Author Topic: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???  (Read 17045 times)

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« on: April 04, 2008, 11:12:00 PM »
I was always a HUGE fan of this 5'4" 245 pound bodybuilder from the early 1980's. Judges critized him for the same reasons they critized Bertil Fox in the early 1980's. For being too FREAKY looking!!!! Here's many pictures of the classic little big guy:

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://clay_b867.tripod.com/BelknapTim/TBelknap0041.jpg&imgrefurl=http://clay_b867.tripod.com/BelknapTim/GalleryTBelknap.html&h=460&w=768&sz=33&hl=en&start=4&um=1&tbnid=ul6SnQ73bwNINM:&tbnh=85&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dtim%2Bbelknap%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rlz%3D1T4ADBF_enCA248CA248%26sa%3DN

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2008, 11:13:28 PM »
This pic of his bicep and overall mass was SICK for the early 80's. He made Haney look like a lightweight in this pic:


BIG DUB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2534
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2008, 11:14:33 PM »
THE Guy that originally brought insulin into the game..

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2008, 11:17:00 PM »
Really?? Well, he was an 87 pound diabetic at 17 apparently and so was his younger brother Fred.

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2008, 11:20:57 PM »
Nah, he was great as an amateur and then got all weird and blocky looking.


Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2008, 11:30:23 PM »
Dude, there are so many better pics of him than that one.

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8574
  • "In Falcon We Trust"
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2008, 11:49:10 PM »
That's the kind of look that always comes to my mind when somebody says "steroids". Unnatural mass, red, veiny and weird.
$

Hurricane Beef !

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4723
  • Beat Coach, Wes & Chaos So Bad . . .
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2008, 02:05:08 AM »
One of the first Slin users.

The Beef


americanbulldog

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2681
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2008, 02:26:50 AM »
I was always a HUGE fan of this 5'4" 245 pound bodybuilder from the early 1980's. Judges critized him for the same reasons they critized Bertil Fox in the early 1980's. For being too FREAKY looking!!!! Here's many pictures of the classic little big guy:

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://clay_b867.tripod.com/BelknapTim/TBelknap0041.jpg&imgrefurl=http://clay_b867.tripod.com/BelknapTim/GalleryTBelknap.html&h=460&w=768&sz=33&hl=en&start=4&um=1&tbnid=ul6SnQ73bwNINM:&tbnh=85&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dtim%2Bbelknap%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rlz%3D1T4ADBF_enCA248CA248%26sa%3DN

Let me think.

Oh yeah,

Narrow clavicles, long torso short chest and lat insertions and overpowering legs.  Anything else I am missing? 

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2008, 04:07:17 PM »
Dude, there are so many better pics of him than that one.

Yeah and they're all from when he was an amateur (at his final am contest).

Moosejay

  • Guest
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2008, 04:09:13 PM »
Yes...his physique looked slapped together in the most awkward of fashions...

20inch calves

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4617
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2008, 04:31:56 PM »
One of the first Slin users.

The Beef





yeah because he was diabetic
irongearco.com

jetpower

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #12 on: April 06, 2008, 04:44:43 PM »
Let me think.

Oh yeah,

Narrow clavicles, long torso short chest and lat insertions and overpowering legs.  Anything else I am missing? 
Midget

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #13 on: April 06, 2008, 05:18:20 PM »


Aside from the conditioning, I think he's just one of those guys that's too big and not too symmetrical. :-\

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2008, 05:26:36 PM »
Dude, there are so many better pics of him than that one.

He looked good up to 1984.  After that, his body started to look a little deformed.  His cheeks, jowls, and neck took on a strange, lumpy, bloated look and although he still had a lot of muscles they did not look "healthy" or aesthetic.  Back in the day he was THE MAN though.

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #15 on: April 06, 2008, 05:30:12 PM »
He looked good up to 1984.  After that, his body started to look a little deformed.  His cheeks, jowls, and neck took on a strange, lumpy, bloated look and although he still had a lot of muscles they did not look "healthy" or aesthetic.  Back in the day he was THE MAN though.

His head and jowls are insane. He permanently looks like he's being 'scanned' and his head is about explode.
O

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7115
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #16 on: April 06, 2008, 08:33:29 PM »
yeah because he was diabetic

he used more than therapeutic doses.






Eric2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2889
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2008, 09:22:29 PM »
Nice bitch tits on the midget. 
h

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57626
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2008, 09:28:20 PM »
Where is The Coach at to claim that this guy didn't introduce insulin to bbing?

Coach swears it was Milos that ruined bbing by introducing insulin.....I mean Milos must have told Tim about this back when he was an 87lb weakling, right Coach?
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

candidizzle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9046
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= TRB953
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2008, 09:30:04 PM »
a revolutionary!  :)

jetpower

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2008, 09:33:13 PM »
Where is The Coach at to claim that this guy didn't introduce insulin to bbing?

Coach swears it was Milos that ruined bbing by introducing insulin.....I mean Milos must have told Tim about this back when he was an 87lb weakling, right Coach?
The Coach is about as sharp as a rubber eraser.

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57626
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #21 on: April 06, 2008, 09:34:55 PM »
The Coach is about as sharp as a rubber eraser.
Are you saying The Coach couldn't cut fog with his wit?
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

jetpower

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2008, 09:48:14 PM »
Are you saying The Coach couldn't cut fog with his wit?
I'm saying his eyes are like two brown circles with big brown beans in the center.

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #23 on: April 07, 2008, 03:02:47 AM »
big fucker.

Tombo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4725
Re: Was 5'4", 21 year old Tim Belknap overlooked???
« Reply #24 on: April 07, 2008, 03:52:47 AM »
he used more than therapeutic doses.







holy shit he looks unbelievable there