Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman - 2002 BFTO DVD Pics (Read 11677 times)

bizzy · « **Reply #50 on:** January 02, 2008, 04:54:45 PM »

I like the Iron Age look of Arnold and Samir but
I think alot of the guys that like those same kind
of physiques forget how small Ronnie's waist was
at one time. His shoulder to waist difference is almost
as good as anyone's in 99. 2nd pic is Brian Buchanan
known for his tiny waist.
3rd pic was taken off my TV with a dig camera b4 I got a DVD recorder.

Condor · « **Reply #51 on:** January 02, 2008, 05:22:23 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 02, 2008, 02:24:18 PM

but Wolf could never equal this:

Wolf is like 10 years younger at this point than when Ronnie was in his prime.

You might eat your words.

Hulkster · « **Reply #52 on:** January 02, 2008, 06:26:57 PM »

Quote from: Condor on January 02, 2008, 05:22:23 PM

Wolf is like 10 years younger at this point than when Ronnie was in his prime.

You might eat your words.

doubtful.

the difference in detail is just too great.

generally, what starts off smooth when you are young, does not increase in detail as you get older.

Hulkster · « **Reply #53 on:** January 02, 2008, 06:29:04 PM »

Wolf is impressive though, but I am not sure if he can climb to the level that ronnie has achieved.

gymguy · « **Reply #54 on:** January 02, 2008, 06:31:36 PM »

Quote from: Julio Ceasar on January 02, 2008, 02:16:43 PM

Cutler got him in size now. Cutler seems too be the most massiv in the industry ever...

Victor Martinez have some god potential to get there too.

Actually, Cutler size would not have compared to Ronnie of the past and it never did in the judges eyes either. He's bigger now, but Ronnie kicked his ass year after year. No one will ever compare to Ronnie when he was his best...NO ONE.

cht868 · « **Reply #55 on:** January 02, 2008, 06:31:44 PM »

dennis wolf is great but ronnie in his prime was and probably will forever be the GREATEST

Hulkster · « **Reply #56 on:** January 02, 2008, 06:45:18 PM »

Quote from: cht868 on January 02, 2008, 06:31:44 PM

dennis wolf is great but ronnie in his prime was and probably will forever be the GREATEST

true.

its hard to imagine a physique better than this:

bizzy · « **Reply #57 on:** January 02, 2008, 07:26:55 PM »

After seeing the recent guest posing of Phil Heath
I was impressed by his CRAZY arms. If you could combine
the width of Wolf (clavicles + shoulders) and the crazy thickness
and condition that Heath can achieve you might have someone
that could surpass Ronnie. Unfortunately, Heath will never have the width (clavicles)
and Wolf will never have the back or biceps that would make them
able to surpass Ron at his best. (I could be wrong but genetically I
think this is the case).

Hulkster · « **Reply #58 on:** January 02, 2008, 07:40:08 PM »

ronnie's level of refinement (ie detail, shape and vascularity) has always put him in a totally different class than other 'mass monsters'.

in fact, it has made him the greatest ever at his best..

James Blunt · « **Reply #59 on:** January 02, 2008, 08:56:02 PM »

kyomu · « **Reply #60 on:** January 03, 2008, 01:37:59 AM »

Yes. Wolf is very good. But hes not "amazing" like Ronnie in his best form.

KillerMonk · « **Reply #61 on:** January 03, 2008, 01:45:27 AM »

Coleman was a Freak of nature in 2003, i do not think Wolf can surpass this but give him 3 years and its going to be close.

Im not entering the Truce thread but 93 Dorian vs Ronnie 03 would be a very close call

GoneAway · « **Reply #62 on:** January 03, 2008, 02:11:50 AM »

we havent even seen wolf in his best form yet. he'll come close to ronnie if he sticks with it and takes all the right advices.

affeman · « **Reply #63 on:** January 03, 2008, 02:15:52 AM »

Quote from: GoneAway on January 03, 2008, 02:11:50 AM

we havent even seen wolf in his best form yet. he'll come close to ronnie if he sticks with it and takes all the right advices.

...from Milos? $:-\$

GoneAway · « **Reply #64 on:** January 03, 2008, 02:29:42 AM »

from whoever he is training with now. look at his physique. it needs to be refined, not have a complete overhaul or much new added.

reasons why ronnie was great:

big, ripped legs
big, ripped chest
big, ripped arms
big, ripped back
small waist

wolf has big, ripped legs, a small waist and a big chest. he should work simply on building the size of his arms and back (lats), whilst getting ripped to shreds all over.

affeman · « **Reply #65 on:** January 03, 2008, 02:37:31 AM »

Wolf definetely needs more quality and density, but come on, this guy only trains for about 9 years, he's a baby. He has the perfect lines and structure to become one of the greatest BB of all time. The quality comes with the years of training, and nothing else (except if your name is Jay Cutler).

KillerMonk · « **Reply #66 on:** January 03, 2008, 02:47:13 AM »

Quote from: GoneAway on January 03, 2008, 02:29:42 AM

from whoever he is training with now. look at his physique. it needs to be refined, not have a complete overhaul or much new added.

reasons why ronnie was great:

big, ripped legs
big, ripped chest
big, ripped arms
big, ripped back
small waist

wolf has big, ripped legs, a small waist and a big chest. he should work simply on building the size of his arms and back (lats), whilst getting ripped to shreds all over.

That would be worth buying a ticket for to see Wolf at Full Potential

LatsMcGee · « **Reply #67 on:** January 03, 2008, 03:08:42 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 02, 2008, 02:18:11 PM

maybe so, but ronnie never won by being the biggest.

he won by having the quality that the other mass monsters' lacked:

Wow, that pic just sent team Nasser under a rock for about a year. Amazing.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #68 on:** January 03, 2008, 06:57:36 AM »

wolf arms are fine...
but seriously lack shape...
no bicep peak
good tris..
but this shows why bi's will always rule tris

James Blunt · « **Reply #69 on:** January 03, 2008, 07:33:45 AM »

GoneAway · « **Reply #70 on:** January 03, 2008, 08:31:36 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on January 03, 2008, 06:57:36 AM

wolf arms are fine...
but seriously lack shape...
no bicep peak
good tris..
but this shows why bi's will always rule tris

true. wolf can improve his biceps just a bit, making them more prominant in shots, but it is also to do with posing. there are tricks to posing which he could use to enhance their look, yet i think he should focus on the other points first (e.g. overall conditioning and bigger lats).

jaejonna · « **Reply #71 on:** January 03, 2008, 08:36:13 AM »

Ronnnie was the Biggest and Most Ripped ...best of both worlds, thus the greatest bb ever....ever

nder98 · « **Reply #72 on:** January 03, 2008, 10:29:20 AM »

Quote from: Julio Ceasar on January 02, 2008, 02:32:23 PM

I wonder what happend with Ronnie's body. Was it all ageing or is he hiding something. Seems like we never will know unless he write a book .

Aging + Anabolics dont produce the same result after years of HEAVY abuse.

Bobby · « **Reply #73 on:** January 03, 2008, 11:04:03 AM »

Quote from: nder98 on January 03, 2008, 10:29:20 AM

Aging + Anabolics dont produce the same result after years of HEAVY abuse.

is this kamali ?

bizzy · « **Reply #74 on:** January 03, 2008, 11:13:11 AM »

I think the best he could have been in the 2007 Olympia
was to equal his 2006 Dutch Grand Prix condition. At 43
he was going to be no better than that. Saying this, I think (as
well as the audience) that he beat Cutler @ this contest and would
have won the 2007 O with this package.