Okay, I could have easily ommitted the "probably." That's like saying, "prove that Ronnie Coleman can do even one rep of 495 flat bench press with full range of motion, and when someone argues Yes he can and gives as support the fact that in his he does five "almost full or bottom-half reps" meaning he could probably do 2-3 full reps, your logic would argue, "no his videos have never shown him do a full rep with 495 therefore he can't do it!"And no the dumbells were not 130. He was pyramiding up in weight, and did his first working set with 140's - the video zoomed in one the 140...and did a relatively easy working set with those, then moved up to a slightly larger dumbell that the video didn't zoom in on, but clearly had an extra two fives on the end of it making it 150.
except that ronnie actually completes a full rep on rep
5 and just before lockout on rep 4.
give it up already. you're sounding way to desperate to prove nasser did something that he didn't. it would lend nasser more credibility if you didn't own yourself every thread.
i mean, the guy was never a p/lifter anyway so why start a thread (elsewhere - too pathetic to look for) telling stories about him inclining 495 for reps?
nasser was huge. i'll totally agree with that. the guy was a monster and was definitely the most massive top tier pro bber of the 90s.
my god he sounds like a bitter whiny old woman now though.