|
the_swami
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2012, 10:52:53 PM » |
|
In 1992-1993 Achim had the widest shoulders of any man alive. He would walk into Golds Venice and we would just be stunned. Dudes shoulders tip to tip must have been 42"-45". Just crazy.
achim was the widest until nasser came along! |
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #26 on: December 04, 2012, 12:11:57 AM » |
|
If you look at pics you can see that achim's natural width is far superior to nasser's
Albrecht had no oil, as opposed to nasser. Muscle fullness, roundness and development-wise, yes, nasser has more developed delts, however he is narrow compared to achim.
Albrecht did not use oil, wasn't boatloading the growth and slin, like the "at least 3 timesMr Olympia runner-up"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #27 on: December 04, 2012, 12:17:13 AM » |
|
his best placing in the olympia was 9th in 91 and aside of his placings his lines were genetically poor and his arms and shoulders were kinda small for his width.. also poor calves for a big white german man..
Yet he probably featured in more magazine covers than nasser |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherief Shalaby
|
|
« Reply #28 on: December 04, 2012, 02:04:11 AM » |
|
If you look at pics you can see that achim's natural width is far superior to nasser's
Albrecht had no oil, as opposed to nasser. Muscle fullness, roundness and development-wise, yes, nasser has more developed delts, however he is narrow compared to achim.
Albrecht did not use oil, wasn't boatloading the growth and slin, like the "at least 3 timesMr Olympia runner-up"
hahhhaha.. i know hatred makes haters imagining things but your case is really severe.. nasser was bigger , wider, denser, and much better shaped than achim.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2012, 02:11:36 AM » |
|
hahhhaha.. i know hatred makes haters imagining things but your case is really severe.. nasser was bigger , wider, denser, and much better shaped than achim..
Nasser had a much better structure, his frame could hold a lot of size, nasser had huge everything incl calves, only deficient bodypart was back when compared to the best backs of the day. Nasser at one time even had a great taper and midsection. At his heaviest he still had a very very good ab/thigh pose. Difficult to match. See? I'm not a hater Achim, however, was wider. Naturally wider. Wider clavicles. Wider structure. Nasser had bigger delts, achim was wider. |
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2012, 02:17:59 AM » |
|
I'm talking real magazines, not arabic or japanese, or the kind that looks like recycled paper Ok, so nasser had more, but remember achim competed as a pro for 5 yrs, nasser was what, 15, 16 yrs ? |
|
|
|
|
|
WillGrant
|
|
« Reply #32 on: December 04, 2012, 02:19:20 AM » |
|
Achim was hugeeeeeeee - great German genetics
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #33 on: December 04, 2012, 02:20:18 AM » |
|
Achim was hugeeeeeeee - great German genetics
Great legs And width. Natural width. |
|
|
|
|
|
WillGrant
|
|
« Reply #34 on: December 04, 2012, 02:22:52 AM » |
|
Great legs
And width. Natural width.
He did a stint with the wwf from memory.. Didn't last to long though. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherief Shalaby
|
|
« Reply #35 on: December 04, 2012, 02:27:30 AM » |
|
I'm talking real magazines, not arabic or japanese, or the kind that looks like recycled paper
Ok, so nasser had more, but remember achim competed as a pro for 5 yrs, nasser was what, 15, 16 yrs ?
man it's really silly to try to compare them,.. achim was good but nasser was in a totally different level.. yes achim was on more covers than other pros in his level because he is a handsome man not because he was a better bb than them.. 5 years are not a short time to reach the top of the sport if you have the needed genetics and dedication.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #36 on: December 04, 2012, 02:29:45 AM » |
|
He did a stint with the wwf from memory.. Didn't last to long though.
Brakus, 1996-99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #37 on: December 04, 2012, 02:31:48 AM » |
|
man it's really silly to try to compare them,.. achim was good but nasser was in a totally different level.. yes achim was on more covers than other pros in his level because he is a handsome man not because he was a better bb than them..
5 years are not a short time to reach the top of the sport if you have the needed genetics and dedication..
True. Albrecht had the look, while nasser was a much better competitor, no doubt But back to the original point, achim is wider |
|
|
|
|
|
snx
|
|
« Reply #38 on: December 05, 2012, 07:57:50 AM » |
|
nasser's shoulders at his best were the best ever on a mass monster..
I don't know...I always thought Dillett had the best shoulders in those days. But a strong case can certainly be made for Nasser's shoulders, pre-synthol. |
|
|
|
|
|
MORTALCOIL
|
|
« Reply #39 on: December 05, 2012, 08:03:16 AM » |
|
Show these pics to any random person and I'm sure he'll point out the strong heterosexual feel that those pics provide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hipolito mejia
|
|
« Reply #40 on: December 05, 2012, 08:07:01 AM » |
|
Never undertood Achim arms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORTALCOIL
|
|
« Reply #41 on: December 05, 2012, 08:10:44 AM » |
|
Never undertood Achim arms.
The only thing you seem to understand is roided she-beats capable of pounding your anus with what was previously a clitoris. |
|
|
|
|
Ronnie Rep
Getbig IV
Gender: 
Posts: 2109
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #42 on: December 05, 2012, 08:24:00 AM » |
|
Never undertood Achim arms.
Schweinhund! Not big enough! |
|
|
|
|
|
ukjeff
|
|
« Reply #43 on: December 05, 2012, 09:34:27 AM » |
|
I recall Achim did a cage fight before the wrestling and got fucking hammered, play fighting was the easier option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figo
|
|
« Reply #44 on: December 05, 2012, 09:37:02 AM » |
|
Never undertood Achim arms.
Same problem as Don Ross, Roger Stewart, Dickerson, Ray Mcneil, Down Hill... |
|
|
|
|
|
MORTALCOIL
|
|
« Reply #45 on: December 05, 2012, 10:34:46 AM » |
|
Same problem as Don Ross, Roger Stewart, Dickerson, Ray Mcneil, Down Hill...
No arms + no head: no chance at the 'O. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherief Shalaby
|
|
« Reply #46 on: December 05, 2012, 11:13:03 AM » |
|
I don't know...I always thought Dillett had the best shoulders in those days. But a strong case can certainly be made for Nasser's shoulders, pre-synthol.
dillett's shoulders were huge with a good shape from the side and the front but from the rear they looked weird.. check his rear biceps pose.. markus too had huge shoulders but shape wise he was not nasser's or even dillett's level.. |
|
|
|
|
|
arce1988
|
|
« Reply #47 on: December 05, 2012, 04:41:19 PM » |
|
Awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
