Author Topic: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd  (Read 5052 times)

Armageddon

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« on: March 11, 2008, 04:26:09 AM »
After watching the 97 Mr.O video it was Clear that Dorian deserved 1st without competition;  however the real question is ,, did Nasser deserve 2nd or Levrone was more worthy than him??

To me Kevin was better in 97 than Nasser




calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2008, 04:27:06 AM »
I actually had Nasser in fourth.

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2008, 05:09:23 AM »
Bald Levrone is hard to beat.

KillerMonk

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1266
  • Future President Of USA
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2008, 05:13:20 AM »
When ever i see photos of Dorian i believe he did not deserve his titles, but then i see videos and Dorian is unbelievable and deserves all his titles.Levrone over Nasser in 97 is a coin toss apples and oranges.
Arnold For President 2012.2016

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2008, 05:17:10 AM »
Isn't that picture from 1997?


Triple-H_2005

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • I mostly lurk...
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2008, 06:01:33 AM »
Cue the Muslim Brigade meltdown...

Hamood, Bobs....  Waiting...

nder98

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1846
  • Getlaid!
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2008, 07:39:13 AM »
After watching the 97 Mr.O video it was Clear that Dorian deserved 1st without competition;  however the real question is ,, did Nasser deserve 2nd or Levrone was more worthy than him??

To me Kevin was better in 97 than Nasser





Show us the comparison

Big Worm

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3969
  • Really ? You finished turd my flend? Maricon..
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2008, 11:37:07 AM »
I had NassHOLE 6th.?

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2008, 01:42:09 PM »
After watching the 97 Mr.O video it was Clear that Dorian deserved 1st without competition;  however the real question is ,, did Nasser deserve 2nd or Levrone was more worthy than him??

To me Kevin was better in 97 than Nasser






Interesting quandery.

BTW, this just in: Spanish Armada defeated by the Englishmen! :o
As empty as paradise

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2008, 01:45:53 PM »
Levrone lost alot of detail when he got too big, also watery. 2000 Levrone is badass

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2008, 04:38:17 PM »
1997 Levrone is one of the few versions I like.
I

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #11 on: September 05, 2008, 05:57:43 AM »
When ever i see photos of Dorian i believe he did not deserve his titles, but then i see videos and Dorian is unbelievable and deserves all his titles.Levrone over Nasser in 97 is a coin toss apples and oranges.

Yes exactly I always feel the same..

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #12 on: September 05, 2008, 06:08:36 AM »
Yes exactly I always feel the same..

Don't you think two accounts is enough, Sharma?

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2008, 06:17:07 AM »
1995 was Levrone's best. 245lbs and shredded.
Team Yates

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2008, 07:41:53 AM »
i was at the o in 97 dorian was the winner a lot of ppl were sayin that nasser look like mr o from the front but thats it

Pretty much everyone who was at the show thought so. The rest are arab homosexuals like Sharma who don't have the slightest clue about bodybuilding!

honest

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3375
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2008, 08:08:54 AM »
nasser was in the mix until they turned around, after that 4th place was a gift

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2008, 08:20:50 AM »
Pretty much everyone who was at the show thought so. The rest are arab homosexuals like Sharma who don't have the slightest clue about bodybuilding!

Plz watch your mouth.. We are talking about bodybuilding here and there is no need to talk bad about Arabs even if you don't like us.. Keep your opinion for yourself.. 

honest

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3375
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #17 on: September 05, 2008, 08:41:23 AM »
Plz watch your mouth.. We are talking about bodybuilding here and there is no need to talk bad about Arabs even if you don't like us.. Keep your opinion for yourself.. 

 shereif you seem okay but Sharma is mentally challenged, his repetitive shit gives the human race a bad name, not just muslims, Nasser was a great  from front and side but a struggling amateur from the back, he was treated fairly and the quote of he got beat by Yates as hes was a Muslim is also an insult to  whites, Yates was clearly superior based on the judging criteria and also to Ronnie when at his best, the only ones who disagree are some of the people on here who keep posting pics of Yates at his worse and Ronnie at his best, the proof is in the actual records, Dorian beat Ronnie, numerous times and nasser even when past his best, the same as cutler beat Coleman when past his best but couldnt live with him in his day.     

