Author Topic: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller  (Read 3648 times)

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #25 on: October 07, 2006, 11:16:16 AM »
Ronnies finished. He was a great champion but now its time to go.

He should retire and spend the rest of his life eating grits and reminiscing about when he was top dog in the IFBB. But, whatever he does, and wherever he goes he will be haunted by two names ... Dorian Yates and Jay Cutler.

 

Adam Empire

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2370
  • Gobias Industries
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #26 on: October 07, 2006, 11:32:19 AM »
come on hulkster...jays look way better ronnie in that first pic..just stop licking colemans ass and accept the fact that jay was too good for ronnie

Agreed.  And how the hell can you compare the leg size when those pics are from two different angles and distances?
Motherboy (the band).

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #27 on: October 07, 2006, 11:38:35 AM »
I really think he is finished. I see very bad sign in his body. I dont see him failed in his condition, but really i see big fatigue of his physic.

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #28 on: October 07, 2006, 11:47:39 AM »
Quote
excactly.  Ron's been going downhill for years, he was fine in 99 but tried to take it to the next level and he's suffereing for it now.
He didn't suffer for the past 6 titles though.  No doubt, Coleman in 98' was much better.  They should have given the O to Martinez on mid section alone.  Jay's abs are the size of most guys pecs from all that GH, simply disgusting. ;D
N

canadaphiliac

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #29 on: October 07, 2006, 11:53:17 AM »
He didn't suffer for the past 6 titles though.  No doubt, Coleman in 98' was much better.  They should have given the O to Martinez on mid section alone.  Jay's abs are the size of most guys pecs from all that GH, simply disgusting. ;D
Are you implying Jay might not have deserved to win!? Blasphemy!

TDK

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2006, 11:54:51 AM »
That Jay pic from 2001 shows exactly what I mean about Jays abs.  The were crunched down and deeeep then.  Now he doesnt pose them properly so each individual abs muscle is really large and shallow.

gmflex

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7037
  • The Empire lives...you rebel scum!!!
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2006, 11:58:25 AM »
 ::) ::) ::)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2006, 12:13:26 PM »
come on hulkster...jays look way better ronnie in that first pic..just stop licking colemans ass and accept the fact that jay was too good for ronnie

I have. And all these Jay fans should accept the fact that Jay won because Ronnie was 43 and injured.  Jay was dominated by Ronnie when Ronnie was younger



 Father Time beat Ronnie. Jay didn't.

Had the Ronnie of 98, 99, 01 AC, 2003 hell, even 2004 and 2005 shown up, 2006 Jay would have lost fair and square. Plain and simple.
Flower Boy Ran Away

TDK

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller
« Reply #33 on: October 07, 2006, 12:17:01 PM »
I agree  Hulkster.  I have said it before and I will say it again...

A 100% Ronnie > 100% Dorian > 100% Haney.

However a 100% Jay < 100% Ronnie.

Mr O is no longer progressive for the first time in a decades.