Surely you are kidding. You are giving these chumps as much credit as one of the greatest Heavyweight Boxing Champions to ever live. Saying they can box
I never claimed they can box as well as Tyson, you idiot.
or "strike"
Yes, they can strike better than Tyson. Why? Because they can strike with their leges too, while Tyson is only good at striking with his arms. That gives them a significant edge over Tyson.
as well as Tyson, it's not even worthy of arguing with you. You have shown you are mentally challenged and probably alot slow.
Making ad hominem attacks is an admission of defeat. Accusing your opponent in an argument of being mentally challenged is the oldest and lamest way to try discrediting him.
Tyson was robbing and beating up grown men as a 12 year old, I imagine he could handle himself quite well against Randy "The Natural" Couture and the rest of those hobos you named.
This tells me nothing of how he would fair against Wand or Mirko in a fight. Randy Couture, Wand, Mirko, etc, are vastly stronger, tougher and better at fighting than the average men Tyson could beat when he was 12.
You MMA guys need to realize people engaged in hand to hand combat long before the "Octagon" was invented. Tyson literally was fighting to live, long before Boxing.
No,
moron, it is you who needs to understand that a fighter who is only good at throwing punches is at a disadvantage when fighting guys who can not only throw punhces but also kicks, knee kicks, elbow kicks and who can also fight on the ground. Guys who could only box got owned each and every single time they fought on the octagon or at PRIDE by fighters who could also fight with their legs and on the ground.
