BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell

[240 is Back]

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm


You can't question the source on this one.  You see the BBC reporter discussing the collapse of WTC7, TWENTY MINUTES BEFORE IT FALLS.  In fact, you can see the thing in the background.

The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure.

[240 is Back]

Damn, how stupid can people be?  Look at WTC7 standing in the background.

[Deedee]

I saw it being reported too not long before the building came down.

[240 is Back]

I saw it being reported too not long before the building came down.

The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure.

Firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down. It is widely acknowledged by those who were there on the scene that warnings were issued for people to evacuate the area in anticipation of the building's collapse, with some even stating that a 20 second countdown preceded the collapse of the 47-story skyscraper, again clearly suggesting that it was taken down by means of explosives as the video footage of its implosion illustrates.

[240 is Back]

Nope.  You can watch the 25 minute clip.
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm

THe cut the feed right before WTC7 fell, probably realizing they reported things having not yet happened.  Yesterday google video was pulling the video like crazy, but enough people saved it, that it's now "out there". 

[240 is Back]

It's pretty funny.  Six months ago, any idea at all that wtc7 was a controlled demo was laughed off.  People would debate it here.  They'd call names, etc.

Today, we have a list of NYFD and NYPD, mlitary, EMTs, and others who all say there was a countdown and a controlled takedown.  You have a video of BBC reporting it 20 minutes before it fell. 

And today, people won't debate it anymore.  They had the courage to talk about it 6 months ago.  But today? They are scared to debate it.  THey know the truth now, and it much be fcking with their heads.  Owned.

[Deedee]

BBC wasn't the only news source covering it.  It was also reported on our side of the pond that there was anticipation the building would be pulled... and then moments later, it was.

[240 is Back]

BBC wasn't the only news source covering it.  It was also reported on our side of the pond that there was anticipation the building would be pulled... and then moments later, it was.

Our official report says it just fell, and no one knew.  There was no controlled demolition (as that would have required weeks of pre-wiring and therefore foreknowledge).

In reality, it was obviously a controlled demo, and the smoking gun of 911.  And it's coming out.

[Hedgehog]

BBC wasn't the only news source covering it.  It was also reported on our side of the pond that there was anticipation the building would be pulled... and then moments later, it was.

In Sweden, I remember reading reports on the internet, and seeing on the newscasts about how the building had collapsed already.

Then I saw live coverage, and it was still standing.


I just think it's a matter of the media anticipating what was gonna happen, it's how I remember it anyway.

Also remember, there was plenty of faulty information circulating. One rumor in Sweden during these hours was that pretty much all tall buildings in the USA were attacked, Sears Tower had been flown into eg.

Sometimes a news story turns into folklore before you know it.

-Hedge

[ribonucleic]

The 9/11 conspiracy theories are pretty well known by now. The BBC addressed them earlier this month with a documentary, The Conspiracy Files, shown within the UK.

Until now, I don't think we've been accused of being part of the conspiracy. But now some websites are using news footage from BBC World on September 11th 2001 to suggest we were actively participating in some sort of attempt to manipulate the audience. As a result, we're now getting lots of emails asking us to clarify our position. So here goes:

1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

An image of the website hosting the alleged BBC World footage3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.

4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another.

5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy... "

Richard Porter is head of news, BBC World

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html

[JOHN MATRIX]

It's pretty funny.  Six months ago, any idea at all that wtc7 was a controlled demo was laughed off.  People would debate it here.  They'd call names, etc.

Today, we have a list of NYFD and NYPD, mlitary, EMTs, and others who all say there was a countdown and a controlled takedown.  You have a video of BBC reporting it 20 minutes before it fell. 

And today, people won't debate it anymore.  They had the courage to talk about it 6 months ago.  But today? They are scared to debate it.  THey know the truth now, and it much be fcking with their heads.  Owned.

hahahaha yes, i dont know how anyone can possibly not believe it was a controlled demo. they must be trying as hard as they can to just not think about it LOL

[kh300]

i dont get it,, so they spent all the time creating the perfect plan,, almost got away with the biggest conspericy in history,, then they blew it by telling news stations they were about to blow it up, and even did a countdown?

and for the millionth time,, pull is a term firefighters use when an area needs to be evacuated and the effort is aborted.. they pulled it because they knew the building wasnt going to last much longer and the structure was failing..

plus controlled demolitions of 50 storie building is a very very loud event,, only the noise of thousands of blasts going off would prove of a demolition

[240 is Back]

i dont get it,, so they spent all the time creating the perfect plan,, almost got away with the biggest conspericy in history,, then they blew it by telling news stations they were about to blow it up, and even did a countdown?