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #18 on: September 05, 2008, 09:30:09 AM »
shereif you seem okay but Sharma is mentally challenged, his repetitive shit gives the human race a bad name, not just muslims, Nasser was a great  from front and side but a struggling amateur from the back, he was treated fairly and the quote of he got beat by Yates as hes was a Muslim is also an insult to  whites, Yates was clearly superior based on the judging criteria and also to Ronnie when at his best, the only ones who disagree are some of the people on here who keep posting pics of Yates at his worse and Ronnie at his best, the proof is in the actual records, Dorian beat Ronnie, numerous times and nasser even when past his best, the same as cutler beat Coleman when past his best but couldnt live with him in his day.     

Are you denying that politics play any role in placings?  Do you also think Jay Cutler was the fair winner for the 2007 Mr. Olympia?  Nasser doesn't only claim that he suffered in placings due to biases, but also said the same for Milos Sarcev and Markus Ruhl.  I'm sure Milos would agree with that even though the two disagree on just about everything else.  Reigning Mr. Olympias (like Dorian after his first few wins) always have an advantage.

nicky.smth

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2034
  • Hugo Chavez looks like hugo chavez
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #19 on: September 05, 2008, 09:36:49 AM »
I had NassHOLE 6th.?

I had him 6th as well..He looked great..However, others looked better.

GhostDog

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 130
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #20 on: September 05, 2008, 10:00:40 AM »
  Nasser was a great  from front and side but a struggling amateur from the back, he was treated fairly    

what a crock of shit.

Big Worm

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3969
  • Really ? You finished turd my flend? Maricon..
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #21 on: September 05, 2008, 10:09:43 AM »
After watching the 97 Mr.O video it was Clear that Dorian deserved 1st without competition;  however the real question is ,, did Nasser deserve 2nd or Levrone was more worthy than him??

To me Kevin was better in 97 than Nasser




I had Nassoil 11th.

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #22 on: September 05, 2008, 10:11:03 AM »
I had him 6th as well..He looked great..However, others looked better.

I had him disqualifed for Synthol abuse and cross eyeing.

bigguns23

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2008, 12:21:40 PM »
shereif you seem okay but Sharma is mentally challenged, his repetitive shit gives the human race a bad name, not just muslims, Nasser was a great  from front and side but a struggling amateur from the back, he was treated fairly and the quote of he got beat by Yates as hes was a Muslim is also an insult to  whites, Yates was clearly superior based on the judging criteria and also to Ronnie when at his best, the only ones who disagree are some of the people on here who keep posting pics of Yates at his worse and Ronnie at his best, the proof is in the actual records, Dorian beat Ronnie, numerous times and nasser even when past his best, the same as cutler beat Coleman when past his best but couldnt live with him in his day.     


AMEN

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: did Nasser deserve 2nd place in 97?? or 3rd
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2008, 12:24:22 PM »
shereif you seem okay but Sharma is mentally challenged, his repetitive shit gives the human race a bad name, not just muslims, Nasser was a great  from front and side but a struggling amateur from the back, he was treated fairly and the quote of he got beat by Yates as hes was a Muslim is also an insult to  whites, Yates was clearly superior based on the judging criteria and also to Ronnie when at his best, the only ones who disagree are some of the people on here who keep posting pics of Yates at his worse and Ronnie at his best, the proof is in the actual records, Dorian beat Ronnie, numerous times and nasser even when past his best, the same as cutler beat Coleman when past his best but couldnt live with him in his day.     

But man,.. why does someone call a whole race a bad thing just coz he doesn't agree with one of them??.. The common thing between all of us here is our love to bodybuilding so let's exchange our thoughts and opinions in this field only and in a clean way..
As for Dorian I agree with you that at his best he could beat both Nasser and Ronnie at their best.. Dorian at his best had no weak point that affected his over all package but Nasser and Ronnie had.. Here we are talking as if the 3 of them were at their best, but still I totally agree with those who say that Dorian didn't deserve his title in 1997 because he was in his worst condition ever.. Beside his totally torn left arm he didn't come as sharp as his normal.. He came at about 270 pounds while his best shape was always at around 255 pounds..
And why you ppl say bad things about Nasser??.. The guy himself never said he deserved to beat Dorian at any other contest but Mr. Olympia 97.. Nasser was happy with his 3rd place at Mr. O. 95 and said before in Flex magazine that at Mr. O. 96 he should have been (at least) 2nd which meant that he saw himself better than Ray but was not sure he was better than Dorian.. I believe that Nasser is smart enough to confess that at their best Dorian could beat him because he (Nasser) knows well that his back was incomparable with Dorian's who had one of the best backs ever if not the best