Why do you dodge my tax question?
Rain Forests are important but I think them independent of the global warming issue. We should strive to limit their destruction.
CO2 has been allegedly linked to global warming yet there is not evidence that it is the CAUSE of it.
Global Warming exists, but I don't believe its cause is man. Temperatures on earth have been changing for 4.5 billion years. What's new? Some people are taking advantage of it to promote a form of globalisation called One World Government.
I didn't answer the tax question since I didn't see how that was somehow pertinent to this discussion.
However, I have no problem answer it: I believe that as long as there are a proper correlation between the tax and benefits for the citizens, ie that the citizens feels that they benefits from the the level of tax, there is no problem.
And currently, I would say that spending is fairly efficient, ie that I have no problem with the level of tax.
However, I have a problem with the taxes being lowered, since we're currently in a economic boom in Sweden. Instead of curbing the economic temperature, we could risk it by overheating it by lowering taxes, inflating the economy.
If you're gonna lower taxes, only do so when there is an economic recess.
And if you're gonna raise 'em - only do it when there's economic growth.
Nice to see that you believe that we should limit the destruction of the Rain Forest.
There were some major steps made at Bali. A UN conference. Where USA was a major part.
Why do you support RonPaul, someone who is anti-UN?