good review.
Biden was obnoxious. Raised his hand to be included in Gravel's criticisms. Just a d-bag.
hilary did no damage. Obama was a tad awkward. Kuscinich was outshined by Gravel as the anti-establishment guy. Edwards was quiet and unimpressive. Dodd, nothing special.
I didn't get to see much of the debate because I was at dinner, but one question I saw before I left really sums up the Democrat way of thinking that makes me hesitant to support them. Dodd was asked what I thought was a good question (forgive me if I miss quote):
"I have to work a full time job to make an honest living. Shouldn't a drug addict have to make an effort to work in order to recieve welfare?"
Dodds response had a few things that bothered me and I would love to hear others POVs.
1. He said that he felt addicts should recieve welfare no questions asked because why should they suffer (I believe in working for what you have)
2. He called addiction a "disease" (living with several alcholics in the family I hate that they call addiction a disease)
I would like to know what everyone thinks, but in my mind it cements the fact that Democrats believe in to many handouts which I feel has become a major detrement to our society. Anyone?