Author Topic: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?  (Read 24240 times)

The Jayhawker

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #200 on: July 09, 2007, 09:33:26 AM »
I have sent an e-mail to Wikipedia administrator Isotope23 explaining the situation.

I have done all I can, but will monitor this.


*I have also added the same picture of TA to the homosexual page to balance things out.


J



J

Titanium

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #201 on: July 09, 2007, 01:24:38 PM »
The picture was described as "bodybuilder posing".
Well thats not a correct pose therefore "posing" is the wrong word to use
and if he doesnt compete he is not a bodybuilder, the 2nd wrong word to use.

Going to a gym then losing a couple of pounds of fat makes you a body BUILDER not a BODYBUILDER.
You are not a BBer until you have competed officially, otherwise the world would be full of bodybuilders, football, basketball, etc... players.

If i adopt the same mentality you have taken then i am a basketball player, footballer, bodybuilder, powerlifter, swimmer, jogger, personal trainer, PC technician, cook and hair stylist (the list keeps on going but for fear of overloading the internet itself i shall stop here.)
Pretty impressive right?

Aswell what has it got to do with strategy?
Its pretty obvious that it was posted for self motivation becuase whilst the top part is full of pictures, the buttom part is empty.
putting a BBer posing as the first thing makes sense becuase a bodybuilder posing officially means thats the final product and thats what its all about.
putting it with the various specialised "departments" of bodybuilding doesnt make sense.

however i have no objection if you place it with Female bodybuilding. hehe just a bit of teasing here, i`m jkin

ah first post!. not nice  >:( when its bitc*ing about someone else but anyway

Paul Allen

  • Guest
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #202 on: July 09, 2007, 02:46:19 PM »
that man on that photo is one of the ugliest people I have ever had the displeasure of seeing.

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57626
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #203 on: July 09, 2007, 07:23:59 PM »
I have sent an e-mail to Wikipedia administrator Isotope23 explaining the situation.

I have done all I can, but will monitor this.


*I have also added the same picture of TA to the homosexual page to balance things out.


J




Keep fighting the good fight, JayHawker ;)
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

garraeth

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2093
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #204 on: July 09, 2007, 10:45:13 PM »
I have sent an e-mail to Wikipedia administrator Isotope23 explaining the situation.

I have done all I can, but will monitor this.


*I have also added the same picture of TA to the homosexual page to balance things out.


J




You'd better contact him again - TrueAss is back

climber

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #205 on: July 10, 2007, 01:17:13 PM »
bump
Hrmmm

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #206 on: July 10, 2007, 06:03:53 PM »
All this is doing is bringing out the jealous rage that you Christian zealots revel in.  Whatever you have to do to fuel your emotion and your hate as that is your lifeblood and inspirado. 

In the end, reason will always triumph.  It is a bloody battle though. 

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #207 on: July 10, 2007, 06:05:18 PM »
All this is doing is bringing out the jealous rage that you Christian zealots revel in.  Whatever you have to do to fuel your emotion and your hate as that is your lifeblood and inspirado. 

In the end, reason will always triumph.  It is a bloody battle though. 
hahahaha, they're a bunch of knuckle dragging savages and Phillistines.

jason armstrong

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1193
  • Riverview Trailer Park St Louis MO
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #208 on: July 10, 2007, 06:27:24 PM »
since the True ANUS' image isn't copyrighted I am going to manufacture some toilet paper with his monkey face on eact 2 ply sheet and it'll sell like hotcakes....you guys should learn to wipe your ass with his posts he and windexfatter are pitiful.

be the first to get the true anus toilet paper and the special anniversay edition with adam richard abeles on it as well to show the world what a shit eater he is.
1

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #209 on: July 10, 2007, 06:30:26 PM »
since the True ANUS' image isn't copyrighted I am going to manufacture some toilet paper with his monkey face on eact 2 ply sheet and it'll sell like hotcakes....you guys should learn to wipe your ass with his posts he and windexfatter are pitiful.

be the first to get the true anus toilet paper and the special anniversay edition with adam richard abeles on it as well to show the world what a shit eater he is.

