Author Topic: BEST MR. OLYMPIA LINEUP EVER PIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Read 19834 times)

Fury · « **Reply #75 on:** November 27, 2006, 08:15:43 PM »

Quote from: Slick Vic on November 27, 2006, 07:42:40 PM

I know you would choose Sergio, Alexxx, but I got Arnold's back so I go with him!

I would probably choose Sergio, too. I could make due with Arnold's physique, though. But, Sergio is one in a billion.

Sean-DeMarco · « **Reply #76 on:** November 27, 2006, 08:17:29 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on November 27, 2006, 01:28:37 PM

Who would you choose?

...I'd go for either Serge or Sergio. Props for posting that.~

The_Hammer · « **Reply #77 on:** November 28, 2006, 12:22:05 AM »

Shoulders=Arnold
Chest=Tie
Legs=Sergio
Arms=Tie
Back=Sergio (however Arnold's back relaxed looks more impressive)

the shadow · « **Reply #78 on:** November 28, 2006, 12:46:46 AM »

Quote from: alexxx on November 27, 2006, 01:28:37 PM

Who would you choose?

just like they way they are standing..
franco
serge
oliva
arnold
zane
franco looks the best

Figo · « **Reply #79 on:** November 28, 2006, 02:07:44 AM »

Zane.

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #80 on:** November 28, 2006, 02:53:24 AM »

How can people even debate this? Arnold Is King. End of story. I do think Sergio relied to much on genetics, you can noticably tell that Arnold improved year after year where as Sergio brought the same package year after year with less then stellar conditioning. Pumpster you sir are by far just as retarded when it comes to logic as Triple V when it comes to BBing. Please shove an icepick in your eye now cause ND owns you day and night even if he isn't right (which in this case he is right).

alexxx · « **Reply #81 on:** November 28, 2006, 03:39:01 PM »

1972 Olympia was by far the best one and the best condition Sergio came in at. Here is a part from the interview with Sergio by Ron Harris from january MuscleMag 2002.

MMI: What where your measurements in top form?

SO: At my biggest competitive weight of 245 in 1972 I had 22 inch arms and 58-inch chest. My thighs were over 30, and my waist was between 27-28.

Now if that waist is that low imagine how much lower it would be had he come in better condition..

Also I just noticed that 4 of those in lineup where previous mr. Olympias.. guess which?

hipolito mejia · « **Reply #82 on:** November 28, 2006, 04:35:33 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on November 28, 2006, 03:39:01 PM

Also I just noticed that 4 of those in lineup where previous mr. Olympias.. guess which?

Correction:

Only Arnold & Sergio were "previous" mr.O in that lineup,

Dr.Franco and Frank went to become mr. O after Arnold got tired of winning and retired at the tender age of 28 in 75'

efirkey · « **Reply #83 on:** November 28, 2006, 06:06:28 PM »

Quote from: body88 on November 27, 2006, 01:37:53 PM

Haha arnold is dwarfing him. With better condition. His shoulders are hunched because he is leaning forward. You are correct about the smaller waist. Sergio has an all around smaller frame. At least make sense when you post

If Arnold weighed about 230, then what would Sergio weigh? Sergio would be way too small to compete by today's standards.

alexxx · « **Reply #84 on:** November 28, 2006, 06:41:47 PM »

Quote from: hipolito mejia on November 28, 2006, 04:35:33 PM

Correction:

Only Arnold & Sergio were "previous" mr.O in that lineup,

Dr.Franco and Frank went to become mr. O after Arnold got tired of winning and retired at the tender age of 28 in 75'

It was previous to my years...

Bast000 · « **Reply #85 on:** November 28, 2006, 06:43:00 PM »

Quote from: efirkey on November 28, 2006, 06:06:28 PM

If Arnold weighed about 230, then what would Sergio weigh? Sergio would be way too small to compete by today's standards.

bullshit, not lean enough yes.

Marty Champions · « **Reply #86 on:** November 28, 2006, 07:03:49 PM »

arnold had everything except a nice set of abs, and i think abs are the most important

nubret wins this one easily and all his bodyparts are in proportion

grab an umbrella · « **Reply #87 on:** November 28, 2006, 07:38:17 PM »

I have a question...just because someones has big arms, does that mean they are good arms??? Sergio had no peak at all on his biceps...arnold at least had decent looking arms...

alexxx · « **Reply #88 on:** November 28, 2006, 07:41:04 PM »

Quote from: grab an umbrella on November 28, 2006, 07:38:17 PM

I have a question...just because someones has big arms, does that mean they are good arms??? Sergio had no peak at all on his biceps...arnold at least had decent looking arms...

The arms muscles are consisted of two muscle belies: biceps and triceps.