You tell us:  Why did BBC report it 20 minutes before it fell?

And if it was a mistake, why did they try like hell to remove this from google?  It was mass censored til Alex Jones put it out and the google gates opened.

[kh300]

You tell us:  Why did BBC report it 20 minutes before it fell?

And if it was a mistake, why did they try like hell to remove this from google?  It was mass censored til Alex Jones put it out and the google gates opened.

because they knew it was comming down,, that shit was burning all day, hours before it fell you could see the stucture weakening

the google thing,, maybee theres something else to it, maybee its another lie by alex jones.. its no secret that they thought the building was going down- its no coverup.. the more logical question is why would they tell reporters they were going to blow it up?

[240 is Back]

because they knew it was comming down,, that shit was burning all day, hours before it fell you could see the stucture weakening

No building like this had ever fallen from fire alone.

How would they know it was going to fall, and how would they know to do a 20 second countdown?

[240 is Back]

maybee its another lie by alex jones..

Can you list ONE lie by Alex Jones in the past?

[kh300]

No building like this had ever fallen from fire alone.

How would they know it was going to fall, and how would they know to do a 20 second countdown?

there wasnt a 20 second countdown,, youll believe anything -sad thing is you would tell me the same thing

[240 is Back]

there wasnt a 20 second countdown,, youll believe anything -sad thing is you would tell me the same thing

So any NYPD, FDNY, EMTs, and military personnel who say there was - are they lying?

[Wombat]

hahahaha yes, i dont know how anyone can possibly not believe it was a controlled demo. they must be trying as hard as they can to just not think about it LOL

I firmly believe that the people in charge of this earth do this shit to show each other just how stupid we really are...I think its a game to them...A total power trip...I truly believe that we are all just slaves and these people just toy with us for the fuk of it...

[kh300]

So any NYPD, FDNY, EMTs, and military personnel who say there was - are they lying?

so far you showed me the one nypd guy- that i checked out and he was released by the nypd psycologists a year before he came out with his story.

[240 is Back]

so far you showed me the one nypd guy- that i checked out and he was released by the nypd psycologists a year before he came out with his story.

So he's lying then?

[Wombat]

because they knew it was comming down,, that shit was burning all day, hours before it fell you could see the stucture weakening

the google thing,, maybee theres something else to it, maybee its another lie by alex jones.. its no secret that they thought the building was going down- its no coverup.. the more logical question is why would they tell reporters they were going to blow it up?

Are you really trying to tell us that everyone knew that building was coming down...Like it should have been expected?

[Eyeball Chambers]

Can you list ONE lie by Alex Jones in the past?

Thats what I want to know.

[240 is Back]

maybee its another lie by alex jones..

You can't name one lie made by Alex Jones, can you?

[ribonucleic]

I’ve tried really, really hard to be a logical and rational as I can be, assessing 911 conspiracy materials. Truthfully, I hardly look at them at all anymore, where I’ll confess that for a couple years after that day, I read quite a lot. I don’t have an opinion about most of them, because none of them really rose to the level of “I need to know everything about this” in my mind. The horrors that came afterwards, the war etc., took up most of my attention.

This video [http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/articles/show/127630-Updated%21+WTC+7+collapse+reported+30+minutes+before+it+happened] is a tad shocking. Scroll forward to 14:40, and read the non denial denial from the head of the BBC.

Then look at this video [http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/articles/show/127680-Another+Smoking+Gun%3F+Now+CNN+Jumps+the+Gun+On+WTC7+-+Video]  from the same site. BBC and CNN making the same “mistake?”

I had mostly written off what I’d come to think of as the “collapse people” because their harping never really made much sense to me. This is altogether different. These could be doctored videos, photoshopped or whatever, one always has to keep the salt shaker handy when looking at videos on the Intertubes. But if they are authentic, they are very spooky to look at. The fact that there are two seperate news agencies reporting the same unfact gives a lot of substance to this layer of the foil.

Please let me know (with links) if this has been debunked.

http://www.correntewire.com/foil