Author Topic: ICE CREAMS and calorie is a calorie and Haha Apenis - all three threads merged.  (Read 84178 times)

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #150 on: March 16, 2007, 09:52:38 PM »
Yeah daddy? Why not have too shit logs with a cup of urine instead of a burger?

I see your back for another owning, glutton for punishment?

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19328
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #151 on: March 16, 2007, 10:13:47 PM »
Yeah daddy? Why not have too shit logs with a cup of urine instead of a burger?

Hey none of us want to eat the same as you.

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #152 on: March 16, 2007, 10:19:31 PM »
I'm sure it's been said before, but if a calorie is a calorie and there is nothing more to it than that, why not have 2000 calories of candy a day instead of mixing your calories with burgers, chips, candy and whatever else?

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19466
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #153 on: March 26, 2007, 12:16:34 AM »
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1844991&dopt=Citation

Lemon PW.
Applied Physiology Research Laboratory, Kent State University, OH 44242.

The debate regarding optimal protein/amino acid needs of strength athletes is an old one. Recent evidence indicates that actual requirements are higher than those of more sedentary individuals, although this is not widely recognized. Some data even suggest that high protein/amino acid diets can enhance the development of muscle mass and strength when combined with heavy resistance exercise training. Novices may have higher needs than experienced strength athletes, and substantial interindividual variability exists. [/size]Perhaps the most important single factor determining absolute protein/amino acid need is the adequacy of energy intake. Present data indicate that strength athletes should consume approximately 12-15% of their daily total energy intake as protein, or about 1.5-2.0 g protein/kg.d-1 (approximately 188-250% of the U.S. recommended dietary allowance). Although routinely consumed by many strength athletes, higher protein intakes have not been shown to be consistently effective and may even be associated with some health risks.

Abeles, why do you post scientific articles that suggests that a high protein intake is beneficial?

-Hedge
As empty as paradise

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #154 on: March 26, 2007, 12:28:05 AM »
Abeles, why do you post scientific articles that suggests that a high protein intake is beneficial?

-Hedge

Hedge, you're a fucking indexing and memorizing genious man. ;D

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #155 on: March 26, 2007, 02:57:01 AM »
Here's the short translation to this long ass worthless (as far as bodybuilding goes) thread.................. .......eat less, lose weight, eat more gain weight, thanks Adonis for letting "The Enigma" "Pumpher" and myself own you AGAIN!


Owning Adonis is too easy.

Similar to a baby in diapers vs real men.

No challange.

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #156 on: March 26, 2007, 06:24:58 AM »
Read the last half.

Owning yourselves.

You don`t need more protein to get the amino acids.  THE MOST IMPORTANT, AS INDICATED BY THE STUDY, IS ADEQUATE AMINO ENERGY INTAKE. NOT HIGHER PROTEIN!Therefore a Higher Protein intake is useless.


I didn`t realize the lot of you were so stupid.  Did you all fail Reading Comprehension?



Perhaps the most important single factor determining absolute protein/amino acid need is the adequacy of energy intake. Present data indicate that strength athletes should consume approximately 12-15% of their daily total energy intake as protein, or about 1.5-2.0 g protein/kg.d-1 (approximately 188-250% of the U.S. recommended dietary allowance). Although routinely consumed by many strength athletes, higher protein intakes have not been shown to be consistently effective and may even be associated with some health risks.



The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #157 on: March 26, 2007, 06:30:17 AM »
I clearly see why the lot of you are ignorant.

All too clear.   You guys failed Reading Comprehension.

nycbull

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5763
  • Team Jay Should Have Won
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #158 on: March 26, 2007, 06:31:01 AM »
why dont you guys post studies that prove that athletes need huge amounts of protein. Why are you guys so lazy?

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #159 on: March 26, 2007, 06:34:17 AM »
why dont you guys post studies that prove that athletes need huge amounts of protein. Why are you guys so lazy?
No Reliable Data at all to prove that.  All evidence points to high Protein as being completely useless. hahahah   IF they find any, there is a direct link to Supplement sales and not peer reviewed.

The studies they DO find will all correlate in that a high and extreme Protein intake is not shown to be necessary or beneficial at all.

ADEQUATE is all you need.

Rimbaud

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9884
  • There can be only one.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #160 on: March 26, 2007, 06:41:34 AM »
why dont you guys post studies that prove that athletes need huge amounts of protein. Why are you guys so lazy?

Maybe because they don't care & they just do what works for them. If high protein works for you then that's great. If low protein works for you that's fine too. I personally just use a moderate protein intake. I weigh about 235lbs. & probably take in about 150 grams of protein a day (somedays more, somedays less). That works for me but I don't push it on others. The only thing I recommend is doing what works for you & with your body.

