didnt you read my post
the Senate Intelligence Committee, Lord Butlers investigation in Britain and the 9/11 Commission have all come out and said there was no lying on the part of President Bush. Plus, Vladimir Putin has said his intelligence told Bush there were weapons of mass destruction.
so Youve got three separate investigations plus the president of Russia all saying
British intelligence, U.S. intelligence, Russian intelligence, told the president there were weapons of mass destruction.now he may have made a mistake, which is obvious. bush even admits to that. but faulty intelligence is not a lie
Second night in a row you've cited the 911 commission as a reliable source.
please recognize that even in the eyes of the committee leaders, the 911 Commission report was merely a narrative attempting to explain Al Quida's involvement in 9/11 and the failure of US systems.
The men leading the report, kean and hamilton, call it very incomplete in need of further editions.
it is rife with errors - I just read a book which points out many anomalies in that report, some of which are completely uintrue glaring discrepencies which they ignored.
To use the 911 report - written by the admin, for the admin, clearing the admin, in order to defend the admin, is very poor debating on your part. you are better than that, man.
kh,
Do you believe in the war in iraq enough to fight in it? Would you let your sons die in the sand for "freeing the iraqis"? Or is it easy for you to manage other lives, as it'll never affect you?