240, I'm definitely with you on # 7. Controlled Dem. No question about it. Men on the ground who I know very well, have told me there is NO OTHER EXPLAINATION.....or conclusion.
Shankville is a different story. The ground where the jet crashed was "Mined" for many, many yrs. When that occurs, the filled used to cover the Mined area is extremely soft, relative to normal dirt in an un-mined area. With this in mind, it no different than the Value Jet Crash in the Fla. Everglades...........The Jet DISAPPEARED. No one disputes that Value Jet didn't crash.....yet the Jet's remains were never recovered.
A passenger Jet crashed in Shankville (no doubt) and was "consumed" by the weak, soft earth. Human remains were also located at the crash site.
240......I'm on your side for the most part. It's only when you head out into "left field" that I disagree.
Discuss the obvious............never the obscure.
Good points!
I grow bored with WTC7. It's controlled demolition is a very obvious sign of foreknowledge, complicity, etc, and proof that there were more than 19 terrorists at work that morning. Also, the fact that it wasn't investigated, shows compliance on the investigatory level. WTC7 will be history's smoking gun of an inside job.
The other topics - who knows, maybe 10% of them I'm right on, maybe 90%, I dunno. Fun to think about though. Example on the WTC6 missile: If that *object* hadn't clipped the north tower, it would have barrelled directly into the base of WTC7, which would have created a big ugly gash, and would have made the WTC7 collapse quite believable. Or, maybe it was intentional to destroy #6- what was removed from those US customs safes which were claimed on insurance? The safes were obliderated and contents were insured. If one were going to do an inside job for money and power, removing goods then claiming them on insurance is a nice little sub-ploy. Fun to think about. Not very consequential. But - we gotta remember that the WTC7 talk also started as an outlandish silly theory. Now, most people will look at it and agree on controlled demo