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19466
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #161 on: March 26, 2007, 08:15:58 AM »
why dont you guys post studies that prove that athletes need huge amounts of protein. Why are you guys so lazy?

Why should I post such studies when I don't believe in high protein diets?

-Hedge
As empty as paradise

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #162 on: March 26, 2007, 08:26:22 AM »
CONCLUSION 
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THERMODYNAMICS
METABOLIZABLE ENERGY
ENERGY EXPENDITURE
IS A CALORIE A...
OTHER EXPLANATIONS FOR...
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
 
 
We conclude that a calorie is a calorie. From a purely thermodynamic point of view, this is clear because the human body or, indeed, any living organism cannot create or destroy energy but can only convert energy from one form to another. In comparing energy balance between dietary treatments, however, it must be remembered that the units of dietary energy are metabolizable energy and not gross energy. This is perhaps unfortunate because metabolizable energy is much more difficult to determine than is gross energy, because the Atwater factors used in calculating metabolizable energy are not exact. As such, our food tables are not perfect, and small errors are associated with their use.

In addition, we concede that the substitution of one macronutrient for another has been shown in some studies to have a statistically significant effect on the expenditure half of the energy balance equation. This has been observed most often for high-protein diets. Evidence indicates, however, that the difference in energy expenditure is small and can potentially account for less than one-third of the differences in weight loss that have been reported between high-protein or low-carbohydrate diets and high-carbohydrate or low-fat diets. As such, a calorie is a calorie. Further research is needed to identify the mechanisms that result in greater weight loss with one diet than with another.



    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
 
ACB and DAS shared the tasks of drafting and revising the manuscript.


    REFERENCES 
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THERMODYNAMICS
METABOLIZABLE ENERGY
ENERGY EXPENDITURE
IS A CALORIE A...
OTHER EXPLANATIONS FOR...
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
 
 


