Author Topic: Nasser El Sonbaty - Threads merged (Read 338340 times)

The_Iron_Disciple · « **Reply #675 on:** December 03, 2007, 09:25:52 PM »

Et tu, Nasser ?

titusisback · « **Reply #676 on:** December 03, 2007, 09:27:33 PM »

Quote from: Lamplighterx on December 03, 2007, 08:52:16 PM

That Nasser is one strong dude

Someone claims he's strong, yes.. Levrone on the other hand has proven to be superioir in strength to nasser, not to mention much more successful on stage. It's sad nasser nut huggers have to come up with BS claims like this, trying to 'elevate' him, when in fact they're owning him and making him the laughing matter of the message board.

Lamplighterx · « **Reply #677 on:** December 03, 2007, 09:30:51 PM »

im sure theres a logical explanation

BEAST 8692 · « **Reply #678 on:** December 03, 2007, 09:55:45 PM »

Quote from: Meso_z on December 03, 2007, 12:06:03 PM

So wheres the clip? I can only see some pics.

Heres the way its meant to be

damn, kevin was a strong bencher. notice the full rom for those reps at 220 and the condition he was in. his form was near perfect on every set and took the time to set up perfectly before every rep as opposed to shaking his head and yelling 'nothing but a peanut'. consequently, he was nice and tight and the reps were smooth.

when ronnie does 220 he doesn't do full rom for most of his reps but he does do the hardest part quite smoothly. his set up wasn't as tight as levrones or as focused imo, which may have been the reason why his shoulders were somewhat askew while he was doing it (his left shoulder was a bit high) which actually makes the lift harder.

all up i think ronnie would be stronger than levrone in the bench (he kills him on the other compounds), but it's not hard to see why levrone had outrageous triceps (since heavy benching has more to do with strong tris than pecs). pound for pound though, i would put my money on kevin if there was a comp.

not sure what came first (chicken or the egg) with levrone as he had great tris, delts and chest early on in his career and apparently was a gifted bencher. what i mean by that is, was it dedicated attention to the exercise itself that produced those tris or did it have more to do with his genetics. i know it was some of both, just curious as to which was the biggest factor.

bigbobs · « **Reply #679 on:** December 03, 2007, 09:58:49 PM »

Quote from: titusisback on December 03, 2007, 09:27:33 PM

Someone claims he's strong, yes.. Levrone on the other hand has proven to be superioir in strength to nasser, not to mention much more successful on stage. It's sad nasser nut huggers have to come up with BS claims like this, trying to 'elevate' him, when in fact they're owning him and making him the laughing matter of the message board.

Show me a pic of Levrone doing incline barbell press with 495.

bigbobs · « **Reply #680 on:** December 03, 2007, 10:00:02 PM »

Quote from: BEAST 8692 on December 03, 2007, 09:55:45 PM

damn, kevin was a strong bencher. notice the full rom for those reps at 220 and the condition he was in. his form was near perfect on every set and took the time to set up perfectly before every rep as opposed to shaking his head and yelling 'nothing but a peanut'. consequently, he was nice and tight and the reps were smooth.

when ronnie does 220 he doesn't do full rom for most of his reps but he does do the hardest part quite smoothly. his set up wasn't as tight as levrones or as focused imo, which may have been the reason why his shoulders were somewhat askew while he was doing it (his left shoulder was a bit high) which actually makes the lift harder.

all up i think ronnie would be stronger than levrone in the bench (he kills him on the other compounds), but it's not hard to see why levrone had outrageous triceps (since heavy benching has more to do with strong tris than pecs). pound for pound though, i would put my money on kevin if there was a comp.

not sure what came first (chicken or the egg) with levrone as he had great tris, delts and chest early on in his career and apparently was a gifted bencher. what i mean by that is, was it dedicated attention to the exercise itself that produced those tris or did it have more to do with his genetics. i know it was some of both, just curious as to which was the biggest factor.

BEAST 8692 · « **Reply #681 on:** December 03, 2007, 10:21:44 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on December 03, 2007, 09:58:49 PM

Show me a pic of Levrone doing incline barbell press with 495.

how about a video of a female bber benching 5 plates aside for reps like it's nothing.

does that mean she's stronger than nasser? afterall, there is actually video evidence of her doing reps as opposed to one pic of nasser unracking it. it appears that the she-beast fan club would have you by the balls iti. they could rightfully claim that (said female bber) is stronger than your boy based on the fact that they have the evidence.....as opposed to you.

btw, your assertion that someone that is benching 315 at the end of workout indicates that he is capable of reppin 100lbs at the start is ridiculous beyond belief, but to say that this indicates that he could do 200lbs more at an earlier stage of his career (even though there is no discernable indication that nasser has lost strength) displays delusion beyond insanity.

titusisback · « **Reply #682 on:** December 03, 2007, 10:54:01 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on December 03, 2007, 09:58:49 PM

Show me a pic of Levrone doing incline barbell press with 495.

Levrone benching 495 lbs for reps

Nasser doing partial shoulder presses with 180 lbs
Nasser training seated calf raises with two plates
Nasser doing partial deadlifts with 220 lbs
Nasser pumping biceps with a 30lb dumbell
Nasser pumping with tiny weights
Nasser showing his retarded dog he picked up from dumpster and made up a ridiculous story only morons belive
WHAT A F'ING BEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAASSSSS SSTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

Nasser had zero work ethic. He got some size because he stole steroid info from Milos. All drugs. That's why he never had enough muscle maturity to be the best.

