Author Topic: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.  (Read 9168 times)

Walter Sobchak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13607
  • HANKINS IS A FUCKING LIAR & QUITTER
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #50 on: July 21, 2015, 09:12:30 PM »
Necrosis, don't ya knock Dr. Kent Hovind.  He graduated from Patriot University.

Patriot University


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#Education

This is like the quack doctor Wiggs was quoting about his distilled water only theory.

Christ some people are stupid

syntaxmachine

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2687
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #51 on: July 21, 2015, 09:25:10 PM »
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

It could, if, e.g., (~X-->Y) (If not X then Y). But clearly that formula doesn't hold in this case (i.e., it isn't the case that if carbon dating is flawed, then the world is roughly 6,000 years old).

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48846
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #52 on: July 21, 2015, 09:31:35 PM »
It could, if, e.g., (~X-->Y) (If not X then Y). But clearly that formula doesn't hold in this case (i.e., it isn't the case that if carbon dating is flawed, then the world is roughly 6,000 years old).

Thank you for the clarification, Syntax.
X

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23538
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #53 on: July 22, 2015, 04:56:39 AM »
The are artifacts in Southern America that hint at humans/civilization having existed for a very long time. Unfortunately a good bunch of scientists have been "expelled" from the community to not shit all over the picture presented to us. It's like everything else - you're part of "the" club as long as you play along.
.

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21255
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #54 on: July 22, 2015, 05:14:25 AM »
Radio Carbon dating is only useful for things less than 50,000 years old.   The earth's age, of 4.5 Billion years, was determined using Radiometric dating of the lead isotope isochron.

Woah buddy, keep your big words and your science to yourself, we are trying to have intelligent conversations here.



The are artifacts in Southern America that hint at humans/civilization having existed for a very long time. Unfortunately a good bunch of scientists have been "expelled" from the community to not shit all over the picture presented to us. It's like everything else - you're part of "the" club as long as you play along.

There was a program on Nat Geo about the Americas before Columbus which showed that there were massive cities in South America, which have now been covered by the rainforests.  They said the indigenous people used to log and clear those forests, but when they were all killed off by smallpox etc., that the rainforests came back and over grew all of the old cities. So, when people say that we need to save these forests, I think that is false, as some of them are only a few hundred years old.  Not all need to be logged, but it would be great to excavate some of these ruins.

The Mormons believe this in their doctrine.

BigCyp

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10897
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #55 on: July 22, 2015, 05:19:05 AM »
Woah buddy, keep your big words and your science to yourself, we are trying to have intelligent conversations here.



There was a program on Nat Geo about the Americas before Columbus which showed that there were massive cities in South America, which have now been covered by the rainforests.  They said the indigenous people used to log and clear those forests, but when they were all killed off by smallpox etc., that the rainforests came back and over grew all of the old cities. So, when people say that we need to save these forests, I think that is false, as some of them are only a few hundred years old.  Not all need to be logged, but it would be great to excavate some of these ruins.

The Mormons believe this in their doctrine.

They also wear secret underwear, and go to a planet called Kolob when they die lol.

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21255
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #56 on: July 22, 2015, 05:36:13 AM »


While I get what you're saying (never heard any Mormons I know mention kobob though), don't all religions have all of these unbelievable/far fetched stories?  I try not to make fun of one over the other, except for Islam as it seems to draw in crazies and promote violence.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #57 on: July 22, 2015, 06:08:20 AM »
It could, if, e.g., (~X-->Y) (If not X then Y). But clearly that formula doesn't hold in this case (i.e., it isn't the case that if carbon dating is flawed, then the world is roughly 6,000 years old).

If it's a binary system.

BigCyp

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10897
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #58 on: July 22, 2015, 07:02:55 AM »
While I get what you're saying (never heard any Mormons I know mention kobob though), don't all religions have all of these unbelievable/far fetched stories?  I try not to make fun of one over the other, except for Islam as it seems to draw in crazies and promote violence.

True. It is a little fresh of me calling Mormons crazy for keeping their underpants off the radar, when it is common knowledge that I believe a man lived in the belly of a fish for 3 days.

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #59 on: July 22, 2015, 07:29:59 AM »
The whole scientific story is bullshit.

We are to believe that for hundreds of millions of years the earth existed.  Then mankind has records up to a few thousand years ago.  Lived like nomads for millennia then all of a sudden the last 100 years we exponentially grew in things like technologies and sciences.  What the fuck was mankind doing for thousands of years if we have so many inventions all at once?

I'm sorry this is what i thought of when i read your post




PJim

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3951
  • Strike another match, go start anew
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #60 on: July 22, 2015, 10:05:41 AM »
I'm sorry this is what i thought of when i read your post





I deal with the public daily and I am constantly baffled by the stupidity of 90 percent of people.

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23538
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #61 on: July 22, 2015, 10:12:35 AM »
Woah buddy, keep your big words and your science to yourself, we are trying to have intelligent conversations here.



There was a program on Nat Geo about the Americas before Columbus which showed that there were massive cities in South America, which have now been covered by the rainforests.  They said the indigenous people used to log and clear those forests, but when they were all killed off by smallpox etc., that the rainforests came back and over grew all of the old cities. So, when people say that we need to save these forests, I think that is false, as some of them are only a few hundred years old.  Not all need to be logged, but it would be great to excavate some of these ruins.

The Mormons believe this in their doctrine.

Hard to say for sure - would love to see for myself and have a little lab in such a region. Nat/Geo and offspring can be pretty creative at times.
.

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #62 on: July 22, 2015, 10:18:59 AM »
Does this mean the Universe really is a Hologram and isn't real?

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21255
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #63 on: July 22, 2015, 11:21:05 AM »
True. It is a little fresh of me calling Mormons crazy for keeping their underpants off the radar, when it is common knowledge that I believe a man lived in the belly of a fish for 3 days.

Whales are mammals bro, as evidenced by many fat women.

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31828
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #64 on: July 22, 2015, 11:27:09 AM »
Whales are mammals bro, as evidenced by many fat women.

The jury is still out on this.

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19391
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #65 on: July 22, 2015, 11:30:48 AM »
Again, planting seeds is hoping that some people may be inspired by your words.

That's pretty much the same thing as what I said.

Semantics.

It is the same thing.