ahhh hahah now your resort to racist attacks...quite tolerant and liberal of you my friend 
my point was to ask you the details which you obviously dont know and cant seem to get passed your bias to see why they would be important.
you do understand that being against reducing job lock on the peoples dime and reducing job lock as a result of cheaper insurance is not the same thing but you dont see why its important?
LMFAO are you fucking serious dumb ass???
Tony, you are an idiot. Just because I usually vote dem does not mean that you'd be able to observe me IRL and say, "Oh, he's a liberal". Most people that I know with whom I haven't talked politics assume I'm a libertarian at best (or maybe just an asshole). I'm the kind of dude who is NOT tolerant on a personal level and have no problem getting into it with strangers on the street. (I just realize you can't run a country like that, so I vote the way I do.) It's a portagee thang, you wouldn't understand it, lol.
Re: Ryan's seemingly inconsistent positions about "job lock", tell me if this sums up your position:
Ryan's positions (against joblock before, no problem with it now) aren't inconsistent because it's actually the causes of each that are the deciding factor for him when it comes to whether he has an issue with job lock or not. Amirite?
Well, goody for Paul Ryan but the real question wasn't about him much. Remember the context in which I mentioned Paul Ryan and job lock? I told someone (you? Dario?) to google Paul Ryan and Job lock because the discussion concerned the CBO's finding that the equivalent to 2.5 (maybe it was 2.3?) million jobs wouldn't be worked because workers would choose to take time to do other things since it would be in their financial interest to do so. I had read about job lock (whereby folks would stay in unsatisfactory jobs only because they were concerned that they'd otherwise have no health insurance but was too lazy to describe it in writing so I looked for a video that would describe the issue and found the Paul Ryan one. So I told whomever to google it. Primarily to bring up the job lock reason for why it wasn't a bad thing that folks were afraid to quit their jobs with only a side goal of pointing out the seeming hypocrisy of Paul Ryan.
BTW, if you tell me how important it is. What percentage of GDP will those "lost" 2.5 million jobs represent?
(This is a thing that bugs me about many conservatives -- You guys don't have much perspective -- A welfare "queen" who might defraud the gov't out of, what?, 25 grand gets every bit as much of your ire (if not more) than, say, defense contractors who fleece the government of millions of dollars at a time.
The moneyed interests in this country have historically tried to turn the comparatively disadvantaged groups against each other (so that the unwashed masses don't unite and revolt) and it's sad that that shit still seems to be working.
Not with me, though, sister.
Anyway, was it at all any tougher than usual to grow up Japanese in Texas?
BTW, I love most non-Indian Asians, generally.
