Do you have the educational background to say it's impossible to differentiate between cadaveric and rhGH by using the assays in the article?
The guy who wrote the article works for William Llewellyn (author of the 'Anabolics' books).
I don't know how much the production costs would differ nowadays. Do you really know it's "100 times cheaper" to produce the rhGH?
Most bodybuilders do not pay the pharmacy prices for growth. Chinese growth, stolen growth, growth bought from HIV+ patients, etc, is what most use. It's still very expensive from legitimate channels.
BTW, does anyone know if hCG has resulted in transmission of any diseases?
If the guy is involved with some steroid guru who writes books, that right there is all you need to know they don't know what they are talking about.
As to synthetic GH being 100's of times cheaper, that may be off, it is more likely thousands of times cheaper. Seriously. Getting real GH is not as easy as making fake steroids, you need to have a supply of dead people, were is that going to come from??? Not happening.
Chinese and other GH sources are, from what I have heard, highly suspect and some down right useless. I have no first hand information, since I have never used any GH-ever.
When a person dies bacteria sets in immediatley, and the body starts to deompose and break down, even if it is frozen, so of course there is a high chance of infection. I would never use real cadaver GH-even of it were free.
So, I don't know what to tell you, except that I do not believe the person who wrote the article.