TA vs. Romano round 99

[IFBBwannaB]

Kindly STFU and leave the training, diet and science to me and stop getting your info from "Steriods.com"

  
    
 
From Medscape Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine

Expert Interview
To Dope or Not to Dope: That is the Ethical Question -- Part 1: An Expert Interview With Dick Pound
Posted

Richard Pound  

Following on the heels of Dr. Garnier's impassioned plea and open letter, Medscape continues its discussions regarding the ethics surrounding the use of performance-enhancing drugs. Pippa Wysong of Medscape begins the first of our 2-part interview series with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) by sitting down with Richard Pound. Mr. Pound is the Chair of the WADA, chair of the Olympic Games Study Commission, and Chancellor of McGill University in Montreal, Canada.

Pound was a swimmer and won a gold, 2 silvers, and a bronze medal for Canada at the 1962 Commonwealth Games in Australia, and was a double finalist at the 1960 Olympics in Rome.

He is also a Montreal tax lawyer and chartered accountant, and author of the book Inside the Olympics: A Behind-the-Scene Look at the Politics, the Scandals, and the Glory of the Games.

Charles Kearns, PhD
Editorial Director
Medscape Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
ckearns@medscape.net

Medscape: Dr. Garnier, the Medical Director of WADA, recently posted a letter addressed to doctors who support doping in sports. What happened to prompt this?

Mr. Pound: Many of the substances used for performance enhancement are prescription drugs — athletes are getting them from somewhere on the basis of prescriptions written by doctors. Dr. Garnier just felt it was a timely and useful thing to do to draw attention to the problem.

Medscape: Why would any doctors support doping in sports? What are some of the reasons you've heard?

Mr. Pound: There are a whole bunch of self-serving justifications. A lot of it is about money — many of these treatments are very expensive. Some say it's safer to do it under medical supervision than not. It's all complete nonsense. They know their patients, they know what their patients do for a living or in nonprofessional sports. And they know whether they're providing something that is a prohibited substance or method. I think there's an ethical duty on the part of physicians to not do this sort of thing.

Medscape: It sounds like WADA's testing procedures are pretty sophisticated. Is it true that anybody who is tested is likely to get caught?

Mr. Pound: The tests are getting better. Most of these doping substances and methods have been around for quite a while, so we've become pretty good at testing for them. We're pretty much on top of some of the newer ones, and there are now tests for things like erythropoietin (EPO) and human growth hormone (HGH). The science inherent in the tests is pretty well accepted, although there are predictable challenges and defenses on the part of anybody who has been caught. They try everything, they say it's not their sample, it wasn't sealed properly, the chain of custody is wrong, the test is no good, the substance was naturally produced. It's almost like there's some kind of checklist that's very predictable; we've heard it all before.

The thing is, we know the science before we put any test out there. We do our best to make sure it's scientifically reliable. We don't want to sanction some athlete for doping unless we're really quite certain that's what happened.

Medscape: So, science is making it pretty tough to cheat.

Mr. Pound: It is certainly making it tougher. We've got better tests, plus
 
 
 

LOL thats your proof? If you havnt read between the lines,he says that the GH tests are yet to be fully accepted.

"The science inherent in the tests is pretty well accepted"

Not to mention that after that he explain how hard it is to find prove it undisputebly.
Go read up,GH have a very short half life,combined with the fact that you can just claim you had a GH spike in the body.Something that can happen.

Dont forget he talks about suprise test unlike this one that he can prepare himself weeks in advance.

[Mr. Intenseone]

LOL thats your proof? If you havnt read between the lines,he says that the GH tests are yet to be fully accepted.

"The science inherent in the tests is pretty well accepted"

Not to mention that after that he explain how hard it is to find prove it undisputebly.
Go read up,GH have a very short half life,combined with the fact that you can just claim you had a GH spike in the body.Something that can happen.

Dont forget he talks about suprise test unlike this one that he can prepare himself weeks in advance.

Damn you're an idiot......clueless as well!!

[wolfgang187]

I have trained Lots of people in the past and a few former DCers.

Migizi right now, was a former DCer. 

More Bullshit

[wolfgang187]

I am changing bodybuilding.  Idea by idea. Post by post.

More Bullshit

[OneManGang]

I deadlifted 225 for 112 times. Here is how I did it.
I used straps. I did as many as I could.  I then rested with the bar in my hands. I DID NOT PUT THE BAR DOWN, then continued.  I think it took about 5 minutes or so, maybe less.

HAHAHAHA!!! You are a lying little bitch cruising on your internet fame! You are a troll who could not stop and you are now an adict to your new found "fame". But off the keyboard you are still a loser.

[Moen]

Seems like John Romano is trying to become the second internet-adonis

[natural al]

I have trained Lots of people in the past and a few former DCers.

Migizi right now, was a former DCer. 

just cause someone read an article online doesn't make them a DC trainer.

My arms were 18, and 19 when I was ultra Fat.

IT was a few inches of fat for sure.  But near 20 inches.

sweet, my arms are 17.5-right arm so that's cool.  I've got "almost 20" arms"  allllllllllriiiiiiight.


oh...so you did 112 reps in 5 minutes, with short breaks?  So you did about 20 reps a minute, if you maintained your initial pace, this is discounting rest periods which you admit to taking so you did about 22 or 23 reps a minute for 5 minutes straight, man with that type of stamina why arent' you more well known than a personallity on a BB message board?  That's almost world class stuff there.



adam....really, at this point I just pity you cause you actually believe the stuff you say, wich is sad.  If anyone paid attention to the things you have said and done and had the info that's going around they'd see exactly what has gone on and what continues to go on.

I'm sorry the MD thing didn't work out for you, now put your chin up and go get a job.  Just move on.

[240_Iz_Nutz]

I did not go through all the replies because that shit gets boring.  I will say if a source sells a guy shit, then tells others...?   That is low...TA is an idiot, and I hope he is all natural...cause the boy sucks....