I guess u forget Gary Hart in 1984...all bullshit and no substance. His BS may start to wear thin before we even get to the convention. This guy has nothing...no executable plan....no experience....its all smoke and mirrors. His speech in Huston was laughable....how does he plan to pay for that. That speech was a list of all the stuff voters want to hear...yet don't have to think how it will be paid for.
Gary Hart went up against Ronald Reagan, who was rhetorically brilliant.
Reagan was a tough opponent. That was the big deal back then.
Just like when Nixon got beat by JFK, nothing wrong with Nixon really, and IMO a better president in many ways than JFK, but he lost because JFK was brilliant and looked like a movie star. Not because he lacked the political platform.
You're constantly claiming that Obama has nothing, that he's just smoke screen.
I have to agree that Obama has a lot of questions to answer.
But I also think it is important to acknowledge that Obama is ridiculously strong as a speaker. Otherwise he would never get away with what many of us consider "thin" speeches.
You start to look like a broken record, and I can respect that you don't want Obama to win.
But here's a question: Why do you think he's being so successful, whooping Hillary's ass and all?