Author Topic: Miss Cali... Tpyical Christian (Read 11119 times)

Busted · « **Reply #125 on:** May 12, 2009, 10:59:43 PM »

Quote from: STella on May 12, 2009, 06:27:28 PM

So do you think it's wrong for Christians to get braces on their teeth soley for cosmetic purposes?

Also, what about Christians dying their hair to cover the grey or change the color?

I didn't see if you answered ........ what denomination your father was when he was a minister?

Also, when you have time, could you please respond to the follow-up questions in the following thread? I'm not flaming you...I am just curious as to your perspective on some things (also Hedge had posted some interesting info you may want to read).

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=276869.0

Thanks!

Im not a christian... Go read the bible and see what it says about what you can and cant do to your body...

DAMY · « **Reply #126 on:** May 13, 2009, 05:24:31 AM »

Faith aside, I reckon any man tinting out greys oughta be shot at dawn.

They look like idiots. Soon as the skin doesn't match the Grecian 2000/Just for Men, the male hair-tinter looks like an Action Man doll circa 1975.

Fuckin' terrible.

Remember Action Man's eagle-eyes, work the lever behind the head, make his eyes peer left and right?

That was him being self-conscious, looking around to see if women and small children were laughing at his comedy barnet.

Vain little plastic wanker.

DAMY

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #127 on:** May 13, 2009, 05:31:18 AM »

Once my hair started thinning in the front, I just shaved it off.

I would not have hair back even if I could at this point.

Butterbean · « **Reply #128 on:** May 13, 2009, 10:05:55 AM »

Quote from: OzmO on May 12, 2009, 06:38:09 PM

Braces aren't permanent. The effects are. They straighten your teeth. Breast implants are permanent and make more men wanna do you.

The results of braces are more permanent than the results of breast implants which can be removed.

Also, wouldn't more men, being visual creatures, want to do a woman with a nice grill instead of a jacked up grill?

Quote from: OzmO on May 12, 2009, 06:38:09 PM

Breast implants are permanent and make more men wanna do you. Women do it for increased sexual attractiveness so they can have more attention leading to more sex outside of marriage.

I had to double-check to see that you actually wrote this post Ozmo

Quote from: a_joker10 on May 12, 2009, 09:43:10 PM

The problem I see in most of these arguments is that you focus on your desires and blame her for them.

A picture is a picture without context. If the lingerie pictures were for a women's magazine most men wouldn't see them, and women they would be a bout beauty and not sex.

See context.

Most women I know that had breast enhancement didn't have the surgery to make themselves more sexually attractive, but to feel beautiful, this is gives them self confidence, very much the same as braces.

There are also many people that have cosmetic surgery after accidents or cancer. This also has more to do with beauty and confidence then sexuality.

There is always exceptions.

Just don't place your views on her without knowing the context of what you see.

Good points here!

Quote from: Busted on May 12, 2009, 10:59:43 PM

Im not a christian... Go read the bible and see what it says about what you can and cant do to your body...

I do read the bible, thanks.

In what denomination was your father a minister?

Quote from: DAMY on May 13, 2009, 05:24:31 AM

Faith aside, I reckon any man tinting out greys oughta be shot at dawn.

They look like idiots. Soon as the skin doesn't match the Grecian 2000/Just for Men, the male hair-tinter looks like an Action Man doll circa 1975.

Fuckin' terrible.

Remember Action Man's eagle-eyes, work the lever behind the head, make his eyes peer left and right?

That was him being self-conscious, looking around to see if women and small children were laughing at his comedy barnet.

Vain little plastic wanker.

DAMY

lol

OzmO · « **Reply #129 on:** May 13, 2009, 11:28:45 AM »

Quote from: STella on May 13, 2009, 10:05:55 AM

The results of braces are more permanent than the results of breast implants which can be removed.

Also, wouldn't more men, being visual creatures, want to do a woman with a nice grill instead of a jacked up grill?

I would but i don't think most men would. I think they would want a stacked rack over a straight grill.

Besides what do you think gets the blood flowing more? Would a man get more of an erection over nice teeth or beautiful full breasts?

Quote

I had to double-check to see that you actually wrote this post Ozmo

What do you mean?

tonymctones · « **Reply #130 on:** May 13, 2009, 11:33:51 AM »

Quote from: OzmO on May 13, 2009, 11:28:45 AM

I would but i don't think most men would. I think they would want a stacked rack over a straight grill.

Besides what do you think gets the blood flowing more? Would a man get more of an erection over nice teeth or beautiful full breasts?

What do you mean?

I think most men would prefer a women with a good smile over one without one...

Id rather have a women with a great face which includes a smile and decent body then a chick with a decent face and fuked up grill and a bangin body maybe thats just me...

