And, this goes back to my original post. That real world experience outweighs lab experiments.
Sure, whatever works. The problem is that he uses "science" to argue for the merit of his supplements. Then in the next turn saying science does not matter. For example, Layne Norton says other aminos (like whey for example) ingested at the same time won't reduce the protein synthetic effect of the essential aminos (Layne is a protein researcher). Milos can't argue science with him so he makes a disparaging comment instead.
It won't hurt to take his drinks, will probably be beneficial. But not to the extent he says or necessarily for the reasons he lists.