The flaw in this whole thread is the term Anti-Christ. That is because you must first believe in a fictional character with super powers and then an opposite character who also has super powers.
Some dude got high as fuck on the Isle of Patmos and wrote down a bunch of baloney.You can interpret this shit in any way you want as it's just insane ramblings. There iscertainly no concensus over the meaning even among Christians, so there will never bea "truth"coming out of this word salad.The Revelations is extra attrative for the religious lunatics because anyone can insert his pet theory into it, everything fits if you read it in a certain way.I could use the Revelations to prove Ronald Coleman is our savior.
Not in the sense of archetypal, primal forces locked together in an eternal struggle. Yes in the sense that some people perform actions which we, by a set of standards called a moral code, deem to be good while others, by the same set of standards, perform actions which we deem to be evil.
i'll say they are powerful forces that have the capacity to motivate and guide the intent and sometimes the action..
Te term anti-Christ in revelations is referring to a single world leader who takes control of one World government, not necessarily a government that control nations but someone who monopolizes the worlds economy like the Rothschild family.The chances of a Muslim being the anti Christ is 1 in a million.
So you believe that good and evil are, for lack of a better term, sentient and can influence people, as opposed to words that describe particular actions within the context of a moral code?
You forget the era we live in. A muslim elected to a position of world power, in this fucked up pc environment - possible.Look at what happened with Obama - the huge pc sympathy vote - translate that over to a muslim.
True but it would have to be a Muslim that does not believe in the Law