She meant it sounded like something busted would say...

sorry stella didnt mean to shove words in your mouth...hehehe

OzmO · « **Reply #131 on:** May 13, 2009, 11:41:21 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on May 13, 2009, 11:33:51 AM

I think most men would prefer a women with a good smile over one without one...

Id rather have a women with a great face which includes a smile and decent body then a chick with a decent face and fuked up grill and a bangin body maybe thats just me...

She meant it sounded like something busted would say... sorry stella didnt mean to shove words in your mouth...hehehe

Wow, I think my gimmick has been exposed.

jk

tonymctones · « **Reply #132 on:** May 13, 2009, 11:43:32 AM »

Quote from: OzmO on May 13, 2009, 11:41:21 AM

Wow, I think my gimmick has been exposed.

jk

and just so you know boobs and smiles are used to procreate as well, serving the main goal of life

homosexuality

OzmO · « **Reply #133 on:** May 13, 2009, 11:49:00 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on May 13, 2009, 11:43:32 AM

and just so you know boobs and smiles are used to procreate as well, serving the main goal of life
homosexuality

You mean the attain of pleasure and or the avoidance of pain.

Dos Equis · « **Reply #134 on:** May 13, 2009, 12:05:13 PM »

Quote from: a_joker10 on May 12, 2009, 09:43:10 PM

The problem I see in most of these arguments is that you focus on your desires and blame her for them.

A picture is a picture without context. If the lingerie pictures were for a women's magazine most men wouldn't see them, and women they would be a bout beauty and not sex.

See context.

Most women I know that had breast enhancement didn't have the surgery to make themselves more sexually attractive, but to feel beautiful, this is gives them self confidence, very much the same as braces.

There are also many people that have cosmetic surgery after accidents or cancer. This also has more to do with beauty and confidence then sexuality.

There is always exceptions.

Just don't place your views on her without knowing the context of what you see.

Excellent points joker. Context definitely matters.

pumphard · « **Reply #135 on:** May 13, 2009, 05:54:04 PM »

Quote from: w8tlftr on May 12, 2009, 07:25:00 PM

Yep. Pretty much.

Check out who's responsible for most weapon charges in most urban center's.

MCWAY · « **Reply #136 on:** May 14, 2009, 12:48:52 PM »

Quote from: Cap on May 12, 2009, 06:30:57 PM

I think it's funny how threatened people are by this woman. The majority of black people in CA voted against gay marriage but I don't see the gays, Perez Hilton included, taking up arms against them. Funny how that works. It's okay for blacks to be bigoted but not Mormons or this pageant girl.

Actually, some of them did. However, for some reason they didn't go to the black communities and vandalize their churches.

One black lesbian writer, Jasmyne Cannick, claimed that she got plenty of nasty-grams from gay activists. That was the point of one of her articles in the San Francisco Chronicle: For all their yapping about tolerance and equality, racism is alive and well among white gays, as it relates to black homosexuals.

Furthermore, certain gay activists are bascially too dense to figure out that the reason many blacks don't equate the "gay rights" stuff with the black civil rights movement is because gay activists tend to BASH the Christian church, which happens to be (at least, African-American churches) the foundation of the civil rights movement.

Heck, its greatest champion is a BLACK PREACHER. Do gay activists really think bashing Christianity and faith is going to sit well with the black community, when it was the driving force of Dr. Martin Luther King's life?

Busted · « **Reply #137 on:** May 14, 2009, 01:40:27 PM »

I love how Christians will hammer the shit out of a liberal if they would have been in her shoes, but their Christian beauty gets caught in lies, naked pics, gets a boob job, lives her life against the bible and they defend her...

MCWAY · « **Reply #138 on:** May 14, 2009, 02:03:23 PM »

Quote from: Busted on May 14, 2009, 01:40:27 PM

I love how Christians will hammer the shit out of a liberal if they would have been in her shoes, but their Christian beauty gets caught in lies, naked pics, gets a boob job, lives her life against the bible and they defend her...

Christians defend Prejean, because they know that, contrary to what certain bone-headed liberals foolishly and sheepishly pretend it to be, this ain't about those "naked" pics; it's about Prejean's answer to a gay judge's question about same-sex "marriage".

That is especially made manifiest when the now-FORMER director of the Miss CA pageant not only took legitimately butt-naked photos for Playboy but did softcore porn FOR THAT SAME COMPANY.

240 is Back · « **Reply #139 on:** May 14, 2009, 04:03:42 PM »

FOX news is having her deliver the news tomorrow on fox and friends!

tonymctones · « **Reply #140 on:** May 14, 2009, 04:05:52 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on May 14, 2009, 04:03:42 PM

FOX news is having her deliver the news tomorrow on fox and friends!