Atkins RC. Dr. Atkins’ new diet revolution. New York: Avon Books, 1998.
Figueroa-Colon R, von Almen TK, Franklin FA, Schuftan C, Suskind RM. Comparison of two hypocaloric diets in obese children. Am J Dis Child 1993;147:160–6.[Abstract]
Stallings VA, Archibald EH, Pencharz PB, Harrison JE, Bell LE. One-year follow-up of weight, total body potassium, and total body nitrogen in obese adolescents treated with the protein-sparing modified fast. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48:91–4.[Abstract]
Wadden TA, Stunkard AJ, Day SC, Gould RA, Rubin CJ. Less food, less hunger: reports of appetite and symptoms in a controlled study of a protein-sparing modified fast. Int J Obes 1987;11:239–49.[Medline]
Palgi A, Read JL, Greenberg I, Hoefer MA, Bistrian BR, Blackburn GL. Multidisciplinary treatment of obesity with a protein-sparing modified fast: results in 668 outpatients. Am J Public Health 1985;75:1190–4.[Abstract]
Yang SP, Martin LJ, Schneider G. Weight reduction utilizing a protein-sparing modified fast. J Am Diet Assoc 1980;76:343–6.[Medline]
Alford BB, Blankenship AC, Hagen RD. The effects of variations in carbohydrate, protein, and fat content of the diet upon weight loss, blood values, and nutrient intake of adult obese women. J Am Diet Assoc 1990;90:534–40.[Medline]
Larosa JC, Fry AG, Muesing R, Rosing DR. Effects of high-protein, low-carbohydrate dieting on plasma lipoproteins and body weight. J Am Diet Assoc 1980;77:264–70.[Medline]
Hendler R, Bonde AA III. Very-low-calorie diets with high and low protein content: impact on triiodothyronine, energy expenditure, and nitrogen balance. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48:1239–47.[Abstract]
Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2082–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Skov AR, Toubro S, Ronn B, Holm L, Astrup A. Randomized trial on protein vs carbohydrate in ad libitum fat reduced diet for the treatment of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:528–36.[Medline]
Brehm BJ, Seeley RJ, Daniels SR, D’Alessio DA. A randomized trial comparing a very low carbohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1617–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Samaha FF, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al. A low-carbohydrate as compared with a low-fat diet in severe obesity. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2074–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Baba NH, Sawaya S, Torbay N, Habbal Z, Azar S, Hashim SA. High protein vs high carbohydrate hypoenergetic diet for the treatment of obese hyperinsulinemic subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:1202–6.[Medline]
Layman DK, Boileau RA, Erickson DJ, et al. A reduced ratio of dietary carbohydrate to protein improves body composition and blood lipid profiles during weight loss in adult women. J Nutr 2003;133:411–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Luscombe ND, Clifton PM, Noakes M, Farnsworth E, Wittert G. Effect of a high-protein, energy-restricted diet on weight loss and energy expenditure after weight stabilization in hyperinsulinemic subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27:582–90.[Medline]
Piatti PM, Monti F, Fermo I, et al. Hypocaloric high-protein diet improves glucose oxidation and spares lean body mass: comparison to hypocaloric high-carbohydrate diet. Metabolism 1994;43:1481–7.[Medline]
Luscombe ND, Clifton PM, Noakes M, Parker B, Wittert G. Effects of energy-restricted diets containing increased protein on weight loss, resting energy expenditure, and the thermic effect of feeding in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25:652–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Forbes GB. Body fat content influences the body composition response to nutrition and exercise. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;904:359–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Webb P. The measurement of energy expenditure. J Nutr 1991;121:1897–901.[Medline]
Webb P. Human calorimeters. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers Division, Greenwood Press Inc, 1985:11–22.
Kleiber M. Energy. In: Kleiber M, ed. The fire of life: an introduction to animal energetics. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1961:105–28.
Kleiber M. Life as a combustion process. In: Kleiber M, ed. The fire of life: an introduction to animal energetics. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1961:3–8.
Moe PW. Future directions for energy requirements and food energy values. J Nutr 1994;124(suppl):1738S–42S.[Medline]
Widdowson EM. Assessment of the energy value of human foods. London: Cambridge University Press, 1955.
Merrill AL, Watt BK. Energy value of foods, basis and derivation. Agricultural handbook no. 74. Washington, DC: Human Nutrition Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1955.
Southgate DA, Durnin JV. Calorie conversion factors. An experimental reassessment of the factors used in the calculation of the energy value of human diets. Br J Nutr 1970;24:517–35.[Medline]
Wisker E, Feldheim W. Metabolizable energy of diets low or high in dietary fiber from fruits and vegetables when consumed by humans. J Nutr 1990;120:1331–7.[Medline]
Miles CW, Kelsay JL, Wong NP. Effect of dietary fiber on the metabolizable energy of human diets. J Nutr 1988;118:1075–81.[Medline]
Goranzon H, Forsum E, Thilen M. Calculation and determination of metabolizable energy in mixed diets to humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1983;38:954–63.[Abstract]
Baer DJ, Rumpler WV, Miles CW, Fahey GC Jr. Dietary fiber decreases the metabolizable energy content and nutrient digestibility of mixed diets fed to humans. J Nutr 1997;127:579–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kruskall LJ, Campbell WW, Evans WJ. The Atwater energy equivalents overestimate metabolizable energy intake in older humans: results from a 96-day strictly controlled feeding study. J Nutr 2003;133:2581–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Brown J, Livesey G, Roe M, et al. Metabolizable energy of high non-starch polysaccharide-maintenance and weight-reducing diets in men: experimental appraisal of assessment systems. J Nutr 1998;128:986–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Miles CW. The metabolizable energy of diets differing in dietary fat and fiber measured in humans. J Nutr 1992;122:306–11.[Medline]
Goranzon H, Forsum E. Metabolizable energy in humans in two diets containing different sources of dietary fiber. Calculations and analysis. J Nutr 1987;117:267–73.[Medline]
Southgate DA. Fibre and the other unavailable carbohydrates and their effects on the energy value of the diet. Proc Nutr Soc 1973;32:131–6.[Medline]
US Department of Agriculture. Composition of foods: raw, processed, and prepared. Agriculture handbook no. 8. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1976–1988.
Davy KP, Horton T, Davy BM, Bessessen D, Hill JO. Regulation of macronutrient balance in healthy young and older men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1497–502.[Medline]
Roy HJ, Lovejoy JC, Keenan MJ, Bray GA, Windhauser MM, Wilson JK. Substrate oxidation and energy expenditure in athletes and nonathletes consuming isoenergetic high- and low-fat diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:405–11.[Abstract]
Thomas CD, Peters JC, Reed GW, Abumrad NN, Sun M, Hill JO. Nutrient balance and energy expenditure during ad libitum feeding of high-fat and high-carbohydrate diets in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:934–42.[Abstract]
Hill JO, Peters JC, Reed GW, Schlundt DG, Sharp T, Greene HL. Nutrient balance in humans: effects of diet composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54:10–7.[Abstract]
Rumpler WV, Seale JL, Miles CW, Bodwell CE. Energy-intake restriction and diet-composition effects on energy expenditure in men. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53:430–6.[Abstract]
Lean ME, James WP. Metabolic effects of isoenergetic nutrient exchange over 24 hours in relation to obesity in women. Int J Obes 1988;12:15–27.[Medline]
Abbott WG, Howard BV, Ruotolo G, Ravussin E. Energy expenditure in humans: effects of dietary fat and carbohydrate. Am J Physiol 1990;258:E347–51.[Medline]
Verboeket-van de Venne WP, Westerterp KR. Effects of dietary fat and carbohydrate exchange on human energy metabolism. Appetite 1996;26:287–300.[Medline]
Astrup A, Buemann B, Christensen NJ, Toubro S. Failure to increase lipid oxidation in response to increasing dietary fat content in formerly obese women. Am J Physiol 1994;266:E592–9.[Medline]
Whitehead JM, McNeill G, Smith JS. The effect of protein intake on 24-h energy expenditure during energy restriction. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996;20:727–32.[Medline]
Eisenstein J, Roberts SB, Dallal G, Saltzman E. High-protein weight-loss diets: are they safe and do they work? A review of the experimental and epidemiologic data. Nutr Rev 2002;60:189–200.[Medline]
Bandini LG, Schoeller DA, Dietz WH. Metabolic differences in response to a high-fat vs. a high-carbohydrate diet. Obes Res 1994;2:348–54.[Medline]
Mikkelsen PB, Toubro S, Astrup A. Effect of fat-reduced diets on 24-h energy expenditure: comparisons between animal protein, vegetable protein, and carbohydrate. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1135–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kreitzman SN, Coxon AY, Szaz KF. Glycogen storage: illusions of easy weight loss, excessive weight regain, and distortions in estimates of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56(suppl):292S–3S.[Abstract]
Pietrobelli A, Allison DB, Heshka S, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the energy content of weight change. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:1339–48.[Medline]
Kempen KP, Saris WH, Westerterp KR. Energy balance during an 8-wk energy-restricted diet with and without exercise in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:722–9.[Abstract]
Heymsfield SB, Darby PC, Muhlheim LS, Gallagher D, Wolper C, Allison DB. The calorie: myth, measurement, and reality. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62(suppl):1034S–41S.[Abstract]
Clark D, Tomas F, Withers RT, et al. Energy metabolism in free-living, ‘large-eating’ and ‘small-eating’ women: studies using 2H2(18)O. Br J Nutr 1994;72:21–31.[Medline]
Racette SB, Schoeller DA, Kushner RF, Neil KM. Exercise enhances dietary compliance during moderate energy restriction in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:345–9.[Abstract]
Mertz W, Tsui JC, Judd JT, et al. What are people really eating? The relation between energy intake derived from estimated diet records and intake determined to maintain body weight. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54:291–5.[Abstract]
Yao M, Roberts SB. Dietary energy density and weight regulation. Nutr Rev 2001;59:247–58.[Medline]


