Author Topic: To John Romano re your article  (Read 13350 times)

dearth

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
  • Getbig!
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #25 on: August 13, 2007, 06:53:02 PM »
Don't you have "back to school" shopping to do?



Bob you're losing it,

you're posting a coversation with your wife on a message board.

Kegdrainer

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • team yeah buddy
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #26 on: August 13, 2007, 06:53:37 PM »
all the money in the world will not buy Derek Anthony any respect on getbig.  

$100 for 20 minutes posing on a webcam for dudes is HOMOSEXUAL, any way you look at it.


Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #27 on: August 13, 2007, 06:53:59 PM »
What the hell are you talking about...?


bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #28 on: August 13, 2007, 06:56:08 PM »
all the money in the world will not buy Derek Anthony any respect on getbig.  

$100 for 20 minutes posing on a webcam for dudes is HOMOSEXUAL, any way you look at it.


wow  and do you know it's also 2007?

DA BULL

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 83
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #29 on: August 13, 2007, 06:57:16 PM »
Chic.................... ............why are you wasting your time with this Dearth guy? hes retarded............nice job taking Romano to school, about time

noc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
Re: TO JOHN ROMANO:
« Reply #30 on: August 13, 2007, 07:02:57 PM »
Derek, you have a Shakespeare quote on your website, I forgot what it is...
 

Toupe or not Toupe, that is the question.

hahahahaha  ;D

Pete Nice

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2871
  • Can't wait until the new DaddyWaddy's come out
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #31 on: August 13, 2007, 07:35:13 PM »
they all worked for the same company

silvio,kai greene,mark dugale,johnny jackson,paco bautista  go look for your self  www.muscleweb.com same shit you call me gay for !

funny thing is im straighter then a arrow i just like the gay community there nice to me ! dont mean im gay or gay for pay..............sorry to disapoint you  >:(


Hi Derek, how's Billy?
Air Falcon

SWOLETRAIN

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2159
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #32 on: August 13, 2007, 07:38:32 PM »
Normally i dig Romanos opinions and doings, but wow!!! talk about owned. Way to keep it real Bob.
-

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #33 on: August 13, 2007, 07:48:49 PM »
Facts are facts.....why Romano decided to try and take a shot at me is a mystery, but should have done his homework first.

Lift Studios

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4998
  • http://www.liftstudios.com
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #34 on: August 13, 2007, 07:59:26 PM »
Facts are facts.....why Romano decided to try and take a shot at me is a mystery, but should have done his homework first.
You're an AMI/WEIDER athlete with a column in a competing magazine.

Bobservation 101.

 ;D
Elevate Your Image.™

Lift Studios

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4998
  • http://www.liftstudios.com
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #35 on: August 13, 2007, 08:05:56 PM »
Or............

Maybe it's because you were an American Gladiator while he was relegated to dating one.

 8)
Elevate Your Image.™

theworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4019
  • Getbig!
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #36 on: August 13, 2007, 08:46:45 PM »
I always thought Chick was kind of a prick, for no reason.

However, after reading his posts, he seems like a 'down to earth' cool guy.  my fault, chichericko!


or as people who talk in a movie theater say, 'down to earf.'


you are gay.

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #37 on: August 13, 2007, 08:49:45 PM »
What a great bunch these are

DP, are you saying that the "NY mafia click" are making a joke out of bodybuilding?

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #38 on: August 13, 2007, 08:56:37 PM »
I always thought Chick was kind of a prick, for no reason.

However, after reading his posts, he seems like a 'down to earth' cool guy.  my fault, chichericko!


or as people who talk in a movie theater say, 'down to earf.'




Make no mistake my friend...if I'm a prick, it's for a damn good reason..!

Benito Mutumbo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #39 on: August 13, 2007, 09:02:51 PM »
Chick, did you read where Billy Guns wants you "whacked"?

Maybe you could comment on what a tool this guy is.


G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #40 on: August 13, 2007, 09:06:02 PM »

Maybe you could comment on what a tool this guy is.




Billy is such an obvious tool anyone commenting on such is unnecessary.
Ron: "I am lazy."

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59428
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: TO JOHN ROMANO:
« Reply #41 on: August 13, 2007, 09:13:55 PM »
lmao

team MD !!!!! 

MUSCULAR DEVELOPMENT RULES!! GETBIG IS A BUNCH OF BITCHES !!! TO MANY HATERS
I wish I was going to the Olympia, so I could tell you what a douche you are to your face.

I nominate you as getbigs biggest douche of the year, douche.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

DA BULL

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 83
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #42 on: August 13, 2007, 09:17:04 PM »
chic.....what do you think of this (taken from MD)??

I hate to say this but, despite being one of my favorite writers, John does sometimes get his statements wrong. There was once an article about the death of a bodybuilder name DJ Johns, and John reported it as JD Dawodu.

However, and I mean a big however,
Chick, has a hidden agenda of self preservation and promotion. Its his only chance to stay alive in this sport. As an athlete's rep he is suppose to have the athletes best interest at heart, but he doesn't. He has only his interest. His articles in Flex are both contradictory as well as self promoting drivel. He goes on and on about how atheletes should conduct themselves but he himself, has done many wrongs. Its much like the pot calling the kettle black.

His recent push to change some of the judging has done nothing to help out the sport and has left the athletes working harder in a much more depleted state. (coontinous callouts without changing the athletes does not improve judging).

