 2025, sixty-five of the 100 largest cities had Democratic mayors and twenty-five of the 100 largest cities had Republican mayors.
You moved the goal posts, (criterion). What you originally asked was,
You did not ask about either the state or city political leanings, or which party the mayor of the city is affiliated with. Also, mayoral races may be either partisan or non-partisan. Will this be your next question, (deflection)?
No questions. Just read Grape Ape's post and learn. :)
He wasn't deflecting. He was continuing the conversation.
The cities that are in the shit are mostly run by democrats.
And it's not surprising to any thinking person.
-
This is moronic, your rationale is the crime is out of control thus you need to sed the military in lolol
I stopped reading here, I assume the rest of your post is stupid as fuck. Yes, if the local government has lost control of criminals, is incapable of controlling the criminal population or complicate in the criminal element, then the feds should step in and take control to knock the criminal aspect down. Once they leave it's up to the local government to maintain the peace and control that was established. If your local government cannot stop or control the criminal element, then maybe they should be replaced with people that take control of criminals.
-
This is moronic, your rationale is the crime is out of control thus you need to sed the military in lolol OK how about the fact that the most crime ridden cites are red and in particular the increase in rate is higer? if this was because of crime wouldn;t you logically start with the most dangerous cities and states or at least ones with increasing crime rates at the highest percentile?
Also, how the fuck will this lower crime? in the short term, maybe, who knows. In the long term what benefit would this temporary retarded action have?
I love how you conflate arguing against sending the military in to a city that doesn't want it when the logic of why its being done doesnt check out and the person doing it is a vindictive little manchild.
Just go along with daddy lil boy. You will do what trump says and defend him till the end. You are happy to unleash the government on fellow citizens if they think differently than you, typical narc behaviour.
Enjoy the mcarthyism/isolationism
'thus you need to sed the military in' 🤡