Excuses.
Well I have long limbs and they work just fine. If you want to take the easy way out, so be it. Those friggin' exercise ball squats look hard as hell to do, that doesn't make them better than a regular squat. I'm sure you can do legpresses and grow if your juiced up the ass like Yates.
Great way to think outside the box, PRIVATE. Long live the legpress, King of the Lifts!
Another frreaking comprehension/retention challenged retarded!!

Please, point to me where I have said one is superior over another....I 've only said that squats are the best for some, and legpresses are the best for others. If you are longlimbed and can free squat no problem, hey, more power to you!! But keep in mind that you are the exception, not the rule. Take a look at Arnold's squatting pictures. He's a longlimbed guy. Look at how far he stick his butt in order to balance the barbell across his trunk, because of his structure. In some pics it almost looks like a good morning!!! No shit he relied heavily on front squats for overall balance of the vastus muscles, for isolation of the tighs......
I free squat myself and absolutely LOVE the exercise. I reap great benefits and desired results with it, and I'm able to concentrate the load of the bar only where I want it, in my tighs, not the butt, neither my lower back.
But that doesn't mean I tag legpresses as an inferior exercise. In my opinion BOTH OF THEM are essential for complete tighs, and I challenge anyone to show me a decent, big, well developed pair of tighs in history built without BOTH of them, at least in a given point in the athlete's carrer.
If you use free squats because you get great results form them, excelent, you're doing it for the right reason. But if you're only doing it in order to adhere to the 'dogma', hey, you'll be one limited SOB of an athlete in the leg department....