Quote meltdown

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #163 on: March 26, 2007, 10:23:42 AM »
Here's the short translation to this long ass worthless (as far as bodybuilding goes) thread.................. .......eat less, lose weight, eat more gain weight, thanks Adonis for letting "The Enigma" "Pumpher" and myself own you AGAIN!

wow..that theory sounds complicated..we need to attach a catchy name to it

the "Eat to live diet"
Here comes the money shot

Old_Rooster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2380
  • SquadFathers mom gave me a BJ
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #164 on: March 26, 2007, 10:25:40 AM »
BMR at 6.5 cal per lb of bodymass says I require about 1450 cal at rest plus 450 per workout. So at about 1700 I'm defficient and should get ripped soon. Calories being calories and proteins, supplements being all a scam, I decided to get my 1700 cals on Cap n' Crunch and Cocopuffs, both will only bring me 4g of protein so I should be fine.

3 weeks later I'm wasting like there's no tomorow, my insulin is all fucked up and glucose to glucagon ratio is off the roof.

Where did I go wrong with my great application of those so called "Principles"?

Breaking out of that madness, I remembered something from biochemistry called PTOR (protein turn over rate). That scientifically proven rule says that my LBM x 1.818 is what I need to prevent from going catabolic. so that's about 310g of protein.


I come to the conclusion that the fucking idiots who think that "calories are calories" are misleading the goodhearted getbiggers.

Discuss  ;D


u fucked up listening to the moron spout the calorie is a calorie bullshit.
Benjamin Pearson-Pedo

nycbull

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5763
  • Team Jay Should Have Won
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #165 on: March 26, 2007, 10:28:59 AM »
Why should I post such studies when I don't believe in high protein diets?

-Hedge

so then you partially agree with Adonis?

