Ok.. il do a little outlook/prediction for all the wannabe judges who are in reality, far too inexperienced to have a proper assessment on the comparison...
1. Pete is alot harder, especially from the back. This is bodybuilding fellas, yes conditioning is a major factor! Funny thing is, Pete is probably going to get HARDER as prejudging approaches! These pix are last night!
2. Someone brought up flow. Well flow is the ENTIRE package. Not just chest delts and arms. Putnam flows much better when you consider calf/ham/quad balance in unison with the upper body. Quads more seperated and detailed, balanced with hams and calves...which are balanced with upper body.
its TOTAL PACKAGE... not a few freaky parts
Well...well, Dixon has two real eyes and Putnam only has one, that's a lack of symmetry...
Actually, from the pics Dixon is harder, and has better back detail, better leg detail, better abs, and his chest is striated. That's what I see, , maybe is I cover up one eye, I see what people are talking about Putnam for. Damn, I wish there more guys like Dennis Newman, Mike Francois, Flex Wheeler, back in the NPC ranks.