Chick can you explain this for us.
6. On April 30, 2007, in conformity with Pro Rule 10.1 (Hearings), you participated in a hearing by teleconference call, at which time the Committee asserted that you violated Pro Rules 9.5 (Contest or Judging Decisions) and 9.6 (Public Statements) and clauses 5, 8, 10, 16 and 17 of the Pro Code of Ethics.
In your own words the code of ethics is just a guide, but now its enforceable to ban people?
Either you abide by the Code of Ethics and hold all members to it or throw it away, this is double standards at its best.