The best ever biceps belong to Arnold ofcourse and to many the best ever triceps belong to Sergio!

grab an umbrella · « **Reply #89 on:** November 28, 2006, 07:52:48 PM »

wow alex...i sure am glad you pointed out that the arm has two muscles...the point i was trying to make was that everyone has been saying sergio has better arms and i wanted a justification

alexxx · « **Reply #90 on:** November 28, 2006, 07:55:02 PM »

Quote from: grab an umbrella on November 28, 2006, 07:52:48 PM

wow alex...i sure am glad you pointed out that the arm has two muscles...the point i was trying to make was that everyone has been saying sergio has better arms and i wanted a justification

I sense a tiny wee bit of sarcasm!

This is why people say that!

grab an umbrella · « **Reply #91 on:** November 28, 2006, 08:00:21 PM »

I'll be honest...his arms are huge...but they look like shit...theres no shape there, all mass....

Sergio Rules 77 · « **Reply #92 on:** November 28, 2006, 08:11:07 PM »

Quote from: grab an umbrella on November 28, 2006, 08:00:21 PM

I'll be honest...his arms are huge...but they look like shit...theres no shape there, all mass....

Those arms look like shit

. Easily one of the top ten stupidest comments ever uttered by mankind. BTW, Hendrix couldn't play the guitar, Larry Bird & Michael Jordan couldn't make last second shots and Michelangelo couldn't paint.

SERGIO!!!!

grab an umbrella · « **Reply #93 on:** November 28, 2006, 08:25:52 PM »

sergio rules 77...explain to me whats so perfect to me about an arm where the bicep looks like a fucking hill...no peak...no cuts...to have a perfect arm, it requires components that he's missing...

Sergio Rules 77 · « **Reply #94 on:** November 28, 2006, 08:42:22 PM »

Quote from: grab an umbrella on November 28, 2006, 08:25:52 PM

sergio rules 77...explain to me whats so perfect to me about an arm where the bicep looks like a fucking hill...no peak...no cuts...to have a perfect arm, it requires components that he's missing...

grab an umbrella...please show me where I said Sergio had the perfect arm ?. I was just disputing the fact that his arms look like shit, which I will say again is one of the stupiest statements I have ever heard. Would you say Arnold had shitty arms because he had weak triceps in comparison with his biceps peak ?. I love how the recent trend on the boards is to say because Sergio didn't have cuts like Andreas Munzer, that he is somehow an inferior bodybuilder. 99.9 % of bodybuilders from that era didn't have "cuts".

SERGIO!!!!!

grab an umbrella · « **Reply #95 on:** November 28, 2006, 08:45:28 PM »

yes i wud say that arnold had bad arms...i mean his tris and forearms sucked in comparison with his bi's....i will agree that most bodybuilders back then didn't have the condition they have today...im not saying that no one back then had cut arms tho...there were plenty of guys who had good detail to their arms back then...sergio doesn't...

Dredlock Rasta · « **Reply #96 on:** November 29, 2006, 07:10:17 AM »

Sergio and Arnold are tied genetic wise. What it comes down to is conditioning and Arnold wins on that. I'd rather have oliva's physique though.

pumpster · « **Reply #97 on:** November 29, 2006, 08:46:41 AM »

Quote from: MikeThaMachine on November 28, 2006, 02:53:24 AM

How can people even debate this? Arnold Is King. End of story. I do think Sergio relied to much on genetics, you can noticably tell that Arnold improved year after year where as Sergio brought the same package year after year with less then stellar conditioning. Pumpster you sir are by far just as retarded when it comes to logic as Triple V when it comes to BBing. Please shove an icepick in your eye now cause ND owns you day and night even if he isn't right (which in this case he is right).

Not according to the pics. Your fantasy overrules reality.

pumpster · « **Reply #98 on:** November 29, 2006, 08:48:11 AM »

Quote from: efirkey on November 28, 2006, 06:06:28 PM

If Arnold weighed about 230, then what would Sergio weigh? Sergio would be way too small to compete by today's standards.

This is really amateur analysis. Oliva weighed around the same as Schwarzenegger; he had more size overall.

pumpster · « **Reply #99 on:** November 29, 2006, 08:49:35 AM »

Quote from: grab an umbrella on November 28, 2006, 07:38:17 PM

I have a question...just because someones has big arms, does that mean they are good arms??? Sergio had no peak at all on his biceps...arnold at least had decent looking arms...

Did you start following BB yesterday? Oliva's tris & forearms were much better; that's 2/3s of the equation except to those dazzled by biceps peaks. His arm size was also bigger, relative to his height, so overall it was a draw at best for Schwarzenegger.