8 years and 17 contests is not longevity...lol cmon man I think Cormier competed more than 17 times in one year alone!
Ronnie dominated even a sharper Flex in 99, receiving perfect scores for the entire contest.
Ronnie had competiton, some of the same competition Dorian had and new blood as well.
And Dorian won controversaily more times than you can count. I mean Levrone looked better than him at times, Nasser, Ray
Doubt Dorian ever did that.
Add all those notes together and this is what you get
Ronnie>Dorian
Ronnie lost a LOT in fact much more than he won ! 17 years of losing a bunch of contests not saying much , Dorian was wiser and in fact a winner right off the bat so he didn't have to compete in shit shows to try and earn money and when he edid become champ he picked his battles and it served him well
Flex wasn't better in 99 than 98

and neither were as good as 93

Ronnie beat guys past their primes that Dorian beat for years , not saying it's his fault Ronnie can only compete with guys who show up , and the new blood would be left for dead in the mid-nineties not saying much
Controversy in reigns? 93 Dorian beat a neat best ever Flex , Flex raises his hand and claims he's ' unbeatable ' 99 Flex claims he's number one and turns his back on Ronnie , Kevin outright said he beat Ronnie in 2000 and 2002 , Jay beat him in 2001 ( prejudging ) 2004 Jay could have beat him it was so close same with 1998 , as a Coleman fan don't cry controversy because Ronnie is knee deep in it
and add all those up and Dorian beats Ronnie as usual , just purely from a statistical standpoint Dorian would beat Ronnie 8 wins to none , 40% win/loss ratio compared to 88%

couple that with the fact Ronnie said on multiple occasions he doesn't think he would beat Dorian and you have Dorian > Ronnie