LOL msnbc should watch out, they helped create this woman and now she will own them in ratings...

Busted · « **Reply #141 on:** May 14, 2009, 04:35:59 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on May 14, 2009, 02:03:23 PM

Christians defend Prejean, because they know that, contrary to what certain bone-headed liberals foolishly and sheepishly pretend it to be, this ain't about those "naked" pics; it's about Prejean's answer to a gay judge's question about same-sex "marriage".

That is especially made manifiest when the now-FORMER director of the Miss CA pageant not only took legitimately butt-naked photos for Playboy but did softcore porn FOR THAT SAME COMPANY.

I could care less about her remark, or her naked pics... Bless her for naked pics she should do more... The LEFT sounded off on her when she went on her Anti Gay / talking about Satan and GOD tour... Then come to find out she wasnt allowed to do that as per her contract... She was not held accountable for breaking the rules...

Same thing with the torture issues, i could care less about torture... but when a LAW is BROKE people should be held accountable...

MCWAY · « **Reply #142 on:** May 15, 2009, 04:49:00 AM »

Quote from: Busted on May 14, 2009, 04:35:59 PM

I could care less about her remark, or her naked pics... Bless her for naked pics she should do more... The LEFT sounded off on her when she went on her Anti Gay / talking about Satan and GOD tour... Then come to find out she wasnt allowed to do that as per her contract... She was not held accountable for breaking the rules...

Same thing with the torture issues, i could care less about torture... but when a LAW is BROKE people should be held accountable...

What part of “Prejean hasn’t done any naked pics” don’t you understand?

The guy to made that "law" (Trump) said she didn't break it. So, the issue is settled. Trump said on "Fox and Friends" that his decision was an easy one.

That's probably why Moakler quit. Between the Donald's statements on "Fox and Friends" (prior to the press conference), "Larry King Live", the press conference itself, and a phone interview on "Fox and Friends" (with Prejean on the show), the impression is that Trump never intended to strip Prejean of her crown.

The scowls on the faces of Moalker and Lewis pretty much told the story.

tonymctones · « **Reply #143 on:** May 15, 2009, 04:55:40 AM »

Quote from: Busted on May 14, 2009, 04:35:59 PM

I could care less about her remark, or her naked pics... Bless her for naked pics she should do more... The LEFT sounded off on her when she went on her Anti Gay / talking about Satan and GOD tour... Then come to find out she wasnt allowed to do that as per her contract... She was not held accountable for breaking the rules...

Same thing with the torture issues, i could care less about torture... but when a LAW is BROKE people should be held accountable...

first of the left was going off before she even left the building you twit, or didnt you hear about the ppl in the lobby accosting ppl over their gay marriage views? how about hilton the very next day? LOL the left didnt wait until she said anything other then supporting traditional marriage

again plz show me where it says she cant take pics that show skin...AS IVE ALREADY PROVEN SHE DIDNT INTENTIONALLY TAKE NUDE PICS...you would probably try and hold her responsible if some guy snapped naked pics of her while she was asleep to wouldnt you?

Busted · « **Reply #144 on:** May 15, 2009, 06:08:07 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on May 15, 2009, 04:49:00 AM

What part of “Prejean hasn’t done any naked pics” don’t you understand?

The guy to made that "law" (Trump) said she didn't break it. So, the issue is settled. Trump said on "Fox and Friends" that his decision was an easy one.

That's probably why Moakler quit. Between the Donald's statements on "Fox and Friends" (prior to the press conference), "Larry King Live", the press conference itself, and a phone interview on "Fox and Friends" (with Prejean on the show), the impression is that Trump never intended to strip Prejean of her crown.

The scowls on the faces of Moalker and Lewis pretty much told the story.

What part of she has over 10 different naked pics out there.... As per the CONTRACT she signed... "no nude or SEMI NUDE" pics... Trump kept her on for PUBLICITY...

MCWAY · « **Reply #145 on:** May 15, 2009, 06:30:25 AM »

Quote from: Busted on May 15, 2009, 06:08:07 AM

What part of she has over 10 different naked pics out there.... As per the CONTRACT she signed... "no nude or SEMI NUDE" pics... Trump kept her on for PUBLICITY...

Tommy posted those pics and she is naked in absolutely NONE of them. Trump reviewed them and said there was no breach.

He made no statements to indicate that Prejean had violated her contract but was being given a second chance (as he did with Miss USA Tara Connor and other pageant girls, who've commited legitimate violations)

You want to see naked pics; look of those of the now-FORMER director of the Miss CA pageant, Shanna Moakler.

Once again, Moakler's a gay rights activist; Lewis is gay; their plan was to use Miss California to promote gay "marriage" in California. But Prejean ain't buying it.

That's where this controversy lies; that's why Moakler quit.