« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Coleman not a good loser?  (Read 5852 times)

freespirit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9535
  • Revolt!
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #50 on: December 28, 2006, 10:10:04 AM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 28, 2006, 10:03:07 AM
Yes !! yes they are lol


No I mean seriously, are they in any way related because of their resemblance in screen names and the combined delusional Coleman nut-hugging. Strange, very strange, no?
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #51 on: December 28, 2006, 04:07:09 PM »
Quote from: xpac2 on December 28, 2006, 10:07:34 AM
Who the f**k cares?! The Olympia was 3 months ago and your doorknobs are still arguing about it  ???

Think about the ones who are arguing about the Mr. Getbig.
Logged

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #52 on: December 28, 2006, 04:36:03 PM »
Quote from: pobrecito on December 27, 2006, 09:28:05 PM
And the point of this picture is what? To show the inferior competition Coleman faced?

Look at the legs of Coleman and Cutler, eventhough Coleman has superior quads it does NOTHING for him becuase overall, Cutler's legs are superior. Better balance throughout the lower body. Now put Yates' back on Cutler and Coleman loses, plain and simple.




HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAH AAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA HAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THat has got to be the most ridiculous bunch of bullshit I v'e ever read.

You Anti-Coleman Penii  will go to any lengths to discredit him.

As to the original question.......yes he's a terrible sport.

The falling to the floor thing is retarded.........and a little faggy.

Your'e a MAN for chrissakes, maintain your composure and be a professional.
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #53 on: December 28, 2006, 04:49:55 PM »
Quote from: The Squadfather on December 27, 2006, 07:38:49 PM
it can't happen that much, 75 percent of the male population of your race is in prison.

that was damn funny!
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Slick Vic

  • Guest
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #54 on: December 28, 2006, 04:56:21 PM »
Quote from: MassRuhlz on December 27, 2006, 06:44:59 PM
How come Jay Cutler stood on stage for all his 2nd place finishes to Coleman and congratulated Ronnie year after  year, but when Cutler wins Coleman storms off stage? Is that the sign of a professional? I'm sure that is what Haney told him back stage, to get back out there and don't leave a sour taste in the mouthes of the fans and judges, just in case he competes next year. I'm not a Ronnie hater, just think he could have shown alittle more class.

You hit the nail right on the head.
Logged

mahg

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 597
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #55 on: December 28, 2006, 05:23:11 PM »
It's funny that they have butterfly butts lol.
Logged

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #56 on: December 29, 2006, 02:51:53 AM »
Quote from: Big_Wiggs on December 27, 2006, 07:01:23 PM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)

    Blacks used to be  beaten by whites all the time...usually with a whip for trying to escape. hahahaha
Logged

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #57 on: December 31, 2006, 05:37:17 AM »
Quote from: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 07:02:06 AM
do you think jays back is weak???.your definetly a cutler hater

No it's not weak, but it's hardly the best back around.


There is zero lower back separation. How can this win the Olympia?!?!?
Logged

fearANDloathing

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 624
  • Deep in The Plak Tow. Don't Fuck with me!
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #58 on: January 03, 2007, 10:36:52 AM »
Quote from: Big_Wiggs on December 27, 2006, 07:01:23 PM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)
;D
also Ronnie has YET to suffer a fair loss. Let's see how he reacts when that actually happens
Logged

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #59 on: January 03, 2007, 10:43:39 AM »
Quote from: Bear on December 31, 2006, 05:37:17 AM
No it's not weak, but it's hardly the best back around.


There is zero lower back separation. How can this win the Olympia?!?!?
on some poses jay looked better than him and on other poses coleman looked better than him.this is a pose by pose analysis that was posted on the flex blog

back lat spread-jay

back double biceps-jay

front relaxed-jay

side chest-ronnie

front double bi-ronnie

most muscular-ronnie

ab and thigh-jay

side triceps-jay

its easy to say that jay beat ronnie fair and square.ronnie did pwn him on some poses but jay was the victor..ronnie 3 jay 5..nuff said
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

pinchharmonic

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 100
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #60 on: January 03, 2007, 12:03:38 PM »
yea if i was black i'd be pretty pissed. it's not like my people are superior in many other things aside from physical competition including sports , etc.
Logged

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: Coleman not a good loser?
« Reply #61 on: January 03, 2007, 12:12:50 PM »
anyone would have been pretty upset from that.
Logged
bodybuildersreality.com
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »