Author Topic: Is this guy natural? (Read 11491 times)

Deicide · « **on:** December 31, 2007, 05:36:41 AM »

Stu · « **Reply #1 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:38:14 AM »

I would fucking hope so, most of getbig was bigger than that before they started working out!

m8 · « **Reply #2 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:39:12 AM »

All drugs.

SquatAss · « **Reply #3 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:39:45 AM »

musclehedz · « **Reply #4 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:41:28 AM »

No, you can tell by the shoulders. Big round shoulders = not natural.

natural al · « **Reply #5 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:51:12 AM »

Quote from: Stu on December 31, 2007, 05:38:14 AM

I would fucking hope so, most of getbig was bigger than that before they started working out!

really?

man, I must be waaay behind then cause that guy is in pretty good shape compared to me, his calfs are waaaay better than mine.

he looks really good there if he is natural, he seems sincire...is he natty? I don't know, he's not huge, he's not ultra ripped. He's big and he's in good shape. he's not freaky.

I'm sure GH15 will say he's on everything under the sun...who knows anymore? I'm sure we could post pics of pee wee herman and people would say he's on shit these days.

you can achieve some development if your natty, it's just harder and takes alot longer.

Deicide · « **Reply #6 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:53:01 AM »

Quote from: musclehedz on December 31, 2007, 05:41:28 AM

No, you can tell by the shoulders. Big round shoulders = not natural.

How can you just make a generalisation like this; big round shoulders=automatically not natural?!

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #7 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:54:22 AM »

...he is natural and I have a headfull of hair .

MONSTER_TRICEPS · « **Reply #8 on:** December 31, 2007, 05:55:38 AM »

Overload · « **Reply #9 on:** December 31, 2007, 06:05:15 AM »

Nope.

musclehedz · « **Reply #10 on:** December 31, 2007, 06:06:35 AM »

Quote from: Trapezkerl on December 31, 2007, 05:53:01 AM

How can you just make a generalisation like this; big round shoulders=automatically not natural?!

Show me a lean natural with big round shoulders

Exactly..

Meso_z · « **Reply #11 on:** December 31, 2007, 06:42:25 AM »

It says "musclemania.com" so not natural. but who cares anyway.

gh15 · « **Reply #12 on:** December 31, 2007, 07:11:07 AM »

are you out of your mind? why even ask this stupid question

hormonized and on many products on good doses and a heavy user for good constant 5-10years,,
cantr believ you even ask ,,takes everything under the son and then some,,horrid physiqe too

Stu · « **Reply #13 on:** December 31, 2007, 07:57:48 AM »

Quote from: natural al on December 31, 2007, 05:51:12 AM

really?

man, I must be waaay behind then cause that guy is in pretty good shape compared to me, his calfs are waaaay better than mine.

he looks really good there if he is natural, he seems sincire...is he natty? I don't know, he's not huge, he's not ultra ripped. He's big and he's in good shape. he's not freaky.

I'm sure GH15 will say he's on everything under the sun...who knows anymore? I'm sure we could post pics of pee wee herman and people would say he's on shit these days.

you can achieve some development if your natty, it's just harder and takes alot longer.

Pee Wee has run a few cycles in his time im sure, nothing heavy just some d-bol tabs yo

dr_para24 · « **Reply #14 on:** December 31, 2007, 08:06:44 AM »

as long as they do not touch roids for 9months, they are consider natural

Mars · « **Reply #15 on:** December 31, 2007, 08:10:38 AM »

as natural as dereks love for the cock.

Dragon · « **Reply #16 on:** December 31, 2007, 09:34:44 AM »

i don't know if his natural, but one thing's for sure, thats a naturaly attainable physique.
i've never seen a huge chest like that on the naturals i've seen but he's in the gym , chest is probably pumped up like hell, but chest is really really full and big for a natural, maybe genetically strong bencher?
and the 'big round shoulder=juicer' thing is the most retarded stupidest thing i've ever heard LOL

MONSTER_TRICEPS · « **Reply #17 on:** December 31, 2007, 09:37:27 AM »

Quote from: Mars on December 31, 2007, 08:10:38 AM

as natural as dereks love for the cock.

Isn't dereks love for the cock pretty natural?

musclehedz · « **Reply #18 on:** December 31, 2007, 09:38:47 AM »

Quote from: Dragon on December 31, 2007, 09:34:44 AM

i don't know if his natural, but one thing's for sure, thats a naturaly attainable physique.
i've never seen a huge chest like that on the naturals i've seen but he's in the gym , chest is probably pumped up like hell, but chest is really really full and big for a natural, maybe genetically strong bencher?
and the 'big round shoulder=juicer' thing is the most retarded stupidest thing i've ever heard LOL

Are you calling me out winstrolboy

The Master · « **Reply #19 on:** December 31, 2007, 09:39:22 AM »

That is probably naturally attainable for someone with great genetics and an insane work ethic.

the_doc · « **Reply #20 on:** December 31, 2007, 09:50:01 AM »

Quote from: Stu on December 31, 2007, 05:38:14 AM

I would fucking hope so, most of getbig was bigger than that before they started working out!

I assume that was a joke. Most getbiggers(myself included) don't look like they go to a gym!

i agree that is a realistic physique to attain. it takes dedication and good diet unless you are very young. My physique was close to that with slightly more bodyfat at 17/18 and I ate almost anything. Nobody should touch 'roids until they are in that guys conditon or atleast would have that size when dieted down. my 2 cents.
The Doc

Dragon · « **Reply #21 on:** December 31, 2007, 09:52:18 AM »

Quote from: musclehedz on December 31, 2007, 05:41:28 AM

No, you can tell by the shoulders. Big round shoulders = not natural.

translation= i'm a juicer with small shitty shoulders

FrenchFrie · « **Reply #22 on:** December 31, 2007, 10:04:08 AM »

you can't fill you muscles with so much mass being natural for the love of god.

The Master · « **Reply #23 on:** December 31, 2007, 10:12:08 AM »

Quote from: FrenchFrie on December 31, 2007, 10:04:08 AM

you can't fill you muscles with so much mass being natural for the love of god.

Look at Layne Norton. Almost the same thing. Layne = natural.

musclehedz · « **Reply #24 on:** December 31, 2007, 10:12:45 AM »

Quote from: Debussey DF on December 31, 2007, 10:12:08 AM

Look at Layne Norton. Almost the same thing. Layne = natural.

Yeah but he is small.