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #166 on: March 26, 2007, 11:12:59 AM »
Hedgehog, McDonald's diets are so "yesterday"   hahahahhaha


Yeah.................so yesterday.  ::)

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #167 on: March 27, 2007, 09:19:09 AM »
Read the last half.

Owning yourselves.

You don`t need more protein to get the amino acids.  THE MOST IMPORTANT, AS INDICATED BY THE STUDY, IS ADEQUATE AMINO ENERGY INTAKE. NOT HIGHER PROTEIN!Therefore a Higher Protein intake is useless.


I didn`t realize the lot of you were so stupid.  Did you all fail Reading Comprehension?



Perhaps the most important single factor determining absolute protein/amino acid need is the adequacy of energy intake. Present data indicate that strength athletes should consume approximately 12-15% of their daily total energy intake as protein, or about 1.5-2.0 g protein/kg.d-1 (approximately 188-250% of the U.S. recommended dietary allowance). Although routinely consumed by many strength athletes, higher protein intakes have not been shown to be consistently effective and may even be associated with some health risks.

2.0g/kg for a guy my size is ~220g  - You don't even get half of that with your dellusional principle. Hell you consider that to be high.

Can you explain what PTOR is without googling all morning? that's whay I though...

That's why you're so skinny, "bones".

End of the story.




arce377

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2551
  • ARCE DO SAN MARTIALARTS SCHOOL
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #168 on: March 27, 2007, 09:20:08 AM »
ALL DRUGS! :D
ARCE
DOSAN DOJO

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #169 on: March 27, 2007, 09:32:38 AM »
2.0g/kg for a guy my size is ~220g  - You don't even get half of that with your dellusional principle. Hell you consider that to be high.

Can you explain what PTOR is without googling all morning? that's whay I though...

That's why you're so skinny, "bones".

End of the story.





Feeding  the fat on your body Protein is useless. You are NOT 242 lbs of Muscle.

At least you realize that you need UNDER 1 Gram Per Lb of Bodyweight as you have noted.

This is a start.  Soon you will learn.  You are still very obese though.

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #170 on: March 27, 2007, 09:36:12 AM »
2.0g/kg for a guy my size is ~220g  - You don't even get half of that with your dellusional principle. Hell you consider that to be high.

Can you explain what PTOR is without googling all morning? that's whay I though...

That's why you're so skinny, "bones".

End of the story.




Also realize that you ARE NOT an ELITE Strength Athlete.

A Strength Athlete refers to OLYMPIC LIFTERS, who in this case, train for a few hours, full body, with many techniques involved.

You are barely more active than a Sedentary man.  You are a few days a week toolbag who does not spend a near fraction of the time in the Gym that an ELITE ATHLETE would.


natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #171 on: March 27, 2007, 09:41:58 AM »
Feeding  the fat on your body Protein is useless. You are NOT 242 lbs of Muscle.

At least you realize that you need UNDER 1 Gram Per Lb of Bodyweight as you have noted.

This is a start.  Soon you will learn.  You are still very obese though.

when are you gonna start giving Ellington Darden the props he deserves for coming up with your "principles"?  Does he know you're marketing them as your own?  How much did you pay for "massive muscles in 10 weeks" by the good Dr.?

honest questions.
nasser=piece of shit

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #172 on: March 27, 2007, 09:46:46 AM »
when are you gonna start giving Ellington Darden the props he deserves for coming up with your "principles"?  Does he know you're marketing them as your own?  How much did you pay for "massive muscles in 10 weeks" by the good Dr.?

honest questions.

I don`t know who Darden is, nor have I read anything he has put out.


You can`t get massive muscles in 10 weeks by the way.

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #173 on: March 27, 2007, 09:55:31 AM »
I don`t know who Darden is, nor have I read anything he has put out.


You can`t get massive muscles in 10 weeks by the way.
hmmm....maybe you should check him out cause he's been saying what you say for over 20 years and you've actually quoted him almost word for word at times.  I'm gonna have to re-read some of arthur jones stuff too cause seems to me you might also be "borrowing" his ideas as well....but I'm sure you've never heard of him or read his stuff either.
nasser=piece of shit

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: "Calories are calories" (oh brother) where did I go wrong?
« Reply #174 on: March 27, 2007, 09:56:33 AM »
hmmm....maybe you should check him out cause he's been saying what you say for over 20 years and you've actually quoted him almost word for word at times.  I'm gonna have to re-read some of arthur jones stuff too cause seems to me you might also be "borrowing" his ideas as well....but I'm sure you've never heard of him or read his stuff either.
For training, I advocate training the WHOLE BODY every single time you set foot in the gym.  Train the Whole body as much as possible.