Does it matter whether Plame was covert or not?
The last time I checked it wasn't a crime to get a free blow job yet Clinton was convicted (impeached by the House) for lying under oath about this non-crime (and also was disbarred).
Personally, I believe she was covert but even if she was not the act of destroying a covert asset (Brewster Jennings was a CIA front company) to damage Wilson (who was proven correct in his claims regarding guy) is despicable
from march 13th of this year:
During House hearings today, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) announced that CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden recently told Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Silvestre Reyes (D-TX) that there was no doubt Victoria Plame Wilson was covert. Cummings — relaying what Waxman had told him — said that Gen. Hayden expressed clearly and directly, “Ms. Wilson was covert.”
Cummings also asked Wilson to respond to the specific claim, made by Victoria Toensing and others, that Plame had lost her covert status because she “had not been stationed abroad within five years.” Cummings asked, “During the past five years, Ms. Plame, from today, did you conduct secret missions overseas?” She answered, “Yes I did, congressman.”