Also Chick is underhanged, meeting with judges for dinner the night before he places 3rd at the NOC, and not to mention his win at that masters show.

He also belittles the women's side of the support suggesting the ifbb even distance themselves from the women because they drain the money from the mens side.

John may not always get his facts straight, but he is a damn good writer and far more interesting then chick will ever be.

Chick is just scum in my book. (snake in the grass).
     

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #43 on: August 13, 2007, 09:28:08 PM »
chic.....what do you think of this (taken from MD)??

I hate to say this but, despite being one of my favorite writers, John does sometimes get his statements wrong. There was once an article about the death of a bodybuilder name DJ Johns, and John reported it as JD Dawodu.

However, and I mean a big however,
Chick, has a hidden agenda of self preservation and promotion. Its his only chance to stay alive in this sport. As an athlete's rep he is suppose to have the athletes best interest at heart, but he doesn't. He has only his interest. His articles in Flex are both contradictory as well as self promoting drivel. He goes on and on about how atheletes should conduct themselves but he himself, has done many wrongs. Its much like the pot calling the kettle black.


So my "hidden agenda" is to retort to Romanos bullshit with the truth???

As to me having the athletes best interest at heart, I will put my record on the line any day of the week...it speaks for itself...



His recent push to change some of the judging has done nothing to help out the sport and has left the athletes working harder in a much more depleted state. (coontinous callouts without changing the athletes does not improve judging).


Does this tool even know what he's talking about? Ask Darrem Charles, or Gustavo Badell, or ANY of the athletes that have competed this year if they have a problem with the changes I've made....fairer placings is what I was after, and competitors given the chance to be compared....both accomplished.


Also Chick is underhanged, meeting with judges for dinner the night before he places 3rd at the NOC, and not to mention his win at that masters show.

Never happened....BTW, I was 2nd at the '02 NOC. The Masters show wasn't close (with all due respect to the other competitors)


He also belittles the women's side of the support suggesting the ifbb even distance themselves from the women because they drain the money from the mens side.


I also got them back on the Olympia stage, as well as awards and increased purse and per diem...and yes, if the womens sport isn't revamped, then it will continue to take from the mens side while not supporting itself....thats a fact.



John may not always get his facts straight, but he is a damn good writer and far more interesting then chick will ever be.


He doesn't have his facts straight...which is what this thread is all about.



Chick is just scum in my book. (snake in the grass).

Much like your buddy Romano...you might have that image when you have all the facts and information wrong.      


send this back to the tool that posted it...

Fulgorre

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #44 on: August 13, 2007, 09:31:30 PM »
chic.....what do you think of this (taken from MD)??

I hate to say this but, despite being one of my favorite writers, John does sometimes get his statements wrong. There was once an article about the death of a bodybuilder name DJ Johns, and John reported it as JD Dawodu.

However, and I mean a big however,
Chick, has a hidden agenda of self preservation and promotion. Its his only chance to stay alive in this sport. As an athlete's rep he is suppose to have the athletes best interest at heart, but he doesn't. He has only his interest. His articles in Flex are both contradictory as well as self promoting drivel. He goes on and on about how atheletes should conduct themselves but he himself, has done many wrongs. Its much like the pot calling the kettle black.

His recent push to change some of the judging has done nothing to help out the sport and has left the athletes working harder in a much more depleted state. (coontinous callouts without changing the athletes does not improve judging).

Also Chick is underhanged, meeting with judges for dinner the night before he places 3rd at the NOC, and not to mention his win at that masters show.

He also belittles the women's side of the support suggesting the ifbb even distance themselves from the women because they drain the money from the mens side.

John may not always get his facts straight, but he is a damn good writer and far more interesting then chick will ever be.

Chick is just scum in my book. (snake in the grass).
     


I try to forget about it, but everytime I see Rusty Jeffers at Gold's Scottsdale or Maximum Fitness I :( and say, "There goes the uncrown Master's Mr. Olympia 2006."

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #45 on: August 13, 2007, 09:32:29 PM »
Chick, has a hidden agenda of self preservation and promotion.  He has only his interest.


Why should he be any different than anyone else?  Only the young are naive enough to not understand that everyone acts primarily in their own self-interest.


Quote
He also belittles the women's side of the support suggesting the ifbb even distance themselves from the women


On this, he's right.  Those transgendered freaks that call themselves "women" do nothing but hurt the sport.
Ron: "I am lazy."

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #46 on: August 13, 2007, 09:33:57 PM »
Please bro....if he was 2nd or 3rd, or even 4th for that matter...you could at least have somewhat of a argument......

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #47 on: August 13, 2007, 09:35:54 PM »
Please bro....if he was 2nd or 3rd, or even 4th for that matter...you could at least have somewhat of a argument......

 ::)

Ron: "I am lazy."

Fulgorre

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #48 on: August 13, 2007, 09:40:06 PM »
Please bro....if he was 2nd or 3rd, or even 4th for that matter...you could at least have somewhat of a argument......

Chick you won the show.  I am not saying you didn't have one helluva a body because you do.  I'm just saying from the pics I saw Rusty got screwed.  Anyway, it is over and you have the title.  I'll try to move on.

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: To John Romano re your article
« Reply #49 on: August 13, 2007, 09:43:45 PM »
Rusty without question should have been in the top 5 (IMO)....but thats a ways off from contending for the title...