You're not offering me a whole different point of view, I wrote a research paper on the natural diet of man in college. I've gone over this milk issue a thousand times with other people and with myself. Just like everything else, for some it's good, for some it's not. Un-pasteurized is almost always better for pretty much everyone. Someone starved for fat would do very well drinking raw cow milk or full fat milk, thus nourishing for them...same with any number of different situations, like the one I mentioned above. Here's the bottom line with diet, much like everything else: the right diet is entirely based on your life's plan. That simple, everything is based on what you want out of life. I know plenty of long term and even no so long term raw vegans that added raw milk/dairy and experienced great health benefits after numerous deficiency issues. And I know plenty of people who, after a time, do worse on dairy. This is the same as the meat argument. What's most important is that the food is humanely raised and grown in an evironmentally suitable manner. Then everything is based on each person's different situation.
Do you know how Kobe beef is obtained ? humanly raised ? bwahaha
Nourishing it's not an argument...as I said : there's good stuff in piss too but it doesn't mean it's your best option.
" What's most important is that the food is humanely raised and grown in an evironmentally suitable manner. Then everything is based on each person's different situation. "
How do you humanly off a cow
?? ...do you make a plush pink hammer to focking knock it out ? Do you cut her throat with her favourite knife it's mommy gave it to her ?
""Slaughterhouse takes readers on a frightening but true journey from one slaughterhouse to another throughout the country. Along the way, we encounter example after example of mistreated animals, intolerable working conditions, lax standards, the slow, painful deaths of children killed as a result of eating contaminated meat, the author's battle with the major television networks, and a dangerously corrupt federal agency that chooses to do nothing rather than risk the wrath of agribusiness, before the whole affair is blown wide open in this powerful exposé.
In the last 15 years, thousands of America's small to mid-sized slaughterhouses have been displaced by a few large, high-speed operations, each with the capacity to kill more than a million animals a year. With fewer slaughterhouses killing an ever-growing number of animals, slaughter "line speeds" have accelerated and a production mentality has emerged in which the rapid slaughter line never seems to stop for anything -- not for injured workers, not for contaminated meat, and, least of all, not for slow or disabled animals.
While investigating the slaughter industry, Eisnitz gains the trust of dozens of workers across the United States. Without exception, the individuals interviewed admit to deliberately beating, strangling, boiling, or dismembering animals alive in violation of the federal Humane Slaughter Act or failing to report those who did -- all in an effort to "keep the production line running." Many also discuss the web of violence in which they have become ensnared and the alcoholism and physical abuse that plague their personal lives.
In an effort to understand how such rampant violations could occur right under the noses of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspectors -- the individuals charged with enforcing humane regulations in slaughterhouses -- Eisnitz examines the inspectors' track record for enforcing meat and poultry safety regulations, their primary responsibility. Following a long paper trail, she learns that contaminated meat and poultry are pouring out of federally inspected slaughterhouses and, not surprisingly, deaths from foodborne illness have quadrupled in the United States in the last 15 years.
Determined to tell the whole story, Eisnitz then examines the physical price paid by employees working in one of America's most dangerous industries. In addition to suffering disfiguring injuries and crippling repetitive-motion disorders, employees describe tyrannical working conditions in which grievances are met with severe reprisals or dismissals. ""
