Here's the deal. Our ENTIRE JUSTICE SYSTEM in the U.S. is predicated on the premise that PEOPLE MUST TELL THE TRUTH UNDER OATH. People are sentenced to death, people are bankrupted, and people are enriched by billions of dollars all under the single premise that you can lie all you want to the media or your friends, but ONCE YOU ARE IN A COURT OF LAW and UNDER OATH, you CANNOT LIE OR YOU WILL BE PUNISHED.
If this premise is undermined, our entire legal system is meaningless. When people are permitted to lie under oath without severe penalty, the system falls apart and testimony becomes a meaningless web of lies with no ability to discern the truth from lies.
PERJURY must be treated seriously and penalized harshly.
Take these words to be gold coming from the foremost legal expert on getbig.com!!
That said, I think a point a lot of us are making is that Marion should never have been in court to begin with. It would be one thing if what she did was malum en se (wrong in and of itself) as opposed to just malum prohibitum (wrong [as or because] prohibited).
Like most people in your joke of a US justice system, her only crime was breaking the law. Where is the corpus delicti (body of crime)? Oh yeah, it didn't exist. People used to laugh when I would point out that someone's only crime was breaking the law, so I'm happy I found the terminology to justify why my point of view was the correct one.
PS - I know that you know what these latin terms refer to Ed, I am just clarifying for the rest of the board.