Author Topic: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?  (Read 63404 times)

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17171
  • Getbig!
Re: did lou ferrigno bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #150 on: June 07, 2012, 05:16:42 PM »
The bench doesn't seem like it's a true test of strength.  The NFL combine should be using an exercise like clean and press to gage strength instead of bench press. 
QFT

kimo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 747
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #151 on: June 08, 2012, 11:29:33 AM »
wothless thread . . maybe . do we have time to waste . ...

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31492
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #152 on: June 08, 2012, 11:33:21 AM »
lou looks great in those pics,frickin huge.looks older there 20 yrs ago then today must have been the heavy sauce....

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79285
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #153 on: June 08, 2012, 12:25:10 PM »
Looked pretty awesome here

Cutlet767

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #154 on: June 08, 2012, 12:50:11 PM »
I can definitely believe he got 500lbs up.

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #155 on: June 08, 2012, 12:50:23 PM »
Looked pretty awesome here
A lot of the late 70's and 80's guys can do that pose but almost no one can do that pose anymore. The pose is meant so that your waist is showing  (kind of sucked in) at the bottom and the top of your waist burdens the thickness, but it is hidden by your arms, so the illusion is your chest sticks out way in front of your waist, unfortunately today's pregnant bodybuilder won't look good in this pose anymore, one of the few poses that actually looked good on tall bodybuilders.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79285
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #156 on: June 08, 2012, 01:04:01 PM »
A lot of the late 70's and 80's guys can do that pose but almost no one can do that pose anymore. The pose is meant so that your waist is showing  (kind of sucked in) at the bottom and the top of your waist burdens the thickness, but it is hidden by your arms, so the illusion is your chest sticks out way in front of your waist, unfortunately today's pregnant bodybuilder won't look good in this pose anymore, one of the few poses that actually looked good on tall bodybuilders.

I think I know what you're talking about  ;D

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #157 on: June 08, 2012, 01:05:19 PM »
Looked pretty awesome here
Indeed..never saw this one I think.

orion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1782
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #158 on: June 08, 2012, 01:27:30 PM »
I think I know what you're talking about  ;D

I like Ronnie but Arnold wipes the floor with him with that pose.

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39904
  • Getbig!
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #159 on: June 08, 2012, 02:16:18 PM »
I think I know what you're talking about  ;D
;D
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39904
  • Getbig!
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #160 on: June 08, 2012, 02:17:13 PM »
 :o
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39904
  • Getbig!
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #161 on: June 08, 2012, 02:18:58 PM »
why was there never a picture with larry scott and dave draper  together?
F

doriancutlerman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: did lou ferrigno bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #162 on: June 08, 2012, 02:38:27 PM »
Thanks for the honest answers, dude.

He might have had the capacity at one time to do so, but without specific training over a period of several months, he would have been crushed like a bug under 560.

Agreed.

Didn't he fight like hell to get maybe 12 reps with a 205 incline when we first see him training in "Pumping Iron"? 

Granted, I suppose it's possible that was one of his later sets and he was tired, but fuck ... a gassed 270 lb. dude struggling with anything less than 365 on the incline isn't too impressive -- I don't give a shit if his arms are a mile long. 

Then there were his standing presses with 245 or so.  "Duh, how many Hank?"

"I wanna see TEN, Louie!  Come on, you're gonna wipe him out!"

"Ugh, ugh, ugh, uh, uh, duh, duh, AHNOLT, AHNOLT, AHHHHNOLT!" 

I freely admit I probably can't do strict standing presses with 245.  I've not even tried the movement in 10 years.  But Louie's strength was singularly unimpressive on film.

I won't even mention how badly he embarrassed himself in that "Superstars" show.  I hear he slimmed down a good bit for that, but even if he was down to 230ish, he couldn't even push-press 290 and hold it :\


Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Lou Ferrigno - did he bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #163 on: June 08, 2012, 02:44:47 PM »
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!! TAKE A LOOK AT THIS HUNK'A MAN!!!!
 
 

Sexybeast777

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2736
Re: did lou ferrigno bench 560lbs in his prime?
« Reply #164 on: December 23, 2017, 04:27:20 PM »
u always read wrong. Arnold wasn't a good bench presser. He had longer arms than most and plus when he moved to america he stopped training heavy and started doing a lot of supersets (chest and back for example). He didn't train for 1 rep maxes or anything. Franco could move some heavy weight on the bench press because of his short arms, but he had awful form.
awful form? gtfo of here with that bullshit, I've seen video of Franco benching 405 lbs for 10 reps with very clean form