Truth hurts, bigpoops, doesn't it?

titusisback · « **Reply #683 on:** December 03, 2007, 10:59:22 PM »

HAHAHAHA

LEVRONED!!!!

titusisback · « **Reply #684 on:** December 03, 2007, 11:02:05 PM »

Pro wins:

Levrone 20 - Nasser 5

titusisback · « **Reply #685 on:** December 03, 2007, 11:15:02 PM »

Quote

Quote from: bigbobs on November 16, 2007, 06:26:26 PM
LOL I think I speak for the majority when I say that generally a bodybuilding fan would rather look like a bodybuilder who places better than the next one, i.e. I would rather look like Milos over Nasser!

Hahahaha.. someone must've given bigboobs some truth serum!

titusisback · « **Reply #686 on:** December 03, 2007, 11:18:59 PM »

Here's the Dorian killer back

titusisback · « **Reply #687 on:** December 03, 2007, 11:26:48 PM »

Nasser is known for his amazing intelligence. After seeing this picture of him, no one could ever doubt it..

toby2007 · « **Reply #688 on:** December 03, 2007, 11:29:56 PM »

Wow..just read some of these posts on Nasser, if I had known people were so into this man, I would have jumped in awhile back. I have known this guy for many years and he is really one of a kind..sorry if that's not what some guys here want to hear, just thought I would share some pics that I have collected over the years..this is Nasser caught in some private moments.

titusisback · « **Reply #689 on:** December 03, 2007, 11:37:07 PM »

Poor, innocent animal...

toby2007 · « **Reply #690 on:** December 03, 2007, 11:40:22 PM »

See Milos....the plasma expanders do indeed work!!

Bluto · « **Reply #691 on:** December 04, 2007, 01:02:37 AM »

great pictures toby!!

Meso_z · « **Reply #692 on:** December 04, 2007, 01:09:30 AM »

Quote from: titusisback on December 03, 2007, 11:37:07 PM

Poor, innocent animal...

LOL. So cute and soooo funny at the same time.

davidpaul · « **Reply #693 on:** December 04, 2007, 02:59:39 AM »

Nasser!

omgsoswole · « **Reply #694 on:** December 04, 2007, 05:02:57 AM »

Quote from: IceCold on December 03, 2007, 08:35:02 PM

i dont think that the plates are fake.

flex only started using fake plates after jp got hurt.

however, cant be certain that nasser did a full rep.

he could have unracked the weight, then brought it down a 1/4 or 1/2 and then had ian re-rack it.

the pic just shows nasser unracking the weight.

Classic Getbig 'fact'. Although it does make some degree of sense, there is (as far as i'm aware) no evidence to confirm this and based entirely on assumption.

Any evidence you want to share?

_bruce_ · « **Reply #695 on:** December 04, 2007, 05:04:35 AM »

Nasser supersetted classes to gain more brainmass

Hail Nasser!

Meso_z · « **Reply #696 on:** December 04, 2007, 05:29:13 AM »

bigbobs lets take for example a Flex photoshoot with Alex Fedorov

Its clearly fake, no one can reverse grip milirary press this weight...
You mean that these plates are actually "real" as Nassers incline bench and so other photoshoots?

Oh as for the pic you requested, here

Actually its a real onem no fake facial expressions, no fake weight FULL BLOWN BABY

BEAST 8692 · « **Reply #697 on:** December 04, 2007, 05:55:18 AM »

lol, bogboobs makes this shit up as he goes along. never before in the history of getbig has anyone been so deluded and full of lies at the same time. goodrum comes close but, at least he tried to tell the truth most of the time.

fake plates have been used by weider media for as long as i've followed bbing at least, about late 1980s.

one pic in muscle and fitness (didn't even have flex back then) shows the golds crew at the time, consisting of the likes of alzado, gaspari, mcclish, eversons, etc and i vividly remember mike christian standing on one end holding 3 45s on his outstretched hand like a waiter would flamboyantly hold up a plate of food. zero strain on his face or body (he was wearing the typical string tank of the times) and that big shit eating grin he always had on his face (cocaine is a hell of a drug). even at 12 years of age it was obvious to me that these were fake plates.

_bruce_ · « **Reply #698 on:** December 04, 2007, 07:02:05 AM »

Nasser never did a working set with 495....

...in fact - he was just warming up

bigbobs · « **Reply #699 on:** December 04, 2007, 07:13:22 AM »

Quote from: BEAST 8692 on December 03, 2007, 10:21:44 PM

btw, your assertion that someone that is benching 315 at the end of workout indicates that he is capable of reppin 100lbs at the start is ridiculous beyond belief, but to say that this indicates that he could do 200lbs more at an earlier stage of his career (even though there is no discernable indication that nasser has lost strength) displays delusion beyond insanity.

I know myself, if I do incline bench at the start of my workout I do 225 for 7-8 reps. However, if I do it as my last exercise I get about the same # of reps with 175 lbs only. That's a 50 lb difference, or 29% of the weight used when doing it as the last exercise. 29% of 315 lbs = 91.35 lbs, therefore I find it very reasonable to assume he would lift 405, which is 90 lbs greater, for the same # of reps at the start of his workout. If you drop the reps and take a point when he was a bit stronger in his career, then 495 for 1-2 reps is very reasonable.