Author Topic: JAY CUTLER 2002 arnold classic pics... (Read 5673 times)

Shadow starts a lot of threads and Cutler is flat out blocky. Midsection is good for a guy his size until this years Olympia where it looked a little funky.

logical? · « **Reply #13 on:** December 10, 2006, 05:00:43 PM »

Mid-section was already just too wide in 2004.

logical? · « **Reply #14 on:** December 10, 2006, 05:01:44 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on December 10, 2006, 04:59:55 PM

Jay kept on trying to be Mr. Olympia, but why? Because it has a big name? He WAS the best bodybuilder of 2002, Mr. Olympia or not. Is that not the same as winning a title with a name? He was world's best in 2002, whether he had a Sandow or not.

Matt, if Jay showed up at the 2002 Olympia in this form, do you think they would have given him the title?

slaveboy1980 · « **Reply #15 on:** December 10, 2006, 05:01:59 PM »

jay cooks 10 times per day when he only has to cook 1-3 times.

MisterMagoo · « **Reply #16 on:** December 10, 2006, 05:10:46 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on December 10, 2006, 04:59:55 PM

Jay kept on trying to be Mr. Olympia, but why? Because it has a big name? He WAS the best bodybuilder of 2002, Mr. Olympia or not. Is that not the same as winning a title with a name? He was world's best in 2002, whether he had a Sandow or not.

because you get a shitload of money if you win, maybe?

logical? · « **Reply #17 on:** December 10, 2006, 05:54:33 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on December 10, 2006, 05:16:57 PM

It's a possibility. He looked incredible in 2002, but a large part of the reason why Jay won is because his back was much improved in 2006. In 2002, I don't think his back would have been able to compare well to Ronnie's - even in Ronnie's injured state. Check out Ron Avidan's pics of Jay at the 2002 ASC here:

Agreed.

njflex · « **Reply #18 on:** December 10, 2006, 07:24:35 PM »

2002 that was his olympia physique,but he couldn't beat ronnie's back ,4 year's later he did,he looked freakier then,like he weighed every pound of muscle he was.

logical? · « **Reply #19 on:** December 10, 2006, 07:29:09 PM »

He didn't compete at the 2002 olympia.

logical? · « **Reply #20 on:** December 10, 2006, 08:41:37 PM »

Do you think so? I'm not so sure- Ronnie's waist hadn't fully blown out by 2002, and from the back it was the same old story. Ronnie just looked flat and depleted- but this was only noticeable in some poses, like the front double bi.

body88 · « **Reply #21 on:** December 10, 2006, 08:44:23 PM »

Quote from: slaveboy1980 on December 10, 2006, 05:01:59 PM

jay cooks 10 times per day when he only has to cook 1-3 times.

Who gives a shit?

logical? · « **Reply #22 on:** December 11, 2006, 03:44:07 AM »

Quote from: Matt C on December 11, 2006, 01:47:08 AM

Ronnie's waist was ok, but his gut was pretty bad that year. Mainly he was flat and depleted as you said. However, I think Jay would have had a little bit of size on him. Perhaps with Ronnie's back he would have still won.

Yeah I could see it going either way.

Personally, I don't think 2001 Ronnie deserved to lose- he beat Jay from the front- and from the back, well...

2002- ROnnie's worst showing- but bad enough?

ANyway that's history.

the shadow · « **Reply #23 on:** December 11, 2006, 04:34:27 AM »

Quote from: Matt C on December 10, 2006, 05:16:57 PM

It's a possibility. He looked incredible in 2002, but a large part of the reason why Jay won is because his back was much improved in 2006. In 2002, I don't think his back would have been able to compare well to Ronnie's - even in Ronnie's injured state. Check out Ron Avidan's pics of Jay at the 2002 ASC here:

http://www.getbig.com/pics/arnold/2003/mens/cutler.htm

If money was on Jay's mind, he would have kept competing in the ASC and the other spring shows that year and made more money than just competing at the Olympia once a year. Money was secondary to Jay who is already financially stable. He wanted the glory that comes with Mr. Olympia title which is something I don't really understand, but to each their own.

this is the first time you said anything positive about cuts..jay is the best of the best and i am glad you also agree with me

the shadow · « **Reply #24 on:** December 11, 2006, 04:48:59 AM »

Quote from: Matt C on December 11, 2006, 04:45:19 AM

Jay is what he is - the best bodybuilder on the planet right now and formally #2 for five years.

this means that jay made ronnie look like his bitch this year..do you agree with me on that matt?..

Author Topic: JAY CUTLER 2002 arnold classic pics... (Read 5673 times)

body88