Bullshit...you can't have it both ways. They are both providing aid to the enemy no matter how you want to look at it...
and I heard with my own ears/read transcripts with my own eyes of testimony from her superiors that she was not covert.....but I'm not wasting more time on that.....point is, like it or not nothing will come of that situation regardless....so why waste time discussing it...
have what both ways? - you say that the two are equivalent and I MUST agree with you?
The two are completely different issues - one is the outing of a COVERT agent by the White House and can gave you an example of how that could be viewed as treason.
The other is a "what if" on the future of an ongoing occupation. It might be treason if we had a secret date to withdraw and the White House LEAKED it. Yeah - then I might see that as treason.
Other than that we'd have to have long coversation about how to wind down this occupation and how it should be done but that's a completely different topic and has nothing to do with the outing of Plame.
If you would humor me - I'd be glad to see some of your proof that Plame was not covert when she was outed by the White House.