Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2025, 08:12:51 AM
-
Libs wont watch this….they don’ watch anything .
i=qo1fa2pghBm6xZ1v
-
So beyond the typical gerrymandering, Newscum is putting the party above the people of his state.
-
Too bad such a beautiful State was ruined by Politicians and the local Libscum.
-
It’s the same the Texas is doing. I seemed to have missed your threads crying about that. Link is to them.
:'( :'( :'( :'(
-
It’s the same the Texas is doing. I seemed to have missed your threads crying about that. Link is to them.
:'( :'( :'( :'(
It's not even remotely the same. But you won't watch the attorney.
-
It’s the same the Texas is doing. I seemed to have missed your threads crying about that. Link is to them.
:'( :'( :'( :'(
So a tit for tat is acceptable if the left is doing it? Why is only Newscum the only governor concerned and whining about it?
-
It's not even remotely the same. But you won't watch the attorney.
Classic cop out.
-
Classic cop out.
Really, I’m what way? Again, didn’t watch it, did you but you felt the need to comment on something you know absolutely nothing about. It’s frustrating how fucking stupid you people are
-
Really, I’m what way? Again, didn’t watch it, did you but you felt the need to comment on something you know absolutely nothing about. It’s frustrating how fucking stupid you people are
The point is that you did not answer his question. You have no idea what I know about gerrymandering done in Texas and California.
-
The point is that you did not answer his question. You have no idea what I know about gerrymandering done in Texas and California.
Goddammit watch the fucking video. It explains both sides. FUCK!!
-
Goddammit watch the fucking video. It explains both sides. FUCK!!
Provide the link and I will. There are multiple videos titled The Attorney.
I doubt you mean this one.
Or this one,
-
Provide the link and I will. There are multiple videos titled The Attorney.
I doubt you mean this one.
Or this one,
Holy shit Prime, it’s in my very first post
-
Holy shit Prime, it’s in my very first post
Yes it was and I missed it.
Well at least folks get to vote on proposition 50. Which gerrymandering proposition did Texans vote on? Somewhere around five lawsuits have been filed to block it the ruling on it should happen happen by December 8, 2025. One of the judges is a Trump-appointee, the lead judge is a relatively moderate Obama-appointee, and one has ruled against redistricting in the past.
-
Texas gerrymandered first without a vote, newsom did this in response and indicated he wouldn't if texas didn't. He also matched the number of seats to what texas added for the GOP and did it democratically via vote LOLOLol, texas did not.
You are fucking delusional as usual. It's in response to the rights obvious power grab because midterms will be a bloodbath as the economy is in shambles as per jerome powell and this authoritarian regime is trampling rights. The courts literally just said trump is delusional with his national guard/military on US soil nonsense, he is trying to get journalists to agree to be given news and almost none will agree to it, its typical fascist bullshit. He knows better then you! he is owed 5 seats and abbott gave it to them so newsom responded, warned he would and did it democratically via vote.
I know you are a simpleton and believe everything fox tells you but spinning this in any other way when newsom said he would if Texas did is disingenuous.
Let's recap for the retards in the back
- trump says he is owed 5 seats
- texas obliges
- newsom says if you try to steal midterms with this obvious power grab I will gerrymander- keep in mind now that when gerrymandering was brought for a vote, to stop it, no republican voted and all the demos did lolol
- newsom matches 5 seats, could of done more but he isn't a fascist
- newsom puts it to a democratic vote unlike texas
It's newsom's fault, what a psycho.
-
It's not even remotely the same. But you won't watch the attorney.
Yeah. It's the exact same thing.
-
So a tit for tat is acceptable if the left is doing it? Why is only Newscum the only governor concerned and whining about it?
So a tit for tat is acceptable if the right is doing it? Why is only MAGAtards the only crybabies concerned and whining about it?
-
Texas gerrymandered first without a vote, newsom did this in response and indicated he wouldn't if texas didn't. He also matched the number of seats to what texas added for the GOP and did it democratically via vote LOLOLol, texas did not.
You are fucking delusional as usual. It's in response to the rights obvious power grab because midterms will be a bloodbath as the economy is in shambles as per jerome powell and this authoritarian regime is trampling rights. The courts literally just said trump is delusional with his national guard/military on US soil nonsense, he is trying to get journalists to agree to be given news and almost none will agree to it, its typical fascist bullshit. He knows better then you! he is owed 5 seats and abbott gave it to them so newsom responded, warned he would and did it democratically via vote.
I know you are a simpleton and believe everything fox tells you but spinning this in any other way when newsom said he would if Texas did is disingenuous.
