No one is comparing 97 to 99 you moron. he was 255 in 97 and he was soft and he was 257 in 99 obviously he got bigger than 97. No one's debating that try and stick to the subject.
you're not getting it:
you are insisting that Ronnie was actually 255 in 97 but we show you he has toothpick quads, smaller chest, arms lats compared to 99 etc.
yet you agree he was 257 in 99 (but way bigger)
that difference is NOT only 2 pounds.
so he was NOT 255 in 1997.
understand now?