Been there done that man ;D




Adam Abeles, why do you claim on your youtube page to be an "internet celebrity"? Is it your full time job?

The Jayhawker

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #210 on: July 10, 2007, 07:16:41 PM »
Well the story ends here. WLU ( the person adding TA image to Wikipedia ) and I were banned for 24 hours because of all the changes.

They wrote me back and said that even thought the image maybe "in poor taste" it is technically legal. Since the picture was posted before my intervention first he gets first rights to have it posted. More or less a first come first served.

The good news is that if others comlplain besides me they will review the case.

In the end it's cool. I showed the picture to some Rugby buddies and they had a good laugh.

Also because this image isn't trademarked we can do with it as we wish. So I'll keep everyone posted what I do with it in the next few days.

J
J

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #211 on: July 10, 2007, 07:29:26 PM »
Wikidouches just hurt the credibility of their site by using the TA pic. 
Ron: "I am lazy."

canadaphiliac

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #212 on: July 10, 2007, 08:19:38 PM »
hahahaha, they're a bunch of knuckle dragging savages and Phillistines.
Maybe even Philistines. :D

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #213 on: July 11, 2007, 11:37:39 AM »


Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify the image I just posted under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, which I took myself.

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57626
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #214 on: July 11, 2007, 07:47:01 PM »

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify the image I just posted under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, which I took myself.
TA where are the visable striations???
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Wikidudeman

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 214
  • Nu mă, Nu mă iei!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #215 on: July 12, 2007, 07:58:55 AM »
TA where are the visable striations???

Where are yours?

The Jayhawker

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #216 on: July 12, 2007, 09:15:37 AM »
A buddy found this. It's going on my new True Adonis Site.  :o

J

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #217 on: July 12, 2007, 11:51:51 AM »
A buddy found this. It's going on my new True Adonis Site.  :o


Nice Photoshop

The Jayhawker

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #218 on: July 12, 2007, 05:54:18 PM »
J

D.L. 5

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2022
  • WILL HARRIS: BRINGING GAY BACK!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #219 on: July 12, 2007, 06:05:51 PM »

In the end, reason will always triumph.  It is a bloody battle though. 

the true adonis is god!

HE IS THE NATURAL IDEAL!

THE PICTURE SHOULD BE OF HIM!

PUT IT BACK UP NOW!
JAY "OLIVE OIL" CUTLER!

Master Blaster

  • Guest
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #220 on: July 12, 2007, 06:08:19 PM »
the true adonis is god!

HE IS THE NATURAL IDEAL!

THE PICTURE SHOULD BE OF HIM!

PUT IT BACK UP NOW!
;D ;D ;D

Master Blaster

  • Guest
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #221 on: July 12, 2007, 06:21:46 PM »
Here's the link to the discussion page on wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bodybuilding
scroll to the bottom for the money quotes like:

Quote
I'm not that person. That person gave me permission to use the image, it's a good image, So I'm using it for several articles. Nothing else to it. Moreover, Even if I was that person, that's not a justification to take it down as far as I know. Wikidudeman

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57626
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #222 on: July 12, 2007, 07:50:03 PM »
Where are yours?
fuck off TA, I'm not posting my pic all over Wiki pretending to be a bodybuilder. Loser, get over yourself, you're a skinny geek who probably uses substantial drugs to stay lean. ::)
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57626
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #223 on: July 12, 2007, 07:51:36 PM »
Nice Photoshop
HAHAHAHA you posted that pic yourself awhile back, bozo :-*
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

D.L. 5

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2022
  • WILL HARRIS: BRINGING GAY BACK!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #224 on: July 13, 2007, 06:48:16 AM »
THE TRUE ADONIS = THE GRECIAN IDEAL!
JAY "OLIVE OIL" CUTLER!