Let's recap for the retards in the back
- trump says he is owed 5 seats
- texas obliges
- newsom says if you try to steal midterms with this obvious power grab I will gerrymander- keep in mind now that when gerrymandering was brought for a vote, to stop it, no republican voted and all the demos did lolol
- newsom matches 5 seats, could of done more but he isn't a fascist
- newsom puts it to a democratic vote unlike texas
It's newsom's fault, what a psycho.
Pure ownage. HAHAHAHAHA See this is why no one is wasting time "debating" the little retard.
-
So a tit for tat is acceptable if the left is doing it? Why is only Newscum the only governor concerned and whining about it?
I don't think there are many other states that could do it to make up the seats, cali is in a unique position with that. Many have commented that its an authoritarian power grab, it's obviously to try and keep power using underhanded methods. What else could it be?
-
Pure ownage. HAHAHAHAHA See this is why no one is wasting time "debating" the little retard.
I honestly feel bad doing it, it's like he cannot think logically and is immune to reason if its not in line with his beliefs. I believe we call this confirmation bias.
It's like debating a christian but instead of faith in jesus its faith in the right.
-
Texas gerrymandered first without a vote, newsom did this in response and indicated he wouldn't if texas didn't.
So it's cool to blackmail other states to get your way? There was no other response from any other state besides CA? How did the NY governor react?
I don't think there are many other states that could do it to make up the seats, cali is in a unique position with that. Many have commented that its an authoritarian power grab, it's obviously to try and keep power using underhanded methods. What else could it be?
You're right, Newscum has been on a long stream of authoritarian moves for years now. You see his latest? Banning the most popular handgun in the country? But only for the people, not for LE. Let's not even talk about his covid mandates.....holy shit. Or what about his impressive manipulation of the blacks looking for reparations? He's been stringing those gullible bastards along for years!. ;D
-
So it's cool to blackmail other states to get your way? There was no other response from any other state besides CA? How did the NY governor react? You're right, Newscum has been on a long stream of authoritarian moves for years now. You see his latest? Banning the most popular handgun in the country? But only for the people, not for LE. Let's not even talk about his covid mandates.....holy shit. Or what about his impressive manipulation of the blacks looking for reparations? He's been stringing those gullible bastards along for years!. ;D
Blackmail? it definitely does not qualify as that lol. He literally said stop the bullshit- you can't just add seats at the behest of the president because he wants to wield power unchecked. Its clearly the right response and if the shoe was on the other foot and Biden was doing this you would be up in arms lol. Talk about a hypocrite.
Ya real authoritarian to put it up for a public vote, classic dictator stuff newsom did there. Meanwhile abbott does it without a vote and for no reason other then wanting more seats to stay in power- which is fucking ridiculous.
You sound silly.
-
Blackmail? it definitely does not qualify as that lol. He literally said stop the bullshit- you can't just add seats at the behest of the president because he wants to wield power unchecked. Its clearly the right response and if the shoe was on the other foot and Biden was doing this you would be up in arms lol. Talk about a hypocrite.
Ya real authoritarian to put it up for a public vote, classic dictator stuff newsom did there. Meanwhile abbott does it without a vote and for no reason other then wanting more seats to stay in power- which is fucking ridiculous.
You sound silly.
Exactly. Yet ignored because of, well..... blackmail. ::)
-
So a tit for tat is acceptable if the left is doing it? Why is only Newscum the only governor concerned and whining about it?
Governor Newsom is not whining about it, he is doing something about it and what he is doing which is putting it to a vote of the people is more democratic than Governor Abbot's approach. But then, Texas' gerrymandering is not a done deal.
-
Blackmail? it definitely does not qualify as that lol. He literally said stop the bullshit- you can't just add seats at the behest of the president because he wants to wield power unchecked. Its clearly the right response and if the shoe was on the other foot and Biden was doing this you would be up in arms lol. Talk about a hypocrite.
Ya real authoritarian to put it up for a public vote, classic dictator stuff newsom did there. Meanwhile abbott does it without a vote and for no reason other then wanting more seats to stay in power- which is fucking ridiculous.
You sound silly.
The question is, if Biden was doing it, would YOU be up in arms? I doubt it, hypocrite. ;)
You sound effeminate.
-
Texas gerrymandered first without a vote, newsom did this in response and indicated he wouldn't if texas didn't. He also matched the number of seats to what texas added for the GOP and did it democratically via vote LOLOLol, texas did not.
