In this area, yes. You are a perfect illustration of why that is.
I've posted multiple links and examples to explain most of the questions you've raised about birth control, but you've ignored all of them and just keep repeating the points I've already addressed.
You can't really be trusted to make an objective, accurate assessment about this issue because you're afraid to consider any information that might alter your position.
[chuckle] So I'm an anti-abortion activist? That's news to me. Two wrong assumptions in this thread Al.
All I've done is raise questions. You haven't really addressed my question. Thanks for the links, but what I've asked is where are the studies showing no adverse long-term effects based on multiple uses of this particular pill. The dose is apparently 50 times stronger than an existing drug.
I spent another few minutes and came up with others (undoubtedly anti-abortion activists) who have questions:
There have been no trials on the long-term effects of the morning-after pill and no published trials on its effects on the fertility and health of teenage girls. The morning-after pill is being increasingly promoted, particularly to girls under the age of consent. The effects on women's health are not being monitored, despite the fact that the drug company behind it recommends that the morning-after pill is not given to girls under 16 without the supervision of their doctor.
http://www.spuc.org.uk/students/abortion/mapAnd there is this quote from earlier in the thread:
Although no conclusive research has been conducted into the long-term effects of the morning-after pill, Dr Niyada said that some studies showed links between constant high levels of progesterone, due to extended use of the pill, and breast, ovarian and uterine cancer plus ectopic pregnancies.
http://www.morningafterpill.org/bangkok.htmIf some studies show links between constant high levels of progesterone and health problems, I wonder what the studies will show on doses 50 times higher than normal?