yawn. If I had something to say on this topic, I certainly would.
honestly though, most intelligent people - including the 2 co-chairs of the 911 commission - believe the official story is inadequate.
I know CTers and Official Story'ers like to debate what really happened, but it's a lot more simple than that.
Did it happen as the official story dictates? No. Even the chairs and 5 of the 10 authors admit that.
Beyond that, you have two sides who both claim to know it all on this topic. Of course, if it was an Inside Job, the CTers couldn't possibly know every detail. Likewise, even you Official Story'ers have to admit it's fishy when pakistan's head of intel sends 100k to Atta, just a few days before attacks... or when ISI head admits to Alex Jones last month that it was an inside job. yes, a leader of the intel services of our ally sends $ to lead hijacker just before 911, and the next guy admits it was an inside job.
Of course, many on both sides let it boil down to pathetic politics. It's not an inside job because Bush wouldn't do that... Or.... It is an inside job because Bush WOULD do that.
Whatever the story, things like paki's involvement mean it was bigger than 19 guys, don't they? I mean, why the 100k just a few days before 911? The 911 commission was never given that information, and now the 2 heads want to know why. Both sides are stupid to waste their time debating it. Wait 40 years and watch everything become declassified as it will. You'll see our 'allies' helped fund it. And that makes it way bigger than 19 guys, it makes it state-sponsored, which is something that is probably above your comprehension.
So let's just say 'fuck it', shall we gentlemen, and admit none of us knows the truth on this one?