You are fucking delusional as usual. It's in response to the rights obvious power grab because midterms will be a bloodbath as the economy is in shambles as per jerome powell and this authoritarian regime is trampling rights. The courts literally just said trump is delusional with his national guard/military on US soil nonsense, he is trying to get journalists to agree to be given news and almost none will agree to it, its typical fascist bullshit. He knows better then you! he is owed 5 seats and abbott gave it to them so newsom responded, warned he would and did it democratically via vote.
I know you are a simpleton and believe everything fox tells you but spinning this in any other way when newsom said he would if Texas did is disingenuous.
Let's recap for the retards in the back
- trump says he is owed 5 seats
- texas obliges
- newsom says if you try to steal midterms with this obvious power grab I will gerrymander- keep in mind now that when gerrymandering was brought for a vote, to stop it, no republican voted and all the demos did lolol
- newsom matches 5 seats, could of done more but he isn't a fascist
- newsom puts it to a democratic vote unlike texas
It's newsom's fault, what a psycho.
I know you live in Canada and probably have no idea how our system works, but the process in Texas and California is not the same. The Texas process went through the legislature, like their state constitution allows. The process in California is a referendum, where people vote, like their state constitution allows.
-
I know you live in Canada and probably have no idea how our system works, but the process in Texas and California is not the same. The Texas process went through the legislature, like their state constitution allows. The process in California is a referendum, where people vote, like their state constitution allows.
So both are legal? Coach doesn't think so.
-
So both are legal? Coach doesn't think so.
So you skip right over how wrong Necrosis was.
-
So you skip right over how wrong Necrosis was.
That is Right. Because my question pertains to posts exchanged between Coach and me.
Your response seems rather odd. BTW.
-
That is Right. Because my question pertains to posts exchanged between Coach and me.
Your response seems rather odd. BTW.
My post was directed to Necrosis. You responded to my post by talking about Coach. Odd. Actually, not it isn't. It's predictable.
-
I know you live in Canada and probably have no idea how our system works, but the process in Texas and California is not the same. The Texas process went through the legislature, like their state constitution allows. The process in California is a referendum, where people vote, like their state constitution allows.
Seems a lot more democratic via californias method. I mean I can only imagine that the legislature is stacked red in texas. Mid decade map redrawing is pretty rare, with the incumbent generally losing seats in mid terms adding five seats (from immiserated communities) seems like a clear attempt to hold on to power and subvert the will of the people.
I am glad you stated Newsom did it constitutionally refuting coach's claims.
He was probably loading up some guns getting ready to take war to newsom for his treachery.
-
Seems a lot more democratic via californias method. I mean I can only imagine that the legislature is stacked red in texas. Mid decade map redrawing is pretty rare, with the incumbent generally losing seats in mid terms adding five seats (from immiserated communities) seems like a clear attempt to hold on to power and subvert the will of the people.
I am glad you stated Newsom did it constitutionally refuting coach's claims.
He was probably loading up some guns getting ready to take war to newsom for his treachery.
California voters are stacked blue, so your contention about Texas also applies to California.
-
California voters are stacked blue, so your contention about Texas also applies to California.
not even close. The public vs sitting members is not even close to the same, they can sway each other, collude, have a party they are beholden to, face consequences for not towing the line, I mean I could go on but its so silly it truly doesn't merit a response. Otherwise why have elections? I am going to start tallying up all the logical fallacies you engage in for fun. Have you ever studied logic? You should, it will help you make sense more often and form coherent positions.
today we have something called a false equivalence. That's 1 for today so far- I will leave the others in the other threads out. Give you a fresh start of sorts.
-
not even close. The public vs sitting members is not even close to the same, they can sway each other, collude, have a party they are beholden to, face consequences for not towing the line, I mean I could go on but its so silly it truly doesn't merit a response. Otherwise why have elections? I am going to start tallying up all the logical fallacies you engage in for fun. Have you ever studied logic? You should, it will help you make sense more often and form coherent positions.
today we have something called a false equivalence. That's 1 for today so far- I will leave the others in the other threads out. Give you a fresh start of sorts.
::)
You should stick to canadian politics. I hope you know more about that pile of shit than you do American politics cause you are one poor deluded, misguided soul.
-
not even close. The public vs sitting members is not even close to the same, they can sway each other, collude, have a party they are beholden to, face consequences for not towing the line, I mean I could go on but its so silly it truly doesn't merit a response. Otherwise why have elections? I am going to start tallying up all the logical fallacies you engage in for fun. Have you ever studied logic? You should, it will help you make sense more often and form coherent positions.
today we have something called a false equivalence. That's 1 for today so far- I will leave the others in the other threads out. Give you a fresh start of sorts.
That's ignorant. Voting by elective representatives is primarily how we run our state and federal governments. You obviously don't know squat about American politics.
But never fear. We are here to help.