Author Topic: Nasser & Achim..  (Read 4427 times)

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2012, 09:52:53 PM »
In 1992-1993 Achim had the widest shoulders of any man alive.  He would walk into Golds Venice and we would just be stunned. Dudes shoulders tip to tip must have been 42"-45". Just crazy.

achim was the widest until nasser came along!

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2012, 11:11:57 PM »
If you look at pics you can see that achim's natural width is far superior to nasser's

Albrecht had no oil, as opposed to nasser. Muscle fullness, roundness and development-wise, yes, nasser has more developed delts, however he is narrow compared to achim.

Albrecht did not use oil, wasn't boatloading the growth and slin, like the "at least 3 timesMr Olympia runner-up"

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2012, 11:17:13 PM »
his best placing in the olympia was 9th in 91 and aside of his placings his lines were genetically poor and his arms and shoulders were kinda small for his width.. also poor calves for a big white german man..

Yet he probably featured in more magazine covers than nasser


Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #28 on: December 04, 2012, 01:04:11 AM »
If you look at pics you can see that achim's natural width is far superior to nasser's

Albrecht had no oil, as opposed to nasser. Muscle fullness, roundness and development-wise, yes, nasser has more developed delts, however he is narrow compared to achim.

Albrecht did not use oil, wasn't boatloading the growth and slin, like the "at least 3 timesMr Olympia runner-up"


hahhhaha.. i know hatred makes haters imagining things but your case is really severe.. nasser was bigger , wider, denser, and much better shaped than achim..

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #29 on: December 04, 2012, 01:08:14 AM »

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2012, 01:11:36 AM »
hahhhaha.. i know hatred makes haters imagining things but your case is really severe.. nasser was bigger , wider, denser, and much better shaped than achim..

Nasser had a much better structure, his frame could hold a lot of size, nasser had huge everything incl calves, only deficient bodypart was back when compared to the best backs of the day. Nasser at one time even had a great taper and midsection. At his heaviest he still had a very very good ab/thigh pose. Difficult to match.

See? I'm not a hater

Achim, however, was wider. Naturally wider. Wider clavicles. Wider structure. Nasser had bigger delts, achim was wider.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2012, 01:17:59 AM »
::)

http://www.achimalbrecht.com/gallery

http://hugenasser.com/gallery/magazine-covers/
I'm talking real magazines, not arabic or japanese, or the kind that looks like recycled paper

Ok, so nasser had more, but remember achim competed as a pro for 5 yrs, nasser was what, 15, 16 yrs ?

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #32 on: December 04, 2012, 01:19:20 AM »
Achim was hugeeeeeeee - great German genetics

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #33 on: December 04, 2012, 01:20:18 AM »
Achim was hugeeeeeeee - great German genetics

Great legs

And width. Natural width.

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #34 on: December 04, 2012, 01:22:52 AM »
Great legs

And width. Natural width.
He did a stint with the wwf from memory.. Didn't last to long though.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #35 on: December 04, 2012, 01:27:30 AM »
I'm talking real magazines, not arabic or japanese, or the kind that looks like recycled paper

Ok, so nasser had more, but remember achim competed as a pro for 5 yrs, nasser was what, 15, 16 yrs ?

man it's really silly to try to compare them,.. achim was good but nasser was in a totally different level.. yes achim was on more covers than other pros in his level because he is a handsome man not because he was a better bb than them..

5 years are not a short time to reach the top of the sport if you have the needed genetics and dedication..

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #36 on: December 04, 2012, 01:29:45 AM »
He did a stint with the wwf from memory.. Didn't last to long though.

Brakus, 1996-99

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #37 on: December 04, 2012, 01:31:48 AM »
man it's really silly to try to compare them,.. achim was good but nasser was in a totally different level.. yes achim was on more covers than other pros in his level because he is a handsome man not because he was a better bb than them..

5 years are not a short time to reach the top of the sport if you have the needed genetics and dedication..

True.

Albrecht had the look, while nasser was a much better competitor, no doubt

But back to the original point, achim is wider

snx

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2131
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #38 on: December 05, 2012, 06:57:50 AM »
nasser's shoulders at his best were the best ever on a mass monster..

I don't know...I always thought Dillett had the best shoulders in those days. But a strong case can certainly be made for Nasser's shoulders, pre-synthol.

MORTALCOIL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #39 on: December 05, 2012, 07:03:16 AM »
Show these pics to any random person and I'm sure he'll point out the strong heterosexual feel that those pics provide.

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7291
  • Getbig!
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #40 on: December 05, 2012, 07:07:01 AM »
Never undertood Achim  arms.

MORTALCOIL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #41 on: December 05, 2012, 07:10:44 AM »
Never undertood Achim  arms.

The only thing you seem to understand is roided she-beats capable of pounding your anus with what was previously a clitoris.

Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #42 on: December 05, 2012, 07:24:00 AM »
Never undertood Achim  arms.
Schweinhund! Not big enough!

ukjeff

  • Guest
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #43 on: December 05, 2012, 08:34:27 AM »
I recall Achim did a cage fight before the wrestling and got fucking hammered, play fighting was the easier option.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #44 on: December 05, 2012, 08:37:02 AM »
Never undertood Achim  arms.

Same problem as Don Ross, Roger Stewart, Dickerson, Ray Mcneil, Down Hill...

MORTALCOIL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #45 on: December 05, 2012, 09:34:46 AM »
Same problem as Don Ross, Roger Stewart, Dickerson, Ray Mcneil, Down Hill...

No arms + no head: no chance at the 'O.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #46 on: December 05, 2012, 10:13:03 AM »
I don't know...I always thought Dillett had the best shoulders in those days. But a strong case can certainly be made for Nasser's shoulders, pre-synthol.

dillett's shoulders were huge with a good shape from the side and the front but from the rear they looked weird.. check his rear biceps pose.. markus too had huge shoulders but shape wise he was not nasser's or even dillett's level..

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Nasser & Achim..
« Reply #47 on: December 05, 2012, 03:41:19 PM »
   Awesome